Skip to main content

Language and the Sustainable Development Goals: Challenges to Language Policy and Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language and Sustainable Development

Part of the book series: Language Policy ((LAPO,volume 32))

  • 384 Accesses

Abstract

Language is not mentioned in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), nor was it seriously considered as an important dimension of social and economic development in the UN planning process that preceded them. Nonetheless, a close examination of some key ideas put forth in that process challenges us to rethink some long-standing assumptions in mainstream language policy and planning (LPP). The analysis focuses on the concepts of (in)equality, agency, and capability as central to the sustainable development agenda. In each case, the UN’s neglect of language is shown to be connected to its reliance on state-centric and rationalist social imaginaries that have also been central to the field of LPP, but that undermine the viability of the SDGs as a sustainable development paradigm. A case is made for moving LPP away from its original concern with “the language problems of developing nations” towards a new focus on “language solutions for a sustainable world.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All 18 Think Pieces are available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/un-task-team-thematic-think-pieces/. Think Pieces 7, 9, 10, 16, 17 and 18, which are specifically referred to in the text, are cited in full in the list of references.

References

  • Agenda 2030. Transforming our world. (2015). United Nations Department of Social and Economic Affairs. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

  • Agenda 21. (1992, June 3–14). United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alamu, O. (2017). Sustainable development goals in Nigeria: What role(s) for Nigeria’s indigenous languages? European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 5(4), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. M. (2016). Capabilities and social justice: The political philosophy of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldauf, R. B., Jr. (2005). Language planning and policy research: An overview. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 981–994). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, J., & Glasgow, G. P. (Eds.). (2018). Agency in language policy and planning: Critical inquiries. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brando, N., & Morales-Gálvez, S. (2021). Capabilities and linguistic justice. Political Studies, 003232172110338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, L., Kam Kwok, G., & Smyth, C. (Eds.). (2020). Language and identity in Europe: The multilingual city and its citizens. Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand, A. (2005). Do you speak English? Language barriers in child protection social work with minority ethnic families. British Journal of Social Work, 35(6), 807–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chik, A., Benson, P., & Moloney, R. (Eds.). (2019). Multilingual Sydney. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). United Nations/Convention on biological diversity secretariat. https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/

  • Corrêa d’Almeida, A., & Otcu-Grillman, B. (2013). The Portuguese language in the United Nations – Framing policy design. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 224, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. A. (2014). Engaged language policy and practices. Language Policy, 13, 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deumert, A., Inder, B., & Maitra, P. (2005). Language, informal networks and social protection: Evidence from a sample of migrants in Cape Town, South Africa. Global Social Policy, 5, 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fettes, M. (1997). Language planning and education. In R. Wodak & D. Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, volume 1: Language policy and political issues in education (pp. 13–22). Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fettes, M. (2015). Language in the United Nations post-2015 development agenda: Challenges to language policy and planning. Language Problems and Language Planning, 39(2), 298–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fettes, M. (2017). Land and the living roots of language: From rights to reconciliation. Tusaaji: A Translation Review, 5(5), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fettes, M. (2019). Language, land, and stewardship: Indigenous imperatives and Canadian policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), Language politics and policies: Perspectives from Canada and the United States (pp. 265–282). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fettes, M. (2022a). Educational capacity-building for linguistic inclusion and mobility: Meso-level strategies for systemic change. In F. Grin, L. Marácz, & N. Pokorn (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary language policy: Mobility and inclusion in multilingual Europe (pp. 195–214). John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fettes, M. (2022b). Languages in concert: Linguistic plurality on indigenous land. In M. C. Guzmán & Ş. T. Gürcağlar (Eds.), Negotiating linguistic plurality: Translation and multilingualism in Canada and beyond (pp. 184–203). McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, J. A., Ferguson, C. A., & Dasgupta, J. (1968). Language problems of developing nations. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, O., & Fishman, J. A. (Eds.). (2011). The multilingual apple: Languages in New York City. Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemberg, D. (2018). “The universal language of the future”: Decolonization, development, and the American embrace of global English, 1945–1965. Modern Intellectual History, 15(2), 561–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddicoat, A. J., & Taylor-Leech, K. (2021). Agency in language planning and policy. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1–2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lwara, E., & Ndalama, D. (2020). Translating sustainable development goals (SDGs) into Chichewa: A quick efficacy assessment. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(5), 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matunga, H. (2013). Theorizing indigenous planning. In R. Walker, T. Jojola, & D. Natcher (Eds.), Reclaiming indigenous planning (pp. 3–32). McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntee-Atalianis, L. J. (2010). Geostrategies of interlingualism: Language policy and practice in the international maritime organisation, London, UK. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2–3), 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntee-Atalianis, L. J. (2015). Language policy and planning in international organisations. In U. Jessner-Schmid & C. J. Kramsch (Eds.), The multilingual challenge: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 295–322). De Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntee-Atalianis, L. J. (2017). “Leave no one behind”: Linguistic and digital barriers to the dissemination and implementation of the United Nations sustainable development goals. Language Problems and Language Planning, 41(3), 217–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEntee-Atalianis, L. J., & Vessey, R. (2020). Mapping the language ideologies of organisational members: A corpus linguistic investigation of the United Nations’ general debates (1970–2016). Language Policy, 19, 549–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEntee-Atalianis, L. J., & Vessey, R. (2021). Using corpus linguistics to investigate agency and benign neglect in organisational language policy and planning: The United Nations as a case study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development., 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1890753

  • Monaka, K. C., & Mutula, S. M. (2010). An inclusive linguistic framework for Botswana: Reconciling the state and perceived marginalized communities. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations, 5, 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Partida, Y. (2012). Language and health care. Diabetes Spectrum, 25(1), 19–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (1996). The UN agenda for development: The role of languages. In S. Léger (Ed.), Vers un agenda linguistique: Regard futuriste Sur les nations Unies/towards a language agenda: Futurist outlook on the United Nations (pp. 399–422). Canadian Centre for Linguistic Rights, University of Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, E. C., & Nonaka, A. (2013). Language and social work: Are we really communicating effectively? Social Work, 58(2), 101–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. (1987). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosberg, D., & Curruthers, D. (2010). Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities. Global Environmental Politics, 10(4), 12–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyer, C. (2011). Re-building language habitats: Connecting language planning and land planning for sustainable futures. In J. Sallabank (Ed.), Language documentation and description (Vol. 9, pp. 35–57). SOAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2012). Elements of a theory of human rights. In T. Brooks (Ed.), Justice and the capabilities approach (pp. 221–262). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemund, P., & Leimgruber, J. R. (Eds.). (2020). Multilingual global cities: Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, J. H. (2017). Hot air or comprehensive progress? A critical assessment of the SDGs. Sustainable Development, 25(4), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B., & Cooper, R. L. (1991). The languages of Jerusalem. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svarstad, H., & Benjaminsen, T. A. (2020). Reading radical environmental justice through a political ecology lens. Geoforum, 108, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Think Piece 10. Economic Commission for Europe (ECE), Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), UN Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD) and UN Entity for Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women (UN Women). (2012). Addressing inequalities: The heart of the post-2015 agenda and the future we want for all. Thematic Think Piece 10. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Think Piece 16. Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), International Labour Organization (ILO), UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) and UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2012). Social protection: A development priority in the post-2015 UN development agenda. Thematic Think Piece 16. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Think Piece 17. Economic Commission for Europe (ECE), Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2012). Building on the MDGs to bring sustainable development to the post-2015 development agenda. Thematic Think Piece 17. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Think Piece 18. United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN Habitat). (2012). Sustainable urbanization. Thematic Think Piece 18. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Think Piece 4. UNESCO (2012). Education and skills for inclusive and sustainable development beyond 2015. Thematic Think Piece 4. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Think Piece 7. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), UN Development Program (UNDP) and UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2012). Governance and development. Thematic Think Piece 7. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Think Piece 9. Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR). (2012). Towards freedom from fear and want: Human rights in the post-2015 agenda. Thematic Think Piece 9. New York and Geneva: UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. A., & Lee, B. (2010). Language liaisons: Language planning leadership in health care. Language Problems & Language Planning, 34(2), 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L., Gany, F., Rosenfeld, P., Carrasquillo, O., Sharif, I., Behar, E., Ambizas, E., Patel, P., Schwartz, L., & Mangione, R. (2007). Access to multilingual medication instructions at New York City pharmacies. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84(6), 742–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, I. T., & Satterthwaite, M. L. (2017). Leaving no one behind? Persistent inequalities in the SDGs. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(8), 1073–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witcher, S. (2013). Inclusive equality: A vision for social justice. Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yap, M. L.-M., & Watene, K. (2019). The sustainable development goals (SDGs) and indigenous peoples: Another missed opportunity? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20(4), 451–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Fettes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fettes, M. (2023). Language and the Sustainable Development Goals: Challenges to Language Policy and Planning. In: McEntee-Atalianis, L.J., Tonkin, H. (eds) Language and Sustainable Development. Language Policy, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24918-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24918-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24917-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24918-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics