Skip to main content

Underwater with a Hand Lens: Ecological Sciences and Environmental Ethics to Value Freshwater Biodiversity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Field Environmental Philosophy

Abstract

Despite their impressive diversity and ecosystem relevance, insects are undervalued and rarely considered in conservation efforts, except for those that are medically or economically important. In terms of funding and effort, insect conservation research lags far behind vertebrate research, hampering the development of methodologies to better understand their conservation needs. This taxonomic bias has a severe limitation in that it only gives moral consideration to our closest evolutionary relatives, excluding the vast majority of other life forms on our planet. In this regard, the Field Environmental Philosophy (FEP) methodology provides a platform for the development of interdisciplinary approaches to biocultural conservation that combine ecological research and environmental ethics. We integrated ecological research, education, and environmental ethics over the last 15 years through the FEP to promote and foster freshwater insect awareness, conservation, and value in the Magellanic sub-Antarctic ecoregion of southern Chile. The FEP practice has enabled us to reach a wide range of people and raise awareness for these under-appreciated co-inhabitants. This methodology also promotes educational practices that encourage direct encounters with the inhabitants, habitats, and life habits, making them “visible” once more. Our work aims to awaken appreciation and valuation of the small co-inhabitants with whom we share the planet by providing a platform of scientific training and thinking from the earliest stages of education, with a novel combination of disciplines aiming to reveal the intrinsic value of freshwater insects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamo S (2016a) Do insects feel pain? A question at the intersection of animal behaviour, philosophy and robotics. Anim Behav 118:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adamo S (2016b) Subjective experience in insects: definitions and other difficulties. Animal Sentience 1:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews PLR (2011) Introduction: laboratory invertebrates: only spineless, or spineless and painless? ILAR J 52:121–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basset Y, Lamarre G (2019) Toward a world that values insects. Science 364:1230–1231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs JC (2017) Emergence of a sixth mass extinction? Biol J Linnean Soc 122:243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell BD (2017) Comparative biology of pain: What invertebrates can tell us about how nociception works. J Neurophysiol 117:1461–1473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Erwin T, Borges P, New T (2011) The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biol Conserv 144:2647–2655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Barton PS, Birkhofer K et al (2020) Scientists’ warning to humanity on insect extinctions. Biol Conserv 242:108426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JA, May RM (2002) Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science 297:191–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Contador T, Kennedy J (2014) Underwater Inhabitants of the rivers of Cape Horn. Universidad de Magallanes

    Google Scholar 

  • Contador T, Kennedy J, Ojeda J et al (2014a) Life cycles of freshwater invertebrates and global climate change in the sub-Antarctic Magellanic ecoregion: long-term ecological research at the Omora … . Bosque

    Google Scholar 

  • Contador T, Méndez M, Medina Y et al (2014b) Río Róbalo Comunidad de Vida

    Google Scholar 

  • Contador T, Kennedy JH, Rozzi R, Villarroel JO (2015a) Sharp altitudinal gradients in magellanic sub-antarctic streams: patterns along a fluvial system in the cape horn biosphere reserve (55°S). Polar Biol 38:1853–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contador T, Rosenfeld S, Ojeda J, Kennedy J (2015b) Historia natural de los invertebrados acuáticos del Cabo de Hornos. Universidad de Magallanes

    Google Scholar 

  • Contador T, Rozzi R, Kennedy J et al (2018) Sumergidos con lupa en los ríos del cabo de hornos: Valoración ética de los ecosistemas dulceacuícolas y sus co-habitantes. Magallania (Punta Arenas) 46:183–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contador TA (2011) Benthic macroinvertebrates of temperate, sub-Antarctic streams: the effects of altitudinal zoning and temperature on the phenology of aquatic insects associated to the Róbalo river, Navarino Island (55 S), Chile. University of North Texas. Denton, Texas, USA. Doctorate Dissertation University of North Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Contador TA, Kennedy JH, Rozzi R (2012) The conservation status of southern South American aquatic insects in the literature. Biodiv Conserv 21(8):2095–2107

    Google Scholar 

  • Davy BJ (2007) An other face of ethics in Levinas. Ethics Environ 12:39–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Marco M, Chapman S, Althor G et al (2017) Changing trends and persisting biases in three decades of conservation science. Glob Ecol Conserv 10:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didham R, Leather S, Basset Y (2019) Ethics in entomology. Antenna 43:124–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon D (2019) Multiple threats imperil freshwater biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Curr Biol 29:R960–R967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood RW (2011) Pain and suffering in invertebrates? ILAR J 52:175–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fazey I, Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2005) What do conservation biologists publish? Biol Conserv 124:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger P, Margutti L, Oviedo RD (1997) School yards and nature trails: ecology education outside the university. Trends Ecol Evol 12:115–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer B, Larson BMH (2019) Collecting insects to conserve them: a call for ethical caution. Insect Conserv Divers 12:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, Defries R, Asner GP et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca CR (2009) The silent mass extinction of insect herbivores in biodiversity hotspots. Conserv Biol 23:1507–1515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukano Y, Soga M (2021) Why do so many modern people hate insects? The urbanization–disgust hypothesis. Sci Total Environ 777:146229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M (2013) Cognition with few neurons: higher-order learning in insects. Trends Neurosci 36:285–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gullan PJ, Cranston PS (2014) The insects: an outline of entomology. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaver I (2013) Environment imagination situation. In: Ricardo Rozzi STA, Pickett CP, Armesto JJ, Baird Callicott J (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world, values, philosophy and actions. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 85–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein C, Barron AB (2016) Insects have the capacity for subjective experience. Anim Sentience 1:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson BMH (2006) The social resonance of competitive and progressive evolutionary metaphors. Bioscience 56:997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemelin RH, Dampier J, Harper R et al (2017) Perceptions of insects: a visual analysis. Soc Anim 25:553–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold AC (2004) Living with the land ethic. Bioscience 54:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood JA (1988) Not to harm a fly: our ethical obligations to insects. Between Species Online J Study Philos Anim 4:. https://doi.org/10.15368/bts.1988v4n3.10

  • Louv R (2008) Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson E, Ospina F (2015) The pluralism of river rights in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Colombia. J Water Law 25:283–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee B, Elwood RW (2013) Shock avoidance by discrimination learning in the shore crab (Carcinus maenas) is consistent with a key criterion for pain. J Exp Biol 216:353–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mather JA (2011) Philosophical background of attitudes toward and treatment of invertebrates. ILAR J 52:205–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • New TR, Samways MJ (2014) Insect conservation in the southern temperate zones: an overview. Aust Entomol 53:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto C, Ovando XMC, Loyola R et al (2017) The role of macroinvertebrates for conservation of freshwater systems. Ecol Evol 7:5502–5513

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nityananda V (2016) Attention-like processes in insects. Proc Biol Sci 283. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1986

  • O’Donnell E (2018) Legal rights for rivers: Competition, collaboration and water governance. Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pawar S (2003) Taxonomic Chauvinism and the methodologically challenged. Bioscience 53:861–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry CJ, Barron AB, Chittka L (2017) The frontiers of insect cognition. Curr Opin Behav Sci 16:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez A, Gutiérrez-Fonseca PE (2014) Estudios sobre macroinvertebrados acuáticos en América Latina: avances recientes y direcciones futuras. Revista de Biología Tropical 62:9–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Regan T (2004) The case for animal rights. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendoll Cárcamo J, Contador T, Gañán M et al (2019) Altitudinal gradients in Magellanic sub-Antarctic lagoons: the effect of elevation on freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and distribution. PeerJ 7:e7128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rendoll Cárcamo J, Contador T, Gañán M (2020) Filosofía Ambiental de Campo: Educación e investigación para la valoración ecológica y ética de los insectos dulceacuícolas. Magallania (Punta)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendoll-Cárcamo J (2018) Variación estacional y altitudinal en la diversidad, distribución y tolerancias térmicas de macroinvertebrados dulceacuícolas sub-Antárticos: en la búsqueda de bioindicadores térmicos para el cambio climático global. Tesis de Magíster. Punta Arenas, Chile: Departamento de Recursos Naturales …

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1999) Extinction rates of North American Freshwater Fauna. Conserv Biol 13:1220–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R (1999) The reciprocal links between evolutionary-ecological sciences and environmental ethics. Bioscience 49:911–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R (2012) Biocultural ethics: recovering the vital links between the inhabitants, their habits, and habitats. Environ Ethics 34(1):27–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R (2018) Biocultural conservation and biocultural ethics. In: et al. From biocultural homogenization to biocultural conservation. Ecology and ethics, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99513-7_19

  • Rozzi R (2019) Taxonomic Chauvinism, No More!: antidotes from hume, darwin, and biocultural ethics. Environ Ethics 41:249–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R, Massardo F, Anderson CB et al (2006) Ten principles for biocultural conservation at the southern tip of the Americas: the approach of the Omora Ethnobotanical Park. Ecol Soc 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R, Arango X, Massardo F et al (2008) Field environmental philosophy and biocultural conservation: the Omora Ethnobotanical Park educational program. Environ Ethics 30:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R, Pickett ST, Palmer C et al (2013) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Barton PS, Birkhofer K et al (2020) Solutions for humanity on how to conserve insects. Biol Conserv 242:108427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Bayo F, Wyckhuys KAG (2019) Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: a review of its drivers. Biol Conserv 232:8–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin CM (2001) Can invertebrates suffer? Or, how robust is argument-by-analogy? Anim Welf 10:103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simaika JP, Samways MJ (2010) Biophilia as a universal ethic for conserving biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24:903–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith D (2004) Issues and trends in higher education biology fieldwork. J Biol Educ 39:6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soga M, Gaston KJ (2016) Extinction of experience: the loss of human-nature interactions. Front Ecol Environ 14:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein CR, Nussbaum MC (2004) Animal rights: current debates and new directions. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauro A, Ojeda J, Caviness T et al (2021) Field environmental philosophy: a biocultural ethic approach to education and ecotourism for sustainability. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 13:4526

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins AJ, Goldstein DA, Lee LC et al (2010) Lobster attack induces sensitization in the sea hare, Aplysia californica. J Neurosci 30:11028–11031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia. Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Authors Contador, Ojeda, and Rozzi received basal support from the Cape Horn International Center (CHIC) - ANID PIA/BASAL (PFB210018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamara Contador .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Contador, T. et al. (2023). Underwater with a Hand Lens: Ecological Sciences and Environmental Ethics to Value Freshwater Biodiversity. In: Rozzi, R., Tauro, A., Avriel-Avni, N., Wright, T., May Jr., R.H. (eds) Field Environmental Philosophy. Ecology and Ethics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23368-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics