Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics in Organizational Network Performance: Lessons from Organized Crime and Organizational Wrongdoing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives in Network Studies

  • 147 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter builds the argument for the need of evaluating the performance of organizational networks from a business ethics perspective. Network performance is normally analyzed in terms of coordination and outcomes, two byproducts of network structure and governance, and not in terms of whether its content is ethical or not. But in a time when wrongdoing and unethical decision-making are more and more diffused in organizational networks and bring along very negative outputs such as costly scandals for companies and societies, embracing an ethical perspective on the evaluation of network performance may advance our knowledge on the nuanced phenomenology of network dysfunctionalities. This chapter builds its argument by bridging the two disconnected literatures of network performance and organizational unethical behavior. It starts examining how network studies have treated performance without including the ethical dimension in the picture. Then, it moves to organizational wrongdoing and discusses how unethical behavior is still theorized as a single-organization phenomenon. Third, it shows the implications of, respectively, the absence of ethical evaluations of network performance and of a networked view of wrongdoing. Finally, it paves the way (1) to future research on network studies, by addressing the role and impact of embracing ethical considerations in studying network dysfunctionalities and (2) to wrongdoing analyses by setting the basis to address wrongdoing in organizational networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aurand, T. W., et al. (2018). The VW diesel scandal: A case of corporate commissioned greenwashing. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (1993). The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review, 58(6), 837–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J., & Dewey, M. (2017). The architecture of illegal markets: Towards an economic sociology of illegality in the economy. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J., & Wehinger, F. (2013). In the shadow: Illegal markets and economic sociology. Socio-Economic Review, 11(1), 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin., 88(1), 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., Butterfield, K. D., & Sklaggs, B. C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior. A social network perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 14–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1999). Entrepreneurs, distrust, and third parties: A strategic look at the dark side of dense networks. In L. Thompson, J. Levine, & D. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. The American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campana, P. (2020). Human smuggling: Structure and mechanisms. Crime and Justice, 49(1), 471–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campana, P., & Varese, F. (2018). Organized crime in the United Kingdom: Illegal governance of markets and communities. British Journal of Criminology, 58(6), 1381–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campana, P., & Varese, F. (2022a). The determinants of group membership in organized crime in the UK: A network study. Global Crime, 23(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campana, P., & Varese, F. (2022b). Studying organized crime networks: Data sources boundaries and the limits of structural measures. Social Networks, 69, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappellaro, G., Compagni, A., & Vaara, E. (2021). Maintaining strategic ambiguity for protection: Struggles over opacity, equivocality, and absurdity around the Sicilian mafia. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, A., Phillips, N., & Ansari, S. (2020). Corporate corruption: A Review and an Agenda for Future Research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 935–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallaro, L., Ficara, A., De Meo, P., Fiumara, G., Catanese, S., Bagdasar, O., Song, W., & Liotta, A. (2020). Disrupting resilient criminal networks through data analysis: The case of Sicilian Mafia. PLoS ONE, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236476

  • Cohan, J. A. (2002). ‘I didn’t know’ and ‘I was only doing my job’: Has corporate governance careened out of control? A case study of Enron’s information myopia. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(3), 275–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contag, M. et al. (2017). How they did it: An analysis of emission defeat devices in modern automobiles. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2017.66

  • Ewing, J. (2016, August 18). Volkswagen supplier played key role in cheating, court papers say. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/19/business/international/volkswagen-supplier-played-key-role-in-cheating-court-papers-say.html#:~:text=FRANKFURT%20%E2%80%94%20The%20German%20auto%20supplier,on%20behalf%20of%20car%20owners

  • Ewing, J. (2017, February 1). Supplierʼs role shows breadth of VWʼs deceit. New York Times. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/01/business/bosch-vw-diesel-settlement.html

  • Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000). Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11(2), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollini, I., Caimo, A., & Campana, P. (2020). Modelling interactions among offenders: A latent space approach for interdependent ego-networks. Social Networks, 63, 134–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R., Palmer, D., & Pozner, J.-E. (2010). Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 53–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. (2007). The architecture of drug trafficking: Network forms of organization in the Colombian cocaine trade. Global Crime, 8(3), 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. (2010). Turning to the ‘Dark Side’: Coordination, exchange, and learning in criminal networks. In M. Kahler (Ed.), Networked politics: Agency, power, and governance (pp. 79–102). Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, B. W. (2005). Agency theory, reasoning and culture at Enron: In search of a solution. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kump, B., & Scholz, M. (2022). Organizational routines as a source of ethical blindness. Organization Theory, First Published Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. T., & Ermann, M. D. (1999). Pinto ‘Madness’ as a flawed landmark narrative: An organizational and network. Social Problems, 46(1), 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linthicum, C., Reitenga, A. L., & Sanchez, J. M. (2010). Social responsibility and corporate reputation: The case of the Arthur Andersen Enron audit failure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(2), 160–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, A. (2017). The network organization. A governance perspective on structure, dynamics, and performance. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, A., & Zirpoli, F. (2016). A dynamic theory of network failure: The case of the Venice Film Festival and the local hospitality system. Organization Studies, 37, 607–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615613369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzio, D., Faulconbridge, J., Gabbioneta, C., & Greenwood, R. (2016). Bad apples, bad barrels and bad cellars: A ‘boundaries’ perspective on professional misconduct. In D. Palmer, K. Smith-Crowe, & T. Greenwood (Eds.), Organizational wrongdoing. Key perspectives and new directions (pp. 141–175). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. S. (2016). The criminal bug: Volkswagen’s middle management. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2767255.

  • Nix, A., Decker, S., & Wolf, C. (2021). Enron and the California energy crisis: The role of networks in enabling organizational corruption. Business History Review, 95(4), 765–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G. (2019). Ethical blindness explains why good people do bad things. Aalto University Executive Education. Retrieved June 27, 2022, from https://www.aaltoee.com/aalto-leaders-insight/2019/ethical-blindness-explains-why-good-people-do-bad-things

  • Palazzo, G., Krings, F., & Hoffrage, U. (2012). Ethical blindness. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. A. (2012). Normal organizational wrongdoing: A critical analysis of theories of misconduct in and by organizations. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. A. (2013). The new perspective on organizational wrongdoing. California Management Review, 56(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J., Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2008). Corrupt organizations or organizations of corrupt individuals? Two types of organization-level corruption. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 685–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podolny, J. M., & Page, K. L. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., Isett, K. R., & Milward, H. B. (2004). Cooperation and compromise: A network response to conflicting institutional pressures in community mental health. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(3), 489–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A preliminary theory of network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Sydow, J. (2010). Evaluating interorganizational relationships. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, & P. Smith Ring (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organization Science, 16(5), 491–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrank, A., & Whitford, J. (2011). The anatomy of network failure. Sociological Theory, 29(3), 151–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siano, A., Vollero, A., Conte, F., & Amabile, S. (2017). ‘More than words’: Expanding the taxonomy of greenwashing after the Volkswagen scandal. Journal of Business Research, 71, 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soda, G., & Usai, A. (1999). The dark side of dense networks: From embeddedness to indebtedness. In A. Grandori (Ed.), Interfirm networks: Organization and industrial competitiveness (pp. 276–302). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J. & Milward, H.B. (2003). Reviewing the evaluation perspective: On criteria, occasions, procedures, and practices. Paper presented at the 10th Conference on Multi-Organizational Partnerships, Alliances and Networks (MOPAN), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/w3/w3sydow/

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2014, December 13). The dozy watchdogs. Retrieved July 2, 2022, from https://www.economist.com/briefing/2014/12/11/the-dozy-watchdogs

  • Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2004). United Nations convention against transnational organized crime and the protocols thereto. https://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNTOC/Publications/TOC%20Convention/TOCebook-e.pdf

  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varese, F. (2013). The structure and the content of criminal connections: The Russian mafia in Italy. European Sociological Review, 29(5), 899–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1990). Autonomy, interdependence, and social control: NASA and the space shuttle challenger. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 225–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1996, 2016). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1999). The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 271–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, J., & Zirpoli, F. (2016). The network firm as a political coalition. Organization Studies, 37(9), 1227–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Bartol, K. M., Smith, K. G., Pfarrer, M. D., & Khanin, D. M. (2008). CEOs on the edge: Earnings manipulation and stock-based incentive misalignment. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Network Organization, Innovation, and Strategy Research Center (NOIS), Department of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy

    Rachele Cavara & Francesco Zirpoli

Authors
  1. Rachele Cavara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francesco Zirpoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachele Cavara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Network Organization, Innovation, and Strategy Research Center (NOIS)Department of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy

    Anna Moretti

  2. Network Organization, Innovation, and Strategy Research Center (NOIS)Department of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy

    Lisa Balzarin

Additional information

This article is a joint endeavor. The listing of author names is alphabetical. Credits authors: Cavara wrote Sects. 2 and 3; Cavara and Zirpoli wrote Sects. 1, 4 and 5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cavara, R., Zirpoli, F. (2023). Ethics in Organizational Network Performance: Lessons from Organized Crime and Organizational Wrongdoing. In: Moretti, A., Balzarin, L. (eds) New Perspectives in Network Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22083-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation