Skip to main content

Maritime Security in the Age of Autonomous Ships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Autonomous Vessels in Maritime Affairs
  • 486 Accesses

Abstract

Maritime history dates back thousands of years, and one constant throughout this time has been that ships plying the oceans have people aboard. With the appearance of ships without onboard crew on our seascape, this certainty has come to an end. Yet, rules aimed at ensuring maritime security are firmly based on the assumption that perpetrators act from onboard the offender ship and that a human–human encounter between enforcers and suspects at sea takes place, with the possibility for direct interaction and communication as well as an exchange of physical documentation. This chapter probes the consequences that the use of unmanned ships to compromise maritime security entails for the continued applicability and relevance of rules designed to prevent and suppress crime at sea. It concludes that the need for regulatory steps is evident. While a formal amendment of relevant treaties, such as the UNCLOS, the Vienna Convention (1988) and the SUA Conventions (1988, 2005), seems out of sight, the turn to unmanned ships will more likely be accommodated through informal law—at least for the time being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, C. H. (2018). Determining the legal status of unmanned maritime vehicles: Formalism vs functionalism. Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, 49(4), 477–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arctic Sunrise Arbitration (The Netherlands v. Russian Federation). PCA-2014-02. Award on the Merits, 14 August 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates Ramirez, V. (2022). Japan wants to make half its cargo ships autonomous by 2040. Singularity Hub. Available at: https://singularityhub.com/2022/02/23/japan-wants-to-make-half-its-cargo-ships-autonomous-by-2040/. Accessed 24 April 2022.

  • Brundage, M., et al. (2018). The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, L. (2017). All hands off deck? The legal barriers to autonomous ships. Journal of International Maritime Law, 23(3), 202–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • CMI Position Paper. (2018). Comité Maritime International. CMI international working group position paper on unmanned ships and the international regulatory framework 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coito, J. (2021). Maritime autonomous surface ships: New possibilities—and challenges—in ocean law and policy. International Law Studies, 97, 259–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coxworth, B. (2022). Large vehicle-carrying ferry makes first-ever autonomous run in Japan. New Atlas. Available at: https://newatlas.com/marine/smart-coastal-autonomous-ferry. Accessed 3 April 2022.

  • EMSA. (2022). EMSA sniffer drone monitoring sulphur and nitrogen emissions from ships operating in the channel. Available at: www.emsa.europa.eu/newsroom/press-releases/item/4740-emsa-sniffer-drone-monitoring-sulphur-and-nitrogen-emissions-from-ships-operating-in-the-channel.html. Accessed 3 May 2022.

  • Fixed Platforms Protocol. (1988). Protocol to the Convention of 10 March 1988 for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, Mar. 10, 1988, 1678 U.N.T.S. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodmann, M. (2015). Future crimes: Inside the digital underground and the battle for our connected world. Corgi Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, S. (2016). War at sea: Nineteenth-century laws for twenty-first-century wars? International Review of the Red Cross, 98(2), 419–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugstvedt, H. (2021). Red Sea drones: How to counter Houthi maritime tactics. War on the Rocks. Available at: https://warontherocks.com/2021/09/red-sea-drones-how-to-counter-houthi-maritime-tactics. Accessed 7 April 2022.

  • IMO Doc SUA/CONF/CW/WP.18. (1988). Report and interpretation following informal consultation on Article 1 of the convention and on the protocol.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO Doc FAL.5/Circ.39/Rev.2, Annex. (2016). Guidelines for the use of electronic certificates.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO Doc LEG 106/WP.5. (2019). Report of the LEG working group on MASS.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO Doc LEG 107/8/5. (2020). Summary of results of the LEG regulatory scoping exercise for the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO Doc LEG 107/8/17. (2020). Summary of main gaps and common themes in instruments under the purview of the Legal Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO Doc MASS-JWG ½. (2022). Consideration of the common issues identified in the RSE of the three committees and how to best address them.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. (2015). Flag verification on the high seas: Understanding requirements for masters and commanders. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 30, 335–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, R., & Klein, N. (2021). Maritime autonomous vehicles and drug trafficking by sea: Some legal issues. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 36, 389–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes, J. E. (2012). Interpreting the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention and defining its terms. In G. K. Walker (Ed.), Definitions for the law of the sea: Terms not defined by the 1982 Convention (pp. 45–83). Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrig, A. (2020). The commission of maritime crimes with unmanned systems: An interpretive challenge for the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. In M. D. Evans & S. Galani (Eds.), Maritime security and the law of the sea: Help or hindrance? (pp. 123–130). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrig, A. (2021). Autonomous offender ships and international maritime security law. In H. Ringbom, E. Røsæg, & T. Solvang (Eds.), Autonomous ships and the law (pp. 23–55). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrig, A. (2022). Unconventional Law for unconventional ships? The role of informal law in the International Maritime Organization’s quest to regulate maritime autonomous surface ships. In N. Klein (Ed.), Unconventional lawmaking in the law of the sea (pp. 112–136). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters. (2020). Saudi-led coalition says it foiled attack on oil tanker off Yemen. Available at: www.reuters.com/article/yemen-security-tanker-idUKL8N2AX4OE. Accessed 19 May 2022.

  • Sands, L. (2022). Drug smuggling: Underwater drones seized by Spanish police. BBC News. Available at: www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62040790. Accessed 12 April 2022.

  • Sutton, H. I. (2019). First narco-USV. Available at: www.hisutton.com/Otranto_unmanned-drug-vessel.html. Accessed 12 June 2022.

  • SUA Convention. (1988). Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, Mar. 10, 1988, 1678 U.N.T.S. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • SUA Convention. (2005). Protocol of 2005 to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, Oct. 14, 2005. IMO Doc. LEG/CONF.15/21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M. N. (ed.). (2017). Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International law applicable to cyber operations. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Maritime Executive. (2022). China launches its first autonomous container ship service. Available at: https://maritime-executive.com/article/china-reports-first-autonomous-containership-entered-service. Accessed 27 May 2022.

  • Tuckett, C. (2021). UK House of Lords, International Relations and Defence Committee. Corrected oral evidence. UNCLOS: Fit for purpose in the 21st Century? Witness: Commander Caroline Tuckett, lead legal adviser, international law, Royal Navy. Available at: https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/3000/pdf/. Accessed 14 May 2022.

  • UNCLOS. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Dec. 10, 1982, 1833 U.N.T.S. 397.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Navy USV Master Plan. (2007). The Navy unmanned surface vehicle (USV) master plan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hooydonk, E. (2014). The law of unmanned merchant shipping: An exploration. The Journal of International Maritime Law, 20, 403–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vienna Convention. (1988). United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Dec. 20 , 1988, 1582 U.N.T.S. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, E. (2019). Ship registration: Law and practice (3rd ed.). Informa Law.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Petrig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Petrig, A. (2023). Maritime Security in the Age of Autonomous Ships. In: Johansson, T.M., Fernández, J.E., Dalaklis, D., Pastra, A., Skinner, J.A. (eds) Autonomous Vessels in Maritime Affairs. Studies in National Governance and Emerging Technologies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24740-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics