Skip to main content

Essential Tool Box

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disruption und Innovation im Produktmanagement

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel konzentriert sich auf wesentliche Werkzeuge, die sich in der Anforderungs-, Konzept- und Kostenphase der Produktentwicklung bewährt haben. Sie sind kurz, knackig und „how to“ formuliert, um eine einfache Anwendung in Projekten zu ermöglichen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Abdulaziz, M. E. (2012). Product function decomposition: A structured method [Slides]. Industrial Engineering Department, King Saud University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, L., et al. (2012). TRIZ power tools: Working with functions. http://www.opensourcetriz.com/images/1_OpenSourceTRIZ_Pictures/2_Working_With_Functions_Pictures/Working_with_Functions.pdf. Zugegriffen am 2017.

  • Blees, C. (2011). Eine Methode zur Entwicklung modularer Produktfamilien. Technische Universität Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenenberg, A. G., Fischer, T. M., & Günther, T. (2012). Kostenrechnung und Kostenanalyse (8. Aufl.). Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, K. A. (2013). Quality function deployment. August, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Weck, O., Simpson, T. W., & Cameron, B. (2003, July, 22–25). Product platform and product family design: From strategy to implementation [Course]. http://professional.mit.edu/programs/short-programs/product-platform-product-family-design. Zugegriffen am 2017.

  • van Eck, D., McAdams, D. A., & Vermaas, P. E. (2007, January). Functional decomposition in engineering: A survey. In ASME 2007 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (S. 227–236). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erixon, G. (1998). Modular function deployment: A method for product modularisation (S. 50–57). Royal Inst. of Technology, Department of Manufacturing Systems, Assembly Systems Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Götzfried, M. (2013). Managing complexity induced by product variety in manufacturing companies: Complexity evaluation and integration in decision-making. Diss. University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölttä-Otto, K. (2005). Modular product platform design. Helsinki University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standard. IEC 60300-3-3 ed.3.0, Copyright © 2017 IEC Geneva, Switzerland. www.iec.ch

  • Kano, N., Tsuji, S., Seraku, N., & Takerhashi, F. (1984). Miryokuteki Hinshitsu to Atarimae Hinshitsu. „Attractive quality and must-be quality“. Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14(2), 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipp, T., & Krause, D. (2008). Design for variety – Efficient support for design engineers. In DS 48: Proceedings design 2008, the 10th international design conference, Dubrovnik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, M. W., & Imsdahl, A. (2014). Modular function deployment: Using module drivers to impart strategies to a product architecture. In Advances in product family and product platform design (S. 91–118). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. V., & Ishii, K. (2002). Design for variety: Developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures. Research in Engineering Design, 13(4), 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reduce Program Costs through Parts Management. (2006). The parts standardization and management committee. http://www.dsp.dla.mil/Portals/26/Documents/Programs/PartsManagement/070524-Report-ReduceCostThroughPSCMBusinessCasePartsManagement.pdf?ver=2016-09-12-151349-237. Zugegriffen am 2017.

  • Ripperda, S., & Krause, D. (2017). Cost effects of modular product family structures: Methods and quantification of impacts to support decision making. Journal of Mechanical Design, 139(2), 021103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, T. W., Bobuk, A., Slingerland, L. A., Brennan, S., Logan, D., & Reichard, K. (2012). From user requirements to commonality specifications: An integrated approach to product family design. Research in Engineering Design, 23(2), 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. A., & Perumal, A. (2010). Waging war on complexity costs: Reshape your cost structure, free up cash flows, and boost productivity by attacking process, product, and organizational complexity. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, F. (1989). Morphologische Forschung. Neuauflage. Baeschlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fuchs, C., Golenhofen, F.J. (2024). Essential Tool Box. In: Disruption und Innovation im Produktmanagement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25918-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25918-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25917-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25918-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics