Abstract
This chapter explores what is original and distinctive of populist foreign policy in Latin America and what are the factors that enable and constrain it. The chapter proceeds as follows: first, we introduce the conceptual dimensions of populism and its more common use in terms of foreign policy analysis. This section also provides an eclectic analytical framework that captures the tradition of populism and its ability to shape the present (temporal dimension), how populists make sense of the international within their regions and in the global arena (spatial dimension), and the creative dimension of the populist leader (agential dimension). Second, we provide a historical contextualization of early populist experiences in Latin America and their key foreign policy principles and tradition. Third, we analyse the different waves of populism especially from the 1990s onwards along the lines of tradition, geopolitics, and leadership. Finally, we conclude with a comparison of the Latin American populist foreign policies in terms of commonalities and differences as well as we outline further research avenues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Financial crises occurred not only in Latin America but also in other parts of the world: Mexico 1994, Southeast Asia 1997, Russia 1998, Brazil 1999, and Argentina 200l.
- 3.
As Souroujon states, certain elements of classical populism would be present in the left turn populists: “(…) the redistributive vocation, the polyclassist mobilization, the nationalization of strategic companies related to energy resources, which was combined with a radicalized rhetoric of the constitution of the people in the face of external and internal enemies” (2021, p. 4).
References
Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International Practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36.
Adler-Nissen, R., & Pouliot, V. (2014). Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 889–911.
Ackerman, S. R., Desierto, D., & Volosin, N. (2011). Hyper-Presidentialism: Separation of Powers without Checks and Balances in Argentina and the Philippines. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 29(1), 246–333. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38XW8H
Amsdem, A. (2001). The Rise of ‘The Rest’: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. Oxford University Press.
Arenas, N. (2016). El chavismo sin Chávez: la deriva de un populismo sin carisma. Nueva Sociedad, 261, 13–22.
Boucher, J.-C., & Thies, C. G. (2019). ‘I am a tariff man’: The Power of Populist Foreign Policy Rhetoric Under President Trump. The Journal of Politics, 81(2), 712–722.
Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge University Press.
Casarões, G. S. P. e. (2012). O papel do Itamaraty na definição da política externa do governo Collor de Mello. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 55(1), 135–153.
Casarões, G. S. P. E., & Barros Leal Farias, D. (2022). Brazilian Foreign Policy Under Jair Bolsonaro: Far-Right Populism and the Rejection of the Liberal International Order. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 35(5), 741–761.
Casullo, M. E. (2019b). How to Become a Leader: Identifying Global Repertoires for Populist Leadership. In F. A. Stengel, D. B. MacDonald, & D. Nabers (Eds.), Populism and World Politics (pp. 55–72). Palgrave Macmillan.
Casullo, M. E. (2019a). ¿Por qué funciona el populismo? El discurso que sabe construir explicaciones convincentes de un mundo en crisis. Siglo XXI.
Chryssogelos, A. (2017). Populism and Foreign Policy. Retrieved January 28, 2020, from http://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/5186/1/Populism-in-Foreign-Policy_OUP_Revised.pdf.
Chryssogelos, A. (2018). Populism in Foreign Policy. In C. Thies (Ed.), Oxford Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis. Oxford University Press.
Conniff, M. (Ed.). (1982). Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective. University of New Mexico Press.
Conniff, M. (1999). Populism in Latin America. The University of Alabama Press.
Da Motta Veiga, P., & Ríos, S. (2007). O Regionalismo pós-liberal, na América do Sul: origens, iniciativas e dilemas. CEPAL, 82, 1–48.
de la Torre, C. (2010). Populist Seduction in Latin America. Ohio University Press.
Deciancio, M., & Tussie, D. (2020). Globalizing Global Governance: Peripheral Thoughts from Latin America. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 13, 29–44.
Destradi, S., & Plagemann, J. (2019). Populism and International Relations: (Un)predictability, Personalisation, and the Reinforcement of Existing Trends in World Politics. Review of International Studies, 45(5), 711–730.
Drezner, D. W. (2017). The Angry Populist as Foreign Policy Leader: Real Change or Just Hot Air. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 41, 23.
Escudé, C. (1992). Realismo Periférico. Fundamentos para la nueva política exterior argentina. Editorial Planeta.
Escudé, C. (1995). El Realismo de los Estados débiles. La política exterior del primer Gobierno Menem frente a la teoría de las relaciones internacionales. GEL.
Frajman, E. (2014). Broadcasting Populist Leadership: Hugo Chávez and Aló Presidente. Journal of Latin American Studies, 46(3), 501–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X14000716
Gardini, G. L., & Lambert, P. (2011). Introduction. In G. L. Gardini & P. W. Lambert (Eds.), Latin American Foreign Policies: Between Ideology and Pragmatism (pp. 1–11). Palgrave Macmillan.
Germani, G. (1978). Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism. Transaction Publishers.
González Vigil, F. (2012). Relaciones de comercio e inversión del Perú con el Asia-Pacífico. In NOVAK, Fabián (coordinador). Veinte años de política exterior peruana (1991–2011) (pp. 209–241). Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2017). Global Populisms and Their Impact. Slavic Review, 76(S1), S3–S8.
Guimarães, F. d. S., & Silva, I. D. O. G. (2021). Far-Right Populism and Foreign Policy Identity: Jair Bolsonaro’s Ultra-Conservatism and the New Politics of Alignment. International Affairs, 97(2), 345–363.
Hawkins, K. (2010). Venezuela’s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Hey, J. (1995). Theories of Dependent Foreign Policy and the Case of Ecuador in the 1980s. Ohio University Center for International Studies.
Jaguaribe, H. (1979). Autonomía periférica y hegemonía céntrica. Estudios Internacionales, 12(46), 91–130.
Kacowicz, A. M., & Wajner, D. F. (2021). Alternative World Orders in an Age of Globalization: Latin American Scenarios and Responses. In Latin America in Global International Relations (pp. 11–30). Routledge.
Knight, A. (1998). Populism and Neo-Populism in Latin America, Especially Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies, 30(2), 223–248.
Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. Verso.
Lesgart, C., & Souroujon, G. (2021). Populism. Uses, Abuses and Travels of an Uncomfortable Concept. In G. P. Doval & G. Souroujon (Eds.), Global Resurgence of the Right. Conceptual and Regional Perspectives (pp. 54–76). Routledge.
Listrani, B. T., & Zaccato, C. (2018). Tendiendo puentes en aguas tumultuosas: la política exterior del gobierno de Mauricio Macri (2015–2018). Perspectivas. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 6, 167–188. https://doi.org/10.35305/prcs.v0i6.39
Löfflmann, G. (2019). America First and the Populist Impact on US Foreign Policy. Survival, 61(6), 115–138.
Lorenzini, M. E., & Pereyra Doval, G. (2020). Tendencias del Orden Internacional y sus efectos sobre el tablero latinoamericano. Conjuntura Austral. Journal of the Global South, 11(55), 34–49.
Lorenzini, M. E., & Pereyra Doval, G. (2019). Posneoliberalismo y después. El Centro Relativo del Sistema Político y el ascenso de la Marea Celeste en el espejo de la Política Exterior de Argentina y Chile. Revista de Ciencia Política, 39(3), 435–457.
Luna, J. P., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2021). Castigo a los oficialismos y ciclo político de derecha en América Latina. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 30(1), 135–156.
Mackinnon, M., & Petrone, M. A. (1998). Populismo y Neopopulismo, el problema de la Cenicienta. Eudeba.
Malamud, A. (2014). Presidentialist Decision Making in Latin American Foreign Policy. Examples from Regional Integration Processes. In A. C. Velasco & J. Dominguez (Eds.), Handbook of Latin America in the World. Routledge.
Malamud, C., & García-Calvo, C. (2009). La política exterior de Ecuador: entre los intereses presidenciales y la ideología, Real Instituto Elcano ARI no. 61/2009.
Mijares, V. (2017). Soft Balancing the Titans: Venezuelan Foreign-Policy Strategy Toward the United States, China, and Russia. Latin American Policy, 8, 201–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12128
Milanesio, N. (2010). Peronists and Cabecitas: Stereotypes and Anxieties at the Peak of Social Change. In M. B. Karush & O. Chamosa (Eds.), The New Cultural History of Peronism (pp. 53–85). Duke University Press.
Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford University Press.
Moffitt, B. (2017). Transnational Populism? Representative Claims, Media and the Difficulty of Constructing a Transnational “People”. Javnost-The Public, 24(4), 409–425.
Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (Eds.). (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge University Press.
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Navarro, M. (1982). Evitas’s Charismatic Leadership. In M. Conniff (Ed.), Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective (pp. 47–67). University of New Mexico Press.
Neto, O. A., & Malamud, A. (2015). What Determines Foreign Policy in Latin America? Systemic versus Domestic Factors in Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico, 1946–2008. Latin American Politics and Society, 57, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00286.x
Panizza, F. (Ed.). (2005). Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. Verso.
Pereyra Doval, G. (2013). The Point of View of the Tradition in the Institutional Identity. The Case of the Ministry of Foreign Relations of Brazil. JANUS.NET E-journal of International Relations, 4(2). https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4135/413534060006.pdf
Pereyra Doval, G., & Ordoñez, E. (2020). De Pivote a Proxy. El occidentalismo rígido de la política exterior bolsonarista. Foreign Affairs Latinoamérica.
Pereyra Doval, G. (2021). Bolsonaro in Brazil. To the Right of the Right. In G. P. Doval & G. Souroujon (Eds.), Global Resurgence of the Right. Conceptual and Regional Perspectives (pp. 214–234). Routledge.
Prebisch, R. (1983). Cinco etapas de mi pensamiento sobre el desarrollo. El trimestre económico, 50(198), 1077–1096.
Reuters. (2022, April 10). Mexico Says It Does Not Accept Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Retrieved August 11, 2022, from https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/mexico-says-it-does-not-accept-russian-invasion-ukraine-2022-04-09/
Riggirozzi, P., & Tussie, D. (2012). The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America. Springer.
Roberts, K. M. (1995). Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: The Peruvian Case. World Politics, 48(1), 82–116.
Roniger, L. (2021). Contesting Liberal Citizenship: The Populist Challenge. ProtoSociology, 38, 229–243.
Russell, R., & Tokatlian, J. G. (2001). De la Autonomía Antagónica a la Autonomía Relacional: una mirada teórica desde el Cono Sur. Posdata. Revista de Reflexión y Análisis Político, 7, 71–92.
Russell, R., & Tokatlian, J. G. (2006). Will Foreign Allies Help? Argentina’s Relations with Brazil and the United States. In E. Epstein & D. Pion Berlin (Eds.), Broken Promises? The Argentine Crisis and Argentine Democracy (pp. 245–269). Lexington Books.
Russell, R., & Tokatlian, J. G. (2013). America Latina y su gran estrategia: entre la aquiescencia y la autonomia. Revista Cidob D’Affers Internacionals, 104, 157–180.
Sagarzazu, I., & Thies, C. G. (2019). The Foreign Policy Rhetoric of Populism: Chávez, Oil, and Anti-imperialism. Political Research Quarterly, 72(1), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918784212
Sanahuja, J. A. (2012). Regionalismo posliberal y multilateralismo en Sudámerica: el caso de Unasur. Anuario de Integración, 9, 19–71.
Sil, R., & Katzenstein, P. (2010). Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Skonieczny, A. (2018). Emotions and Political Narratives: Populism, Trump and Trade. Politics and Governance, 6(4), 62–72.
Skonieczny, A. (2019). Populism and Trade: The 2016 US Presidential Election and the Death of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. In F. A. Stengel, D. B. MacDonald, & D. Nabers (Eds.), Populism and World Politics: Exploring Inter- and Transnational Dimensions (pp. 337–363). Palgrave Macmillan.
Small, J. (2022, March 4). Mexico, Brazil Leaders Ignore Their UN Delegates, Refuse to Sanction Russia. Retrieved August 11, 2022, from https://www.newsweek.com/mexico-brazil-leaders-ignore-their-un-delegates-refuse-sanction-russia-1685001
Souroujon, G. (2021). Las definiciones mínimas de populismo. Problemas y potencialidades. Revista Pilquen, 24(2), 1–12.
St. John, R. B. (2017). La política exterior peruana en el nuevo milenioContinuidad y cambio. Revista del Instituto Riva-Agüero, 2(2), 65–119.
Stefanoni, P. (2018). Biblia, buey y bala… recargados: Jair Bolsonaro, la ola conservadora en Brasil y América Latina. Nueva Sociedad, 278, 4–11.
Stengel, F. A., MacDonald, D. B., & Nabers, D. (Eds.). (2019). Populism and World Politics: Exploring Inter- and Transnational Dimensions. Palgrave Macmillan.
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Open University Press.
Thies, C., & Wehner, L. E. (2022). The Personality Traits of Populist Leaders and Their Foreign Policies: Hugo Chávez and Donald Trump. International Studies Quarterly, 66(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab083
Thies, C. (2017). Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis in Latin America. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(3), 662–681.
Tickner, A. B. (2008). Latin American IR and the Primacy of lo práctico. International Studies Review, 10(4), 735–748.
Verbeek, B., & Zaslove, A. (2017). Populism and Foreign Policy. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 384–405). Oxford University Press.
Villamar, Z. (2019). Un nuevo gobierno en México, ¿Una nueva política exterior?
Wajner, D. F. (2016). La inminente era del neo-progresismo en Latinoamérica. Foreign Affairs Latinoamérica, January, https://revistafal.com/la-inminente-era-delneoprogresismo-en-latinoamerica/
Wajner, D. F. (2019). Making (Latin) America Great Again: Lessons from Populist Foreign Policies in the Americas. In F. A. Stengel, D. B. MacDonald, & D. Nabers (Eds.), Populism and World Politics: Exploring Inter- and Transnational Dimensions (pp. 195–225). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wajner, D. F. (2021). Exploring the Foreign Policies of Populist Governments: (Latin) America First. Journal of International Relations and Development, 24(3), 651–680.
Wajner, Daniel F. (2022). Global Populism. In The Palgrave Handbook of Populism (pp. 351–367). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wajner, D. F., & Giurlando, P. (2023). Introduction to Populist Foreign Policy (PFP). In P. Giurlando & D. Wajner (Eds.), Populist Foreign Policy: Regional Perspectives of Populism in the International Scene. Palgrave.
Wajner, D. F., & Roniger, L. (2019). Transnational Identity Politics in the Americas: Reshaping “Nuestramérica” as Chavismo’s Regional Legitimation Strategy. Latin American Research Review, 54(2), 458–475.
Wajner, D. F., & Roniger, L. (2022). Populism and Transnational Projection: The Legitimation Strategies of Pink Tide Neo-Populist Leaderships in Latin America. Comparative Political Theory, 3, 1–30.
Wehner, L. (2020). The Narration of Roles in Foreign Policy Analysis. Journal of International Relations and Development, 23(2), 359–384.
Wehner, L. E. (2022). Stereotyped Images and Role Dissonance in the Foreign Policy of Right-Wing Populist Leaders: Jair Bolsonaro and Donald Trump. Cooperation and Conflict. https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367221108814
Wehner, L., & Thies, C. (2014). Role Theory, Narratives and Interpretation: The Domestic Contestation of Roles. International Studies Review, 16(3), 411–436.
Wehner, L. E., & Thies, C. G. (2021). The Nexus of Populism and Foreign Policy: The Case of Latin America. International Relations, 35(2), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117820944430
Weyland, K. (1999). Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics, 31(4), 379–401.
Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/422412
Weyland, K. (2003). Economic Voting Reconsidered: Crisis and Charisma in the Election of Hugo Chávez. Comparative Political Studies, 36(7), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003255106
Weyland, K. (2017). Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. A. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press.
Wojczewski, T. (2020). Trump, Populism, and American Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16(3), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orz021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doval, G.P., Wehner, L., Wajner, D.F. (2023). Tradition, Geopolitical Constraints, and Leadership Styles in Latin American Populist Foreign Policy. In: Giurlando, P., Wajner, D.F. (eds) Populist Foreign Policy. Global Foreign Policy Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22773-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22773-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22772-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22773-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)