Abstract
Human-robot proxemics behaviors can vary significantly based on personal, robot, and environmental factors which, along with their deployment in public-facing interactions, calls for a wider and in-depth exploration. This paper explores the impact of the operational altitude of small unmanned aerial vehicle (sUAV) on users’ comfortable interaction distance. Additionally, we investigate the effectiveness of crowd-sourced prototyping of human-robot proxemics studies in order to conduct broader research faster. By leveraging interaction techniques from literature like video/sound and projective 2D distancing, we explore personal space interactions in online studies (N = 288) with the sUAV and the Double telepresence robot. We then compare the findings with our in-person interaction data (N = 36) and to prior literature. While in-person interactions are the ultimate goal, online methods can be used to reduce resources (including equipment, costs), allow larger sample sizes, and may lead to a more comprehensive sampling of population than would be expected from in-person studies. The lessons learned from this work are applicable broadly within the social robotics community, even outside those who are interested in proxemics interactions, to conduct future crowd-sourced experiments. The various modalities provided similar trends when compared with data from in-person studies. While the distances may not have been precise compared to those measured in the real world, these experiments are useful to detect patterns in human-robot interactions, and to conduct formative studies with new technology before committing limited resources to in-person testing.
Supported by NSF IIS-175050.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Qualifications and worker task quality (2020). https://blog.mturk.com/qualifications-and-worker-task-quality-best-practices-886f1f4e03fc
Amazon mechanical turk (MTurk) (2022). https://www.mturk.com/
Acharya, U., Bevins, A., Duncan, B.A.: Investigation of human-robot comfort with a small unmanned aerial vehicle compared to a ground robot. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2758–2765. IEEE (2017)
Belmonte, L.M., et al.: Feeling of safety and comfort towards a socially assistive unmanned aerial vehicle that monitors people in a virtual home. Sensors 21(3), 908 (2021)
Cochran, C.D., Hale, W.D., Hissam, C.P.: Personal space requirements in indoor verses outdoor locations. J. Psychol. 117(1), 121 (1984)
Cochran, C., Urbanczyk, S.: The effect of availability of vertical space on personal space. J. Psychol. 111(1), 137–140 (1982)
Duncan, B.A., Murphy, R.R.: Comfortable approach distance with small unmanned aerial vehicles. In: IEEE RO-MAN, pp. 786–792. IEEE (2013)
Hayduk, L.A.: Personal space: an evaluative and orienting overview. Psychol. Bull. 85(1), 117 (1978)
Hedaoo, S., Williams, A., Wadgaonkar, C., Knight, H.: A robot barista comments on its clients: social attitudes toward robot data use. In: 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 66–74. IEEE (2019)
Jia, R., Steelman, Z.R., Reich, B.H.: Using mechanical turk data in is research: risks, rewards, and recommendations. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 41(1), 14 (2017)
Joosse, M.P.: Investigating positioning and gaze behaviors of social robots: people’s preferences, perceptions, and behaviors (2017)
Kidd, C.D.: Sociable robots: the role of presence and task in human-robot interaction. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2003)
Koay, K.L., Syrdal, D.S., Walters, M.L., Dautenhahn, K.: Living with robots: investigating the habituation effect in participants’ preferences during a longitudinal human-robot interaction study. In: 2007 IEEE RO-MAN, pp. 564–569. IEEE (2007)
Lehmann, H., Saez-Pons, J., Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K.: In good company? perception of movement synchrony of a non-anthropomorphic robot. PloS one 10(5), e0127747 (2015)
Li, J.: The benefit of being physically present: a survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 77, 23–37 (2015)
Li, R., van Almkerk, M., van Waveren, S., Carter, E., Leite, I.: Comparing human-robot proxemics between virtual reality and the real world. In: 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 431–439. IEEE (2019)
Oosterhout, T.V., Visser, A.: A visual method for robot proxemics measurements. In: CTIT Technical Reports Series, pp. 61–68 (2008)
Powers, A., Kiesler, S., Fussell, S., Torrey, C.: Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 145–152 (2007)
Rajamohan, V., Scully-Allison, C., Dascalu, S., Feil-Seifer, D.: Factors influencing the human preferred interaction distance. In: 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 1–7 (2019)
Saez-Pons, J., Lehmann, H., Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K.: Development of the sociability of non-anthropomorphic robot home companions. In: 4th International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics, pp. 111–116. IEEE (2014)
Sanders, J.L., Thomas, M.A., Suydam, M., Petri, H.: Use of an auditory technique in personal space measurement. J. Soc. Psychol. 112(1), 99–102 (1980)
Szafir, D., Mutlu, B., Fong, T.: Communication of intent in assistive free flyers. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 358–365 (2014)
Takayama, L., Pantofaru, C.: Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5495–5502. IEEE (2009)
Terpilowski, M.: Scikit-posthocs: pairwise multiple comparison tests in python. J. Open Source Softw. 4(36), 1169 (2019)
Walkey, F.H., Gilmour, D.R.: Comparative evaluation of a videotaped measure of interpersonal distance. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 47(3), 575 (1979)
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the panas scales. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 54(6), 1063 (1988)
Wojciechowska, A., Frey, J., Sass, S., Shafir, R., Cauchard, J.R.: Collocated human-drone interaction: methodology and approach strategy. In: 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 172–181. IEEE (2019)
Woods, S., Walters, M., Koay, K.L., Dautenhahn, K.: Comparing human robot interaction scenarios using live and video based methods: towards a novel methodological approach. In: 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, vol. 2006, pp. 750–755. IEEE (2006)
Woods, S.N., Walters, M.L., Koay, K.L., Dautenhahn, K.: Methodological issues in hri: a comparison of live and video-based methods in robot to human approach direction trials. In: 2006 IEEE RO-MAN, pp. 51–58. IEEE (2006)
Xu, Q., et al.: Effect of scenario media on human-robot interaction evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 275–276 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kunde, S., Simms, N., Uriarte, G., Duncan, B. (2022). Let’s Run an Online Proxemics Study! But, How Do Results Compare to In-Person?. In: Cavallo, F., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13817. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24667-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24667-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24666-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24667-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)