Abstract
In this chapter we outline the form of governance that, we argue, should be the preferred form of governing wicked problems: the trans-active governance as politics of problematization which would be governing them without reducing them as processes, and treating them as un-owned processes. This leads us to discussing the contingency of the socio-political world, and the role of failure in governance. Consequently, we put forth an approach that we call “failure governance,” which would not see governance failure as an aberration, but as something to be presumed from the beginning and governed through self-reflective irony, requisite variety of responses and reflexive orientation. Here we draw heavily on Bob Jessop’s notion of metagovernance. Finally, we discuss why governance failure often happens, when it comes to wicked problems. This is the concluding chapter of Part I of the book, whose aim was to set the stage for a relational understanding of wicked problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alford, J., & Head, B. W. (2017). Wicked and less wicked problems: A typology and a contingency framework. Policy and Society, 36(3), 397–413.
Argyris, C., & Donald, S. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Addison-Wesley.
Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Pearson.
Bacchi, C. (2016). Problematizations in health policy: Questioning how “problems” are constituted in policies. SAGE Open, 6(2), 1–16.
Bang, H. (2003a). Governance as political communication. In H. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication (pp. 7–23). Manchester University Press.
Bang, H. (2003b). A new ruler meeting a new citizen: Culture governance and everyday making. In H. Bang (Ed.), Governance, as social and political communication (pp. 241–266). Manchester University Press.
Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press.
Bevir, M. (2003). A decentred theory of governance. In H. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication (pp. 200–221). Manchester University Press.
Bevir, M. (2004). Governance and interpretation: What are the implications of postfoundationalism? Public Administration, 82(3), 605–625.
Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. (2006). Governance stories. Routledge.
Brewer, J. (2013). The public value of the social sciences. An interpretive essay. Bloomsbury.
Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences: an introduction. London and New York: Routledge
Chia, R., & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy without design. The silent efficacy of indirect action. Cambridge University Press.
Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. John Wiley.
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the known. Beacon Press.
Dudley, G., Parsons, W., Radaelli, C. M., & Sabatier, P. (2000). Symposium. Theories of the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(1), 122–140.
Fraher, A., & Grint, K. (2018). Agonistic governance: The antinomies of decision-making in US Navy SEALs. Leadership, 14(2), 220–239.
Grint, K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of “leadership”. Human Relations, 58(11), 1467–1494.
Grint, K. (2010a). Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: The role of leadership. In S. Brookes & K. Grint (Eds.), The new public leadership challenge (pp. 169–186). Palgrave.
Grint, K. (2010b). Leadership: A very short introduction. Oxford University PRess.
Hay, C. (2011). Interpreting interpretivism interpreting interpretations: The new hermeneutics of public administration. Public Administration, 89(1), 167–182.
Head, B. W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy, 3(2), 101–118.
Head, B. W. (2018). Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society, 38(2), 180–197.
Hoppe, R. (2010). The governance of problems. Puzzling, powering, participation. The Policy Press.
Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Polity.
Jessop, B. (2003). Governance and metagovernance: On reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In H. Bang (Ed.), Governance, as social and political communication (pp. 101–116). Manchester University Press.
Jessop, B. (2004). Multilevel governance and multilevel metagovernance. Changes in the EU.
Jessop, B. (2009). From governance to governance failure and from multi-level governance to multi-scalar meta-governance. In B. Arts, A. Lagendijk, & H. J. v. Houtum (Eds.), The disoriented state: Shifts in governmentality, territoriality and governance (pp. 79–98). Springer.
Jessop, B., (2011). Metagovernance. In: M. Bevir (ed). The Sage handbook of governance (106–123). London: Sage.
Jessop, B. (2016a). The state: Past, present, future. Polity.
Jessop, B. (2016b). Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 8–32.
Jessop, B. (2022). Putting civil society in its place. Policy Press.
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2015). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Sage.
Kooiman, J., & Jentoft, S. (2009). Meta-governance: Values, norms and principles, and the making of hard choices. Public Administration, 87(4), 818–836.
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
Malpas, J., & Wickham, G. (1995). Governance and failure: On the limits of sociology. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 31(3), 37–50.
Marchart, O. (2007). Post-foundational political thought: Political difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh University Press.
Mayer, I., van Daalen, E., & Bots, P. (2012). Policy analytical styles. In E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, & X. Wu (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public policy (pp. 255–270). Routledge.
Mayer, I., van Daalen, E., & Bots, P. (2013). Perspectives on policy analysis: A framework for understanding and design. In W. Thissen & W. Walker (Eds.), Public policy analysis. New developments (pp. 41–64). Springer.
Meuleman, L. (2008). Public management and the metagovernance of hierarchies, networks and markets: The feasibility of designing and managing governance style combinations. Springer Science & Business Media.
Meuleman, L. (2013). Cultural diversity and sustainability metagovernance. In L. Meuleman (Ed.), Transgovernance (pp. 37–81). Springer.
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. London and New York: Routledge.
Ney, S., & Verweij, M. (2015). Messy institutions for wicked problems: How to generate clumsy solutions? Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy, 33(6).
Ostrom, E. (1998). Behavioural approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22.
Parsons, W. (1995). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Richardson, K. (2007). Complex systems thinking and its implications for policy analysis. In G. Morcöl (Ed.), Handbook of decision making (pp. 189–221). CRS Press.
Richardson, K. and Cilliers, P. 2001. Special Editors’ Introduction: What Is Complexity Science? A View from Different Directions. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 3(1), 5–23
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
Romme, G., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (1999). Circular organizing and triple loop learning. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(5), 439–454.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, solidarity. Cambridge University Press.
Schön, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic Books.
Selg, P. (2016). “The fable of the Bs”: Between substantialism and deep relational thinking about power. Journal of Political Power, 9(2), 183–205.
Selg, P. (2018). Power and relational sociology. In F. Dépelteau (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology (pp. 539–557). Palgrave Macmillan.
Sørensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98–114.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258.
Tosey, P., Visser, M., & Saunders, M. N. K. (2012). The origins and conceptualizations of “triple-loop” learning: A critical review. Management Learning, 43(3), 291–307.
Verweij, M., & Thompson, M. (2006). Clumsy solutions for a complex world: Governance, politics and plural perceptions. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wagenaar, H. (2011). Meaning in action: Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. Routledge.
Wendt, A. (2015). The quantum mind and social science. Unifying physical and social ontology. Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Selg, P., Sootla, G., Klasche, B. (2023). From Governance Failure to Failure Governance: A Relational Approach to Governing Wicked Problems. In: A Relational Approach to Governing Wicked Problems. Palgrave Studies in Relational Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24034-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24034-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24033-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24034-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)