Abstract
The idea of women empowerment is often understood through the varied social contexts of individuals. There have been many attempts in understanding this notion among Western Educated Industrialized Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) women. A similar exploratory trajectory is seldom found in non-WEIRD samples of women especially those from South East Asian collectivistic cultures. The present study attempts to explore the concept of empowerment among middle-aged women from collectivistic cultures, who are often subjected to benevolent sexism from a social constructivist position. The paper would emphasize notions about the empowerment of ordinary women, particularly with regard to their occupational status. The discussion would be positioned in the cultural context of the Indian subcontinent where gender roles, norms and expectations define the concept of empowerment among women. A psychodynamic Kleinian approach involving object relations is adopted to elaborate on the occupational position of the participants where their interpersonal dynamics are explored.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amin, S. N. (2018). “Somehow, I will convince my people, … I will have to follow but I won’t accept everything”: Asian women’s empowerment via higher education. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2018.1465508
Barhate, B., Hirudayaraj, M., Dirani, K., Barhate, R., & Abadi, M. (2021). Career disruptions of married women in India: An exploratory investigation. Human Resource Development International, 24(4), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2021.1904352
Clarke, J. (2019). We need to talk about Fabian: Klein’s ‘lost’ theory of projective identification and the social construction of gender/queer objects. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 33(3), 192–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02668734.2019.1695654
Creswell, J. W. (2003). A framework for design. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (pp. 9–11).
Durán, M., Moya, M., & Megías, J. L. (2011). It’s his right, it’s her duty: Benevolent sexism and the justification of traditional sexual roles. The Journal of Sex Research, 48(5), 470–478. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41319012
Evans, K. L., Millsteed, J., Richmond, J. E., Falkmer, M., Falkmer, T., & Girdler, S. J. (2014). The complexity of role balance: Support for the model of juggling occupations. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21(5), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2014.902988
Fernández, M. L., Castro, Y. R., & Lorenzo, M. G. (2004). Evolution of hostile sexism and benevolent sexism in a Spanish sample. Social Indicators Research, 66(3), 197–211. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27522069
Hockmeyer, A. (1988). Object relations theory and feminism: Strange bedfellows. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies., 10(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345935
Khalid, M. W., Samargandi, N., Shah, A. H., & Almandeel, S. (2020). Socio-economic factors and women’s empowerment: Evidence from Punjab. Pakistan, International Economic Journal, 34(1), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2019.1677742
Kim, R. Y. (2020). An unforeseen story of alpha-woman: Breadwinner women are more likely to quit the job in work-family conflicts. Applied Economics, 52(55), 6009–6021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1781775
Klein, M. (1998). Love, guilt & reparation. Vintage.
Klein, V., Savaş, O., & Conley, T. D. (2021). How WEIRD and androcentric is sex research? Global inequities in study populations. The Journal of Sex Research, 59(7), 810–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1918050
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. Columbia University Press.
Mintchev, N. (2018). Object-relations and cultural narratives in the analysis of racism: Theorizing subjectivity after Klein and Lacan. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 28(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2018.1432959
Mosseri, S. E. (2021). Finding middle ground: The relationship between cultural schemas and working mothers’ work-family strategies. Community, Work & Family, 24(3), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2019.1682968
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251.
Sayers, J. (1987). Melanie Klein, psychoanalysis, and feminism. Feminist Review, 25, 23–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1395033
Scott, A. (1990). Melanie Klein and the questions of feminism. Women: A Cultural Review, 1(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09574049008578032
Yeon, W. S. (2005). Play the men’s game? Accommodating work and family in the workplace. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 11(3), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2005.11665992
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jochan, G.M., Banerjee, T. (2023). Indian Women and Empowerment: A Kleinian Approach. In: Mayer, CH., et al. Women's Empowerment for a Sustainable Future. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25924-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25924-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25923-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25924-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)