Abstract
On the basis of economic and user-relevant criteria, this paper proposes an assessment framework for zero-emission vehicles. This framework enables a transparent evaluation of different zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) from the perspective of (potential) customers, based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach for a multi-criteria decision analysis. The relevant criteria for the evaluation were derived from literature and from semi-structured interviews. These interviews were held with individuals having driving experience with both battery electric and fuel cell electric vehicles. An AHP survey was also conducted with ZEV drivers and ZEV-interested individuals for the criteria weights to be determined. Seven criteria were found to be particularly relevant for evaluating zero-emission vehicles: total cost, range, charging/refueling time, charging/refueling infrastructure availability, greenhouse gas emissions, spaciousness, and driving dynamics. The assessment framework includes value scores representing the degree to which a specific ZEV satisfies a given quality criterion. The proposed framework combines these scores with the criteria weights derived in the AHP. The framework is useful for the design of ZEVs by vehicle manufacturers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
ZEV drivers are individuals who have gained experience with BEVs or FCEVs through car sharing, ownership, company vehicles, or rental cars. ZEV-interested individuals keep themselves up to date via podcasts, forums, and newsletters.
References
Global EV Outlook. (2021). https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ed5f4484-f556-4110-8c5c-4ede8bcba637/GlobalEVOutlook2021.pdf. Last accessed Mar 10 2022
A European Green Deal. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/. Last accessed Mar 10 2022
Mandys, F. (2021). Electric vehicles and consumer choices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142, 1–9.
Liao, F., Molin, E., & van Wee, B. (2017). Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: A literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 252–275.
Byun, D. (2001). The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model. Information & Management, 38(5), 289–297.
Vrkljan, B. H., & Anaby, D. (2011). What vehicle features are considered important when buying an automobile? An examination of driver preferences by age and gender. Journal of Safety Research, 42(1), 61–65.
Fujita, K. S., Yang, H., Taylor, M., & Jackman, D. (2022). Green light on buying a car: How consumer decision-making interacts with environmental attributes in the new vehicle purchase process. Transportation Research Record, 2676(7), 743–762.
Raza, S., Masmoudi, M. (2020).Consumer vehicle purchase decision-making during COVID-19. In: 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (pp 692–696) Sakheer, Bahrain.
Fabianek, P., Will, C., Wolff, S., & Madlener, R. (2020). Green and regional? A multi-criteria assessment framework for the provision of green electricity for electric vehicles in Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 1–22.
Fabianek, P., Madlener, R. (2022). A Multi-Criteria Assessment Framework for Evaluating the User Experience at E-Vehicle Charging Stations in Germany. Institute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior. FCN Working Paper No. 6/2022. RWTH Aachen University, May.
Wilson, C. (2013). Interview techniques for UX practitioners.1st edn. Elsevier B.V.
Hackbarth, A., & Madlener, R. (2016). Willingness-to-pay for alternative fuel vehicle characteristics: A stated choice study for Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 89–111.
Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176.
Saaty, T. L. (1991). Some mathematical concepts of the analytic hierarchy process. Behaviormetrika, 18(29), 1–9.
Aull-Hyde, R., Erdogan, S., & Duke, J. M. (2006). An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(1), 290–295.
Haustein, S., & Jensen, A. F. (2018). Factors of electric vehicle adoption: A comparison of conventional and electric car users based on an extended theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(7), 484–496.
Fabianek, P., Madlener, R. (2023). Assessing Zero-Emission Vehicles from the Customer's Perspective using a Multi-Criteria Framework. Institute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior. FCN Working Paper. RWTH Aachen University, in prep.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fabianek, P., Madlener, R. (2023). A Multi-criteria Assessment Framework for Zero-Emission Vehicles from a Customers’ Perspective. In: Grothe, O., Nickel, S., Rebennack, S., Stein, O. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2022. OR 2022. Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24907-5_56
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24907-5_56
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24906-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24907-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)