Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

The present chapter addresses the construct of language learning strategies (LLS). It starts with an overview of approaches to the investigation of LLS. After anchoring LLS in the so-called good language learner studies (Rubin, 1975), selected definitions and features of LLS are discussed. This is followed by outlining the status quo in strategy research. Afterwards, an account of taxonomies, classifications, and categorizations of LLS is provided. The following part of the chapter addresses LLS through the prism of self-regulation (SR) and thus expands the macro-context of strategy use. This includes a reference to the psychological foundations of SR, reflections on its educational implications and, finally, elaborating on recent insights into the concept of self-regulated language learning (SRLL). Next, the variables affecting the use of LLS are discussed, with the exception of personality, which is addressed in Chap. 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Dörneyi and Ryan (2015) pointed out the ambiguity of strategies and opted for describing strategies as features of the learning process rather than an attribute of the language learner.

  2. 2.

    Mapping the scope of LLS poses a challenge not merely because of the scope of strategy research, but also due to a variety of co-existing approaches which researchers have adopted when attempting to distinguish between various strategies. For this reason, scholars have resorted to categorizations consisting in recognizing, differentiating, and understanding ideas which are grouped for specific purposes (Cohen & Lefebvre, 2005), classifications, that is, ordering entities into groups of classes on the basis of their similarity in order to achieve within-group homogeneity and between-group heterogeneity (Bailey, 1994), or taxonomies, that is, empirically derived groupings, aimed to introduce structure into a body of facts, and build a unified and homogeneous view of a particular domain (Chandra & Tumanyan, 2005).

  3. 3.

    Communicative strategies were excluded from the strategy taxonomy in later papers (Ehrman & Oxford, 1990; Oxford, 1990) as the label tended to be misused and the tactics under the label specifically referred to compensation strategies (cf. Tarone, 1981, 1983).

  4. 4.

    Cohen (2014: 16) admits that communication strategies may or may not have impact on learning.

  5. 5.

    The examples that Oxford (2017) provides include using analysing to regulate emotions, manage motivation, or deal with sociocultural issues and attitudes, and thus going beyond its cognitive dimension, and qualifying summarising texts, reconceptualising words, or skipping examples in a text as either cognitive or metacognitive strategies, depending on the researcher’s interpretation.

  6. 6.

    For example, reasoning is traditionally associated with developing receptive skills rather than productive skills (Oxford, 2017).

  7. 7.

    These areas bear a close resemblance to the ABCDs of personality, which include affects, cognitions, behaviors, and desires (Wilt & Revelle, 2017), and are discussed in Chap. 1.

  8. 8.

    It needs to be granted, though, that de Bruin and van Gog (2012) also claim that “(w)hen metacognitive instruction takes into account a number of design principles, accuracy of metacognitive processes in children can equal that of adults” (p. 45).

  9. 9.

    Strunk and Steele (2011) therefore advocated for using the term self-efficacy for self-regulation, as earlier suggested by Klassen et al. (2008).

  10. 10.

    The most advanced learners aimed to review and study between 1000 and 2000 Kanji characters.

  11. 11.

    Rose and Harbon (2013) mention that similar conclusions were reached by Bandura and Schunk (1981) and Dörnyei (2001).

  12. 12.

    According to Oxford and Nyikos (1989), learners’ attitudes are, in fact, a composite of affective variables, which also include their personality. Since personality cannot really be analyzed in terms of an affective variable, regardless of the framework chosen in order to investigate it, it is considered as a separate factor.

  13. 13.

    Oxford and Nyikos (1989) distinguish between the so-called personality characteristics, or, long-term traits, and general personality types, measured by the MBTI (Myers & Briggs, 1976).

  14. 14.

    Politzer (1983) investigated three types of students’ self-reported behaviours, including general behaviours, classroom behaviours, and interactions with others.

  15. 15.

    According to Stern (1992), the combination of the two variables, age and learners’ beliefs, may be of critical importance, as some adult learners might not even make any efforts to learn, for example, the pronunciation of the target language, only due to their conviction of being “too old”.

  16. 16.

    Green and Oxford (1995) related this finding to the tendencies which they had observed in TV programs, which were, at they claimed, dominated by shows preferred by men, such as broadcasts of sport events or action films.

  17. 17.

    Language attainment is probably the most comprehensive term that refers to L2 learners’ achievement, and learning or improving skills, which could be operationalized as performance in specific tests, as suggested by Pawlak (2008), or quantified by self-assessment or CEFR level. Obviously, the term itself denotes a certain degree of ambiguity, which can impede investigating the relationships between language learning strategies and language attainment. This remains particularly relevant from the contemporary perspective of LLS investigations (cf. Pawlak, 2021), especially in the light of criticisms of CEFR scales for insufficient validity (Wisniewski, 2018).

  18. 18.

    Strategy researchers’ belief in the benefits of strategy use led to the arrival of a number of guidebooks for both language learners and course instructors to accelerate the acquisition of the target language, which were later assessed in terms of efficiency. To mention just one example, Cohen (2005) conducted a comprehensive study of a group of language learners and course instructors in order to assess the impact of expanding learners’ LLS repertoires and provide instruction in strategy training and use.

References

  • Allan, D. (1995). Oxford placement test. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amerstorfer, C. M. (2018). Past its expiry date? The SILL in modern mixed-methods strategy research. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 497–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (2000). Learning and memory. John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anugkakul, G., & Yordchim, S. (2014). Language learning strategies of Chinese students at Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University in Thailand. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 2511–2514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardasheva, Y., & Tretter, T. R. (2013). Strategy inventory for language learning–ELL student form: Testing for factorial validity. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 474–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzarotti, S., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Italian adaptation of the emotion regulation questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R., & Alquist, J. L. (2009). Self-regulation as a limited resource: Strength model of control and depletion. In J. P. Forgas, R. F. Baumeister, & D. M. Tice (Eds.), Psychology of self-regulation (pp. 21–34). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P., & Lor, W. (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System, 27, 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E. (1983). Some factors in the selection and implementation of communication strategies. Strategies in Interlanguage Communication, 100–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E. (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 65, 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok, E., & Fröhlich, M. (1978). Variables of classroom achievement in second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 62, 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1982). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavel & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (pp. 515–529). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. A. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, J. G., & Longhini, A. (2002). Focusing on learning styles and strategies: A diary study in an immersion setting. Language Learning, 52, 401–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, D. (1984). Plans, learner strategies and self direction in language learning. System, 12, 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U., O’Malley, M. J. (1986). A cognitive academic language learning approach: An ESL content-based curriculum. National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamot, A. U. (1987). A study of learning strategies in foreign language instruction. First year report. Office of International Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, C., & Tumanyan, A. (2005). Supply chain system taxonomy: A framework and methodology. Human Systems Management, 24(4), 247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffield, F., Steer, R., Hodgson, A., Spours, K., Edward, S., & Finlay, I. (2005). A new learning and skills landscape? The central role of the learning and skills council. Journal of Education Policy, 20, 631–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D. (1995). Second language learning and use strategies: Clarifying the issues. Minnesota University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D. (2003). The learner’s side of foreign language learning: Where do styles, strategies, and tasks meet? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41, 279–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D. (2005). Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2, 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D., & Dörneyi, Z. (2002). Focus on the language learner: Motivation, styles, and strategies. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 170–190). Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H., & Lefebvre, C. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (2007). Language learner strategies. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching. Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterall, S. (1995). Developing a course strategy for learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 49, 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csizér, K., & Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behaviour: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98–119). Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dakowska, M. (2005). Teaching English as a foreign language: a guide for professionals. PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, D. F. (1985). Learning strategy research. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, & R. Glasser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Relating instruction to research (pp. 209–239). Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruin, A. B. H., & Van Gog, T. (2012). Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 22, 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, L., Kuipers, E., Kuerten, Y., Van Laar, M., Olivier, B., & Verster, J. C. (2011). The RT-18: A new screening tool to assess young adult risk-taking behaviour. International Journal of General Medicine, 4, 575–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Otto, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. In Working papers in applied linguistics (Vol. 4, pp. 43–69). Thames Valley University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, K., Belsky, J., & Fearon, R. M. P. (2014). From early attachment to engagement with learning in school: The role of self-regulation and persistence. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1350–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer, C., & Oxford, R. L. (1996). Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 61–74). University of Hawai’i at Manoa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droździał-Szelest, K. (1997). Language learning strategies in the process of acquiring a foreign language. Motivex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1975). Learning styles inventory. Price Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 73, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies is an intensive training setting. The Modern Language Journal, 74, 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgort, I., & Warren, P. (2014). L2 vocabulary learning from reading: Explicit and tacit lexical knowledge and the role of learner and item variables. Language Learning, 64, 365–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (1990). Handbook of educational ideas and practices. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, S. G. B., Easting, G., & Pearson, P. R. (1984). Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P., Baumeister, R., & Tice, D. M. (2009). Psychology of self-regulation: An introductory review. In J. P. Forgas, R. F. Baumeister, & D. M. Tice (Eds.), Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 1–17). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. (2007). Has language learning strategy research come to an end? A response to Tseng et al. (2006). Applied Linguistics, 28, 615–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model (Vol. 10). Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. C. (2013). Motivation. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 443–447). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Topics in applied psycholinguistics (Vol. 1). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1986). Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 327–351). Newbury House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerami, M. H., & Baighlou, S. M. (2011). Language learning strategies used by successful and unsuccessful Iranian EFL students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1567–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, P. R. (1997). Language-learning strategies for learners of Japanese: Investigating ethnicity. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, P. R. (2012). The impact of cultural background on the choice of language learning strategies in the JFL context. System, 40, 483–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen, T., Martínez, V. R., Rojas, P. P., & Espinoza A. L. (2001). Can foreign language learning strategies turn into crutches? A pilot study on the use of strategies by successful and unsuccessful language learners. Revista Signos, 34, 49–50, 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregersen, T., & MacIntyre, P. (2014). Capitalizing on language learners’ individuality: From premise to practice. Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenfell, M., & Harris, V. (1999). Modern languages and learning strategies: In theory and practice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, C. (2004). Language-learning strategies: Theory and research. Centre for Research in International Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, C., & Cansiz, G. (2015). Language learning strategies: A holistic view. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5, 473–493. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2015.5.3.7.

  • Griffiths, C. (2018). The strategy factor in successful language learning: The tornado effect (Vol. 121). Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, C. (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, C. (2012). Learning styles: Traversing the quagmire. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning (pp. 151–168). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, C. (2015). What have we learnt from ‘good language learners’? ELT Journal, 69, 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, C., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). The twenty-first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction to this special issue. System, 43, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigornko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Ehrman, M. E. (2000). A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The Canal-F theory and test. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J. (2014). Handbook of emotion regulation. The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Y. (2012). Learning strategies: Prototypical core and dimensions of variation. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3, 330–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habók, A., & Magyar, A. (2018). The effect of language learning strategies on proficiency, attitudes and school achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02358.

  • Hakan, K., Aydin, B., & Bulent, A. (2015). An investigation of undergraduates’ language learning strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1348–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbach, A. (2000). Finding out about students’ learning strategies by looking at their diaries: A case study. System, 28, 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, V. (2001). Helping learners learn: Exploring strategy instruction in language classrooms across Europe. Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, J. G., & Paige, R. M. (2008). A strategies-based approach to culture and language learning in education abroad programming. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 17, 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, E. K. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18, 333–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In I. J. B. Pride, & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurkovič, V. (2010). Effect of explicit language learning strategy instruction on language-test and self-assessment scores. English Language Teaching, 3, 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamper, G. D., Mahlobo, E. B., & Lemmer, E. (2003). The relationship between standardised test performance and language learning strategies in English second language: A case study. Journal for Language Teaching, 37, 164–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khamkhien, A. (2010). Factors affecting language learning strategy reported usage by Thai and Vietnamese EFL learners. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 7, 66–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostons, D., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunasaraphan, K. (2015). English learning strategy and proficiency level of the first year students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1853–1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Y. (2009). Language learning strategy use and English proficiency of university freshmen in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 255–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauriola, M., Litman, J. A., Mussel, P., De Santis, R., Crowson, H. M., & Hoffman, R. R. (2015). Epistemic curiosity and self-regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaver, B. L., Ehrman, M., & Shekhtman, B. (2005). Achieving success in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Heinz, M. (2016). English language learning strategies reported by advanced language learners. Journal of International Education Research, 12, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v12i2.9629

  • Lee, R., & Oxford, R. L. (2008). Understanding EFL learners’ strategy use and strategy awareness. Asian EFL Journal, 10, 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesiak-Bielawska, E. D. (2013). Różnice indywidualne w procesie aktywizacji języka [Individual differences in language acquisition]. Oficyna Wydawnicza Łośgraf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, T. (2009). Language learning strategies—The theoretical framework and some suggestions for learner training practice. English Language Teaching, 2, 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman, J. A., & Mussel, P. (2013). Validity of the interest-and deprivation-type epistemic curiosity model in Germany. Journal of Individual Differences, 34, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. H. T., & Lee, Y. S. (2015). Measuring self-regulation in second language learning: A Rasch analysis. SAGE Open, 5, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015601717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoCastaro, V. (1994). Learning strategies and learning environments. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, R., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). A diary study focusing on listening and speaking: The evolving interaction of learning styles and learning strategies in a motivated, advanced ESL learner. System, 43, 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaro, E. (2004). Fourteen features of a language learner strategy. AIS St Helens, Centre for Research in International Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaro, E. (2007). Language learner strategies: Adhering to a theoretical framework. Language Learning Journal, 35, 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730701599245.

  • Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms. Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 320–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaro, E. (2008). The shifting dimensions of language learner autonomy. In T. Lamb & H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities and responses (pp. 47–62). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35, 338–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGroarty, M. (1988). University foreign language learning: What predicts success? CLEAR Center for Language Education and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michońska-Stadnik, A. (2008). Identyfikacja oraz trening strategii dla rozwoju autonomii [Strategy identification and training for autonomy development]. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Autonomia w nauce języka obcego—co osiągnęliśmy i dokąd zmierzamy [Autonomy in foreign language learning—what we have achieved and where we are heading] (pp. 393–404). Wydział Pedagogiczno-Artystyczny UAM and Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Koninie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B., & Clarke, M. (2011). Identity in second language teaching and learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching (pp. 817–836). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., & Briggs, K. (1976). The Myers-Briggs type indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Modern Language Center, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nenkov, G. Y., Inman, J. J., & Hulland, J. (2008). Considering the future: The conceptualization and measurement of elaboration on potential outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 126–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D. (1997). Does learner strategy training make a difference? Lenguas Modernas, 24, 123–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyikos, M. (2008). Gender and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 73–82). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nyikos, M., & Oxford, L. (1993). A factor analytic study of language learning strategy use: Interpretations from information-processing theory and social psychology. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, J. M., Russo, R. P., Chamot, A. U., Stewener-Manzanares, G., & Kupper, L. (1985). Learning strategies used by high school students learning English as a second language. Language Learning, 35, 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, M. J., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (1986). Development and psychometric testing of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioural and Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (1989a). The role of styles and strategies in second language learning. ERIC Digest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (1989b). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (1996). Employing a questionnaire to assess the use of language learning strategies. Applied Language Learning, 7, 28–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (1999). Relationships between second language learning strategies and language proficiency in the context of learner autonomy and self-regulation. Revista Canaria De Estudios Ingleses, 38, 108–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Gala, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L., & Cohen, A. D. (1992). Language learning strategies: Crucial issues of concept and classification. Applied Language Learning, 3, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. E. (1995). Adults’ language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23, 359–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L., & Gkonou, C. (2018). Interwoven: Culture, language, and learning strategies. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 403–426. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.10.

  • Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L., Nyikos, M., & Ehrman, M. (1988). Vive la difference? Reflections on sex differences in use of language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 21, 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. L., Yunkyoung, C., Leung, S., & Hae-Jin, K. (2004). Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42, 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors, 35, 737–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parel, R. (2004). The impact of lexical inferencing strategies on second language reading proficiency. Reading and Writing, 17, 847–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2008). Investigating English language learning and teaching. Faculty of Fine Arts and Pedagogy in Kalisz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (Ed.). (2011a). Autonomia w nauce języka obcego—uczeń a nauczyciel [Autonomy in foreign language learning—the language learner and the language teacher]. Wydział Pedagogiczno-Artystyczny UAM w Poznaniu and Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Koninie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (Ed.). (2011b). Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2012). The dynamic nature of motivation in language learning: A classroom perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 249–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. (2021). Investigating language learning strategies: Prospects, pitfalls and challenges. Language Teaching Research, 25, 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M., & Kiermasz, Z. (2018). The use of language learning strategies in a second and third language: The case of foreign language majors. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M., & Oxford, R. L. (2018). Conclusion: The future of research into language learning strategies. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 525–535. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.15

  • Pellegrino, V. A. (1998). Student perspectives on language learning in a study abroad context. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 4, 91–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, V. (1991). A look at learner strategy use and ESL proficiency. Catesol Journal, 4, 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–31). Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., Murray, T., & Bromme, R. (2012). Is adaptation to task complexity really beneficial for performance? Learning and Instruction, 22, 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pineda, J. E. (2010). Identifying language learning strategies: An exploratory study. Gist Education and Language Research Journal, 4, 94–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Elsevier Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In: P. R. Pintrich, D. Brown & C. E. Weinstein (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie (pp. 371–402). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Van De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991b). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politzer, R. L. (1983). An exploratory study of self-reported language learning behaviors and their relation to achievement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 54–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politzer, R. L., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Levin, J. R. (1977). Developmental differences in subjects’ associative-learning strategies and performance: Assessing a hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 24, 431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przybył, J. (2016). Cultural variation in the use of language learning strategies: A comparative study. Konińskie Studia Językowe, 4, 439–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przybył, J., & Urbańska, J. (2020). Language learning strategies and self-regulation: Companions or competitors? In S. Chudak, & M. Pieklarz-Thien (Eds.), Der Lernende im Zentrum der Forschung der gegenwärtigen Fremdsprachendidaktik Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang (117–136).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta, L. (2008). Aptitude and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 142–155). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles—an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, J. W. (1978). Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning: Language learning and language teaching (Vol. 2). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer, W. D., Jr., & Bean, J. P. (1973). Sentence effects and noun-pair learning: A developmental interaction during adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 15, 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H. (2012). Reconceptualizing strategic learning in the face of self-regulation: Throwing language learning strategies out with the bathwater. Applied Linguistics, 33, 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H., Briggs, J. G., Boggs, J. A., Sergio, L., & Ivanova-Slavianskaia, N. (2018). A systematic review of language learner strategy research in the face of self-regulation. System, 72, 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H., & Harbon, L. (2013). Self-regulation in second language learning: An investigation of the kanji learning task. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 96–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 1, 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 2, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. (2008). Reflections. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 15–30). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S. (2005). Motivational factors questionnaire. University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salahshour, F., Sharifi, M., & Salahshour, N. (2013). The relationship between language learning strategy use, language proficiency level and learner gender. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 634–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. (2012). The language-learning self, self-enhancement activities, and self-perceptual change. Language Teaching Research, 16, 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–64). University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R., & Watanabe, Y. (2001). Motivation, strategy use, and pedagogical preferences in foreign language learning. Motivation and Second Language Acquisition, 23, 313–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, D., & Leśniewska, J. (2012). Age and SLA: Research highways and bye-ways. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. 97–113). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sitzman, T., & Ely, K. (2010). Sometimes you need a reminder: The effects of prompting self-regulation on regulatory processes, learning, and attrition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in language learning. Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning: Language learning and language teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 69–94). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevick, E. W. (1989). Success with foreign languages: Seven who achieved it and what worked for them. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strunk, K. K., & Steele, M. R. (2011). Relative contributions of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and self-handicapping in predicting student procrastination. Psychological Reports, 109, 983–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studenska, A. (2011). Educational level, gender and foreign language learning self-regulation difficulty. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1349–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwanarak, K. (2012). English language learning beliefs, learning strategies and achievement of masters students in Thailand. TESOL in Context, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, T., Magidand, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, O. (1993). Language learning strategies and their relationship to achievement in English as a foreign language. Language Laboratory, 30, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarone, E. (1981). Some thoughts on the notion of communication strategy. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 142–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A., Stevens, J. R., & William, A. J. (2006). The effects of explicit reading strategy training on L2 reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. In L. Ortega & J. M. Norris (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 213–244). John Benjamins Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N., Rose, H., Cohen, A. D., Gao, X. A., Sasaki, A., & Hernandez-Gonzalez, T. (2022). The third wind of language learning strategies research. Language Teaching, 55, 417–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, W. T., Dörney, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27, 78–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhrig, K. (2015). Learning styles and strategies for language use in the context of academic reading tasks. System, 50, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usuki, M. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy: Learning from the Japanese language learners’ perspectives. ERIC Clearinghouse on Language and Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uztosun, M. S. (2014). The impact of language learning experience on language learner strategy use in Turkish EFL context. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5, 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varasteh, H., Ghanizadeh, A., & Akbari, O. (2016). The role of task value, effort-regulation, and ambiguity tolerance in predicting EFL learners’ test anxiety, learning strategies, and language achievement. Psychological Studies, 61, 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-015-0351-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Véliz, M. C. (2012). Language learning strategies (LLSs) and L2 motivation associated with L2 pronunciation. Literatura y Lingüística, 25, 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Self-regulation interventions with a focus on language learning strategies. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 727–747). Elsevier Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C., & Rogers, B. (1985). Comprehension monitoring: The neglected learning strategy. Journal of Developmental Education, 9, 619–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenden, A. L., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Prentice Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenden, A. L. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy: Planning and implementing learner training for language learners. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenden, A. L. (1986). Helping language learners think about learning. ELT Journal, 40, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, C. (2008). Language learning strategies in independent language learning: An overview. In S. Hurd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Language learning strategies in independent settings (pp. 3–24). Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilczyńska, W. (1999). Uczyć się czy być nauczanym? O autonomii w przyswajaniu języka obcego [To learn or to be taught? About autonomy in foreign language acquisition]. PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., Mercer, S., & Ryan, S. (2015). Exploring psychology in language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. (2021). A framework for task-based learning. Intrinsic Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilt, J., & Revelle, W. (2017). Extraversion. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The oxford handbook of the five factor model of personality (pp. 57–81). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winke, P. (2013). An investigation into second language aptitude for advanced Chinese language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (2018). Theorizing and researching levels of processing in self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12173

  • Winne, P. H. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 29–46). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). Elsevier Inc.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski, K. (2018). The empirical validity of the common European framework of reference scales. An exemplary study for the vocabulary and fluency scales in a language testing context. Applied Linguistics, 39, 933–959. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. L., & Nunan, D. (2011). The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System, 39, 144–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, N. D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27, 515–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz, C. (2010). The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of ELT learners in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 682–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, N. (2015). The predictive value of the self-regulating capacity in vocabulary learning scale. Applied Linguistics, 36, 641–647. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility belief. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2007). Reliability and validity of self-efficacy for learning form (SELF) scores of college students. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie [journal of Psychology], 215, 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Comparing students’ self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub Przybył .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Przybył, J., Pawlak, M. (2023). Language Learning Strategies. In: Personality as a Factor Affecting the Use of Language Learning Strategies . Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25255-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25255-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25254-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25255-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics