Skip to main content

Why Design Thinking Matters in Healthcare

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Thinking in Healthcare
  • 379 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces reader to the basics of the design thinking process from empathy to testing designed products and services. It discusses issues from the perspective of healthcare. Design thinking offers a framework and methods for complex problem solving applied widely by various disciplines. It is traditionally associated with the business, innovation, and customer-oriented development of products and services, where the goal is to gain success, sustainability, and customer benefit. Design thinking has received increasing attention also in healthcare, where patients’ needs and experiences should be viewed as sources of innovation. Aging population, complex health challenges, financial pressures, shortage of healthcare staff, and the demand for patient-centered approach in healthcare provide the basis for applying design thinking to develop better healthcare services and health technology solutions. Design thinking can be viewed as a systematic innovation and iterative process that puts emphasis into deep empathy for end-user perceptions, needs, and challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braha D, Reich Y (2003) Topological structures for modeling engineering design processes. Res Eng Des 14(4):185–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-003-0035-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Razzouk R, Shute V (2012) What is design thinking and why is it important? Rev Educ Res 82(3):330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maula H, Maula J (2019) Design ja johtaminen. Alma Talent, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts JP, Fisher TR, Trowbridge MJ, Bent C (2016) A design thinking framework for healthcare management and innovation. Healthc (Amst) 4(1):11–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernstein A (2015) The evolution of design thinking (full issue). Harvard Business Review, September, p 93

    Google Scholar 

  6. McLaughlin JE, Wolcott MD, Hubbard D, Umstead K, Rider TR (2019) A qualitative review of the design thinking framework in health professions education. BMC Med Educ 19(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1528-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein RM, Fiscella K, Lesser CS, Stange KC (2010) Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 29(8):1489–1495. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cliff B (2012) The evolution of patient-centered care. J Healthc Manag 57(2):86–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/00115514-201203000-00003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim SH, Myers CG, Allen L (2017) Health care providers can use design thinking to improve patient experiences. Harv Bus Rev 95(5):222–229

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dell’Era C, Magistretti S, Cautela C, Verganti R, Zurlo F (2020) Four kinds of design thinking: from ideating to making, engaging, and criticizing. Creat Innov Manag 29(2):324–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Austin C (2015) Design thinking: expanding the frame of reference. A study of concepts, ideas and thinking tools developed by Edward de Bono that have potential within a design process and design thinking framework. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Swinburne University. https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/items/a3edaa30-f026-4992-af96-1fb05c8ccc3e/1/

  12. Waidelich L, Richter A, Kolmel B, Bulander R (2018) Design thinking process model review. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC). IEEE, Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  13. Altman M, Huang TTK, Breland JY (2018) Design thinking in health care. Prev Chronic Dis 15(180128):E117. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Badwan B, Bothara R, Latijnhouwers M, Smithies A, Sandars J (2018) The importance of design thinking in medical education. Med Teach 40(4):425–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1399203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin RL (2009) The opposable mind: winning through integrative thinking. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  16. Plattner H, Meinel C (2010) In: Leifer L (ed) Design thinking: understand-improve-apply. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Geissdoerfer M, Bocken NMP, Hultink EJ (2016) Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business modelling process – a workshop based on a value mapping process. J Clean Prod 135:1218–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cross N (2001) Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Des Issues 17(3):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oliveira M, Zancul E, Fleury AL (2021) Design thinking as an approach for innovation in healthcare: systematic review and research avenues. BMJ Innov 7(2):491–498. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2020-000428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stempfle J, Badke-Schaube P (2002) Thinking in design teams-an analysis of team communication. Des Stud 23:473–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seidel VP, Fixson SK (2013) Adopting design thinking in novice multidisciplinary teams: the application and limits of design methods and reflexive practices: adopting design thinking in novice teams. J Prod Innov Manag 30:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ogura S, Jakovljevic MM (2018) Global population aging-health care, social and economic consequences. Front Public Health 6:335

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Feng Z (2019) Global convergence: aging and long-term care policy challenges in the developing world. J Aging Soc Policy 31(4):291–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2019.1626205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization (2016) Global strategy on human resources for health: workforce 2030. WHO document production services, Geneva; Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250368/?sequence=1

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ferreira FK, Song EH, Gomes H, Garcia EB, Ferreira LM (2015) New mindset in scientific method in the health field: design thinking. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 70(12):770–772. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(12)01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anni Pakarinen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pakarinen, A. (2023). Why Design Thinking Matters in Healthcare. In: Pakarinen, A., Lemström, T., Rainio, E., Siirala, E. (eds) Design Thinking in Healthcare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24510-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24510-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24509-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24510-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics