Skip to main content

Artificial Reverie and Administered Negativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Dialectics of Liberation in Dark Times

Part of the book series: Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice ((CPTRP))

  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

In One-Dimensional Man, Marcuse complicates the Freudian thesis of the discontent inherent to civilization, arguing that “the conflicts of the unhappy individual now seem far more amenable to cure … and seem more adequately defined in terms of the ‘neurotic personality of our time.’” An central element of Marcuse’s thesis is the addition of historical specificity to Freudian theory. However, as subsequent theorists such as Paul Piccone and Tim Luke warn, such a project requires continual development. As monopoly capitalism achieves complete hegemony, they argue, the integrative forces of one-dimensional society undergo qualitative changes—collapsing backward into “artificial negativity.” With these critiques in mind, this chapter attempts to drill down on the idea of negativity, artificial and otherwise. Complementing Marcuse’s Freudian analysis of late capitalist subjectivity with the psychoanalytic theory of Melanie Klein and Wilfred Bion, this chapter seeks to understand negativity from an early developmental perspective. In particular, I draw from Bion’s theory of “reverie” to describe the way contemporary cultural institutions mediate economic demands on character structure with the psychological needs of neoliberal subjects. In this framing, this chapter seeks to understand the internalization of one-dimensional society under conditions of totalized neoliberalism and argues that artificial negativity has continued to develop—emerging in a form I term “administered negativity.” Here, we follow the argument that new modes of thought are structurally compelled during the transition from expansive entrepreneurial capitalism to intensive technological capitalism and that this process of character development nevertheless comports with Marcuse’s one-dimensionality thesis. In so doing, we look to understand the demands of capital on contemporary subjectivity and the continual development of integrative social forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    C.f. One-dimensional Man 50 Years on: The Struggle Continues, ed. Terry Maley (United States: Fernwood Publishing, 2017); Marcuse in the Twenty-First Century: Radical Politics, Critical Theory, and Revolutionary Praxis, ed. Robert Kirsch and Sarah Surak (United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis, 2018).

  2. 2.

    Kirsch, Robert, and Sarah Surak, “Introduction,” New Political Science: Marcuse in the Twenty-First Century: Radical Politics, Critical Theory, and Revolutionary Praxis 38, no. 4 (October 1, 2016): 458.

  3. 3.

    Theodor W. Adorno, “Theory of Pseudo-Culture (1959),” Telos 1993, no. 95 (March 1993): 34.

  4. 4.

    Herbert Marcuse, “Some Social Implications of Modern Technology,” in The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, ed. Andrew Arato and Eike Gebhardt (New York: Continuum, 1982): 142.

  5. 5.

    Ibid., 143.

  6. 6.

    Paul Piccone, “The Crisis of One-Dimensionality,” Telos 35 (March 1978): 45.

  7. 7.

    Ibid.

  8. 8.

    Tim Luke, “Culture and Politics in the Age of Artificial Negativity,” Telos 1978, no. 35 (March 1978): 72.

  9. 9.

    Ibid., 63.

  10. 10.

    Ibid., 58.

  11. 11.

    Indeed, it was in One-Dimensional Man that Marcuse writes “continuity is preserved through rupture: quantitative development becomes qualitative change if it attains the very structure of an established system; the established rationality becomes irrational when, in the course of its internal development, the potentialities of the system have outgrown its institutions.” Marcuse, no doubt, would be unsurprised that one-dimensional society is continually torn apart by its internal contradictions.

  12. 12.

    Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man (Boston: Beacon, 1964), 125–126.

  13. 13.

    Elizabeth Kita, “‘They Hate Me Now But Where Was Everyone When I Needed Them?’: Mass Incarceration, Projective Identification, and Social Work Praxis,” Psychoanalytic Social Work 26, no. 1 (April 2019): 16.

  14. 14.

    Thomas Ogden, The Matrix of the Mind: Object Relations and the Psychoanalytic Dialogue (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004), 68.

  15. 15.

    W. R. Bion, Learning from Experience (London: Karnac, 1984), 34.

  16. 16.

    Ogden, The Matrix of the Mind, 72.

  17. 17.

    Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man, 10.

  18. 18.

    Ibid., 74.

  19. 19.

    Ibid., 74.

  20. 20.

    Melanie Klein, “Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms,” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 27 (1946): 99–110.

  21. 21.

    Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man, 10–11.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., 193.

  23. 23.

    Ibid.

  24. 24.

    Joel Kovel, “Rationalization and the Family,” in Race, Politics, and Culture: Critical Essays on the Radicalism of the 1960s, ed. Adolph Reed, Jr (Westport: Greenwood, 1986), 207–226.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., 209–210.

  26. 26.

    Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society (Boston: Beacon, 1964), 157.

  27. 27.

    David Riesman, The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963).

  28. 28.

    C. Wright Mills, “The Competitive Personality,” Partisan Review 13, no. 4 (September–October 1946): 433–441.

  29. 29.

    Ibid., 440–441.

  30. 30.

    Kovel, The Age of Desire, 128.

  31. 31.

    W. R. Bion, Learning from Experience (London and New York: Karnac, 1962), 66–67.

  32. 32.

    Ibid., 67.

  33. 33.

    Kant, Critique of Pure Reason A.138/B.177, 180.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., A.141/B.180, 182–183.

  35. 35.

    Ibid., A.142/B.181, 183.

  36. 36.

    Ibid., A.141/B.180, 182.

  37. 37.

    Ibid., A.141–142/B.180–181, 183.

  38. 38.

    Bion, Learning from Experience, 34–35.

  39. 39.

    Ibid., 34–35.

  40. 40.

    Ibid., 91.

  41. 41.

    Ibid., 37.

  42. 42.

    Ibid., 36.

  43. 43.

    Ibid.

  44. 44.

    W. R. Bion, “Attacks on Linking,” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 40 (1959): 308–315.

  45. 45.

    Theodor W. Adorno, “Theory of Pseudo-Culture (1959),” Telos 1993, no. 95 (March 1993): 34.

  46. 46.

    Ibid., 151.

  47. 47.

    Benjamin Y Fong, “What Does America Believe?” Damage, June 3, 2019, https://damagemag.com/2019/06/03/what-does-america-believe/.

  48. 48.

    Rodrigo Duarte, “The Culture Industry in Brazil,” Chapter 4 in Culture Industry Today, ed. Fabio Akcelrud Durão (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2010), 96.

  49. 49.

    Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno, trans. John Cumming, Dialectic of Enlightenment (New York: Continuum, 1996), 124–125.

  50. 50.

    Chris Crawford, “Dosing Culture, Part One,” Damage, September 3, 2020, https://damagemag.com/2020/09/03/dosing-culture-part-one/.

  51. 51.

    Aurora Borealis, “On the Persistence of Left Hegelianism,” Damage, October 29, 2018, https://damagemag.com/2018/10/29/on-the-persistence-of-left-hegelianism/.

  52. 52.

    Joel Kovel, “Rationalization and the Family,” in Race, Politics, and Culture: Critical Essays on the Radicalism of the 1960s, ed. Adolph Reed, Jr (Westport: Greenwood, 1986), 220.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taylor Hines .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hines, T. (2023). Artificial Reverie and Administered Negativity. In: Hines, T., Jansen, PE., Kirsch, R.E., Maley, T. (eds) The Dialectics of Liberation in Dark Times. Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22488-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics