Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Polarizing Media, Polarizing Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communicating Politics Online

  • 150 Accesses

Abstract

Partisan polarization is a topic of great attention, both to scholars and the general public. Polarization is a gradual process, but one that appears to have accelerated significantly over the last fifteen years. Digital mobile communication technology has exposed polarization to the public but also reinforced existing trends that encourage polarization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Althaus, Scott, and David Tewksbury. 2002. Agenda Setting and the “New” News: Patterns of Issue Importance Among Readers of the Paper and Online Versions of the New York Times. Communication Research 29: 180–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, Larry. 2006. Priming and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. In Capturing Campaign Effects, eds. Henry Brady and Richard Johnston, 78–114. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Matthew, and Tim Groeling. 2008. New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse. Political Communication 25: 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, Dan, Stefan Krasa, and Mattias Polborn. 2008. Political Polarization and the Electoral Effects of Media Bias. Journal of Public Economics 92: 1092–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Gina. 2019. Social Media and Scandal. In The Routledge Companion to Media and Scandal, eds. Howard Tumber and Silvio Waisbord, 165–173. Lanham, MD: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Xi, and Yu Liu. 2018. How Does Online News Curate Linked Sources? A Content Analysis of Three Online News Media. Journalism 18: 852–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, Torun, Macartan Humphreys, and Daniel Rubenson. 2014. The Elements of Political Persuasion: Content, Charisma and Cue. The Economic Journal 124: F257–F292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eveland, William, Krisztina Marton, and Mihye Seo. 2004. Moving Beyond “Just the Facts”: The Influence of Online News on the Content and Structure of Public Affairs Knowledge. Communication Research 31: 82–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, Holly. 2014. Managing Political Polarization in Congress: A Case Study on the Use of the Hastert Rule. Utah Law Review 2014: 757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferling, John. 2004. Adams vs. Jefferson: The Tumultuous Election of 1800. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, Daniel. 2020. Party Domination and Base Mobilization: Donald Trump and Republican Party Building in a Polarized Era. The Forum 18: 135–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghersetti, Marina. 2014. Still the Same? Comparing News Content in Online and Print Media. Journalism Practice 8: 373–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnson, Paul. 1986. Do Parties Make a Difference? The Role of Party Organizations in Congressional Elections. The Journal of Politics 48: 589–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Seth. 2017. Changing Votes or Changing Voters? How Candidates and Election Context Swing Voters and Mobilize the Base. Electoral Studies 48: 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary. 2000. Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection. In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, vol. 5, eds. Jon Bond and Richard Fleisher, 17–18. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Youngju. 2015. Exploring the Effects of Source Credibility and Others’ Comments on Online News Evaluation. Electronic News 9: 160–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkland, Justin. 2014. Ideological Heterogeneity and Legislative Polarization in the United States. Political Research Quarterly 67: 533–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Heather. 2018, February 10. Continuing Resolutions and Other Budget Uncertainties Present Management Challenges. In: Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Federal Spending Oversight and Emergency Management, Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs, U.S. Se nate. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, Isabelle, and Juliane Lischka. 2019. Is Audience Engagement Worth the Buzz? The Value of Audience Engagement, Comment Reading, and Content for Online News Brands. Journalism 20: 714–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubin, Emily, and Christian von Sikorski. 2021. The Role of (Social) Media in Political Polarization: A Systematic Review. Annals of the International Communication Association 45: 188–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonhard, Larissa, Veronika Karnowski, and Anna Sophie Kümpel. 2020. Online and (the Feeling of Being) Informed: Online News Usage Patterns and their Relation to Subjective and Objective Political Knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior 103: 181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, Nolan, Keith Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2009. Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization? American Journal of Political Science 53: 666–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall. 1994. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nokken, Timothy, and Keith Poole. 2004. Congressional Party Defection in American History. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29: 545–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Erik, Sharad Goel, and Shanto Iyengar. 2021. Partisan Selective Exposure in Online News Consumption: Evidence from the 2016 Presidential Campaign. Political Science Research and Methods 9: 242–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Keith, and Howard Rosenthal. 2001. D-Nominate After 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly 26: 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynauld, Vincent, and André Turcotte. 2018. “Different Strokes for Different Folks”: Implications of Voter Micro-Targeting and Appeal in the Age of Donald Trump. In Political Marketing in the 2016 US Presidential Election, ed. Jamie Gillies, 11–28. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Jason, Jacob Smith, and Sarah Treul. 2016. Party Committee Targeting and the Evolution of Competition in US House Elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 26: 96–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Andrew, and Delia Dumitrescu. 2019. Vox Twitterati’: Investigating the Effects of Social Media Exemplars in Online News Articles. Journal of Development Policy and Practice 21: 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, Larry. 1991. Feeding Frenzy: How Attack Journalism has Transformed American Politics. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Ananya, and Pinar Yildirim. 2015, June 16. Clicks Bias in Editorial Decisions: How Does Popularity Shape Online News Coverage? https://ssrn.com/abstract=2619440. Accessed 12 Sept 2022.

  • Sides, John, and Daniel Hopkins. 2015. Political Polarization in American Politics. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wezerk, Gus. 2018, Feburary 7. 20 Years Of Congress’s Budget Procrastination, In One Chart. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/20-years-of-congresss-budget-procrastination-in-one-chart/. Accessed 20 Oct 2022.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Radford University, Radford, VA, USA

    Chapman Rackaway

Authors
  1. Chapman Rackaway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chapman Rackaway .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rackaway, C. (2023). Polarizing Media, Polarizing Politics. In: Communicating Politics Online. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24056-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation