Abstract
The first objective of this chapter is to present a detailed description of the procedures used to construct the interregional input–output system for Colombia with 2015 data. This tool facilitates analyzing the interrelationships among departments of the country concerning trade flows. The chapter details the methodological procedures adopted to generate the interregional system and the database used by other researchers and practitioners. Different applications are discussed in Part III of this volume, identifying structural features of Colombia’s regional economies. In this chapter, the authors also present illustrative analyses using different indicators from the estimated database, revealing some of the main structural features of the economy of Colombia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Acosta and Bonet in Chap. 4 of this book found limited interregional spillover effects in the economic growth of Colombian departments derived from a spatial econometric estimation.
- 3.
This approach has been applied for distinct interregional systems: interisland model for the Azores (Haddad et al., 2015), interregional models for Brazil (Haddad et al., 2017), Colombia (Haddad et al., 2018), Egypt (Haddad et al., 2016a, 2016b), Greece (Haddad et al., 2020a), Lebanon (Haddad, 2014), Mexico (Haddad et al., 2020b), Morocco (Haddad et al., 2020c), and Paraguay (Haddad et al., 2021).
- 4.
In the following presentation, we abstract from the NPISH component of final demand, whose treatment follows the same procedure as those presented for the other components of domestic absorption.
- 5.
The OD matrix provides information for the following sectors: S1-S3, S5-S6, S10-S13, S15-S32, and S44. For the remaining sectors, we used the most similar sector available.
- 6.
Cai (2022) discusses a calibration procedure for estimating bilateral trade between the regions of a country.
- 7.
For more details, see Miller and Blair (2009).
- 8.
The contribution of external demand for regional output varies considerably by Department (see Chap. 9 of this book).
References
Altman, M. (2003). Staple theory and export-led growth: constructing differential growth. Australian Economic History Review, 43(3), 230–255.
Bonet, J. (2005). Regional structural changes in Columbia: An input output approach, Borradores de Economia, 341. Banco de la República de Colombia.
Chenery, H. B. (1956). Interregional and international input-output analysis. In T. Barna (Ed.), The structure interdependence of the economy (pp. 341–356). Wiley.
Cai, M. (2022). A calibrated gravity model of interregional trade. Spatial Economic Analysis, 1–19.
Dixon, P. B. & Rimmer, M. T. (2004). Disaggregation of results from a detailed general equilibrium model of de US to the State level. General Working Paper n. 145. Centre of Policy Studies.
Gabela, J. G. F. (2020). On the accuracy of gravity-RAS approaches used for inter-regional trade estimation: evidence using the 2005 inter-regional input-output table of Japan. Economic Systems Research, 32(4), 521–539.
Haddad, E. A., Araújo, I. F., Ibarrarán, M. E., Boyd, R., Elizondo, A., & Belausteguigoitia, J. C. (2020b). Interstate input-output model for Mexico, 2013. Análisis Económico, 35(90), 7–43. http://www.analisiseconomico.azc.uam.mx/index.php/rae/article/view/527/380
Haddad, E. A., Cotarelli, N., Simonato, T. C., Vale, V. A., & Visentin, J. C. (2020b). The grand tour: Keynes and Goodwin go to Greece. Economic Structures, 9(31), 1–21.
Haddad, E. A., Farajalla, N., Camargo, M., Lopes, R. L., & Vieira, F. V. (2014). Climate change in Lebanon: Higher-order regional impacts from agriculture. The Region, 1(1), 9–24.
Haddad, E. A., Gonçalves, C. A., & Nascimento, T. (2017). Matriz Interestadual de Insumo-Produto para o Brasil: Uma Aplicação do Método IIOAS. Revista Brasileira De Estudos Regionais e Urbanos, 11(4), 424–446.
Haddad, E. A., Mengoub, F. E., & Vale, V. A. (2020c). Water content in trade: A regional analysis for Morocco. Economic Systems Research, 32(4), 565–584.
Haddad, E. A., Silva, V., Porsse, A. A., & Dentinho, T. P. (2015). Multipliers in an Island economy: The case of the Azores. In A. A. Batabyal & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), The region and trade: New analytical directions (pp. 205–226). World Scientific.
Haddad, E., Faria, W., Galvis, L. A., & Hahn, L. W. (2018). Matriz Insumo-Producto Interregional para Colombia. Revista De Economía Del Caribe, 21, 1–24.
Haddad, E., Faria, W., Galvis, L. A., & Hahn, L. W. (2016a). Interregional input-output matrix for Colombia, Borradores de Economia, 923. Banco de la República.
Haddad, E. A., Lahr, M., Elshahawany, D., & Vassallo, M. (2016b). Regional analysis of domestic integration in Egypt: An interregional CGE approach. Economic Structures, 5(25), 1–33.
Haddad, E.A., Perobelli, F. S., Castro, G. Araújo, I. Ramirez-Alvarez, P. E., & Fernandes, R. (2021). Tool kits in multi-regional and multi-sectoral general equilibrium modeling for paraguay. TD NEREUS 1–2021, Núcleo de Economia Regional e Urbana da Universidade de São Paulo (NEREUS).
Hewings, G. J., & Oosterhaven, J. (2021). Interregional trade: Models and analyses. In M. M. Fischer & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of regional science (pp. 373–395). Springer.
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1984). A dissenter’s confession: ‘The strategy of economic development’ revisited. In G. M. Meier & D. Seers (Eds.,. Pioneers in development (pp. 85–111). The World Bank and Oxford University Press.
Isard, W. (1951). Interregional input-output analysis: A model of a space economy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 33, 318–328.
Isard W., Azis I. J., Drennan M. P., Miller R. E., Saltzman S., & Thorbecke E. (1998). Methods of interregional and regional analysis. Ashgate.
Leontief, W. (1936). Quantitative input-output relations in the economic systems of the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 18, 105–125.
Leontief, W., Hollis, B., Chenery, P., Clark, P., Duesenberry, J., Ferguson, A., Grosse, R., et al. (1953). Studies in the structure of the American economy. White Plains, NY: International Arts and Science Press.
Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2022). Input-output analysis: Foundations and eExtensions (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Moses, L. N. (1955). The stability of interregional trading patterns and input-output analysis. American Economic Review, 45(5), 803–832.
North, D. C. (1955). Location theory and regional economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 63(3), 243–258.
Perobelli, F. S., Haddad, E. A., Moron, J. B., & Hewings, G. J. (2010). Structural interdependence among Colombian departments. Economic Systems Research, 22(3), 279–300.
Perroux, F. (1950). Economic space: Theory and applications. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(1), 89–104.
Round, J. I. (1983). Nonsurvey techniques: A critical review of the theory and the evidence. International Regional Science Review. 8(3), 189–2.
Watkins, M. H. (1963). A staple theory of economic growth. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 29(2), 141–158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: List of Regions
DANE Code | Region | Department |
---|---|---|
5 | R1 | Antioquia |
8 | R2 | Atlántico |
11 | R3 | Bogotá D.C |
13 | R4 | Bolívar |
15 | R5 | Boyacá |
17 | R6 | Caldas |
18 | R7 | Caquetá |
19 | R8 | Cauca |
20 | R9 | Cesar |
23 | R10 | Córdoba |
25 | R11 | Cundinamarca |
27 | R12 | Chocó |
41 | R13 | Huila |
44 | R14 | La Guajira |
47 | R15 | Magdalena |
50 | R16 | Meta |
52 | R17 | Nariño |
54 | R18 | Norte de Santander |
63 | R19 | Quindío |
66 | R20 | Risaralda |
68 | R21 | Santander |
70 | R22 | Sucre |
73 | R23 | Tolima |
76 | R24 | Valle del Cauca |
81 | R25 | Arauca |
85 | R26 | Casanare |
86 | R27 | Putumayo |
88 | R28 | San Andrés |
91 | R29 | Amazonas |
94 | R30 | Guainía |
95 | R31 | Guaviare |
97 | R32 | Vaupés |
99 | R33 | Vichada |
Appendix 2: List of sectors
Id | Sector | CIIU Rev. 4 AC |
---|---|---|
S1 | Agriculture | A0101 |
S2 | Coffee growing | 003 |
S3 | Livestock and hunting | A0102 |
S4 | Forestry and logging | A02 |
S5 | Fishing and aquaculture | A03 |
S6 | Mining of coal and lignite | 017 |
S7 | Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas | 018 021 022 |
S8 | Mining of metal ores | 019 |
S9 | Other mining and quarrying | 020 |
S10 | Processing and preserving of meat and preserving of fish, crustaceans, and mollusks | 023 024 025 |
S11 | Processing of vegetable and animal oils and fats | 026 |
S12 | Processing of dairy products | 027 |
S13 | Processing of grain mill products, starches, and starch products | 028 032 035 |
S14 | Processing of coffee products | 029 |
S15 | Processing of sugar | 030 031 |
S16 | Processing of cocoa, chocolate, and sugar confectionery | 033 |
S17 | Processing and preserving of fruit and vegetables | 034 |
S18 | Manufacture of beverages; manufacture of tobacco products | 036 |
S19 | Manufacture of textiles; manufacture of wearing apparel | 037 038 |
S20 | Manufacture of leather and related products | 039 |
S21 | Manufacture of wood and products of wood and cork, except furniture; manufacture of articles of straw and plaiting materials | 040 |
S22 | Manufacture of paper and paper products; printing and reproduction of recorded media | 041 042 |
S23 | Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products | 043 044 |
S24 | Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products; manufacture of pharmaceuticals, medicinal chemical, and botanical products | 045 046 047 |
S25 | Manufacture of rubber and plastics products | 048 |
S26 | Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products | 049 |
S27 | Manufacture of basic metals; manufacture of fabricated metal products, except machinery and equipment | 050 051 |
S28 | Manufacture of electrical equipment; manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products | 052 |
S29 | Manufacture of machinery and equipment NEC; repair and installation of machinery and equipment | 053 057 |
S30 | Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers, and semi-trailers; Manufacture of other transport equipment | 054 |
S31 | Manufacture of furniture | 055 |
S32 | Other manufacturing | 056 |
S33 | Electricity | 058 059 060 |
S34 | Gas, steam and air conditioning supply | 061 |
S35 | Water collection, treatment and supply | 062 |
S36 | Sewerage; waste collection, treatment and disposal activities; materials recovery | 063 064 065 066 |
S37 | Construction | 067 068 069 |
S38 | Wholesale and retail trade | 070 |
S39 | Repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles | 071 |
S40 | Land transport and transport via pipelines | 072 074 |
S41 | Water transport | 073 |
S42 | Air transport | 075 |
S43 | Warehousing and support activities for transportation | 076 |
S44 | Postal and courier activities | 077 |
S45 | Accommodation and food service activities | I (078–080) |
S46 | Information and communication | J (081–084) |
S47 | Financial and insurance activities | K (085–088) |
S48 | Real estate activities | 089 |
S49 | Professional, scientific and technical activities; administrative and support service activities | M + N (090–097) |
S50 | Public administration and defense; compulsory social security | O (098–099) |
S51 | Education | 100 101 |
S52 | Human health and social work activities | Q (102–103) |
S53 | Arts, entertainment, and recreation; other service activities | R + S (104–108) |
S54 | Activities of households as employers | 109 |
Appendix 3: Sectoral GRP Data
DANE publishes sectoral GRP information for 12 activity sectors in the 33 regions of Colombia for 2015. To obtain a more disaggregated sectoral structure, we disaggregated the sectoral structure using regional shares from other databases. This disaggregation procedure considered the consistency with the sectoral information available at the SUT at the national level. Table 5.3 shows the sectoral structure after the disaggregation of the sectors. This table also exhibits the variables used to calculate regional shares.
After calculating the regional shares for each SUT sector, the respective sectoral value-added estimates at the national level (from the national IO table) were distributed across the 33 Colombian regions. Next, the consistency of the regionalized data with GRP estimates was ensured using the bi-proportional adjustment method, RAS.
DANE publishes information about international trade statistics for 97 products and 33 departments. After calculating the regional shares for each IIOM-COL sector, the respective sectoral exports estimate at the national level (from the national IO table) were distributed across the 33 Colombian regions (Table 5.4).
Appendix 4: Average Travel Time (in Minutes)
See Fig. 5.10.
Appendix 5A: Interregional Trade in Colombia, 2015 (in COP Billions)
See Fig. 5.11.
Appendix 5B: Interregional Trade in Colombia: Purchases Shares, 2015
See Fig. 5.12.
Appendix 5C: Interregional Trade in Colombia: Sales Shares, 2015
See Fig. 5.13.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haddad, E.A., Galvis-Aponte, L.A., Araújo, I.F. (2023). The Interregional Input–Output System for Colombia. In: Haddad, E.A., Bonet, J., Hewings, G.J.D. (eds) The Colombian Economy and Its Regional Structural Challenges. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22653-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22653-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22652-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22653-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)