Skip to main content

Improving on the Markov-Switching Regression Model by the Use of an Adaptive Moving Average

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Perspectives and Paradigms in Applied Economics and Business

Abstract

Regime detection is vital for the effective operation of trading and investment strategies. However, the most popular means of doing this, the two-state Markov-switching regression model (MSR), are not an optimal solution, as two volatility states do not fully capture the complexity of the market. Past attempts to extend this model to a multi-state MSR have proved unstable, potentially expensive in terms of trading costs, and can only divide the market into states with varying levels of volatility, which is not the only aspect of market dynamics relevant to trading. We demonstrate it is possible and valuable to instead segment the market into more than two states not on the basis of volatility alone, but on a combined basis of volatility and trend, by combining the two-state MSR with an adaptive moving average. A realistic trading framework is used to demonstrate that using two selected states from the four thus generated leads to better trading performance than traditional benchmarks, including the two-state MSR. In addition, the proposed model could serve as a label generator for machine learning tasks used in predicting financial regimes ex ante.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Goldfeld, S. M., & Quandt, R. E. (1973). A Markov model for switching regressions. Journal of Econometrics, 1(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamilton, J. D. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 357–384.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krolzig, H.-M. (1997). Markov-switching vector autoregressions: Modelling, statistical inference, and application to business cycle analysis. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Hauptmann, J., Hoppenkamps, A., Min, A., Ramsauer, F., & Zagst, R. (2014). Forecasting market turbulence using regime-switching models. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufman, P. J. (1995). Smarter trading: Improving performance in changing markets. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Timmermann, A. (2000). Moments of Markov switching models. Journal of Econometrics, 96(1), 75–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, C.-J., & Nelson, C. R. (1998). State space models with regime switching: Classical and Gibbs-sampling approaches with applications. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, C.-J. (1993). Unobserved-component time series models with Markov-switching heteroscedasticity: Changes in regime and the link between inflation rates and inflation uncertainty. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 11(3), 341–349.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jeanne, O., & Masson, P. (2000). Currency crises, sunspots and Markov-switching regimes. Journal of International Economics, 50(2), 327–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bulla, J. (2011). Hidden Markov models with t components. Increased persistence and other aspects. Quantitative Finance, 11(3), 459–475.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Srivastava, S., & Bhattacharyya, R. (2018). Evaluating the building blocks of a dynamically adaptive systematic trading strategy. Available at SSRN 3144169.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wyckoff, R. D. (1937). The Richard D. Wyckoff method of trading in stocks. Wyckoff Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruiz-Franco, L., Jiménez-Gómez, M., & Lambis-Alandete, E. (2018). Trading strategy on the future mini S & P 500. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13(13), 11018–11024.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arthur, D., & Vassilvitskii, S. (2006). k-means++: The advantages of careful seeding.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boldin, M. D. (1996). A check on the robustness of Hamilton's Markov switching model approach to the economic analysis of the business cycle. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Israelsen, C. L. (2005). A refinement to the Sharpe ratio and information ratio. Journal of Asset Management, 5(6), 423–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Edelen, R., Evans, R., & Kadlec, G. (2013). Shedding light on “invisible” costs: Trading costs and mutual fund performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 69(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piotr Pomorski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pomorski, P., Gorse, D. (2023). Improving on the Markov-Switching Regression Model by the Use of an Adaptive Moving Average. In: Gartner, W.C. (eds) New Perspectives and Paradigms in Applied Economics and Business. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23844-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics