Skip to main content

Flashcards: The Preferred Online Game-Based Study Tool Self-Selected by Students to Review Medical Histology Image Content

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biomedical Visualisation

Abstract

Medical students use several supplementary digital resources to support learning. Majority of these supplementary resources enhance learning by recall and repetition. A few examples of these resources are concept maps, flashcards (FCs), and self-testing tools. Traditionally, paper-based FCs are used in higher education. The concept of paper-based FCs is extended to the digital world in the form of electronic/web-based FCs. The use of electronic/digital flashcards has been reported to review course material in the medical school curriculum. Some of the medical school coursework requires students to acquire visual skills, for example, histology and pathology. Students, who do not have prior knowledge of the basic content on histology and pathology struggle to identify microscopic tissues and organs. Therefore, students look for other supplementary resources to support visual learning. Digital resources like Anki, Quizlet, and Osmosis provide study tools that support visual skills. A review of the literature revealed only a few publications pertaining to the use of digital testing tools for histology education in medical school curriculum. In the medical histology course at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Einstein), Bronx, NY, first-year medical students used a game-based platform (Quizlet) to review image-based histology course content in the form of four Quizlet study sets. Students chose from six Quizlet study tools (Flashcards, Learn, Speller, Test, Match, and Race/Gravity) to review the image-based course material and test their knowledge on accurate identification of histological images. The data on student usage of study tools was tracked and analyzed for 4 years (Graduating Classes of 2018 to 2021) to calculate: the total usage of the game-based study tools (Flashcards, Learn, Speller, Test, Match, and Race/Gravity) over the period of 4 years, total percent usage over 4 years of each game-based study tools (Flashcards, Learn, Speller, Test, Match, and Race/Gravity) in each of the four Quizlet study sets and to identify the preferred game-based study tool. The data showed a consistent year-on-year increase in usage of game-based study tools by 50% (M = 445 in 2018 compared to M = 849 in 2021). For the four Quizlet study sets the percent usage of each study tool Flashcards, Learn, Test, Match, Gravity, and Speller was tracked and combined across the four academic years. It was found that Flashcards were used significantly more frequently than any other tool and this was followed by Learn, Test, Match, Gravity, and Speller (p < 0.0001 using chi-square). The study concludes that flashcards are the preferred study tool used by students to acquire visual skills for identifying histological images and could be incorporated when designing online study tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson CI, Robinson EG, Rice J et al (2002) An easy-to-use word processing program for creating concept cards in psychology courses: a method for teachers. Psychol Rep 90(3 Pt 1):968–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen EB, Walls RT, Reilly FD (2008) Effects of interactive instructional techniques in a web-based peripheral nervous system component for human anatomy. Med Teach 30(1):40–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rawi W, Easterling L, Edwards PC (2015) Development of a mobile device optimized cross platform-compatible oral pathology and radiology spaced repetition system for dental education. J Dent Educ 79(4):439–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Back DA, Behringer F, Haberstroh N et al (2016) Learning management system and e-learning tools: an experience of medical students’ usage and expectations. Int J Med Educ 7:267–273

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bell LTO, Evans DJR (2014) Art, anatomy, and medicine: is there a place for art in medical education? Anat Sci Educ 7(5):370–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Betrancourt M (2005) The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In: Mayer R (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 287–296

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bills CG (1997) Effects of structure and interactivity on internet-based instruction. Report no. Report Number|, Date. Place Published|: Institution|

    Google Scholar 

  • Brelje TC, Sorenson RL (2014) Atlas of human histology: a guide to microscopic structure of cells, tissues and organs. http://histologyguide.com/index/index-A.html. Accessed 24 Feb

  • Bringman-Rodenbarger L, Hortsch M (2020) How students choose E-learning resources: the importance of ease, familiarity, and convenience. FASEB Bioadv 2(5):286–295

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson D (2012) Using flashcards to support your learning. J Vis Commun Med 35(1):25–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campos-Sanchez A, Lopez-Nunez JA, Scionti G et al (2014) Developing an audiovisual notebook as a self-learning tool in histology: perceptions of teachers and students. Anat Sci Educ 7(3):209–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chariker JH, Naaz F, Pani JR (2011) Computer-based learning of neuroanatomy: a longitudinal study of learning, transfer, and retention. J Educ Psychol 103(1):19–31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chegg I (2003) Study blue. https://www.chegg.com/flashcards?referrer=https://www.studyblue.com. Accessed 12 Nov

  • Chen W, Allen C (2017) Concept mapping: providing assessment of, for, and as learning. Med Sci Educ 27(2):149–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirdover CYM, Vayvada H, Atabey A, Eylul A (2008) Comparison of learning with concept maps and classical methods among medical students. In: Cañas AJ, Åhlberg M, Novak JD (eds) Concept mapping: connecting educators

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng F, Gluckstein JA, Larsen DP (2015) Student-directed retrieval practice is a predictor of medical licensing examination performance. Perspect Med Educ 4(6):308–313

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus H (1913) Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. 1885. Teachers College, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erhel S, Jamet E (2013) Digital game-based learning: impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Comput Educ 67:156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firecraker L (2015) Firecracker | learn faster, remember everything. https://www.firecracker.me/. Accessed 7 Nov

  • Friedman RB (1996) Top ten reasons the world wide web may fail to change medical education. Acad Med 71(9):979–981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • García M, Victory N, Navarro-Sempere A et al (2019) Students’ views on difficulties in learning histology. Anat Sci Educ 12(5):541–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gheysens K, Lebeau R, Glendinning D (2017) Teaching spinal cord neuroanatomy through drawing: an interactive, step-wise module. MedEdPORTAL 13:10592

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Golding JM, Wasarhaley NE, Fletcher B (2012) The use of flashcards in an introduction to psychology class. Teach Psychol 39(3):199–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould DJ, Terrell MA, Fleming J (2008) A usability study of users’ perceptions toward a multimedia computer-assisted learning tool for neuroanatomy. Anat Sci Educ 1(4):175–183

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Greene SJ (2018) The use and effectiveness of interactive progressive drawing in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 11(5):445–460

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hafferty FW (1998) Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine's hidden curriculum. Acad Med 73(4):403–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart-Matyas M, Taylor A, Lee HJ et al (2019) Twelve tips for medical students to establish a collaborative flashcard project. Med Teach 41(5):505–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman HM, Irwin AE, Ligon RG (1992) PathPics: an image-based instructional program used in the pathology and histology curriculum and transmitted over a wide area network. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1992(01/01):796–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland J, Clarke E, Glynn M (2016) Out of sight, out of mind: do repeating students overlook online course components? Anat Sci Educ 9(6):555–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hortsch M (2013) Virtual biology: teaching histology in the age of Facebook. FASEB J 27(2):411–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jape D, Zhou J, Bullock S (2022) A spaced-repetition approach to enhance medical student learning and engagement in medical pharmacology. BMC Med Educ 22(1):337

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Javaid MA, Chakraborty S, Cryan JF et al (2018) Understanding neurophobia: reasons behind impaired understanding and learning of neuroanatomy in cross-disciplinary healthcare students. Anat Sci Educ 11(1):81–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jurjus RA, Lee J, Ahle S et al (2014) Anatomical knowledge retention in third-year medical students prior to obstetrics and gynecology and surgery rotations. Anat Sci Educ 7(6):461–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jurjus RA, Brown K, Goldman E et al (2016) Curricular response to increase recall and transfer of anatomical knowledge into the obstetrics/gynecology clerkship. Anat Sci Educ 9(4):337–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke JD, Blunt JR (2011) Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science 331(6018):772–775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karpicke JD, Roediger HL (2008) The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science 319(5865):966–968

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot BP, DeWolf WC, Masser BA et al (2007) Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ 41(1):23–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil MK, Nelson LD, Kibble JD (2010) The use of self-learning modules to facilitate learning of basic science concepts in an integrated medical curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 3(5):219–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kharbach M (2022) Educastional technology and mobile learning. https://www.educatorstechnology.com/2014/02/10-useful-web-tools-for-creating-online.html. Accessed 6 Nov

  • Kirschner PA (2002) Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learn Instr 12(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornell N, Bjork RA (2008) Optimising self-regulated study: the benefits - and costs - of dropping flashcards. Memory 16(2):125–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kornell N, Son LK (2009) Learners' choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory 17(5):493–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambers A, Talia AJ (2021) Spaced repetition learning as a tool for orthopedic surgical education: a prospective cohort study on a training examination. J Surg Educ 78(1):134–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leong SL, Baldwin CD, Adelman AM (2003) Integrating web-based computer cases into a required clerkship: development and evaluation. Acad Med 78(3):295–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lisa L, Oana R (2022) University of Colorado: virtual histology Lab. http://leeshistology.com/slides/human/general/neural/31#!/lat=-130&lng=-99.5&zoom=0

  • Lu M, Farhat JH, Beck Dallaghan GL (2021) Enhanced learning and retention of medical knowledge using the Mobile flash card application Anki. Med Sci Educ 31(6):1975–1981

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Luo L, Kiewra KA, Samuelson L (2016) Revising lecture notes: how revision, pauses, and partners affect note taking and achievement. Instr Sci 44(1):45–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew M, Morrow CS, Atiyeh L et al (2016) Dental student study strategies: are self-testing and scheduling related to academic performance? J Dent Educ 80(5):542–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLean M (2001) Web pages: an effective method of providing CAI resource material in histology. Med Teach 23(3):263–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead B (2006) Creating concept maps: integrating constructivism principles into online classes. Int J Instruct Technol Distance Learn 3(1):17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon R, Laynor G (2019) Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education. J Med Libr Assoc 107(2):251–257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Patel SG, Rosenbaum BP, Chark DW et al (2006) Design and implementation of a web-based, database-driven histology atlas: technology at work. Anat Rec B New Anat 289(5):176–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly FD (2011) Outcomes from building system courseware for teaching and testing in a discipline-based human structure curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 4(4):190–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Routt E, Mansouri Y, de Moll EH et al (2015) Teaching the simple suture to medical students for long-term retention of skill. JAMA Dermatol 151(7):761–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidmaier R, Ebersbach R, Schiller M et al (2011) Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: retesting versus restudying. Med Educ 45(11):1101–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro L, Bell K, Dhas K et al (2020) Focused multisensory anatomy observation and drawing for enhancing social learning and three-dimensional spatial understanding. Anat Sci Educ 13(4):488–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sims R (1997) Interactivity: a forgotten art? Comput Hum Behav 13(2):157–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soma L (2016) Interactive tutorial of normal lymph node histology for pathology and laboratory medicine residents and medical students. MedEdPORTAL 12:10513

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sun M, Tsai S, Engle DL et al (2021) Spaced repetition flashcards for teaching medical students psychiatry. Med Sci Educ 31(3):1125–1131

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller J (1994) Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn Instr 4(4):295–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takizawa PA (2011) Histology @Yale. Available at: http://medcell.org/histology/histology.php

  • Taveira-Gomes T, Prado-Costa R, Severo M et al (2015) Characterization of medical students recall of factual knowledge using learning objects and repeated testing in a novel e-learning system. BMC Med Educ 15:4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas L, Bennett S, Lockyer L (2016) Using concept maps and goal-setting to support the development of self-regulated learning in a problem-based learning curriculum. Med Teach 38:930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trelease RB (2016) From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: how computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anat Sci Educ 9(6):583–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai S, Sun M, Asbury ML et al (2021) Novel spaced repetition flashcard system for the in-training examination for obstetrics and gynecology. Med Sci Educ 31(4):1393–1399

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vogelsang M, Rockenbauch K, Wrigge H et al (2018) Medical education for “generation Z”: everything online?! - An analysis of internet-based media use by teachers in medicine. GMS J Med Educ 35(2):Doc21

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wanda D, Fowler C, Wilson V (2016) Using flash cards to engage Indonesian nursing students in reflection on their practice. Nurse Educ Toda 38:132–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman AC, Tanzer K, Nemec EC 2nd (2019) Gamifying the memorization of brand/generic drug names. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 11(3):287–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wissman KT, Rawson KA, Pyc MA (2012) How and when do students use flashcards? Memory 20(6):568–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priti L. Mishall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mishall, P.L., Burton, W., Risley, M. (2023). Flashcards: The Preferred Online Game-Based Study Tool Self-Selected by Students to Review Medical Histology Image Content. In: Abdel Meguid, E., Mishall, P.L., Nation, H.L., Rea, P.M. (eds) Biomedical Visualisation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1406. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26462-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics