Skip to main content

Feelings of Insecurity, Obstacles and Conflicts: Issues Blind People Have with e-scooters in Public Space and Potential Improvements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Energy for Smart Transport (CSUM 2022)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1548 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years, light electric standing scooters have become a popular mode of transport in urban areas all around the world. Even though this type of vehicle has been first introduced only a few years ago, e-scooters are of major interest in transport research and there is a rapidly growing body of research on various aspects of e-scooters. In this contribution, we focus on the voice of a marginal group in transportation. We investigate the experiences and opinions blind and visually impaired people have towards e-scooters. For doing so, we conducted a survey on experiences and opinions on e-scooters consisting of closed and open questions. The survey was disseminated via associations and key partners. A total of 276 blind or visually impaired persons participated in spring 2021 in Germany. The results show that blind and visually impaired probands feel highly disturbed by e-scooters in their everyday mobility. Almost all participants have already experienced conflicting situations with e-scooters as pedestrians. Thereby, unproperly parked e-scooters cause by far more problems than those driving. Half of the respondents have already tripped or fallen because of a parked e-scooter. Therefore, the greatest potential for improving the situation for this group and pedestrians in general, lies in fixed parking areas. The results enable us to understand the perspective of a group often less considered in transport research. We draw recommendations based on the assessment of this specific group in order to develop the transport system towards an integrative design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fitt, H., Curl, A.: The early days of shared micromobility: a social practices approach. J. Transp. Geogr. 86, 102779 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reck, D.J., Martin, H., Axhausen, K.W.: Mode choice, substitution patterns and environmental impacts of shared and personal micro-mobility. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 102, 103134 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gebhardt, L., Wolf, C., Seiffert, R.: “I’ll take the E-scooter instead of my car”—the potential of E-scooters as a substitute for car trips in Germany. Sustainability 13(13), 7361 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kleinertz, H., et al.: Accident mechanisms and injury patterns in e-scooter users–a retrospective analysis and comparison with cyclists. Deutsches Arzteblatt Int. 118(8), 117–121 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wüster, J., et al.: Impact of the rising number of rentable E-scooter accidents on emergency care in berlin 6 months after the introduction: a maxillofacial perspective. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 14(1), 43–48 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Namiri, N.K., et al.: Electric scooter injuries and hospital admissions in the United States, 2014–2018. JAMA Surg. 155(4), 357–359 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. English, K.C., et al.: The characteristics of dockless electric rental scooter-related injuries in a large US city. Traffic Inj. Prev. 21(7), 476–481 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kobayashi, L.M., et al.: The e-merging e-pidemic of e-scooters. Trauma. Surg. Acute Care Open 4(1), e000337 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cicchino, J.B., Kulie, P.E., McCarthy, M.L.: Severity of e-scooter rider injuries associated with trip characteristics. J. Safety Res. 76, 256–261 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hardinghaus, M., et al.: Identifying E-scooter hazard hotspots. In: Road Safety and Digitalization. Athens, Greece (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Högner, N.: Herausforderungen blinder und sehbehinderter Menschen im Straßenverkehr und Maßnahmen zur sicheren Teilnahme. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 232(08), 982–987 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Saalmann, R.D.: E-Roller im urbanen Raum: eine praktikable Innovation oder Quelle eines neuen Konfliktpotenzials?/vorgelegt von Raphael David Saalmann. Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koca-Atabey, M., Öz, B., Tekes, B.: The Traffic Experiences of Blind Road Users: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crudden, A., McDonnall, M.C., Hierholzer, A.: Transportation: an electronic survey of persons who are blind or have low vision. J. Visual Impairment Blindness 109(6), 445–456 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Crudden, A.: Transportation Issues: Perspectives of Orientation and Mobility Providers. J. Visual Impairment & Blindness 109(6), 457–468 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, S., et al.: The Impact of Electric/Hybrid Vehicles and Bicycles on Pedestrians Who are Blind or Have Low Vision (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parkin, J., Smithies, N.: Accounting for the needs of blind and visually impaired people in public realm design. J. Urban Des. 17(1), 135–149 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown, K., Norgate, S.H.: Barriers and facilitators for blind and visually impaired users of shared space. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.—Municipal Eng. 172(4), 209–217 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. DBSV.: Zahlen & Fakten (2020); Available from: https://www.dbsv.org/zahlen-fakten.html

  20. Oostendorp, R., Hardinghaus, M.: Shared vs. private e-scooters: same vehicle—different mode? Empirical evidence on e-scooter usage in Germany. In: Transport Research Arena (TRA). Lisbon, Portugal (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  21. GENESIS-Online Datenbank (2022); Available from: https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online

Download references

Acknowledgment

The project was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure using resources from the National Cycling Plan 2020 (NRVP). We would like to thank Clara Dehlinger for data curation and Julia Jarass for comments on the manuscript. Thanks also to the project partners Martina Hertel, Victoria Langer and Uta Bauer (Difu–German Institute of Urban Affairs) and Claudia Leschik (DLR Institute of Transportation Systems).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Hardinghaus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hardinghaus, M., Oostendorp, R. (2023). Feelings of Insecurity, Obstacles and Conflicts: Issues Blind People Have with e-scooters in Public Space and Potential Improvements. In: Nathanail, E.G., Gavanas, N., Adamos, G. (eds) Smart Energy for Smart Transport. CSUM 2022. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23721-8_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23721-8_81

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-23720-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-23721-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics