Skip to main content

e-Government and Green IT: The Intersection Point

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Data and Algorithms for e-Government

Abstract

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) use in the public sector has changed in recent decades. There is a growing demand for governments to expand their data processing and storage capabilities. Public services provided to citizens are being migrated from physical processes to digital ones. Thus, governments guided by digital technologies have emerged and the concept of e-Government standout. However, technological evolution must development aligned with current environmental concerns. Hereupon, the concept of Green IT has been highlighted in the scientific literature and in organizations/industries that seek the sustainable use of ICT. Thus, this study aims to identify the intersection point between the scientific literature on e-Government and Green IT to enable interdisciplinary research lines involving these subjects. To achieve the objective, first, Systematic Literature Review (SLR) techniques were applied to identify 102 studies. In a second step, techniques of Lexical Analysis and Content Analysis were applied to the textual corpus of the studies identified by the SLR. Third, we applied Zipf’s and Bradford’s bibliometrics laws to identify the main scientific journals and prolific authors. Our analyses suggest that e-Government and Green IT subjects have no associations in the literature studied. Each of the themes is discussed and analyzed differently, but they share similar theoretical underpinnings in the Information Systems field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liang, Y., Qi, G., Zhang, X., & Li, G. (2019). The effects of e-Government cloud assimilation on public value creation: An empirical study of China. Government Information Quarterly, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101397

  2. Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deng, H. (2008). Towards objective benchmarking of electronic government: An inter-country analysis. Transforming Government People, Process Policy, 2, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506160810902176

  4. Antoni, D., Apriliani, Herdiansyah, M.I., & Akbar, M. (2018). Critical factors of transparency and trust for evaluating e-government services for the poor. In 2nd International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2017, pp. 1–6. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Bina Darma.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krishnan, S., & Teo, T. S. H. (2011). e-Government, e-business, and national environmental performance. In PACIS 2011—15th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Quality Research in Pacific. Department of Information Systems, School of Computing, National University of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murugesan, S., & Gangadharan, G. R. (2012). Harnessing Green IT: Principles and Practices. Wiley-IEEE Computer Society PR

    Google Scholar 

  7. Butler, T. (2011). Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: Building theory on the role of Green IS. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20, 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dao, V. T., Langella, I. M., & Carbo, J. (2011). From green to sustainability: Information technology and an integrated sustainability framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20, 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2011.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sedera, D., Lokuge, S., Tushi, B., & Tan, F. (2017). Multi-disciplinary green IT archival analysis: A pathway for future studies. In: Communications of the Association for Information Systems, p 28. Association for Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jnr, B. A. (2020). Examining the role of green IT/IS innovation in collaborative enterprise-implications in an emerging economy. Technology in Society, 62, 101301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ojo, A. O., & Fauzi, M. A. (2020). Environmental awareness and leadership commitment as determinants of IT professionals engagement in Green IT practices for environmental performance. Sustainable Production and Consumption. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, A. J., Boudreau, M.-C., & Watson, R. (2008). Information systems and ecological sustainability. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10, 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287260810916907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Houghton, J. (2007). ICT and the environment: A framework for analysis. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/40833025.pdf

  14. Kumar, R., & Mieritz, L. (2007). Conceptualizing “Green” IT and Data Center Power and Cooling Issues

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lange, S., Pohl, J., & Santarius, T. (2020). Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand? Ecological Economics, 176, 106760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106760

  16. Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., Molina-Castillo, F.J., & Reuver, M. (2018). The impact of digitalization on business models. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20, 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2017-0039

  17. Mahmudul Hasan, M. (2015). e-Government service research development: A literature review. Public Affairs and Administration Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Application, 1, 538–568. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8358-7.CH025

  18. Lee, J., Kim, H. J., & Ahn, M. (2011). The willingness of e-Government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lips, A. M. B., & Schuppan, T. (2009). Transforming e-government knowledge through public management research. Public Management Review, 11, 739–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030903318921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shareef, M., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). e-Government adoption model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carter, L. D., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information System Journal, 15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x

  23. Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2012). e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wyld, D. C. (2010). The cloudy future of government it: cloud computing and the public sector around the world. International Journal of Web and Semantic Technology, 1, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ingrams, A., Manoharan, A., Schmidthuber, L., & Holzer, M. (2020). Stages and determinants of e-government development: A twelve-year longitudinal study of global cities. International Public Management Journal, 23, 731–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1467987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Malodia, S., Dhir, A., Mishra, M., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2021). Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saylam, A., & Yıldız, M. (2022). Conceptualizing citizen-to-citizen (C2C) interactions within the E-government domain. Government Information Quarterly, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101655

  29. Umbach, G., & Tkalec, I. (2022). Evaluating e-governance through e-government: Practices and challenges of assessing the digitalisation of public governmental services. Evaluation and Program Planning, 93, 102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Watson, R., Boudreau, M.-C., & Chen, A. J. (2010). Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: Energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quarterly, 34, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Elliot, S. (2011). transdisciplinary perspectives on environmental sustainability: A resource base and framework for IT-enabled business transformation. MIS Quarterly, 35, 197–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043495

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Bose, R., & Luo, X. (2011). Integrative framework for assessing firms’ potential to undertake Green IT initiatives via virtualization—A theoretical perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20, 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2011.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Landum, M., Moura, M. M. M. E, & Reis, L. (2021). A framework for the Alignment of ICT with Green IT. Advance in Science, Technology and Engineering System Journal, 6, 593–601. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj060268

  34. Verdecchia, R., Lago, P., Ebert, C., & De Vries, C. (2021). Green IT and green software. IEEE Software, 38, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2021.3102254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Anthony, B., Majid, M. A., & Romli, A. (2020). A generic study on Green IT/IS practice development in collaborative enterprise: Insights from a developing country. Journal of Engineering and Technological Management—JET-M, 55, 101555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bernstein, J. H. (2014). Disciplinarity and trandisciplinarity in the study of knowledge. Informing Science, 17, 241–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Minayo, M.C. de S., & Sanches, O. (1993). Quantitativo-qualitativo: oposição ou complementaridade? Cadernos de Saude Publica, 9, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X1993000300002

  38. Minayo, M.C. de S. (2012). Análise qualitativa: teoria, passos e fidedignidade. Ciência and Saúde Coletiva, 17, 10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012000300007

  39. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a Review. MIS Quarterly, 26, xiii–xxiii. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132319

  40. Eitan, A. T., Smolyansky, E., & Harpaz, I. K., Connected Papers. https://www.connectedpapers.com/about

  41. Jenkin, T. A., Webster, J., & McShane, L. (2011). An agenda for “Green” information technology and systems research. Information and Organization, 21, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Melville, N. P. (2010). Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS Quarterly, 34, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schmermbeck, H. (2019). On making a difference: Towards an integrative framework for green IT and green IS adoption. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawai, EUA.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jnr, B. A., Mazlina, A. M., & Awanis, R. (2017). Sustainable adoption and implementation in collaborative enterprise: A systematic literature review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95, 1875–1915.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Oseni, K. O., Dingley, K., & Hart, P. (2015). Barriers facing e-Service technology in developing countries: A structured literature review with Nigeria as a case study. In 2015 International Conference on Information Society (i-Society), pp. 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Oseni, K. O., Dingley, K., & Hart, P.(2015). e-Service security: taking proactive measures to guide against theft, case study of developing countries. International Journal of e-Learning, 5, 454–461. https://doi.org/10.20533/IJELS.2046.4568.2015.0058

  50. Yusifov, F., & Gurbanli, A. (2018). e-Services evaluation criteria: the case of Azerbaijan. Information and Moksl. https://doi.org/10.15388/IM.2018.0.11938

  51. Ranaweera, H. (2016). Perspective of trust towards e-government initiatives in Sri Lanka. Springerplus, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1650-y

  52. Johnson, N., & Phillips, M. (2018). Rayyan for systematic reviews. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 30, 46–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2018.1444339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Marchand, P., & Ratinaud, P. (2012). L’analyse de similitude appliquée aux corpus textuels : les primaires socialistes pour l’élection présidentielle française. In Actes des 11èmes Journées Internationales d’Analyse des Données Textuelles (JADT), pp. 687–699.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Camargo, B. V., & Justo, A. M. (2013). IRAMUTEQ: Um software gratuito para análise de dados textuais. Temas em Psicologia, 21, 513–518. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2013.2-16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Frogeri, R. F., Ziviani, F., Martins, A. de P., Maria, T. C., & Zocal, R. M. F. (2022). O Grupo de trabalho 4 do enancib: uma análise bibliométrica. Perspect. em Gestão Conhecimento, 12, 235–252. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2236-417X.2022v12n1.62824

  56. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00028-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Franklin Frogeri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frogeri, R.F., da Silva Diniz, W.F., dos Santos Portugal Júnior, P., Piurcosky, F.P. (2023). e-Government and Green IT: The Intersection Point. In: Gaie, C., Mehta, M. (eds) Recent Advances in Data and Algorithms for e-Government. Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Software and Systems Engineering, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22408-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics