Skip to main content

A Combined Measure Based on Diversification and Accuracy Gains for Forecast Selection in Forecast Combination

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Operations Research Proceedings 2022 (OR 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Operations Research ((LNOR))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recent innovations in the field of forecast combination include integrated methods for forecast selection, weighting and regularization. The methods proposed in related articles first label whether or not forecasters should remain in the selection using information criteria from statistical learning theory. Depending on the selection status, the optimal weights of all forecasters in the sample are then used as baseline to shrink the weights either toward zero or the mean, with the degree of regularization determining the final selection of forecasters. In this paper, we propose a new information criterion reflecting the importance of diversification and accuracy gains in the selection of forecasters for integrated methods. In an iterative procedure motivated by forward feature selection, each forecaster is selected sequentially, while at each step the increase in accuracy and diversification due to the addition of a forecaster to the previous selection is measured. To quantify the increase in diversity, the multiple correlation coefficient is used, which captures the correlation between the previously selected forecasters and a candidate, where the lower the correlation between the candidate and the selection, the higher the gain in diversity for the combination. For the accuracy increase, the accuracy achieved by optimal weight combinations with the previously selected forecasters is compared with the accuracy after adding a candidate. A hyperparameter further enables the trade-off between accuracy and diversification gains in the criterion. Simulation-based studies show scenarios in which our presented information criterion achieves advantages in out-of-sample prediction accuracy over previous criteria for selection by accounting for accuracy and diversification gains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Atiya, A. F. (2020). Why does forecast combination work so well? International Journal of Forecasting, 36, 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.03.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lichtendahl, K. C., & Winkler, R. L. (2020). Why do some combinations perform better than others? International Journal of Forecasting, 36, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.03.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schulz, F., Setzer, T., & Balla, N. (2022). Linear hybrid shrinkage of weights for forecast selection and combination. In: Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, (pp. 2125–2134). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2022.267

  4. Schulz, F. Non-linear hybrid shrinkage of weights for forecast selection and combination. In Wirtschaftsinformatik 2022 Proceedings, (Vol. 7). https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2022/business_analytics/business_analytics/7

  5. Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2004). Combination forecasts of output growth in a seven country data set. Journal Forecast, 23, 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Timmermann, A. (2006). Forecast combinations. Handbook of Economic Forecasting, 1, 135–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0706(05)01004-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yokuma, J. T., & Armstrong, J. S. (1995). Beyond accuracy: Comparison of criteria used to select forecasting methods. International Journal of Forecasting, 11, 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(95)00615-X

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Schulz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schulz, F., Setzer, T., Balla, N. (2023). A Combined Measure Based on Diversification and Accuracy Gains for Forecast Selection in Forecast Combination. In: Grothe, O., Nickel, S., Rebennack, S., Stein, O. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2022. OR 2022. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24907-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics