Abstract
Turkey has a rich climate diversity, and it is one of the countries that has developed in recent years renewable energy production. Renewable energy resources, which are among the elements that ensure the economic independence of a country, can be listed as wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal resources. Turkey provides energy production through its resources. While engineering and geographical science studies stand out on this subject in the literature, there are limited studies on the social reflections of the subject. In this chapter, social reflections on solar energy production in Turkey were discussed and evaluated within the scope of public relations. According to the data published by the Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, Konya produces the most solar energy in Turkey. Hence Konya City was chosen as the research universe. Focus group research was conducted with 16 participants selected from the residents of the city. The social reflections on solar energy were assembled according to the result of the interviews. This chapter aims to generate a guide in forming public opinion on environmental policies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AA. (2020, September 28). Kırklareli’nde bir köye 80 güneş paneli yerleştirildi. Retrieved from https://temizenerji.org: https://temizenerji.org/2020/09/28/kirklarelinde-bir-koye-80-gunes-paneli-yerlestirildi/
Çukurova Kalkınma Ajansı. (2012). Yenilenebili Enerji Raporu. Çukurova Kalkınma Ajansı.
Bergmann, A., Hanley, N., & Wright, R. (2006). Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments. Energy Policy, 34, 1004–1014.
Bhuiyan, M. A., Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Mikhaylov, A., Danish, M. S. S., Pinter, G., et al. (2022). Economic indicators and bioenergy supply in developed economies: QROF-DEMATEL and random forest models. Energy Reports, 8, 561–570.
Brewer, J., Ames, D. P., Solan, D., Lee, R., & Carlisle, J. (2015). Using GIS analytics and social preference data to evaluate utility-scale solar power site suitability. Renewable Energy, 81, 825–836.
Carlisle, J. E., Kane, S. L., Solan, D., Bowman, M., & Joe, J. C. (2015). Public attitudes regarding large-scale solar energy development in the U.S. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48, 835–847.
Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Martínez, L. (2022a). Collaboration enhanced hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach to analyze the renewable energy investment projects. Energy Reports, 8, 377–389.
Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Mikhaylov, A., Pinter, G., & Shaikh, Z. A. (2022b). Analysis of renewable-friendly smart grid technologies for the distributed energy investment projects using a hybrid picture fuzzy rough decision-making approach. Energy Reports, 8, 11466–11477.
Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Çağlayan, Ç., Yavuz, D., & Kararoğlu, D. (2023). Can renewable energy investments be a solution to the energy-sourced high inflation problem? In Managing inflation and supply chain disruptions in the global economy (pp. 220–238). IGI Global.
Ding, Z., Yüksel, S., & Dincer, H. (2021). An integrated Pythagorean fuzzy soft computing approach to environmental management systems for sustainable energy pricing. Energy Reports, 7, 5575–5588.
Doğan, A. (2022, April 11). Karapınar GES ile Türkiye’de elektrik üretiminde güneş enerjisinin payı yüzde 20’ye çıkacak. Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr; https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/ekonomi/karapinar-ges-ile-turkiyede-elektrik-uretiminde-gunes-enerjisinin-payi-yuzde-20ye-cikacak/2560636
Dong, W., Zhao, G., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2022). A novel hybrid decision making approach for the strategic selection of wind energy projects. Renewable Energy, 185, 321–337.
Enerji Atlası. (2022). Karapınar YEKA-1 GES. Retrieved from https://www.enerjiatlasi.com; https://www.enerjiatlasi.com/gunes/karapinar-yeka-11.html
Enerji Ekonomisi. (2022, May 11). Türkiye GÜNEŞ Enerjisi (GES) Haritası! Retrieved from https://www.enerjiekonomisi.com; https://www.enerjiekonomisi.com/turkiye-gunes-enerjisi-ges-haritasi/21439/
EPDK. (2018). YEKDEM ile İlgili Sıkça Sorulan Sorular. Retrieved 2022, from https://www.epdk.gov.tr: https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-2713/yekdem-ile-ilgili-sikca-sorulan-sorular
Eskin, N. (2006). Türkiye’de Güneş Enerjisi Araştırma. 2006, 74–82.
Eti, S., Dinçer, H., Gökalp, Y., Yüksel, S., & Kararoğlu, D. (2023). Identifying key issues to handle the inflation problem in the healthcare industry caused by energy prices: An evaluation with decision-making models. In Managing inflation and supply chain disruptions in the global economy (pp. 162–178). IGI Global.
Fang, S., Zhou, P., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). Assessment of safety management system on energy investment risk using house of quality based on hybrid stochastic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making approach. Safety Science, 141, 105333.
GÜNDER. (2018). Güneş Enerjisi Yol Haritası. GÜNDER. Retrieved from https://www.gunder.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/G%C3%BCne%C5%9Fin-Yol-Haritas%C4%B1-Rapor-KAPAK.pdf
Haiyun, C., Zhixiong, H., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2021). Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110844.
İHA. (2022, August 24). Bursa’daki bu okul kendi enerjisini üretti. Retrieved from https://www.iha.com.tr: https://www.iha.com.tr/bursa-haberleri/bursadaki-bu-okul-kendi-enerjisini-uretti-3875984/
International Energy Agency. (2021). Trends in photovoltaic applications 2021. IEA.
Kannan, N., & Vakeesan, D. (2016). Solar energy for future world: – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1092–1105.
Kapluhan, E. (2014). Enerji Coğrafyası Açısından Bir İnceleme: Güneş Enerjisinin Dünya’daki ve Türkiye’deki Kullanım Durumu. İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Coğrafya Bölümü Coğrafya Dergisi, 29, 70–98.
Kostis, P., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Knowledge-based energy investments of European economies and policy recommendations for sustainable development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–33.
Kou, G., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). Inventive problem-solving map of innovative carbon emission strategies for solar energy-based transportation investment projects. Applied Energy, 311, 118680.
Li, W., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). Understanding the financial innovation priorities for renewable energy investors via QFD-based picture fuzzy and rough numbers. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 1–30.
Meng, Y., Wu, H., Zhao, W., Chen, W., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). A hybrid heterogeneous Pythagorean fuzzy group decision modelling for crowdfunding development process pathways of fintech-based clean energy investment projects. Financial Innovation, 7(1), 1–34.
Mukhtarov, S., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). The impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from Turkey. Renewable Energy, 187, 169–176.
Richardson, L. (2022, May 3). What is the history of solar energy and when were solar panels invented? Retrieved from news.energysage.com; https://news.energysage.com/the-history-and-invention-of-solar-panel-technology/#:~:text=In%20theory%2C%20solar%20energy%20was,light%20torches%20for%20religious%20ceremonies
Río, P., & Burguillo, M. (2008). Assessing the impact of renewable energy deployment on local sustainability: Towards a theoretical framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 1325–1344.
Solargis. (2022). Global Solar Atlas. Retrieved from https://globalsolaratlas.info: https://globalsolaratlas.info/map?c=11.523088,8.261719,2&s=26.115986,-4.602671&m=site
Sun, L., Peng, J., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Coalition-oriented strategic selection of renewable energy system alternatives using q-ROF DEMATEL with golden cut. Energy, 256, 124606.
T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı. (2022, August 26). Güneş. Retrieved from https://enerji.gov.tr: https://enerji.gov.tr/bilgi-merkezi-enerji-gunes
Wan, Q., Zhao, X., Liu, H., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Assessing the new product development process for the industrial decarbonization of sustainable economies. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211067231
Wu, X., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). Analysis of crowdfunding platforms for microgrid project investors via a q-rung orthopair fuzzy hybrid decision-making approach. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 1–22.
Wüstenhagen, R., & Bilharz, M. (2006). Green energy market development in Germany: Effective public policy and emerging customer demand. Energy Policy, 34, 1681–1696.
Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35, 2683–2691.
Xu, X., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). An integrated decision-making approach with golden cut and bipolar q-ROFSs to renewable energy storage investments. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 1–14.
Yuan, X., Zuo, J., & Ma, C. (2011). Social acceptance of solar energy technologies in China—End users’ perspective. Energy Policy, 39, 1031–1036.
Yuan, G., Xie, F., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2021). The theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ)-based strategic mapping of green nuclear energy investments with spherical fuzzy group decision-making approach. International Journal of Energy Research, 45(8), 12284–12300.
Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). Identifying the strategic priorities of nuclear energy investments using hesitant 2-tuple interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 145, 104103.
Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., Eti, S., & Adalı, Z. (2022). Strategy improvements to minimize the drawbacks of geothermal investments by using spherical fuzzy modelling. International Journal of Energy Research, 46, 10796.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Gong, C., Dinçer, H., & Yüksel, S. (2022). An integrated hesitant 2-tuple Pythagorean fuzzy analysis of QFD-based innovation cost and duration for renewable energy projects. Energy, 248, 123561.
Zhao, Y., Xu, Y., Yüksel, S., Dinçer, H., & Ubay, G. G. (2021). Hybrid IT2 fuzzy modelling with alpha cuts for hydrogen energy investments. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(13), 8835–8851.
Zhou, P., Luo, J., Cheng, F., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2021). Analysis of risk priorities for renewable energy investment projects using a hybrid IT2 hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with alpha cuts. Energy, 224, 120184.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eken, I., Kurt, S. (2023). Creating Public Opinion in Digitalized Renewable Energy Projects: The Case of the Konya City. In: Vardarlıer, P. (eds) Multidimensional and Strategic Outlook in Digital Business Transformation. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23432-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23432-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-23431-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-23432-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)