Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Students’ Environmental Awareness and Low-Carbon Behavior: Exploring the Differences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Perspectives and Paradigms in Applied Economics and Business

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

Young people are generally well aware of the importance of transitioning to a low-carbon economy. However, there is a significant gap between awareness of the importance of a low-carbon transition and actual behavior. The main aim of this paper is to explore the relationship between these two dimensions and, accordingly, using the k-means cluster method, create a typology of young people, Croatian university students. In addition, the paper is focused on examining the association between cluster membership and selected demographic variables. The application of the cluster method on the data collected by a survey in 2021 resulted in three significantly different, stable, and meaningful clusters. They differ in the extent to which respondents are aware of the importance of a low-carbon economy and the extent to which they engage in low-carbon behavior. The first cluster includes about 5% of respondents who are quite skeptical but often engaged in low-carbon activities. The second cluster includes trusting respondents who sometimes engage in low-carbon activities. This cluster consists of about 68% of respondents. The last cluster includes skeptical respondents who are mostly opposed (rarely active) to low-carbon behavior. The non-parametric chi-square tests suggest that, unlike the selected demographic variables (e.g., gender, financial situation, previously completed study program, field of education, or household size), there is not enough evidence to confirm the existence of the association between rural/urban living environment and cluster membership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ivanova, D., Stadler, K., Steen-Olsen, K., Wood, R., Vita, G., Tukker, A., & Hertwich, E. G. (2016). Environmental impact assessment of household consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(3), 526–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. IPCC Homepage: Global warming of 1.5°C. (2018). https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_High_Res.pdf. Last accessed 16 Mar 2022.

  3. Larson, L. R., Stedman, R. C., Cooper, C. B., & Decker, D. J. (2015). Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43(4), 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Varela-Candamio, L., Novo-Corti, I., & García-Álvarez, M. T. (2018). The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170(1), 1565–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, W., & Li, J. (2019). Who are the low-carbon activists? Analysis of the influence mechanism and group characteristics of low-carbon behavior in Tianjin, China. The Science of the Total Environment, 683, 729–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bosworth, G. J. (2019). The influence of values on environmental behaviour: an evaluation of a segmentation approach. Doctoral dissertation, Keele University, Great Britain. http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/6086/. Last accessed 20 Feb 2022.

  7. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barr, S., Gilg, A. W., & Ford, N. (2005). The household energy gap: Examining the divide between habitual- and purchase-related conservation behaviours. Energy Policy, 33(11), 1425–1444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, S. P., Ma, S. Z., Pan, Y., Li, Y., Yuan, Y. H., Tsai, S. B. (2020). An empirical study on how climate and environmental issues awareness affects low carbon use behaviour. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering 27(1).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, Y., Liu, R., & Jiang, X. (2019). What drives low-carbon consumption behavior of Chinese college students? The regulation of situational factors. Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 95(1), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schipper, L., Bartlett, S., Hawk, D., & Vine, E. (1989). Linking life-styles and energy use: A matter of time? Annual Review of Energy, 14(1), 273–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feng, Z. H., Zou, L. L., & Wei, Y. M. (2010). Study on the relationship between Chinese residents’ living and Co2 emissions. Energy of China 32(3).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klöckner, C. A., Nayum, A., & Mehmetoglu, M. (2013). Positive and negative spillover effects from electric car purchase to car use. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 21, 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Truelove, H. B., Carrico, A. R., Weber, E. U., Raimi, K. T., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 29, 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin, S. M. (2016). Reducing students’ carbon footprints using personal carbon footprint management system based on environmental behavioural theory and persuasive technology. Environmental Education Research, 22(5), 658–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bai, Y., Liu, Y. (2013). An exploration of residents’ low-carbon awareness and behavior in Tianjin, China. Energy Policy 61(C), 1261–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abdul Aziz, N. J., Mohd, Y. M., & Yismail, N. A. (2015). Developing low-carbon awareness and low-carbon behavior framework for tackling CO2 emission in a city. Applied Mechanics and Material, 747(1), 265–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfeifer, S., Stanic, M., Borozan, D. J. (2021). Students’ intentions for going green - extending the pro-environmental theory of planned behavior. In Proceedings of the 38th International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA) (pp. 1009–1017). IBIMA, Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., Van Der Werff, E., & Lurvink, J. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46(2), 163–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bamberg, S., & Moser, G. (2007). Twenty Years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Árnadóttir, Á., Czepkiewicz, M., & Heinonen, J. (2019). The geographical distribution and correlates of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors in an urban region. Energies, 12(8), 1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tolppanen, S., & Kang, J. (2020). The effect of values on carbon footprint and attitudes towards pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production 282, 124524).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Niemeyer, S. (2010). Consumer voices: adoption of residential energy-efficient practices. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 140–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinsson, J., & Lundqvist, L. J. (2010). Ecological citizenship: Coming out ‘clean’ without turning ‘green’? Environmental Politics, 19(4), 518–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lavelle, M. J., Rau, H., & Fahy, F. (2015). Different shades of green? Unpacking habitual and occasional pro-environmental behavior. Global Environmental Change, 35(1), 368–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Blömer, J., Lammersen, C., Schmidt, M., & Sohler, C. (2016). Theoretical analysis of the K-means algorithm—A survey. In: Kliemann, L., Sanders, P. (Eds.) Algorithm Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Khandare, A., & Alvi, A. S. (2016). Survey of improved k-means clustering algorithms: Improvements, shortcomings and scope for further enhancement and scalability. In: Satapathy, S., Mandal, J., Udgata, S., Bhateja, V. (Eds.) Information systems design and intelligent applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liu, Y., Wang, N., & Zhao, J. (2018). Relationships between isomorphic pressures and carbon management imitation behaviour of firms. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cadez, S., Czerny, A., & Letmathe, P. (2019). Stakeholder pressures and corporate climate change mitigation strategies. Business Strategy & the Environment, 28(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the Croatian Science Foundation under the project IP-2020-02-1018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University, Osijek, Croatia

    Djula Borozan & Sanja Pfeifer

Authors
  1. Djula Borozan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sanja Pfeifer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Djula Borozan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA

    William C. Gartner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Borozan, D., Pfeifer, S. (2023). Students’ Environmental Awareness and Low-Carbon Behavior: Exploring the Differences. In: Gartner, W.C. (eds) New Perspectives and Paradigms in Applied Economics and Business. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23844-4_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation