Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Der Zustand der Affirmation in der Friedensförderung: Die Suche nach pragmatischen Übergängen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Frieden in politischem Unsettlement

  • 167 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Geschichte der Friedenskonsolidierung hat mehrere Etappen durchlaufen, die alle durch eine Auseinandersetzung zwischen normativen Perspektiven, Machtkämpfen und Pragmatismus gekennzeichnet waren. Die Wiederentdeckung interner gewaltsamer Konflikte nach dem Kalten Krieg wurde von einer Periode konzeptioneller Autorität begleitet: Die Schaffung liberal-demokratischer politischer Institutionen im Prozess der Staatsbildung sollte Frieden und Stabilität ermöglichen. Da der angestrebte Erfolg ausblieb, musste sich die Friedenskonsolidierung die Kritik des „local turn“ und anderer Ansätze zu eigen machen. Kontextbezogene Ansätze und Kenntnisse sollten einen neuen Hintergrund für nützliche Interventionen bieten. Die Akzeptanz des Kontexts und die Generierung von entsprechendem Wissen überforderten jedoch die Friedensförderung. Die Erkenntnis des Scheiterns zwang die Friedensförderung schließlich dazu, ihre Umweltbedingungen zu bekräftigen. Ein auf prinzipiengeleitetem Pragmatismus basierender Übergangsansatz, der auf bestehenden, bisher vernachlässigten Praktiken in Friedensprozessen aufbaut, könnte eine mögliche Antwort auf diesen Zustand der Affirmation bieten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Truman’s Inaugural Address, 20. Januar 1949, Harry S. Truman Presidential Library and Museum, https://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/50yr_archive/inagural20jan1949.htm/, Zugriff am 16. September 2018.

  2. 2.

    Das Zitat geht auf Franklin Roosevelt zurück, der sich auf den nicaraguanischen Diktator Somoza (den älteren Bruder) bezog, den er einen „Hurensohn, aber unseren Hurensohn“ nannte.

  3. 3.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chilcot-report-tony-blair-read-response-statement-in-full-iraq-war-inquiry-a7123251.html/, abgerufen am 3. September 2018.

  4. 4.

    The Guardian, 12. Mai 2016, „Walkout at Ugandan president’s inauguration over ICC remarks“, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/12/walkout-at-ugandan-presidents-inauguration-over-icc-remarks/, Zugriff am 3. September 2018.

  5. 5.

    http://fundforpeace.org/fsi/, abgerufen am 3. September 2018.

Literature

  • Annan, Kofi A. 2005. Larger freedom: Towards development, Security and human rights for all, Report of the Secretary-General. A/59/2005. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, Claudia. 2007. Law transformed: Guantanamo and the “other” exception. Third World Quarterly 28(3): 489–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael, und Christoph Zürcher. 2009. The peacebuilder’s contract: How external statebuilding reinforces weak statehood. In The dilemmas of statebuilding: Confronting the contradictions of postwar peace operations, Hrsg. Roland Paris und Timothy D. Sisk, 23–52. London/New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Christine. 2015. What we talk about when we talk about political settlements: Towards inclusive and open political settlements in an era of disillusionment. PSRP working paper no. 1. PSRP, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Christine, und Jan Pospisil. 2017. Navigating inclusion in transitions from conflict: The formalised political unsettlement. Journal of International Development 29(5): 576–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, David. 1971. Eden, Blum, and the origins of non-intervention. Journal of Contemporary History 6(3): 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, Thomas. 2002. The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy 13(1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, Thomas, und Oren Samet-Marram. 2015. The new global marketplace of political change. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabal, Patrick, und Jean-Pascal Daloz. 1999. Africa works: Disorder as political instrument. Oxford: James Currey Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, Wren, Tobias Debiel, und Frank Gadinger, Hrsg. 2013. Relational sensibility and the ‘turn to the local’: Prospects for the future of peacebuilding, Global dialogues 2. Duisburg: Centre for Global Cooperation Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, David. 2006. Empire in denial: The politics of state-building. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. The security-development nexus and the rise of “anti-foreign policy”. Journal of International Relations and Development 10(4): 362–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. International statebuilding: The rise of post-liberal governance. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Beyond good and evil: Ethics in a world of complexity. International Politics 51(4): 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Resilience and the “everyday”: beyond the paradox of “liberal peace”. Review of International Studies 41(1): 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Peacebuilding: The twenty years’ crisis, 1997–2017. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018a. Ontopolitics in the anthropocene: An introduction to mapping, sensing and hacking. Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018b. Intervention and statebuilding beyond the human: From the “black box” to the “great outdoors”. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 12(1): 80–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, David, und Oliver P. Richmond. 2015. Contesting postliberalism: Governmentality or emancipation? Journal of International Relations and Development 18(1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Paul, und Anke Hoeffler. 2004. Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers 56(4): 563–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criddle, Evan J. 2015. Three Grotian theories of humanitarian intervention. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 16(2): 473–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Coning, Cedric. 2016. From peacebuilding to sustaining Peace: Implications of complexity for resilience and sustainability. Resilience: International Policies Practices and Discourses 4(3): 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Implications of complexity for peacebuilding policies and practices. In Complexity thinking for peacebuilding practice and evaluation, Hrsg. Emery Brusset, Cedric de Coning und Bryn Hughes, 19–48. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, Alex. 2015. The real politics of the horn of Africa: money, war and the business of power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doornbos, Martin. 2001. “Good governance”: The rise and decline of a policy metaphor? The Journal of Development Studies 37(6): 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dossa, Shiraz. 2007. Slicing up “development”: Colonialism, political theory, ethics. Third World Quarterly 28(5): 887–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. The liberal way of development and the development-security impasse: Exploring the global life-chance divide. Security Dialogue 41(1): 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EUGS – EU Global Strategy. 2016. Shared vision, common action: A stronger Europe. Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. The end of history? The National Interest 16(Summer): 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. State building: Governance and world order in the twenty-first century. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan. 1969. Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research 6(3): 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, Ashraf, und Claire Lockhart. 2009. Fixing failed states. A framework for rebuilding a fractured world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. 1993. Post-liberalism: Studies in political thought. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, Gretchen, und Steven Levitsky. 2004. Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heraclides, Alexis, und Ada Dialla. 2015. Humanitarian intervention in the long nineteenth century: Setting the precedent. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysmans, Jef. 2014. Security unbound: Enacting democratic limits. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, Beate. 2007a. The tragedy of liberal diplomacy: Democratization, intervention, statebuilding (Part I). Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1(1): 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. The tragedy of liberal diplomacy: Democratization, intervention, statebuilding (Part II). Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 1(2): 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, Hans. 2001. The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, Mary. 1999. New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Human security: Reflections on globalization and intervention. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. In defence of new wars. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development 2(1): Article 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, Stathis N., und Laia Balcells. 2010. International system and technologies of rebellion: How the end of the cold war shaped internal conflict. The American Political Science Review 104(3): 415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kende, Istvan. 1968. Peaceful co-existence: Its interpretation and misinterpretation. Journal of Peace Research 5(4): 352–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khittel, Stefan, und Jan Pospisil. 2010. Früherkennung von bewaffneten Konflikten? Ein Vergleich standardisierter Konfliktanalyseverfahren. oiip Working Paper No. 62, oiip, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivimäki, Timo. 2016. Paradigms of peace: A pragmatist introduction to the contribution to peace of paradigms of social science. London: Imperial College Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kozhevnikov, Feodor Ivanovich, Hrsg. 1960. International law: A textbook for use in law schools. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., Foreign Languages Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, John Paul. 2005. The moral imagination: The art and soul of building peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas. 2013. Critical debates on liberal peacebuilding. Civil Wars 15(2): 242–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, Roger. 2011. International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of peace. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Indicators+: A proposal for everyday peace indicators. Evaluation and Program Planning 36(1): 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, Roger, und Oliver P. Richmond. 2013. The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly 34(5): 763–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWhinney, Edward. 1962. “Peaceful co-existence” and Soviet-Western international law. American Journal of International Law 56(4): 951–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, Joel S. 1988. Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Edward, Roland Paris, und Oliver P. Richmond, Hrsg. 2009. New perspectives on liberal peacebuilding. New York, NY: United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSS – US National Security Strategy. 2015. Washington. DC: The White House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor, und Marco A. Janssen. 2004. Multi-level governance and the resilience of social-ecological systems. In Globalisation, Poverty and Conflict, Hrsg. Max Spoor, 239–259. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padelford, Norman J. 1937. The international non-intervention agreement and the Spanish civil war. The American Journal of International Law 31(4): 578–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, Roland. 2001. Human security: Paradigm shift or hot air? International Security 26(2): 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. At war’s end: Building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Does liberal peacebuilding have a future? In New perspectives on liberal peacebuilding, Hrsg. Edward Newman, Roland Paris und Oliver P. Richmond, 97–111. New York, NY: United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Saving liberal peacebuilding. Review of International Studies 36(2): 337–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pospisil, Jan. 2016. Komplikation statt Komplexität: Die EU als globaler Peacebuilding-Akteur. In Europa und Demokratien im Wandel: Ausgewählte Beiträge zum Globalisierungsforum 2014–2015, Hrsg. Gudrun Biffl und Dorothea Stepan, 83–102. Krems: DUK.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. “Unsharing” sovereignty: G7+ and the politics of international statebuilding. International Affairs 93(6): 1417–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pospisil, Jan, und Florian P. Kühn. 2016. The resilient state: New regulatory modes in international approaches to state building? Third World Quarterly 37(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramalingam, Ben. 2015. Aid on the edge of chaos: Rethinking international cooperation in a complex world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsbotham, Oliver. 2010. Transforming violent conflict: Radical disagreement, dialogue and survival. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Oliver P. 2001. A genealogy of peacemaking: The creation and re-creation of order. Alternatives 26(3): 317–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Beyond liberal peace? Responses to “backsliding”. In New perspectives on liberal peacebuilding, Hrsg. Edward Newman, Roland Paris und Oliver P. Richmond, 54–77. New York, NY: United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Resistance and the post-liberal peace. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38(3): 665–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. A post-liberal peace. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016a. Peace formation and political order in conflict affected societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016b. Mediation in post-liberal international relations. Unpublished draft paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. A genealogy of mediation in international relations: From ‘analogue’ to ‘digital’ forms of global justice or managed war? Cooperation and Conflict 53(3): 301–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricigliano, Robert. 2011. Systems thinking in conflict Assessment: Concepts and application. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, William I. 1996. Promoting polyarchy: Globalization, US intervention, and hegemony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, Ben. 2000. Theories of European integration. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosato, Sebastian. 2003. The flawed logic of democratic peace theory. American Political Science Review 97(4): 585–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Gideon. 1998. Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy (Review article). World Politics 51(1): 144–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostow, Walt William. 1960. The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabaratnam, Meera. 2013. Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace. Security Dialogue 44(3): 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saferworld. 2004. Conflict-sensitive approaches to development, humanitarian assistance and peacebuilding: A resource pack. London: Saferworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, Ian. 2009. Intelligent policy making for a complex world: Pragmatism, evidence and learning. Political Studies 57(4): 699–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Jack. 2000. From voting to violence: Democratization and nationalist conflict. London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunkin, Grigory I. 1958. Co-existence and international law (Volume 095). In Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. The Hague: The Hague Academy of International Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1945. Charter of the United Nations. Washington, DC: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, John. 2005. The complexity turn. Theory, Culture & Society 22(5): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Väyrynen, Raimo. 1991. New directions in conflict theory: Conflict resolution and conflict transformation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander. 1992. Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization 46(2): 391–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiuff Moe, Louise, und Finn Stepputat. 2018. Introduction: Peacebuilding in an era of pragmatism. International Affairs 94(2): 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Coventry University, Centre for Trust, Peace and Social Relations (CTPSR), Coventry, Großbritannien

    Jan Pospisil

Authors
  1. Jan Pospisil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pospisil, J. (2023). Der Zustand der Affirmation in der Friedensförderung: Die Suche nach pragmatischen Übergängen. In: Frieden in politischem Unsettlement. Springer VS, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23747-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23747-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-23746-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-23747-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation