Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Accessibility Impact of High Speed Rail in Italy: A User-Based Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Socioeconomic Impacts of High-Speed Rail Systems (IW-HSR 2022)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Among the impacts that a High Speed Rail network has on a country’s society, economy and environment, the impact resulting from accessibility changes plays a key role. In fact, the main direct change generated by a new transportation system is the variation (generally a reduction) of travel times. This produces secondary effects as well, such as changes in accessibility, and shifts of transport demand from other modes of transport to rail. These changes generate other broader effects, which have an impact on various socio-economic and environmental issues, such as energy use, environmental structure, tourism, social dynamics, human health, safety, general economy, business clustering, labour productivity, land use, real estate, transport system resilience, technology development, innovation, and policies. While the concept of accessibility has been defined in several ways by various studies in the scientific literature, it usually refers to the ease of obtaining socioeconomic opportunities (activities, services, goods) within a geographic area or—from a more passive perspective—the ease with which such opportunities can be reached. While accessibility indicators can be distinguished by whether they focus on infrastructure, utilities, location, or even people, they are usually based on travel times between geographic locations. Although in continuous transport systems, such as road networks, travel times are highly significant for the purpose of depicting accessibility, that is not true for scheduled systems like collective ones, such as bus, rail, air, and maritime transport. In these latter cases, the onboard travel time is not fully representative of the user’s actual travel time, since the time spent accessing the transport system and the waiting time for services both play a crucial role in the users’ perception of accessibility. Several studies have been conducted to analyse the accessibility changes generated by the Italian High Speed Rail system built and put into service over the first two decades of this century. However, these studies have often focused on an accessibility concept based on service travel time, rather than on user travel time, including access and waiting times. This paper offers an analysis of the accessibility impact of High Speed Rail in Italy, focusing on a user-based approach. Accessibility indicators are therefore set up taking into account rail service timetables, and therefore the access to the services from the rail stations themselves, which, for the users, are the actual access points to the transport system. Moreover, the results of this user-based analysis are compared to the simple service travel time approach, in the order to estimate the differences and to highlight the methodological dissimilarities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Google Inc. “General Transit Feed Specification Reference”. Accessed July 19, 2014 from http://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/reference [71].

References

  1. Curtis, C., Scheurer, J.: Planning for sustainable accessibility: developing tools to aid discussion and decision-making. Prog. Plann. 74, 53–106 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Litman, T.: A evaluating accessibility for transportation planning, Victoria Transport Policy Institute, www.vtpi.org (2012)

  3. Bhat, C., Handy, S., Kockelman, K., Mahmassani, H., Chen, Q., Weston, L.: Development of an Urban Accessibility Index: Literature Review. University of Texas, Austin USA, Center for Transportation Research (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen, W.G.: How accessibility shapes land use. J. Am. Instit. Plann. 25(1) 73–76 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dalvi, M.Q., Martin, K.M.: The measurement of accessibility: some preliminary results. Transportation 5, 17–42 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morris, J.M., Dumble, P.L., Wigan, M.R.: Accessibility indicators for transportation planning. Transp. Res. A 13, 91–109 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnston, R.J., Gregory, D., Pratt, G., Watts, M.: The Dictionary of Human Geography. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bach, L.: The problem of aggregation and distance for analyses of accessibility and access opportunity in location-allocation models. Environ. Plann. A 13, 955–978 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ingram, D.R.: The concept of accessibility: a search for an operational form. Reg. Stud. 5, 101–107 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Handy, S.L., Niemeier, D.A.: Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environ. Plann. A 29, 1175–1194 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vickerman, R.W.: Accessibility, attraction, and potential: a review of some concepts and their use in determining mobility. Environ. Plann. A 6, 675–691 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S.R.: Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility. In: Hensher, D.A., Sopher, P.R. (eds.) Behavioural Travel Modelling. Croom Helm, Andover, Hants, pp. 654–679 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Le Vine, S., Lee-Gosselin, M., Sivakumar, A., Polak, J.: A new concept of accessibility to personal activities: development of theory and application to an empirical study of mobility resource holdings. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 1–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geurs, K.T., Ritsema van Eck, J.R.: Accessibility measures: review and applications. RIVM Report 408505 006. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Geurs, K.T., van Wee, B.: Accessibility evaluation of landuse and transport strategies: Review and research directions. J. Transp. Geogr. 12, 127–140 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Geurs, K.T., van Wee, B.: Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. EJTIR 11(4), 350–367 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Curtis, C., Scheurer, J.: Multiple accessibility: developing a tool for evaluating land use-transport integration. GAMUT, Australasian Centre for the Governance and Management of Urban Transport, University of Melbourne, Melbourne (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gutièrrez, J.: Transport and accessibility. In: Kitchin, R., Thrift, N. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, pp. 410–417. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Páez, A., Scott, D.M., Morency, C.: Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. J. Transp. Geogr. 25, 141–153 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kwan, M.P.: Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geogr. Anal. 30, 191–216 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rotoli, F., Christidis, P., Vannacci, L., Lopez-Ruiz, H.G., Navajas, C.E., Ibáñez, R.N.: Potential impacts on accessibility and consumer surplus of improvements of the European railway system. In: Euro Working Group on Transportation 2014 Compendium of Papers (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gutierrez, J., Gonzalez, R., Gomez, G.: The European high-speed train network: predicted effects on accessibility patterns. J. Transp. Geogr. 4(4), 227–238 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bruinsma, F., Rietveld, P.: The accessibility of European cities; theoretical framework and comparison of approached. Environ. Plann. A 30, 499–521 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Street, N.: Time Contours: Using Isochrone Visualization to Describe Transport Network Travel Cost. Imperial College London, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lightfoot, C., Kelly, F.: Travel-Time Maps–Transforming our View of Transport Asymptopia. University of Cambridge, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gamper, J., Boehlen, M.H., Cometti, W., Innerebner, M.: Defining isochrones in multimodal spatial networks. In: Proceedings of CIKM-11, October 24–28, 2011, Glasgow, Scotland, pp. 2381–2384 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schürmann, C., Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M.: Accessibility indicators. Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung 39, Institute of Spatial Planning, Universität Dortmund Dortmund (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rodrigue, J.P., Comtois, C., Slack, B.: The Geography of Transport Systems. Routledge, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Geurs, K.T., Ritsema van Eck, J.R.: Accessibility evaluation of land-use scenarios: the impact of job competition land-use and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands. Environ. Plann. B 30(1), 69–87 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hägerstrand, T.: What about people in regional science? People of the Regional Science Association, 24, pp. 7–21 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Miller, H.J.: Modelling accessibility using space–time prism concepts within geographical information systems. Int. J. Geogr. Syst. 5(3), 287–301 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Miller, H.J.: Measuring space–time accessibility benefits within transportation networks: basic theory and computational procedures. Geogr. Anal. 31(2), 187–212 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Recker, W.W., Chen, C., McNally, M.G.: Measuring the impact of efficient household travel decisions on potential travel time savings and accessibility gains. Transp. Res. A 35(4), 339–369 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ben-Akiva, M., Lerman, S.R.: Discrete Choice Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge MA (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Williams, H.C.W.L.: Travel demand models, duality relations and user benefit analysis. J. Reg. Sci. 16(2), 147–166 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Silva, C., Pinho, P.: The Structural Accessibility Layer (SAL): revealing how urban structure constrains travel choice. Environ. Plann. A 42, 2735–2752 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Charalambous, N., Mavridou, M.: Space syntax: spatial integration accessibility and angular segment analysis by metric distance (ASAMeD). In: Hull, A., Silva, C., Bertolini, L. (eds.) Accessibility Instruments for Planning Practice, pp. 57–62. COST Office, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vandenbulcke, G., Steenberghen, T., Thomas, I.: Mapping accessibility in Belgium: a tool for land-use and transport planning? J. Transp. Geogr. 17, 39–53 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yang, R., Yan, H., Xiong, W., Liu, T.: The study of pedestrian accessibility to rail transit stations based on KLP model. Proc. Social Behav. Sci. 96, 714–722 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Monzón, A., Ortega, E., López, E.: Efficiency and spatial equity impacts of high-speed rail extensions in urban areas. Cities 30, 18–30 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen, C.L., Hall, P.: The impacts of high-speed trains on British economic geography: a study of the UK’s InterCity 125/225 and its effects. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(4), 689–704 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Martinez Sánchez-Mateos, H.S., Givoni, M.: The accessibility impact of a new High-Speed Rail line in the UK—a preliminary analysis of winners and losers. J. Transp. Geogr. 25, 105–114 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Chen, C.L., Hall, P.: The wider spatial-economic impacts of high-speed trains: a comparative case study of Manchester and Lille sub-regions. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 89–110 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cao, J., Liu, X.C., Wang, Y., Li, Q.: Accessibility impacts of China’s high-speed rail network. J. Transp. Geogr. 28,12–21 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chandra, S., Vadali, S.R.: Evaluating accessibility impacts of the proposed America 2050 high-speed rail corridor for the Appalachian Region. J. Transp. Geogr. 37, 28–46 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen, G., de Abreu e Silva, J.: Estimating the provincial economic impacts of high-speed rail in Spain: an application of structural equation modelling. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 111, 157–65 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Albalate, D., Bel, G.: High speed rail: lessons for policy makers from experiences abroad. In: IREA Working Papers, Barcelona (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Adler, N., Pels, E., Nash, C.: High speed rail and air transport competition: game engineering as tool for cost-benefit analysis. Transp. Res. Part B 44(7), 821–833 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Preston, J.: High speed rail in britain: about time or a waste of time? J. Transp. Geogr. 22, 308–311 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chang, J.S., Lee, J.H.: Accessibility analysis of Korean high speed rail: a case study of the Seoul metropolitan area. Transp. Rev. 28(1), 87–103 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Levinson, D.M.: Accessibility impacts of high-speed rail. J. Transp. Geogr. 22, 288–291 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gutiérrez Puebla, J.: El tren de alta velocidad y sus efectos espaciale. Invest. Reg. 5, 199–221 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Vickerman, R.: High-speed rail and regional development: the case of intermediate stations. J. Transp. Geogr. 42, 157–165 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Venter, C.J., Cross, C.: Location, mobility, and access to work. Mobility 13 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Willigers, J., van Wee, B.: High-speed rail and office location choices: a stated choice experiment for the Netherlands. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 745–754 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Dubé, J., Thériault, M., Des Rosiers, F.: Commuter rail accessibility and house values: the case of the Montreal South Shore, Canada, 1992–2009. Transp. Res. Part A 54, 49–66 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M.: The shrinking continent: accessibility, competitiveness, and cohesion. In: Faludi, A. (ed.) European Spatial Research and Planning, pp. 115–140. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kotavaara, O., Antikainen, H., Rusanen, J.: Population change and accessibility by road and rail networks: GIS and statistical approach to Finland 1970–2007. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 926–935 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ortega, E., López, E., Monzón, A.: Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail at different planning levels. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 130–141 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ortega, E., Lòpez, E., Monzón, A.: Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail under different zoning systems. J. Transp. Geogr. 34, 16–24 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Monzón, A., Ortega, E., López, E.: Social impacts of high speed rail projects: addressing spatial equity effects. In: Proceedings, 12th WCTR, July 11–15, 2010–Lisbon, Portugal. E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos (UPM), Madrid (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gutiérrez, J.: Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid–Barcelona–French border. J. Transp. Geogr. 9(4), 229–242 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gutiérrez, J., Condeço-Melhorado, A., López, E., Monzón, A.: Evaluating the European added value of TEN-T projects: a methodological proposal based on spatial spillovers, accessibility and GIS”. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 840–850 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Martín, J.C., Gutiérrez, J., Román, C.: Data envelopment analysis (DEA) index to measure the accessibility impacts of new infrastructure investments: the case of the high-speed train corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French border. Reg. Stud. 38(6), 697–712 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Martín, J.C., Reggiani, A.: Recent methodological developments to measure spatial interaction: synthetic accessibility indices applied to high speed train investments. Transp. Rev. 27(5), 551–571 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Gutièrrez, J., Urbano, P.: Accessibility in the European Union: the impact of the Trans-European road network. J. Transp. Geogr. 4(1), 15–25 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hou, Q., Li, S.M.: Transport infrastructure development and changing spatial accessibility in the Greater Pearl River Delta, China, 1990–2020. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 1350–1360 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Shaw, S.L., Fang, Z., Lu, S., Tao, R.: Impacts of high speed rail on railroad network accessibility in China. J. Transp. Geogr. (in press) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Vannacci, L., Tartaglia, M., Elena, N., Rotoli, F.: The use of open data for estimating rail accessibility in Europe. In: Ingegneria Ferroviaria LXX (7–8), pp. 611–634 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Vannacci, L.: European accessibility using real timetable data. In: Proceedings of the Nectar Cluster 6 Meeting, Seville 6th February 2014

    Google Scholar 

  71. Google Inc.: General transit feed specification reference. http://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/reference (2014). Accessed 19 July 2014

  72. Renne, J.L., Hamidi, S., Ewing, R.: Transit commuting, the network accessibility effect, and the built environment in station areas across the United States. Res. Transp. Econ. 60, 35–43 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane, Roma, Italia

    Mario Tartaglia, Lorenzo Vannacci & Martina Farsi

Authors
  1. Mario Tartaglia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorenzo Vannacci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martina Farsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Mario Tartaglia;

Methodology: Lorenzo Vannacci;

Resources: Lorenzo Vannacci;

Formal analysis: Martina Farsi;

Visualization: Martina Farsi;

Writing original draft: Abstract Mario Tartaglia, 1. Summary Mario Tartaglia, 2. Introduction Lorenzo Vannacci, 3. Literature review Lorenzo Vannacci, Mario Tartaglia, 4. The case study Martina Farsi; 5. Methodology and data Martina Farsi, 6. Results and discussion Martina Farsi, 7. Conclusions and further perspectives Martina Farsi;

Review: Mario Tartaglia, Lorenzo Vannacci;

Writing, review and editing: Martina Farsi;

Supervision: Mario Tartaglia.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Vannacci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

    Francesca Pagliara

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tartaglia, M., Vannacci, L., Farsi, M. (2023). The Accessibility Impact of High Speed Rail in Italy: A User-Based Approach. In: Pagliara, F. (eds) Socioeconomic Impacts of High-Speed Rail Systems. IW-HSR 2022. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26340-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation