Abstract
A car line can offer more than \(10^{100}\) variants, and for each customer order a concrete selection of features and parts needs to be done. The respective selection rules are interconnected and are subject to constraints imposed by different car lines. We address the problem of finding and fixing logical errors in these interconnected selection rules within different contexts of allowed feature combinations. Previous work has focused on text-based or matrix-like representations which presented challenges regarding cognitive complexity, size of the representation, and usability. We present an integrated visualization of the combined practical effects of item selection and feature combination rules. The implemented tool detects logical errors and supports user workflows to fix the data visually.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amilhastre, J., Fargier, H., Marquis, P.: Consistency restoration and explanations in dynamic CSPS-application to configuration. Artif. Intell. 135(1–2), 199–234 (2002)
Astesana, J.M., Cosserat, L., Fargier, H.: Constraint-based vehicle configuration: a case study. In: ICTAI. IEEE (2010)
Berndt, R., Bazan, P., Hielscher, K.S.: MDD-based verification of car manufacturing data. In: CIMSIM. IEEE (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMSim.2011.40
Bischoff, D., Küchlin, W.: Adapting binary decision diagrams for visualizing product configuration data. In: Eibl, M., Gaedke, M. (eds.) INFORMATIK 2017. GI e.V. (2017). https://doi.org/10.18420/in2017_149
Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: Translating pseudo-boolean constraints into sat. J. Satisfiability Boolean Model. Comput. 2(1–4), 1–26 (2006)
Krawietzek, N.: Minimierung der graphischen Repräsentation von Coderegeln durch Variablensortierung. Master’s thesis, SCMT, Filderstadt, Germany (2020)
Küchlin, W.: Logic and verification of product configuration in the automotive industry. In: Proof and Computation II, pp. 387–408. World Scientific (2021). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811236488_0009
Küchlin, W., Sinz, C.: Proving consistency assertions for automotive product data management. J. Autom. Reason. 24(1–2), 145–163 (2000)
Mannion, M., Camara, J.: Theorem proving for product line model verification. In: van der Linden, F.J. (ed.) PFE 2003. LNCS, vol. 3014, pp. 211–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24667-1_16
Rudell, R.: Dynamic variable ordering for ordered binary decision diagrams. In: Kuehlmann, A. (ed.) The Best of ICCAD, pp. 51–63. Springer, Boston (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0292-0_5
Shafiee, S., Kristjansdottir, K., Hvam, L., Felfernig, A., Myrodia, A.: Analysis of visual representation techniques for product configuration systems in industrial companies. In: IEEM. IEEE (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ieem.2016.7797985
Tidstam, A., Bligård, L.O., Ekstedt, F., Voronov, A., Åkesson, K., Malmqvist, J.: Development of industrial visualization tools for validation of vehicle configuration rules. In: TMCE (2012)
Tidstam, A., Malmqvist, J.: Comparison of configuration rule visualizations methods. In: Bernard, A., Rivest, L., Dutta, D. (eds.) PLM 2013. IAICT, vol. 409, pp. 550–559. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41501-2_55
Voronov, A., Tidstam, A., Åkesson, K., Malmqvist, J.: Verification of item usage rules in product configuration. In: Rivest, L., Bouras, A., Louhichi, B. (eds.) PLM 2012. IAICT, vol. 388, pp. 182–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35758-9_16
Zengler, C., Küchlin, W.: Boolean quantifier elimination for automotive configuration – a case study. In: Pecheur, C., Dierkes, M. (eds.) FMICS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8187, pp. 48–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41010-9_4
Acknowledgements
This work has received funding by the BMWK-funded project SofDCar (19S21002D).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bischoff, D., Küchlin, W., Kopp, O. (2023). POSEIDON: A Graphical Editor for Item Selection Rules Within Feature Combination Rule Contexts. In: Noël, F., Nyffenegger, F., Rivest, L., Bouras, A. (eds) Product Lifecycle Management. PLM in Transition Times: The Place of Humans and Transformative Technologies. PLM 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 667. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25182-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25182-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25181-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25182-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)