Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inconsistency Reduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Pairwise Comparisons

Part of the book series: Multiple Criteria Decision Making ((MCDM))

  • 120 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the problem of inconsistency reduction—if a pairwise comparisons matrix is inconsistent beyond a given threshold, it has to be modified. After a brief review of the literature, several iterative and non-iterative algorithms and approaches for inconsistency reduction are provided and numerically compared via Monte Carlo simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abel, E., Mikhailov, L., & Keane, J. (2018). Inconsistency Reduction in decision making via multi-objective optimisation. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(1), 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benítez, J., Delgado-Galván, X., Gutiérrez, J. A., & Izquierdo, J. (2011). Balancing consistency and expert judgment in AHP. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54, 1785–1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2010.12.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benítez, J., Delgado-Galván, X., Izquierdo, J., & Pérez-García, R. (2011). Achieving matrix consistency in AHP through linearization. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.03.013

  4. Benítez, J., Delgado-Galván, X., Izquierdo, J., & Pérez-García, R. (2012). Improving consistency in AHP decision-making processes. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(5), 2432–2441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benítez, J., Izquierdo, J., Pérez-García, R., & Ramos-Martínez, E. (2014). A simple formula to find the closest consistent matrix to a reciprocal matrix. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38, 3968–3974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozóki, S., Fülöp, J., & Poesz, A. (2011). On pairwise comparison matrices that can be made consistent by the modification of a few elements. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 19(2), 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bozóki, S., Fülöp, J., & Poesz, A. (2015). On reducing inconsistency of pairwise comparison matrices below an acceptance threshold. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 23, 849–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-014-0346-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao, D., Leung, L. C., & Law, J. S. (2008). Modifying inconsistent comparison matrix in analytic hierarchy process: A heuristic approach. Decision Support Systems, 44, 944–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ergu, D., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Shi, Y. (2011). A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP. European Journal of Operational Research, 213, 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finan, J. S., & Hurley, W. J. (1997). The analytic hierarchy process: Does adjusting a pairwise comparison matrix to improve the consistency ratio help? Computers and Operations Research, 24(8), 749–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao, J., Shan, R., Cui, H., & Ren, W. (2011). A new method for modification consistency of the judgment matrix based on genetic ant algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, 6(1), 1903–1906. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMT.2011.6002416

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gastes, D., & Gaul, W. (2012). The consistency adjustment problem of AHP pairwise comparison matrices. In A. Diamantopoulos, W. Fritz, & L. Hildebrandt (Eds.), Quantitative marketing and marketing management. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3722-3_2

  13. Gaul, W., & Gastes, D. (2012). A note on consistency improvements of AHP paired comparison data. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 6(4), 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Girsang, A. S., Tsai, C.-W., & Yang, C.-S. (2015). Ant algorithm for modifying an inconsistent pairwise weighting matrix in an analytic hierarchy process. Neural Computing and Applications, 26(2), 313–327. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1630-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. González-Pachón, J., & Romero, C. (2004). A method for dealing with inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research, 158, 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grzybowski, A. Z. (2016). New results on inconsistency indices and their relationship with the quality of priority vector estimation. Expert Systems with Applications, 43, 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.08.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Holsztynski W., & Koczkodaj W. W. (1996). Convergence of Inconsistency Algorithms for the Pairwise Comparisons. Information Processing Letters, 59(4), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(96)00113-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ishizaka, A., & Lusti, M. (2004). An expert module to improve the consistency of AHP matrices. International Transactions in Operational Research, 11, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2004.00443.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishizaka, A., & Siraj, S. (2020). Interactive consistency correction in the analytic hierarchy process to preserve ranks. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 43, 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-020-00309-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jarek, S. (2016). Removing inconsistency in pairwise comparisons matrix in the AHP. Multiple Criteria Decision Making, 11, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kendall, M. (1948). Rank correlation methods. Charles Griffin & Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Koczkodaj, W. W., & Orlowski, M. (1999). Computing a consistent approximation to a generalized pairwise comparisons matrix. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 37, 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Koczkodaj, W. W., & Szarek, S. J. (2010). On distance-based inconsistency reduction algorithms for pairwise comparisons. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 18(6), 859–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Koczkodaj, W. W., Szybowski, J., Kosiek, M., & Xu, D. (2015). Fast convergence of distance-based inconsistency in pairwise comparisons. Fundamenta Informaticae, 137(3), 355–3671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kou, G., & Lin, C. (2014). A cosine maximization method for the priority vectorderivation in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(1), 225–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kowal, B., Kuras, P. Strzalka, D., Mazurek, J., & Perzina, R. (2021). REDUCE: An online decision support tool for reduction of inconsistency in multiplicative pairwise comparisons. In 3rd International conference on Decision making for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Karvina: Silesian University in Opava, School of Business Administration in Karvina (pp. 294–300).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kulakowski, K., Juszczyk, R., & Ernst, S. (2015). A concurrent inconsistency reduction algorithm for the pairwise comparisons method. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing ICAISC 2015: Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (pp. 214–222).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li, H. L., & Ma, L., C. (2007). Detecting and adjusting ordinal and cardinal inconsistencies through a graphical and optimal approach in AHP models. Computers and Operations Research, 34, 780–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2005.05.010

  29. Linares, P. (2009). Are inconsistent decisions better? An experiment with pairwise comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 492–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Magnot, J.-P., Mazurek, J., & Ciernanova, V. (2021). A gradient method for inconsistency reduction of pairwise comparisons matrices. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 152, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2022.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mazurek, J., Perzina, R., Strzalka, D., & Kowal, B., (2020). A new step-by-step (SBS) algorithm for inconsistency reduction in pairwise comparisons. IEEE Access, 8, 135821–135828. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3011551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mazurek, J., Perzina, R., Strzalka, D., Kowal B., & Kuras, P. (2021). A numerical comparison of iterative algorithms for inconsistency reduction in pairwise comparisons. IEEE Access, 9, 62553–62561. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3074274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Negahban, A. (2018). Optimizing consistency improvement of positive reciprocal matrices with implications for Monte Carlo Analytic Hierarchy Process. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 124, 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pan, V. Y., & Chen, Z. Q. (1999). The complexity of the matrix eigenproblem. In ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (pp. 507–516).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pankratova, N., & Nedashkovskaya, N. (2015). Methods of evaluation and improvement of consistency of expert pairwise comparison judgements. Information Theories and Applications, 22(3), 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pereira V., & Costa, H. G. (2015). Nonlinear programming applied to the reduction of inconsistency in the AHP method. Annals of Operations Research, 229, 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1750-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pereira, V., & Costa, H. G. (2018). AHP inconsistency reduction through two greedy algorithms application. https://doi.org/10.31224/osf.io/bhga9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Saaty, T. L. (1980). Analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Saaty, T. L. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process–what is it and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Szybowski, J. (2018). The improvement of data in pairwise comparison matrices. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 1006–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Temesi, J. (2019). An interactive approach to determine the elements of a pairwise comparison matrix. Central European Journal of Operational Research, 27, 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-018-0539-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tseng, T. Y., Lin, S. W., Huang, C. L., & Lee, R. (2006). Inconsistency adjustment in the AHP using the complete transitivity convergence algorithm. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 4, Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2006.385299

  43. Vasconcelos, G. R., & de Miranda Mota, C. R. (2019). Exploring multi criteria elicitation model based on pairwise comparisons: Building an interactive preference adjustment algorithm. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2125740

  44. Xia, M., & Chen, J. (2015). Consistency and consensus improving methods for pairwise comparison matrices based on Abelian linearly ordered group. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 266, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2014.07.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Xu, Z., & Wei, C. (1999). A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 116, 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00109-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xu, K., & Xu, J. (2020). A direct consistency test and improvement method for the analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09323-y

  47. Zhang, B., Pedrycz, W., Fayek, A.R., & Dong, Y. A. (2022). Differential evolution-based consistency improvement method in AHP with an optimal allocation of information granularity. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52(7), 6733–6744. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3035909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang, H., Sekhari, A., Ouzrout, Y., & Bouras, A. (2014). Optimal inconsistency repairing of pairwise comparison matrices using integrated linear programming and eigenvector methods. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Mathematical Problems in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/989726

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Silesian University in Opava, Orlova, Czech Republic

    Jiri Mazurek

Authors
  1. Jiri Mazurek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mazurek, J. (2023). Inconsistency Reduction. In: Advances in Pairwise Comparisons. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23884-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation