Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Conceptual Framework for Enabling Benefits from Linking Sustainability and Project Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Business Change

  • 366 Accesses

Abstract

With the aim of identifying and analyzing the impact of sustainable project management on the project’s success and the development of values for an organization and society, a conceptual framework for enabling benefits from linking sustainability and project management has been developed and presented in this chapter. The conceptual framework for sustainable project management was developed as a basis for the empirical research in the doctoral thesis of the author. The factors that could contribute to the successful integration of sustainability principles into project management were identified and analyzed in this chapter. Based on the literature review, the following factors were presented: sustainability principles, project success, values for the organization and society, phases of sustainable project management, practices, tools, and techniques for project management, and the competencies of the project manager and the project team members. The starting point of the analysis was the assumption that the integration of the sustainability concept into the concept of project management would encompass all three dimensions of sustainability: social, environmental, and economic. This idea is very close and should contribute to the turning of the idea of a circular economy into reality by providing a better design of a project result in order to make better use of resources and to prevent waste production and pollution. When deciding about energy sources, resources, and materials, it can be seen as a contribution of the circular economy to fully recover resources by closing loops of resource flows instead of wasting them. Social, environmental, and economic dimensions should permeate each phase of sustainable project management by implementing practices, tools, techniques, and competencies for sustainable project management, thus enabling benefits in terms of a project result that better meets the expectations of the stakeholders. The satisfied expectations of stakeholders would result in the project’s success, which would lead to the creation of value for the organization and society. When efforts are planned and managed in accordance with the concepts of sustainable development and circular economy, long-term benefits and capacity preservation for future generations are possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarseth, W., Ahola, T., Aaltonen, K., Økland, A., & Andersen, B. (2017). Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarval, R. S., & Kalmar, T. (2015). Sustainability in project management – Eight principles in practice. Umeå School of Business and Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armenia, S., Dangelico, R. M., Nonino, F., & Pompei, A. (2019). Sustainable Project Management: A conceptualization-oriented review and a framework proposal for future studies. Sustainability, 11, 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework methods for defining project success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banihashemi, S., Hosseini, M. R., Golizadeh, H., & Sankaran, S. (2017). Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries. International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013520265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieker, T. (2003). Sustainability management with the balanced scorecard. In Proceedings of 5th international summer academy on technology studies (pp. 17–34).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieker, T., & Waxenberger, B. (2002). Sustainability balanced scorecard and business ethics. In 10th international conference of the greening of industry network, Göteborg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, M. A. (2017). Corporate sustainability and responsibility: Creating value for business, society and the environment. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 2(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, V., Chanda, A., Angra, S., & Chawla, G. (2018). The sustainable project management: A review and future possibilities. Journal of Project Management, 3(3), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.jpm.2018.2.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2001). Design for the environment: A quality based model for green product development. Management Science, 47(2), 250–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 41(3), 614–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002

  • De Witt, A. (1988). Measurement of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 6(3), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863/88/030164-07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deland, D. (2009). Sustainability through Project Management and net impact. PMI global congress North America. Project Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias-Sardinha, I., & Reijnders, L. (2005). Evaluating environmental and social performance of large Portuguese companies: A balanced scorecard approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(2), 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eken, G., Bilgin, G., Dikmen, I., & Birgonul, M. T. (2020). A lessons-learned tool for organizational learning in construction. Automation in Construction, 110, 102977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing Ltc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskerod, P., & Huemann, M. (2013). Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: What standards say. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371311291017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2018). The open PM2 Project Management methodology guide of the European Commission – Guide 3.0. Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fangel, M. (2018). Proactive project management. Van Haren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Sánchez, G., & Rodríguez-López, F. (2010). A methodology to identify sustainability indicators in construction project management-application to infrastructure projects in Spain. Ecological Indicators, 10(6), 1193–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, D., Paugam, S., & Jacobs, S. (2003). Unemployment, poverty and social isolation: Is there a vicious circle of social exclusion? European Societies, 5(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000057668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gareis, R., Huemann, M., & Martinuzzi, A. (2009). Relating sustainable development and project management. IRNOP IX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedknegt, D., & Silvius, A. J. G. (2012). The implementation of sustainability principles in project management. Proceedings of the 26th IPMA World Congress, Crete, 875–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • GPM Green Project Management. (2019). P5 Standard for sustainability in project management. USA. Available at: https://greenprojectmanagement.org/

  • Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Whose value? Whose creation? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610709872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guenster, N., Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Koedijk, K. (2011). The economic value of corporate ecoefficiency. European Financial Management, 17(4), 679–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haffar, M., & Searcy, C. (2017). Classification of trade-offs encountered in the practice of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 495–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, R. (2010). Sustainability learning: An introduction to the concept and its motivational aspects. Sustainability, 2(9), 2873–2897. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2092873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helne, T., & Hirvilammi, T. (2015). Wellbeing and sustainability: A relational approach. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? Research Policy, 29, 871–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, A. (2012). Project management as if the world matters: At the intersection of sustainable development and project management. Presented at the 12th Northumbria Research Conference. 16–17 May 2012. Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hristov, I., & Chirico, A. (2019). The role of sustainability key performance indicators (KPIs) in implementing sustainable strategies. Sustainability, 11(20), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, B.-G., & Tan, J. S. (2012). Sustainable project management for green construction: Challenges, impact, and solutions. CIOB Construction Conference, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPMA ICB4. (2015). Individual competence baseline for project management. International Project Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, B. W., Singhal, V. R., & Subramanian, R. (2010). An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 430–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, B. R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, and practice. Environment, 47(3), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerzner, H. (2009). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (10th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: A guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. JohnWiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl, K. (2016). Becoming a sustainable organization A project and portfolio management approach. CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koke, B., & Moehler, R. C. (2019). Earned green value management for project management: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 230, 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labuschagne, C., & Brent, A. C. (2006). Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechler, T. G. (2000). Empirical evidence of people as determinants of project success projects as business constituents and guiding motives. In Projects as business constituents and guiding motives (pp. 217–227), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4505-7_17

  • Lewin, A. Y., & Minton, J. W. (1986). Determining organizational effectiveness: Another look, and an agenda for research. Management Science, 32(5), 514–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magano, J., Silvius, A. G. J., Sousa e Silva, C., & Leite, A. (2021). The contribution of project management to a more sustainable society: Exploring the perception of project managers. Project Leadership and Society, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltzman, R., & Shirley, D. (2010). Green project management. CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2004). Community-based and driven development: A critical review (Policy research working paper no. 3209). World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A., & Menon, A. (1997). Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: The emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milošević, D., & Patanakul, P. (2005). Standardized project management may increase development projects success. International Journal of Project Management, 23(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: Linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32, 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moldan, B., Janousková, S., & Hák, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller, A., & Schaltegger, S. (2005). The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for ecoefficiency analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munns, A. K., & Bjeirmi, B. F. (1996). The role of project management in achieving project success. International Journal of Project Management, 14(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00057-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, P., Harrington, M., & Parker, D. (2012). Leadership performance is significant to project success or failure: A critical analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(2), 204–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). Glossary of key terms in evaluation and results based management, dostupno na: http://www.oecd.org (datum pristupa: 15.4.2020).

  • Oehlmann, I. (2010). The sustainable footprint methodology. Delft University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Økland, A. (2015). Gap analysis for incorporating sustainability in project management. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrović, N., Bošnjak, I., & Nedeljković, S. (2017). Disaster risk reduction for sustainable development goals. European Project Management Journal, 7(2), 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, W. J. (2003). Project management: Achieving project bottom-line success. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • PMBOK. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • PRINCE2. (2017). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2 (6th ed.). Office of Government Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proença, J. J. C. (2019). Living lab innovation methodologies. CAD, 13(2), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbani, A., Zamani, M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 7316–7327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. S., Duraiappah, A. K., Antons, D. C., Munoz, P., Bai, X., Fragkias, M., & Gutscher, H. (2012). A vision for human Well-being: Transition to social sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 23(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, M. A. (2015). Integrating sustainability issues into project management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sariatli, F. (2017). Linear economy versus circular economy: A comparative and analyzer study for optimization of economy for sustainability. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/vjbsd-2017-0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, R. P., & Silvius, A. J. G. (2017). The sustainable project management canvas. The Journal of Modern Project Management. https://doi.org/10.19225/JMPM01206

  • Schöggl, J.-P., Stumpf, L., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2020). The narrative of sustainability and circular economy – A longitudinal review of two decades of research. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, 105073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, N. K., Govindan, K., Lai, K. K., Chen, W. K., & Kumar, V. (2021). The transition from linear economy to circular economy for sustainability among SMEs: A study on prospects, impediments, and prerequisites. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1803–1822. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A., Levy, O., & Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvius, A. J. G. (2016). Sustainability as a competence of project managers. PM World Journal, 5(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvius, A. J. G., & Schipper, R. (2014). Sustainability in project management: A literature review and impact analysis. Social Business, 4(1), 63–96. https://doi.org/10.1362/204440814X13948909253866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvius, A. J. G., Schipper, R., Planko, J., van der Brink, J., & Köhler, A. (2012). Sustainability in project management. Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J., Lindkvist, L., & DeFillippi, R. (2004). Project-based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge: Editorial. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1475–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabo, L. (2016). Sustainability, creativity and innovation in project management – model development for assessing organizational performance through projects. Vezetéstudomány-Budapest Management Review, 10, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabassi, A., Argyropoulou, M., Roufechaei, M., & Argyropoulou, R. (2016). Leadership behavior of project managers in sustainable construction projects. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 724–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taherdoost, H. (2018). How to lead to sustainable and successful IT project management? Propose 5Ps Guideline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tam, G. (2010). The program management process with sustainability considerations. Journal of Project, Program & Portfolio Management, 1(1), 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorović, M., & Obradović, V. (2018). Sustainability in project management: A project manager perspective. In I. Ljumović & A. Éltető (Eds.), Sustainable growth and development in small open economies (pp. 88–106). Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. ISBN 978-963-301-664-0 (e-book), ISBN 978-963-301-663-3 (paperback).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toljaga-Nikolić, D. (2022). Integrated model for project success improvement based on sustainability principles. Doctoral thesis. University of Belgrade, Serbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toljaga-Nikolić, D., Todorović, M., & Bjelica, D. (2016). Sustainability and project management – Where is the linkage?. In XV international symposium – Symorg 2016, symposium proceedings “Reshaping the future through sustainable business development and entrepreneurship” (pp. 1088–1093).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toljaga-Nikolić, D., Todorović, M., Dobrota, M., Obradović, T., & Obradović, V. (2020). Project management and sustainability: Playing trick or treat with the planet. Sustainability, 12(20), 8619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., Wei, K., & Sun, H. (2014). Whole life project management approach to sustainability. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(2), 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. (2012). What have been the impacts of World Bank Community-driven development programs? CDD impact evaluation review and operational & research implications. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaoka, K. (2008). Social capital and health and well-being in East Asia: A population-based study. Social Science & Medicine, 66(4), 885–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaharia, M., Pătrascu, A., Gogonea, M. R., Tănăsescu, A., & Popescu, C. (2017). A cluster design on the influence of energy taxation in shaping the new EU-28 economic paradigm. Energies, 10, 257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

    Danijela Toljaga-Nikolić

Authors
  1. Danijela Toljaga-Nikolić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danijela Toljaga-Nikolić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

    Vladimir Obradović

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Toljaga-Nikolić, D. (2023). A Conceptual Framework for Enabling Benefits from Linking Sustainability and Project Management. In: Obradović, V. (eds) Sustainable Business Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23543-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation