Abstract
To facilitate societal adaptation, we need to establish the principles of Endeavor Architecture (EnA) in addressing the limitations of Enterprise Architecture (EA). To support the social perspectives that EnA adds, we propose establishing EnA directions and requirements, particularly epistemic relationships among the agencies. Furthermore, we assert that EnA must be open to new paradigms and technologies to facilitate societal adaptation. EnA also must accelerate data, information, knowledge, and wisdom transformation, integration, and sharing. We illustrate how the Upper Modelling Framework (UMF), an open, system-oriented upper ontology, along with ten principles of knowledge dynamics, may serve as a framework that sets the direction of EnA beyond EA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersen J.T., Sax J., Giannozzi A.: Conjoint effects of interacting strategy-making processes and lines of defense practices in strategic Risk Management: an empirical study. Long Range Plann. (2021) 102164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102164.
Batty, M., et al.: Smart cities of the future. The Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214(1), 481–518 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
Baxter, H.: Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Stanford University Press (2011). https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804769129.001.0001
Baxter, M., Polovina, S., Kemp, N., Laurier, W.: Underpinning layered enterprise architecture development with formal concept analysis. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds.) Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. The 1st Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement (MOVE) Workshop at the 23rd ACM CSCW2020, revised selected papers. CCIS 1694. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/series/7899/books (2022)
Blakemore, E.: This is What Happened When an Australian City Gave Trees Email Addresses. Smithsonian Magazine. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/what-happened-when-australian-city-gave-trees-email-addresses-180955851/ (2015)
Bohman, J., Rehg, W.: Jürgen Habermas. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/habermas/. Accessed 21 Sep 2022 (2017)
Boyd, R., Richerson, P.J., Henrich, J.: The cultural niche: why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108(supplement_2), 10918–10925 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100290108
Caine, J.: Advancing strategy ontology. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds.) Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. The 1st Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement (MOVE) Workshop at the 23rd ACM CSCW2020, revised selected papers. CCIS 1694. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/series/7899/books (2022)
Callaghan, C.: Disaster management, crowdsourced R&D and probabilistic innovation theory: Toward real-time disaster response capability. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduction 17, 238–250 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.05.004
Callaghan, C.: The physics of a coronavirus pandemic: how to avoid impending apocalyptic or dystopian economic scenarios (3 April 2020). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3567585. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3567585
Cavoukian, A.: Privacy by Design. https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/pbd_implement_7found_principles.pdf (2011). Accessed 15 Sep 2022
Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Marjanovic, O.: Ethical Implications of IT-enabled Information Flows Conceived as Intermediaries or Mediators, Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Adelaide (2015)
Chikersal, P., Tomprou, M., Kim, Y., Wooley, W.A., Dabbish, L.: Deep structures of collaboration: physiological correlates of collective intelligence and group satisfaction. In: CSCW ‘17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp 873–888 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998250
Chourabi, H., et al.: Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework. Computer Society, IEEE (2012)
Colfer, J.L., Baldwin, Y.C.: The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions, Working Paper, Harvard Business School Working Papers Series (2016)
Continuity Central. Academic study provides insights into effective enterprise risk management. The latest enterprise risk management news from around the world (January 2022). https://www.continuitycentral.com/index.php/news/erm-news/6974-academic-study-provides-insights-into-effective-enterprise-risk-management
Conroy, N.K., Rubin, V.L., Chen, Y.: Automatic deception detection: methods for finding fake news. Proc. Assoc. Info. Sci. Technol. 52(1), 1–4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010082
Dawes, S.S., Bloniarz, A.P., Kelly, L.K., Fletcher, D.P.: Some Assembly Required: Building a Digital Government for the 21st Century. Center for Technology in Government, University of Albany, State University of New York. https://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/some_assembly/some_assembly.pdf (1999)
Dietz, J.L.G.: Understanding and modelling business processes with DEMO. In: Akoka, J., Bouzeghoub, M., Comyn-Wattiau, I., Métais, E. (eds.) ER 1999. LNCS, vol. 1728, pp. 188–202. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47866-3_13
Dietz, J.L.G., Mulder, J.B.H.: The Evolution of DEMO (2020a) http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2825/paper6.pdf
Dietz, J.L.G., Mulder, H.B.F.: Enterprise Ontology: A Human-Centric Approach to Understanding the Essence of Organisation. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020)
Dignum, V.: Responsible artificial intelligence: designing AI for human values. ITU J. ICT Discoveries 1(1), 1–8 (2018). https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/opb/journal/S-JOURNAL-ICTF.VOL1-2018-1-PDF-E.pdf
Enterprise Architecture Solutions: Essential Project (2022). https://enterprise-architecture.org/. Accessed 21 Sep 2022
Few, R., Morchain, D., Spear, D., et al.: Transformation, adaptation, and development: relating concepts to practice. Palgrave Commun. 3, 17092 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.92
Finkelstein, C.: Enterprise Architecture for Integration: Rapid Delivery Methods and Technologies. Artech House, Boston (2006)
Frosch-Wilke, D., Tuchtenhagen, S.: Using business intelligence systems for enterprise architecture. IADIS Int. J. 14(1), 57–69 (2016)
Gaß, O., Ortbach, K., Kretzer, M., Maedche, A., Niehaves, B.: Conceptualizing individualization in information systems – a literature review. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 37, 64–88 (2015). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol37/iss1/3
Gell-Man, M.: What is complexity? Complexity 1(1), 16–19 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.6130010105
Gell-Man, M.: Interview with Murray Gell-Mann, Nobel Laureate in Physics 1969 by Joanna Rose (2001). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBmUmLTGj1Q
Gell-Mann, M.: A Crude Look at the Whole. Talk given at Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (2013) https://www.paralimes.org/tag/murray-gell-mann/
Gharajedaghi, J.: Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity: A Platform for Designing Business Architecture. Butterworth-Heinemann (2006)
Global Forest Watch: Global Forest Watch, Washington, DC. https://www.globalforestwatch.org (20002). Accessed 26 Sep 2022
Giachetti, R.E.: Design of Enterprise Systems: Theory, Architecture, and Methods. Taylor & Francis Group, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2010)
Zachman, J.P.: The Zachman Framework Evolution by: John P. Zachman. Zachman International. https://www.zachman.com/ea-articles-reference/54-the-zachman-framework-evolution (2011)
Zachman, A.J.: Enterprise Architecture Defined: Primitives and Composites. https://www.zachman.com/resources/zblog/item/enterprise-architecture-defined-primitives-and-composites (2019)
Gidley, J.: Global knowledge futures: articulating the emergence of a new meta-level field. Integr. Rev. 9(2), (2013)
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C, Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., Meijers, E.: Smart Cities – Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna University of Technology. http://curis.ku.dk/ws/files/37640170/smart_cities_final_report.pdf (2007). Accessed 26 Sep 2022
Goertzel, B.: Artificial general intelligence: concept, state of the art, and future prospects. J. Artif. Gen. Intell. 5(1), 1–46 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2014-0001
Gong, Y., Janssen, M.: The value of and myths about enterprise architecture. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 46, 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.006
Groza, A.: Towards detecting fake news using natural language understanding and reasoning in Description Logics. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds.) Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. The 1st Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement (MOVE) Workshop at the 23rd ACM CSCW2020, revised selected papers. CCIS 1694. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/series/7899/books (2022)
Groza, A., Pomarlan, M.: Towards an ontology of explanations. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds.) Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. The 1st Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement (MOVE) Workshop at the 23rd ACM CSCW2020, revised selected papers. CCIS 1694. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/series/7899/books (2022)
Groza, A., Pop, A.: Fake news detector in the medical domain by reasoning with description logics. In: 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP), Cluj-Napoca, Romania, pp. 145–152 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCP51029.2020.9266270
GUA: Enterprise Ontology. The Global University Alliance. https://www.globaluniversityalliance.org/research/enterprise-ontology/. Accessed 21 Sep 2022
Hall, R., Bowerman, B, Braverman, J., Taylor, J., Todosow, H., von Wimmersperg, U.: The vision of a smart city. In: 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop. Paris, France (2000). https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/773961
Habermas, J.: The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. The MIT Press (1991)
Habermas, J.: The Future of Human Nature. Polity Press (2003)
Hanschke, I.: Strategic IT Management: A Toolkit for Enterprise Architecture Management. Springer, London, NY (2010)
Hammer & Company: PRISM: Dispersion and Interconnection: Approaches to Distributed Systems Architecture, Final Report. Technical report, CSC Index, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts (1986)
Harrison, C., Donnelly, I.A.: A theory of smart cities. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS, vol. 55, issue 1. Hull, UK (2011) https://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings55th/article/view/1703
Harrison, C., et al.: Foundations for smarter cities. IBM J. Res. Dev. 54(4), 1–16 (2010)
Heintz, E., et al.: Framework for systematic identification of ethical aspects of healthcare technologies: the SBU approach. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 31(3), 124–130 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462315000264
Heng, M.S.H., De Moor, A.: From Habermas’s communicative theory to practice on the internet. Info. Syst. J. 13, 331–352 (2003)
Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92671-9
Hong, A., et al.: Reconciling big data and thick data to advance the new urban science and smart city governance, J. Urban Aff. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.2021085
Jakobsen, D., Graf (2022). Formal, measurable ontologies for worldviews. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds.) Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. The 1st Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement (MOVE) Workshop at the 23rd ACM CSCW2020, revised selected papers. CCIS 1694. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/series/7899/books (2022)
Jani, A., et al.: A novel ontological approach to estimate inequalities and underuse of social prescriptions for mental health in primary care in England. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds.) Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. The 1st Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement (MOVE) Workshop at the 23rd ACM CSCW2020, revised selected papers. CCIS 1694. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/series/7899/books (2022)
Kaisler, S., Armour, F.: Enterprise architecting: critical problems. In: 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS-38 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.241
Kakarontzas, G., Anthopoulos, G.L., Chatzakou, D., Vakali, A.: A conceptual enterprise architecture framework for smart cities - a survey based approach. In: 11th Int. Conf. on E-Business (ICE-B), pp. 47–54 (2014)
Kappelman, L., Zachman, J.: The enterprise and its architecture: ontology & challenges. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. 53(4), 87–95 (2013)
Kelly, Y., Zilanawala, A., Booker, C., Sacker, A.: Social media use and adolescent mental health: findings from the UK millennium cohort study. eClinical Med., part of The Lancet Discovery Sci. 6, 59–68 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.12.005
Kendal, E.: Ethical, legal and social implications of emerging technology (ELSIET) symposium. Bioethical Inquiry 19, 363–370 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-022-10197-5
Knauss, A., Borici, A., Knauss E., Damian, D.: Towards understanding requirements engineering in IT ecosystems. In: Second IEEE International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE), pp. 33–36. Chicago, IL (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2012.6347679
Lacey, J., Howden, M., Cvitanovic, C., Dowd, A.: Informed adaptation: ethical considerations for adaptation researchers and decision-makers. Glob. Environ. Chang. 32, 200–220 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.011
Lan, M., Liu, L., Burmeister, J., Zhu, W., Zhou, H., Gu, X.: Are crime and collective emotion interrelated? a “broken emotion”. conjecture from community twitter posts. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221113210
Lapalme, J.: Three schools of thought on enterprise architecture. IT Prof. 14(6), 37–43 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2011.109
Lapalme, J., Gerber, A., Van der Merwe, A., Zachman, J., De Vries, M., Hinkelmann, K.: Exploring the future of enterprise architecture: a Zachman perspective. Comput. Ind. 79, 103–113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.010
Lapouchnian, A.: Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: An Overview of the Current Research. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto. http://www.cs.utoronto.ca/~alexei/pub/Lapouchnian-Depth.pdf (2005). Accessed 23 Sep 2022
Latapie, H., et al.: A Metamodel and Framework for Artificial General Intelligence from Theory to Practice. J. AI. Consci. 08(02), 205–227 (2021)
Lom, M., Prybil, O.: Smart city model based on systems theory. Int. J. Inform. Manage. 56, 102092 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102092
Martin, J.: The Great Transition. Using the Seven Disciplines of Enterprise Engineering to Align People, Technology and Strategy. Amacon, New York, NY (1995)
McGagh, D., et al.: A novel ontological approach to track social determinants of health in primary care. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds.) Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. The 1st Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement (MOVE) Workshop at the 23rd ACM CSCW2020, revised selected papers. CCIS 1694. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/series/7899/books (2022)
McMaham, P., Evans, J.: Ambiguity and Engagement. Am. J. Sociol. 124(3), (2018). https://doi.org/10.1086/701298
Mircea, E., Toma, L., Sanduleac, M.: The smart city concept of 21st century. Procedia Eng. 181, 12–19 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.357
Moir, E., Moonen, T., Clark, G.: What are future cities? Government Office for Science, UK (2014)
Mohanty, S.P., Choppali, U., Kougianos, E.: Everything you wanted to know about smart cities: the Internet of things is the backbone. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 5(3), 60–70 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2016.2556879
de Moor, A., et al.: Participatory collaboration mapping of design-enabled urban innovations: the MappingDESIGNSCAPES case. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds.) Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. The 1st Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement (MOVE) Workshop at the 23rd ACM CSCW2020, revised selected papers. CCIS 1694. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/series/7899/books (2022a)
de Moor, A., et al.: Collaborative sensemaking of design-enabled urban innovations: the MappingDESIGNSCAPES case. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds.) Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. The 1st Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement (MOVE) Workshop at the 23rd ACM CSCW2020, revised selected papers. CCIS 1694. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/series/7899/books (2022b)
Mora, L., et al.: Assembling sustainable smart city transitions: an interdisciplinary theoretical perspective. J. Urban Technol. 28(1–2), 1–27 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1834831
Mowles, C.: Complex, but not quite complex enough: the turn to the complexity sciences in evaluation scholarship. Evaluation 20(2), 160–175 (2014)
Munafò, M., Nosek, B., Bishop, D., et al.: A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0021 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
Nam, T., Pardo, T.A.: Smart City as Urban Innovation: Focusing on Management, Policy and Context. International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV), Tallinn, Estonia, 26–28 Sep. 2011
Olan, F., Arakpogun, E.O., Suklan, J., Nakpodia, F., Damij, N., Jayawickrama, U.: Artificial intelligence and knowledge sharing: contributing factors to organizational performance. J. Bus. Res. 145, 605–615 (2022)
Op’t Land, M., Proper, E., Waage, M., Cloo, J., Steghuis, C.: Enterprise Architecture: Creating Value by Informed Governance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85232-2
Orr, H.A.: The generic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 119–127 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1523
Perks, C., Beveridge, T. (eds.): Guide to Enterprise IT Architecture. Springer New York, New York, NY (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/b98880
Phuong, T., Biesbroek, R.G., Wals, A.E.J.: The interplay between social learning and adaptive capacity in climate change adaptation: a systematic review. NJAS: Wageningen J. Life Sci. 82(1), 1–9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2017.05.001
Polovina, R.: On understanding and modelling complex systems, through a pandemic. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds.) Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. The 1st Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement (MOVE) Workshop at the 23rd ACM CSCW2020, revised selected papers. CCIS 1694. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/series/7899/books (2022)
Polovina, R.: Formal Object Specification in Object-Oriented Modeling and their Consequences: Integration of Static and Dynamic Aspects–Data, Functions and Events. Ph.D. Thesis, Czech Technical University in Prague (1999)
Polovina, R., Wojtkowski, W.: On the nature of modeling and object orientation. In: 4th Systems Science European Congress, pp 679–688. Valencia, Spain (1999)
Polovina, R., Wojtkowski, W.: Leveraging formal specifications: integration of formal paradigms in multidimensional modeling space. In: Harindranath, G., et al. (eds.) New Perspectives on Information Systems Development, pp. 161–175. Springer US, Boston, MA (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0595-2_13
Polovina, S., Polovina, R., Kemp, N., Pu, K.: MOVE: measuring ontologies in value-seeking environments: CSCW for human adaptation. In: CSCW’20 Companion: Conference Companion Publication of the 2020a on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing October, pp 475–482 (2020a). https://doi.org/10.1145/3406865.3418595
Polovina, S., von Rosing, M., Etzel, G.: Leading the practice in layered enterprise architecture. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 62–69. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2574/ (2020b)
Quick, S.K., Feldman, S.M.: Distinguishing participation and inclusion. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 31(3), 272–290 (2011)
Raphael, K., Poslad, S.: The thing with e.coli: highlighting opportunities and challenges of integrating bacteria in IoT and HCI. In: ‘CHI’19 Extended Abstracts, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, 4–9 May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607
Reader, M.S., Hager, Y., Laland, N.K.: The evolution of primate general and cultural intelligence. Phil. Trans. B 366(1567), 1017–1027 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0342
Richerson, P.J., Boyd, R.: The human life history is adapted to exploit the adaptive advantages of culture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375(1803), 20190498 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0498
Ross, J., Weill, P., Robertson, D.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press (2006)
Sarta, A., Durand, R., Vergne, J.: Organizational adaptation. J. Manag. 47(1), 43–75 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320929088
Shahidi, F.F., Parnia, A., Sidiqqi, A.: Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in premature and avoidable mortality in Canada, 1991–2016. CMAJ 192(39), E1114–E1128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.191723
Singer-Velush, N., Sherman, K., Anderson, E.: Microsoft Analyzed Data on Its Newly Remote Workforce. Harvard Business Review, 15 Jul 2020
Simonet, G., Duchemin, E.: The concept of adaptation: Interdisciplinary scope and involvement in climate change. Sapiens 3(1) (2010). https://journals.openedition.org/sapiens/997#tocto2n1
Smit, B., Pilifosova, O., Huq, S., Challenger, B., Burton, I.: Adaptation to Climate Change in the Context of Sustainable Development and Equity. IPCC Reports. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar3/wg2/chapter-18-adaptation-to-climate-change-in-the-context-of-sustainable-development-and-equity/ (2001). Accessed 21 Sep 2022
Søilen, K.S.: Making sense of the collective intelligence field: a review. J/ Intell. Stud. Bus. 9(2), 6–18 (2019). https://ojs.hh.se/index.php/JISIB/article/view/405
Sowa, F.J., Zachman, A.J.: Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 31(3), 590 (1992)
Sparx Services: https://sparxsystems.us/. Accessed 14 Sep 2022
Stojakovic-Celustka, S.: FinTech and its implementation. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds.) Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. The 1st Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhance-ment (MOVE) Workshop at the 23rd ACM CSCW2020, revised selected papers. CCIS 1694. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://www.springer.com/series/7899/books (2022)
van Steenbergen, M., van den Berg, M., Brinkkemper, S.: A balanced approach to developing the enterprise architecture practice. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J., Cardoso, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2007. LNBIP, vol. 12, pp. 240–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88710-2_19
Sternberg, R.J.: Intelligence. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 14(1), 19–27 (2012). https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.1/rsternberg
Stewart, D., Whalen, M.W., Cofer, D., Heimdahl, M.P.E.: Architectural modeling and analysis for safety engineering. In: Bozzano, M., Papadopoulos, Y. (eds.) IMBSA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10437, pp. 97–111. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64119-5_7
Tapscott, D., Caston, A.: Paradigm Shift – The New Promise of Information Technology. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York (1993). 0-07-062857-2
The Open Group: The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) Standard, 10th edn. https://www.opengroup.org/togaf(2022)
The Open Group: ArchiMate 3.1 Specification. https://publications.opengroup.org/downloadable/download/link/id/MC4xODA3OTQwMCAxNjYyOTIxMjQ2MTYyNDA2NDE2NjAzNzAxMTIy/ (2019)
The World Bank: Urban Development Overview. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/overview#1 (2020)
Toppeta, D.: The Smart City vision: How innovation and ICT can build smart, “livable”, sustainable cities” “The Innovation Knowledge Foundation. https://inta-aivn.org/images/cc/Urbanism/background%20documents/Toppeta_Report_005_2010.pdf (2010)
Tran., T., Cimiano, P., Ankolekar, A.: Rules for an ontology-based approach to adaptation. In: SMAP’06. IEEE (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMAP.2006.31
Vinuesa, R., et al.: The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nat. Commun. 11, 233 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y
Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, A.R, Hayes, M.N., Nelson, E.L.: Helping CIOs Understand Smart Cities’ Initiatives. Forrester. https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/itworldcanada/archive/Themes/Hubs/Brainstorm/forrester_help_cios_smart_city.pdf (2010)
Williams, K.Y., O’Reilly, C.A.: Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Res. Organ. Behav. 20, 77–140 (1998). https://ils.unc.edu/courses/2013_spring/inls285_001/materials/WIlliams.OReilly.1996.Diversity&demography.pdf
Woolley, A.W., Aggarwal, I., Malone, T.W.: Collective intelligence and group performance. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 24(6), 420–424 (2015)
Xiong, F., Pan, S., Zhu, X.: Collective behavior analysis and graph mining in social networks. Complexity 2022, 9873569 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9873569
Yaworsky, P.: A Model for General Intelligence. Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome, NY 13441 (2018). https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1811/1811.02546.pdf
Vacha, T., Pribyl, O., Lom, M., Bacurova, M.: Involving citizens in smart city projects: systems engineering meets participation. In: Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP) (2016)
Zachman, A.J.: Yes, “Enterprise Architecture is Relative”, but it is not Arbitrary. Zachman International. https://www.zachman.com/ea-articles-reference/57-eanotarbitrary (n.d.)
Zachman, A.J.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J. 26(3), 276–292 (1987). https://www.zachman.com/images/ZI_PIcs/ibmsj2603e.pdf
Zachman, A.J.: John Zachman’s Concise Definition of the Zachman Framework™, Zachman International. https://www.zachman.com/about-the-zachman-framework (2008)
Zachman, A.J.: Zachman Framework Rows. What are they? Zachman International. https://www.zachman.com/resources/zblog/item/zachman-framework-rows-what-are-they (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Polovina, R., Polovina, S. (2022). Towards Endeavor Architecture to Support Knowledge Dynamics of Societal Adaptation. In: Polovina, R., Polovina, S., Kemp, N. (eds) Measuring Ontologies for Value Enhancement: Aligning Computing Productivity with Human Creativity for Societal Adaptation. MOVE 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1694. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22228-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22228-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22227-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22228-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)