Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application of TOPSIS Method to Determine Best Alternative in Wire-EDM 90CrSi Tool Steel

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Engineering Research and Application (ICERA 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 602))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 692 Accesses

Abstract

The goal of this research is to find the best process input parameters in wire-electrical discharge machining (wire-EDM) when processing 90CrSi tool steel. The TOPSIS method was used as a tool in this study to solve the MCDM problem. Furthermore, the MEREC method is employed to compute the weights on the output parameters of the experiment result. According to the results of this work, experiment No. 19 is the best experimental setup, with the following input parameters: the cutting voltage VM = 9 (V), the pulse on time Ton = 12 (s), the pulse off time Toff = 18 (s), the servo voltage SV = 35 (V), the wire feed WF = 8 (mm/min), and the feed speed SPD = 4.5 (mm/min).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Trung, D.D., Thinh, H.: A multi-criteria decision-making in turning process using the MAIRCA, EAMR, MARCOS and TOPSIS methods: a comparative study. Adv. Prod. Eng. Manag. 16(4), 443–456 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Do, D.T.: A combination method for multi-criteria decision making problem in turning process. Manuf. Rev. 8 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Do, D.T.: Multi-criteria decision making under the MARCOS method and the weighting methods: applied to milling, grinding and turning processes. Manuf. Rev. 9 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singh, A., et al.: TOPSIS based selection of optimal end milling process parameters. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen, H.-Q., et al.: A comparative study on multi-criteria decision-making in dressing process for internal grinding. Machines 10(5), 303 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huu Phan, N., Muthuramalingam, T.: Multi criteria decision making of vibration assisted EDM process parameters on machining silicon steel using Taguchi-DEAR methodology. Silicon 13(6), 1879–1885 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Majumder, H., Maity, K.: Prediction and optimization of surface roughness and micro-hardness using GRNN and MOORA-fuzzy-a MCDM approach for nitinol in WEDM. Measurement 118, 1–13 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sreeraj, P., et al.: Application of MCDM based hybrid optimization of WEDM process parameters. Mater. Today: Proc. 50, 1186–1192 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jaiswal, A., et al.: Multi response optimization of wire EDM process parameters. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patel, J.D., Maniya, K.D.: Optimization of WEDM process parameters for aluminium metal matrix material Al+ SiC Using MCDM Methods. In: Advances in Manufacturing Processes, pp. 59–70. Springer (2021)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bavche, A.L., Valekar, M., Padaseti, B.K.: Application of MOORA to optimize WEDM process parameters: a multi-criteria decision making approach. In: ICRRM 2019–System Reliability, Quality Control, Safety, Maintenance and Management: Applications to Civil, Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, p. 73 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huo, J., et al.: Influence of process factors on surface measures on electrical discharge machined stainless steel using TOPSIS. Mater. Res. Exp. 6(8), 086507 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huu Phan, N., Muthuramalingam, T.: Multi-criteria decision-making of vibration-aided machining for high silicon-carbon tool steel with Taguchi–topsis approach. Silicon 13(8), 2771–2783 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen, H.-Q., et al.: Multi-criteria decision making in the PMEDM process by using MARCOS, TOPSIS, and MAIRCA methods. Appl. Sci. 12(8), 3720 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hwang, C.-L., Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y.: A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput. Oper. Res. 20(8), 889–899 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M.: Assessment of distribution center locations using a multi-expert subjective–objective decision-making approach. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 1–19 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Thai Nguyen University of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Economics - Technology for Industries, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Trieu Quy Huy

  2. Vinh Long University of Technology Education, Vĩnh Long, Vietnam

    Le Hong Ky & Le Hoang Anh

  3. University of Transport and Communications, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Bui Thanh Danh

  4. Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam

    Nguyen Manh Cuong & Nguyen Thanh Tu

Authors
  1. Trieu Quy Huy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Le Hong Ky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Le Hoang Anh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bui Thanh Danh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nguyen Manh Cuong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nguyen Thanh Tu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nguyen Thanh Tu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam

    Duy Cuong Nguyen

  2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam

    Ngoc Pi Vu

  3. Vietnam Association for Science Editing, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam

    Banh Tien Long

  4. Institute for Automation and Systems Engineering, Ilmenau University of Technology (IUT), Ilmenau, Germany

    Horst Puta

  5. Department of Computer Science and Automation, Ilmenau University of Technology (IUT), Ilmenau, Germany

    Kai-Uwe Sattler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Huy, T.Q., Ky, L.H., Anh, L.H., Danh, B.T., Cuong, N.M., Tu, N.T. (2023). Application of TOPSIS Method to Determine Best Alternative in Wire-EDM 90CrSi Tool Steel. In: Nguyen, D.C., Vu, N.P., Long, B.T., Puta, H., Sattler, KU. (eds) Advances in Engineering Research and Application. ICERA 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 602. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22200-9_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22200-9_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22199-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22200-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation