Abstract
As noted in Chap. 2, when we encounter a new person in real life or in media content, top-down and bottom-up processes interact to determine whether what we observe about that person (bottom-up processing) matches any categories with which we are familiar and that we can deploy (top-down processing) (Hall and Crisp, 2005, pp. 1436–1437). When presented with a film featuring a female wheelchair user holding a baby—both attributes being equally salient—the viewer will probably deploy two categories into the joint category of ‘disabled mother’ with correspondingly joint dispositions. This joining may be additive or surprising, as discussed earlier. However, if the character has salient attributes that appear to match too many different categories, the reliance on categories will become too complex to process and no longer viable, thus obliging the viewer to rely on the bottom-up process of observing the character’s uniqueness in the current situation (ibid.). If perspective-taking is added to that perception, decategorisation will ensue. This chapter discusses the key aspects of decategorisation, which are the rendering of the character as differentiated (i.e. unique) and personalising them to induce perspective-taking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baudrillard, J. (2005). The System of Objects. Verso.
Brauer, M., Er-rafiy, A., Kawakami, K., & Phills, C. E. (2012). Describing a Group in Positive Terms Reduces Prejudice Less Effectively Than Describing It in Positive and Negative Terms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 757–761.
Brylla, C. (2018). Performativity on the Margin: Pornography: The Musical (2003). Film Studies, 18(1), 70–83.
Crisp, R., Ensari, N., Hewstone, M., & Miller, N. (2003). A Dual-Route Model of Crossed Categorisation Effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 13(1), 35–73.
Crisp, R. J., Hewstone, M., & Rubin, M. (2001). Does Multiple Categorization Reduce Intergroup Bias? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), 76–89.
Eder, J. (2006). Ways of Being Close to Characters. Film Studies, 8(1)., Manchester University Press, 68–80.
Eder, J. (forthcoming). Characters in Film and Other Media. Open Book Publishers.
Eitzen, D. (2007). Documentary’s Peculiar Appeals. In J. D. Anderson & B. F. Anderson (Eds.), Moving Image Theory: Ecological Considerations (pp. 183–199). SIU Press.
Ensari, N., Christian, J., Kuriyama, D. M., & Miller, N. (2012). The Personalization Model Revisited: An Experimental Investigation of the Role of Five Personalization-Based Strategies on Prejudice Reduction. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(4), 503–522.
Ensari, N., & Miller, N. (2001). Decategorization and the Reduction of Bias in the Crossed Categorization Paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 193–216.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Houlette, M. A. (2010). Social Categorization. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice (pp. 526–543). SAGE.
Hall, E. T. (1969). The Hidden Dimension: Man’s Use of Space in Public and Private. Bodley Head.
Hall, N. R., & Crisp, R. J. (2005). Considering Multiple Criteria for Social Categorization Can Reduce Intergroup Bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1435–1444.
Meyrowitz, J. (1986). Television and Interpersonal Behavior: Codes of Perception and Response. In G. Gumpert & R. Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/Media—Interpersonal Communication in a Media World. Oxford University Press.
Miller, N. (2002). Personalization and the Promise of Contact Theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 387–410.
Miller, N., & Brewer, M. B. (Eds.). (1984). Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation. Academic Press.
Nash, K. (2011). Documentary-for-the-Other: Relationships, Ethics and (Observational) Documentary. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 26(3), 224–239.
Neupert, R. J. (1995). The End: Narration and Closure in the Cinema. Wayne State University Press.
Nichols, B. (1981). Ideology and the Image: Social Representation in the Cinema and Other Media. Indiana University Press.
Renov, M. (2004). The Subject of Documentary. University of Minnesota Press.
Smith, G. M. (2007). The Segmenting Spectator: Documentary Structure and The Aristocrats. Projections, 1(2), 83–100.
Spence, L., & Navarro, V. (2011). Crafting Truth: Documentary Form and Meaning. Rutgers University Press.
Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brylla, C. (2023). Decategorisation. In: Documentary and Stereotypes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26372-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26372-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26371-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26372-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)