Abstract
Medical students use several supplementary digital resources to support learning. Majority of these supplementary resources enhance learning by recall and repetition. A few examples of these resources are concept maps, flashcards (FCs), and self-testing tools. Traditionally, paper-based FCs are used in higher education. The concept of paper-based FCs is extended to the digital world in the form of electronic/web-based FCs. The use of electronic/digital flashcards has been reported to review course material in the medical school curriculum. Some of the medical school coursework requires students to acquire visual skills, for example, histology and pathology. Students, who do not have prior knowledge of the basic content on histology and pathology struggle to identify microscopic tissues and organs. Therefore, students look for other supplementary resources to support visual learning. Digital resources like Anki, Quizlet, and Osmosis provide study tools that support visual skills. A review of the literature revealed only a few publications pertaining to the use of digital testing tools for histology education in medical school curriculum. In the medical histology course at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Einstein), Bronx, NY, first-year medical students used a game-based platform (Quizlet) to review image-based histology course content in the form of four Quizlet study sets. Students chose from six Quizlet study tools (Flashcards, Learn, Speller, Test, Match, and Race/Gravity) to review the image-based course material and test their knowledge on accurate identification of histological images. The data on student usage of study tools was tracked and analyzed for 4 years (Graduating Classes of 2018 to 2021) to calculate: the total usage of the game-based study tools (Flashcards, Learn, Speller, Test, Match, and Race/Gravity) over the period of 4 years, total percent usage over 4 years of each game-based study tools (Flashcards, Learn, Speller, Test, Match, and Race/Gravity) in each of the four Quizlet study sets and to identify the preferred game-based study tool. The data showed a consistent year-on-year increase in usage of game-based study tools by 50% (M = 445 in 2018 compared to M = 849 in 2021). For the four Quizlet study sets the percent usage of each study tool Flashcards, Learn, Test, Match, Gravity, and Speller was tracked and combined across the four academic years. It was found that Flashcards were used significantly more frequently than any other tool and this was followed by Learn, Test, Match, Gravity, and Speller (p < 0.0001 using chi-square). The study concludes that flashcards are the preferred study tool used by students to acquire visual skills for identifying histological images and could be incorporated when designing online study tools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson CI, Robinson EG, Rice J et al (2002) An easy-to-use word processing program for creating concept cards in psychology courses: a method for teachers. Psychol Rep 90(3 Pt 1):968–974
Allen EB, Walls RT, Reilly FD (2008) Effects of interactive instructional techniques in a web-based peripheral nervous system component for human anatomy. Med Teach 30(1):40–47
Al-Rawi W, Easterling L, Edwards PC (2015) Development of a mobile device optimized cross platform-compatible oral pathology and radiology spaced repetition system for dental education. J Dent Educ 79(4):439–447
Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, New York
Back DA, Behringer F, Haberstroh N et al (2016) Learning management system and e-learning tools: an experience of medical students’ usage and expectations. Int J Med Educ 7:267–273
Bell LTO, Evans DJR (2014) Art, anatomy, and medicine: is there a place for art in medical education? Anat Sci Educ 7(5):370–378
Betrancourt M (2005) The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In: Mayer R (ed) The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 287–296
Bills CG (1997) Effects of structure and interactivity on internet-based instruction. Report no. Report Number|, Date. Place Published|: Institution|
Brelje TC, Sorenson RL (2014) Atlas of human histology: a guide to microscopic structure of cells, tissues and organs. http://histologyguide.com/index/index-A.html. Accessed 24 Feb
Bringman-Rodenbarger L, Hortsch M (2020) How students choose E-learning resources: the importance of ease, familiarity, and convenience. FASEB Bioadv 2(5):286–295
Bryson D (2012) Using flashcards to support your learning. J Vis Commun Med 35(1):25–29
Campos-Sanchez A, Lopez-Nunez JA, Scionti G et al (2014) Developing an audiovisual notebook as a self-learning tool in histology: perceptions of teachers and students. Anat Sci Educ 7(3):209–218
Chariker JH, Naaz F, Pani JR (2011) Computer-based learning of neuroanatomy: a longitudinal study of learning, transfer, and retention. J Educ Psychol 103(1):19–31
Chegg I (2003) Study blue. https://www.chegg.com/flashcards?referrer=https://www.studyblue.com. Accessed 12 Nov
Chen W, Allen C (2017) Concept mapping: providing assessment of, for, and as learning. Med Sci Educ 27(2):149–153
Demirdover CYM, Vayvada H, Atabey A, Eylul A (2008) Comparison of learning with concept maps and classical methods among medical students. In: Cañas AJ, Åhlberg M, Novak JD (eds) Concept mapping: connecting educators
Deng F, Gluckstein JA, Larsen DP (2015) Student-directed retrieval practice is a predictor of medical licensing examination performance. Perspect Med Educ 4(6):308–313
Ebbinghaus H (1913) Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. 1885. Teachers College, New York
Erhel S, Jamet E (2013) Digital game-based learning: impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Comput Educ 67:156–167
Firecraker L (2015) Firecracker | learn faster, remember everything. https://www.firecracker.me/. Accessed 7 Nov
Friedman RB (1996) Top ten reasons the world wide web may fail to change medical education. Acad Med 71(9):979–981
García M, Victory N, Navarro-Sempere A et al (2019) Students’ views on difficulties in learning histology. Anat Sci Educ 12(5):541–549
Gheysens K, Lebeau R, Glendinning D (2017) Teaching spinal cord neuroanatomy through drawing: an interactive, step-wise module. MedEdPORTAL 13:10592
Golding JM, Wasarhaley NE, Fletcher B (2012) The use of flashcards in an introduction to psychology class. Teach Psychol 39(3):199–202
Gould DJ, Terrell MA, Fleming J (2008) A usability study of users’ perceptions toward a multimedia computer-assisted learning tool for neuroanatomy. Anat Sci Educ 1(4):175–183
Greene SJ (2018) The use and effectiveness of interactive progressive drawing in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 11(5):445–460
Hafferty FW (1998) Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine's hidden curriculum. Acad Med 73(4):403–407
Hart-Matyas M, Taylor A, Lee HJ et al (2019) Twelve tips for medical students to establish a collaborative flashcard project. Med Teach 41(5):505–509
Hoffman HM, Irwin AE, Ligon RG (1992) PathPics: an image-based instructional program used in the pathology and histology curriculum and transmitted over a wide area network. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1992(01/01):796–797
Holland J, Clarke E, Glynn M (2016) Out of sight, out of mind: do repeating students overlook online course components? Anat Sci Educ 9(6):555–564
Hortsch M (2013) Virtual biology: teaching histology in the age of Facebook. FASEB J 27(2):411–413
Jape D, Zhou J, Bullock S (2022) A spaced-repetition approach to enhance medical student learning and engagement in medical pharmacology. BMC Med Educ 22(1):337
Javaid MA, Chakraborty S, Cryan JF et al (2018) Understanding neurophobia: reasons behind impaired understanding and learning of neuroanatomy in cross-disciplinary healthcare students. Anat Sci Educ 11(1):81–93
Jurjus RA, Lee J, Ahle S et al (2014) Anatomical knowledge retention in third-year medical students prior to obstetrics and gynecology and surgery rotations. Anat Sci Educ 7(6):461–468
Jurjus RA, Brown K, Goldman E et al (2016) Curricular response to increase recall and transfer of anatomical knowledge into the obstetrics/gynecology clerkship. Anat Sci Educ 9(4):337–343
Karpicke JD, Blunt JR (2011) Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science 331(6018):772–775
Karpicke JD, Roediger HL (2008) The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science 319(5865):966–968
Kerfoot BP, DeWolf WC, Masser BA et al (2007) Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ 41(1):23–31
Khalil MK, Nelson LD, Kibble JD (2010) The use of self-learning modules to facilitate learning of basic science concepts in an integrated medical curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 3(5):219–226
Kharbach M (2022) Educastional technology and mobile learning. https://www.educatorstechnology.com/2014/02/10-useful-web-tools-for-creating-online.html. Accessed 6 Nov
Kirschner PA (2002) Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learn Instr 12(1):1–10
Kornell N, Bjork RA (2008) Optimising self-regulated study: the benefits - and costs - of dropping flashcards. Memory 16(2):125–136
Kornell N, Son LK (2009) Learners' choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory 17(5):493–501
Lambers A, Talia AJ (2021) Spaced repetition learning as a tool for orthopedic surgical education: a prospective cohort study on a training examination. J Surg Educ 78(1):134–139
Leong SL, Baldwin CD, Adelman AM (2003) Integrating web-based computer cases into a required clerkship: development and evaluation. Acad Med 78(3):295–301
Lisa L, Oana R (2022) University of Colorado: virtual histology Lab. http://leeshistology.com/slides/human/general/neural/31#!/lat=-130&lng=-99.5&zoom=0
Lu M, Farhat JH, Beck Dallaghan GL (2021) Enhanced learning and retention of medical knowledge using the Mobile flash card application Anki. Med Sci Educ 31(6):1975–1981
Luo L, Kiewra KA, Samuelson L (2016) Revising lecture notes: how revision, pauses, and partners affect note taking and achievement. Instr Sci 44(1):45–67
McAndrew M, Morrow CS, Atiyeh L et al (2016) Dental student study strategies: are self-testing and scheduling related to academic performance? J Dent Educ 80(5):542–552
McLean M (2001) Web pages: an effective method of providing CAI resource material in histology. Med Teach 23(3):263–269
Muirhead B (2006) Creating concept maps: integrating constructivism principles into online classes. Int J Instruct Technol Distance Learn 3(1):17–30
O’Hanlon R, Laynor G (2019) Responding to a new generation of proprietary study resources in medical education. J Med Libr Assoc 107(2):251–257
Patel SG, Rosenbaum BP, Chark DW et al (2006) Design and implementation of a web-based, database-driven histology atlas: technology at work. Anat Rec B New Anat 289(5):176–183
Reilly FD (2011) Outcomes from building system courseware for teaching and testing in a discipline-based human structure curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 4(4):190–194
Routt E, Mansouri Y, de Moll EH et al (2015) Teaching the simple suture to medical students for long-term retention of skill. JAMA Dermatol 151(7):761–765
Schmidmaier R, Ebersbach R, Schiller M et al (2011) Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: retesting versus restudying. Med Educ 45(11):1101–1110
Shapiro L, Bell K, Dhas K et al (2020) Focused multisensory anatomy observation and drawing for enhancing social learning and three-dimensional spatial understanding. Anat Sci Educ 13(4):488–503
Sims R (1997) Interactivity: a forgotten art? Comput Hum Behav 13(2):157–180
Soma L (2016) Interactive tutorial of normal lymph node histology for pathology and laboratory medicine residents and medical students. MedEdPORTAL 12:10513
Sun M, Tsai S, Engle DL et al (2021) Spaced repetition flashcards for teaching medical students psychiatry. Med Sci Educ 31(3):1125–1131
Sweller J (1994) Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learn Instr 4(4):295–312
Takizawa PA (2011) Histology @Yale. Available at: http://medcell.org/histology/histology.php
Taveira-Gomes T, Prado-Costa R, Severo M et al (2015) Characterization of medical students recall of factual knowledge using learning objects and repeated testing in a novel e-learning system. BMC Med Educ 15:4
Thomas L, Bennett S, Lockyer L (2016) Using concept maps and goal-setting to support the development of self-regulated learning in a problem-based learning curriculum. Med Teach 38:930
Trelease RB (2016) From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: how computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anat Sci Educ 9(6):583–602
Tsai S, Sun M, Asbury ML et al (2021) Novel spaced repetition flashcard system for the in-training examination for obstetrics and gynecology. Med Sci Educ 31(4):1393–1399
Vogelsang M, Rockenbauch K, Wrigge H et al (2018) Medical education for “generation Z”: everything online?! - An analysis of internet-based media use by teachers in medicine. GMS J Med Educ 35(2):Doc21
Wanda D, Fowler C, Wilson V (2016) Using flash cards to engage Indonesian nursing students in reflection on their practice. Nurse Educ Toda 38:132–137
Whitman AC, Tanzer K, Nemec EC 2nd (2019) Gamifying the memorization of brand/generic drug names. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 11(3):287–291
Wissman KT, Rawson KA, Pyc MA (2012) How and when do students use flashcards? Memory 20(6):568–579
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mishall, P.L., Burton, W., Risley, M. (2023). Flashcards: The Preferred Online Game-Based Study Tool Self-Selected by Students to Review Medical Histology Image Content. In: Abdel Meguid, E., Mishall, P.L., Nation, H.L., Rea, P.M. (eds) Biomedical Visualisation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1406. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26462-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26462-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26461-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26462-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)