Skip to main content

Efficiency and Ideas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Organization
  • 748 Accesses

Abstract

The fourth of the distinctions around which this book is organized relates to what it is that international organizations (IOs) actually accomplish. This distinction can best be represented as one between efficiency and ideas. Some analysts of IOs focus on their role in making relations among states as efficient as possible. They do this by submitting IOs to what is essentially an economic style of analysis. Other analysts focus on how IOs affect the way that states, national decision-makers, and global populations more broadly think. In other words, they examine the effects of IOs on norms of behavior in international politics. This calls for a more sociological mode of analysis. This chapter discusses the methodologies of both approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aron, William. “Science and the IWC.” In Toward a Sustainable Whaling Regime, edited by Robert Friedheim, pp. 105–122. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkin, J. Samuel. “The Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms.” Millennium 27 (1998): 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkin, J. Samuel. The Sovereignty Cartel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael. Eyewitness to a Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Handler Chayes. “On Compliance.” International Organization 47 (1993): 175–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claude, Inis Jr. “Collective Legitimation as a Political Function of the United Nations.” International Organization 20 (1966): 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSombre, Elizabeth R., and Joanne Kauffman. “The Montreal Protocol Multilateral Fund: Partial Success Story.” In Institutions for Environmental Aid: Pitfalls and Promise, edited by Robert Keohane and Marc Levy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, Jack. International Human Rights, 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, George, David Rocke, and Peter Barsoom. “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?” International Organization 50 (1996): 379–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, James. “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation.” International Organization 52 (1998): 269–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, Rosemary. Rights beyond Borders: The Global Community and the Struggle over Human Rights in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedheim, Robert, ed. Toward a Sustainable Whaling Regime. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowa, Joanne. “Rational Hegemons, Excludable Goods, and Small Groups: An Epitaph for Hegemonic Stability Theory?” World Politics 41 (1989): 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Julia. “Domestic Capacity and the Implementation Gap in Regional Trade Agreements.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (2014): 55–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Peter, Robert Keohane, and Marc Levy, eds. Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkin, Louis. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Ian. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53 (1999): 379–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Ian. “Legitimacy and Contestation in Global Governance: Revisiting the Folk Theory of International Institutions.” Review of International Organizations 14 (2019): 717–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Robert. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter, Robert Keohane, and Stephen Krasner, eds. Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert. “The Demand for International Regimes.” International Organization 36 (1982): 325–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, Friedrich, and John Gerard Ruggie. “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State.” International Organization 40 (1986): 753–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Edward, Arild Underdal, Steinar Andresen, Jorgen Wettestad, Tora Skodvin, and Elaine Carlin. Environmental Regime Effectiveness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, Jennifer. “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (1999): 225–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Ronald. Intentional Oil Pollution at Sea: Environmental Policy and Treaty Compliance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Ronald. “Sources of Transparency: Information Systems in International Regimes.” International Studies Quarterly 42 (1998): 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar, Sidi. “Rethinking Development from a Postcolonial Perspective.” Conflictology 3 (2012): 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, Nicholas. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oye, Kenneth, ed. Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, Beth. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, Laura. “Gendered Realities of the Immunity Principle: Why Gender Analysis Needs Feminism,” International Studies Quarterly 50 (2006): 889–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Thomas W. “The New Law of War: Legitimizing Hi-Tech and Infrastructural Violence.” International Studies Quarterly 46 (2002): 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Oran, ed. The Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Samuel Barkin .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barkin, J.S. (2023). Efficiency and Ideas. In: International Organization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22559-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics