Skip to main content

Explicating Field-Defining Concepts: The Global, the Cosmopolitan, and the Parochial

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Cross-Border Journalism
  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

Over the past few decades, globalization and revolution in communication technology have metamorphosized the news media and their relationship with social and human communication. This chapter delves into these macro trends by explicating three key concepts, the global, the cosmopolitan, and the parochial. Occurring in various iterations, these conceptual threads capture important research themes relating to the practice and problematics of international journalism. By observing the debate, controversies, and the points of disagreement—sometimes severe—among scholars investigating cross-border journalism, this critical essay will elucidate the various issues and agendas defining the challenges of journalism research in the current and upcoming eras.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Social communication tends to involve multiple speakers (not necessarily at the same time), whereas human communication includes communication with family members and professionals (such as doctor-patient).

  2. 2.

    Although social psychologists use many different definitions (Schneider, 2004), they tend to assert that stereotyping is an act of generalization that involves categorization with an implied ingroup and the outgroup (Mackie et al., 1996; Stangor, 2015).

  3. 3.

    However, one aspect of cross-border journalism that is not well investigated is the reverse case: how non-Western media report the West. It is quite possible for instance, that Middle East’s news media reporting of the West or Asian (e.g., China, Japan) media’s reporting of the West could be just as biased and distorted toward the West.

Recommended Readings

  • Bebawi, S., & Evans, M. (2019). The future foreign correspondent. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez, K. (2007). The myth of media globalization. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (1997). Covering Islam: How the media and the experts determine how we see the rest of the world. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tanikawa, M. (2023). Explicating Field-Defining Concepts: The Global, the Cosmopolitan, and the Parochial. In: Rothenberger, L., Löffelholz, M., Weaver, D.H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Cross-Border Journalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23023-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics