Skip to main content

Negative Partisanship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communicating Politics Online
  • 151 Accesses

Abstract

Digital mobile technology creates a variety of impacts on the end user and democracy generally. The use of ideological news and social media is constant, making our political affiliations an ever-greater part of our identities. Those identities can become more tribal and focus on small-group affiliations thanks to social media’s ability to directly connect niche interests, and that tribalism leads to a strain of polarization known as negative partisanship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramowitz, Alan, and Jennifer McCoy. 2019. Racial Resentment, Negative Partisanship, and Polarization In Trump’s America. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681: 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, Alan, and Steven Webster. 2018. Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties but Behave Like Rabid Partisans. Political Psychology 39: 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amira, Karyn, Jennifer Cole Wright, and Daniela Goya-Tocchetto. 2021. In-Group Love Versus Out-Group Hate: Which is More Important to Partisans and When? Political Behavior 43: 473–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auxier, Brooke. 2020, Otober 15. 64% of Americans Say Social Media have a Mostly Negative Effect on the Way Things Are Going in the U.S. Today. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/10/15/64-of-americans-say-social-media-have-a-mostly-negative-effect-on-the-way-things-are-going-in-the-u-s-today/. Accessed 20 Oct 2022.

  • Bankert, Alexa. 2020. The Origins and Effect of Negative Partisanship. In Research Handbook on Political Partisanship, eds. Henrik Oscarsson and Sören Holmberg, 89–01. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Caleb, and Rebecca Hayes. 2015. Social Media: Defining, Developing, and Divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication 23: 46–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabris, Matteo, Davide Marengo, Claudio Longobardi, and Michele Settanni. 2020. Investigating the Links Between Fear of Missing Out, Social Media Addiction, and Emotional Symptoms in Adolescence: The Role of Stress Associated with Neglect and Negative Reactions on Social Media. Addictive Behaviors 106: 106364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris, Robert, Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center Research: n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halevy, Ni, Ori Weisel, and Gary Bornstein. 2012. “In‐Group Love” and “Out‐Group Hate” in Repeated Interaction Between Groups. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 25: 188–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiaeshutter-Rice, Dan, and Ian Hawkins. 2022. The Language of Extremism on Social Media: An Examination of Posts, Comments, and Themes on Reddit. Frontiers in Political Science: n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Donna, Christopher Larimer, Alison Howard, Raul Madrid Jr, Mirya Holman, Abby Perkins, and Carrie Skulley. 2017. Unconventional, Partisan, and Polarizing Rhetoric: How the 2016 Election Shaped the Way Candidates Strategize, Engage, and Communic. Lanham, Md: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Hae Yeon, Jeremy Jamieson, Harry Reis, Christopher Beevers, Robert Josephs, Michael Mullarkey, Joseph O’Brien, and David S. Yeager. 2020. Getting Fewer “Likes” than Others on Social Media Elicits Emotional Distress Among Victimized Adolescents. Child Development 91: 2141–2159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Paul, Clement So, Francis Lee, Louis Leung, and Michael Chan. 2018. Social Media and Political Partisanship—A Subaltern Public Sphere’s Role in Democracy. Telematics and Informatics 35 (7): 1949–1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, Karen. 2014. The Evolution of Social Media from 1969 to 2013: A Change in Competition and a Trend Toward Complementary, Niche Sites. The Journal of Social Media in Society: n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall, and Bruce Powers. 1989. The Global Village : Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naftulin, Julia. 2016, July 13. Here's How Many Times We Touch Our Phones Every Day. https://www.businessinsider.com/dscout-research-people-touch-cell-phones-2617-times-a-day-2016-7. Accessed 15 Aug 2022.

  • Nesi, Jacqueline, Andrew Rothenberg, Alexandra H. Bettis, Maya Massing-Schaffer, Kara Fox, Eva Telzer, Kristen Lindquist, and Mitchell Prinstein. 2022. Emotional Responses to Social Media Experiences Among Adolescents: Longitudinal Associations with Depressive Symptoms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 51: 907–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web is Changing What We Read and How We Think. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeples, Lynne. 2018, December 14. Can’t Put Down the Phone? How Smartphones are Changing Our Brains—and Lives. https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/surprising-ways-smartphones-affect-our-brains-our-lives-ncna947566. Accessed 22 Oct 2022.

  • Ramirez, Courtney. 2022, July 10. Platform Counts. https://nealschaffer.com/differences-between-facebook-twitter-linkedin-writing/. Accessed 10 Oct 2022.

  • Ridge, Hannah. 2020. Enemy Mine: Negative Partisanship and Satisfaction with Democracy. Political Behavior 42: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robards, B. 2018. Belonging and Neo-Tribalism on Social Media Site Reddit. In Neo-Tribes, eds. A. Hardy, A. Bennett, and B. Robards, 187–206. Campaign-Urbana, IL: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnberg, Petter. 2022. How Digital Media Drive Affective Polarization Through Partisan Sorting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119: e2207159119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacks, Yehuda, and Aviv Weinstein. 2021, May 28. Excessive Smartphone Use Is Associated With Health Problems in Adolescents and Young Adults. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8204720/. Accessed 10 Oct 2022.

  • Yu, Xudong, Magdalena Wojcieszak, and Andreu Casas. 2021, August 15. Affective Polarization on Social Media: In-Party Love Among American Politicians, Greater Engagement with Out-Party Hate Among Ordinary Users. osf.io. https://osf.io/rhmb9/download. Accessed 20 Oct 2022.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chapman Rackaway .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rackaway, C. (2023). Negative Partisanship. In: Communicating Politics Online. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24056-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics