Skip to main content

The H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest Long-Term Ecological Research Program, Oregon, USA: A Historical Biocultural Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Field Environmental Philosophy

Part of the book series: Ecology and Ethics ((ECET,volume 5))

  • 266 Accesses

Abstract

The H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest and Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Program, Oregon, USA, has a history of influence in biocultural conservation through basic and applied ecology and forestry research, close partnership with managers of public forest lands, and a growing arts/humanities program. Studies of old-growth forests, the northern spotted owl flagship species, and watersheds over several decades underpinned a major shift in federal forest lands management policies in the early 1990s as the public sense for native forests shifted from their utilitarian values to their intrinsic value. Since the 2000s, a program engaging arts and humanities, including creative writers and philosophers, has richly expressed the profound beauty, wonder, and mystery of the forest, perhaps foreshadowing a new era of forest stewardship. This transformation parallels merging of environmental science, arts, and humanities at other USA LTER sites and similar programs internationally, notably the Omora Ethnobotanical Park Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research program in the Cape Horn Biosphere Reserve, Chile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews Forest (2021) H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest. Available via: https://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/

  • Batavia C, Nelson MP (2016) Conceptual ambiguities and practical challenges of ecological forestry: a critical review. J For 114(5):572–581. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.15-103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayles DP (2019) Outside of time|Forest landscapes. [online] Terrain.org https://www.terrain.org/2019/arterrain/david-paul-bayles/

  • Beckham SD (1977) The Indians of western Oregon: this land was theirs. Arago Books, Coos Bay

    Google Scholar 

  • Blue River Quorum (2011) The Blue River declaration: an ethic of the earth. Minding Nat 4(3):146. [online] https://www.humansandnature.org/the-blue-river-declaration-an-ethic-of-the-earth

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie N, Goodrich C, Swanson F (eds) (2016) Forest under story: creative inquiry in an old-growth forest. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecological Reflections (2021) Ecological reflections network. Available via: http://www.ecologicalreflections.com

  • FEMAT (1993) Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic, and social assessment. Report of the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team (FEMAT) 1993-793-071. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis (2015) Laudato Si’. On care for our common home. Encyclical letter. Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division, Huntington

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF (1999) Foreword. In: Johnson KN, Swanson F, Herring M, Greene S (eds) Bioregional assessments: science at the crossroads of management and policy. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF (2018) Foreword. In: Rozzi R, May RH Jr, Chapin FS III, Massardo F, Gavin M, Klaver I, Pauchard A, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (eds) From biocultural homogenization to biocultural conservation. Ecology and ethics, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht, pp v–vii

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF, Cromack K Jr, Denison W, McKee WA, Maser C, Sedell J, Swanson F, Juday G (1981) Ecological characteristics of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Gen Tech Rep PNW-118. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF, Johnson KN, Johnson DL (2018) Ecological forest management. Waveland Press, Long Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Geier MG (2007) Necessary work: discovering old forests, new outlooks, and community on the H.J. Andrews experimental forest, 1948–2000. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-687. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goralnik L, Kelly SM, O’Connell KA, Nelson MP, Schulze M (2020) Forest discovery: place relationships on an environmental science, arts and humanities (eSAH) field trip. Aust J Environ Educ 1:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2020.28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goralnik L, Nelson MP, Gosnell H, Leigh MB (2016) Arts and humanities inquiry in the long-term ecological research network: empathy, relationships, and interdisciplinary collaborations. J Environ Stud Sci 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0415-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goralnik L, Nelson MP, Ryan L, Gosnell H (2015) Arts and humanities efforts in the US long-term ecological research (LTER) network: understanding perceived values and challenges. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FSIII, Callicott JB, Pickett STA (eds) Earth stewardship, linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Ecology and ethics, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 249–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Grignon J, Kimmerer RW (2019) Listening to the forest. In: Van Horn G, Hausdoerffer J (eds) Wildness: relations of people and place. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirt PW (1994) A conspiracy of optimism: management of the National Forests since World War Two. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Converv Biol 10(2):328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer RW (2013) Braiding sweetgrass: indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh MB, Nelson MP, Goralnik L, Swanson F (2021) Integration of the arts and humanities with environmental science in the LTER network. In: Waide RB, Kingsland SE (eds) The challenges of long term ecological research: a historical analysis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 315–334

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li JL, Herring ML (2013) Ellie’s log: exploring the forest where the great tree fell. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • Long-Term Ecological Reflections (2021) Available via: https://liberalarts.oregonstate.edu/centers-and-initiatives/spring-creek-project/programs-and-residencies/long-term-ecological-reflections

  • Markiewicz J, Goralnik L, O’Connell K (2022) Screens on trails: digital environmental science, arts, and humanities learning for biocultural conservation. In: Rozzi R, Tauro A, Wright T, Avriel-Avni N, May RH Jr (eds) Field environmental philosophy: education for biocultural conservation. Ecology and ethics, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht, p XXX

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller V (2020) A cathedral not made by hands. Commonweal 147(1):20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore KD, Nelson MP (eds) (2010) Moral ground: ethical action for a planet in peril. Trinity University Press, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MP (2021) Ground rules for ethical ecology. Am Sci 109:246–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins WG (2018) The H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest: seventy years of pathbreaking forest research. Or Hist Q 119(4):454–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins WR (2020) A place for inquiry, a place for wonder: the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R (2012) Biocultural ethics: the vital links between the inhabitants, their habits and regional habitats. Environ Ethics 34:27–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R (2013) Biocultural ethics: from biocultural homogenization toward biocultural conservation. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C, Armesto JJ, Callicott JB (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Ecology and ethics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 9–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R, Arango X, Massardo F, Anderson C, Heidinger K, Moses K (2008) Field environmental philosophy and biocultural conservation: the Omora Ethnobotanical Park education program. Environ Ethics 30:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R, Armesto JJ, Gutiérrez J, Massardo F, Likens G, Anderson CB, Poole A, Moses K, Hargrove G, Mansilla A, Kennedy JH, Willson M, Jax K, Jones C, Callicott JB, Kalin MT (2012) Integrating ecology and environmental ethics: earth stewardship in the southern end of the Americas. BioScience 62(3):226–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozzi R, Massardo F, Anderson C, Heidinger K, Silander J (2006) Ten principles for biocultural conservation at the southern tip of the Americas: the approach of the Omora Ethnobotanical Park. Ecol Soc 11(1):43. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art43/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson FJ (2015) Confluence of arts, humanities, and science at sites of long-term ecological inquiry. Ecosphere 6(8):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00139.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson FJ, Goodrich C, Moore KD (2008) Bridging boundaries: scientists, creative writers, and the long view of the forest. Front Ecol Environ 6(9):499–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauro A, Ojeda J, Caviness T, Mosses K, Moreno R, Wright T, Zhu D, Poole A, Massardo F, Rozzi R (2021) Field environmental philosophy: a biocultural ethic approach to education and ecotourism for sustainability. Sustainability 13:4526. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu D (2022) Bridge the channel, enhance the inclusivity: a comparison between flagship species-centered and moss-centered conservation in Chile and China. In: Rozzi R, Tauro A, Wright T, Avriel-Avni N, May RH Jr (eds) Field environmental philosophy: education for biocultural conservation. Ecology and ethics, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht, p nnn

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The HJ Andrews Experimental Forest and Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) program is administered cooperatively by the US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Oregon State University, and the Willamette National Forest. This was supported by the National Science Foundation under LTER grants DEB-2025755 and DEB-1440409 and the Spring Creek Project in the School of History, Philosophy, and Religion, Oregon State University, from the Shotpouch Foundation, US Forest Service, and private donors. I greatly appreciate contributions over the years from KD Moore, C Goodrich, MP Nelson, C Lettero, W Robbins, R Rozzi, and many others.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick J. Swanson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Swanson, F.J. (2023). The H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest Long-Term Ecological Research Program, Oregon, USA: A Historical Biocultural Perspective. In: Rozzi, R., Tauro, A., Avriel-Avni, N., Wright, T., May Jr., R.H. (eds) Field Environmental Philosophy. Ecology and Ethics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23368-5_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics