Skip to main content

The Government Accountability Office: Redefining But Maintaining Neutral Competence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trump and the Bureaucrats

Abstract

The Government Accountability Office (GAO—originally the General Accounting Offices) was created in the same statute as OMB in 1921. It has undergone major transformations over its history. In the second half of the twentieth century, it transitioned from an accounting agency to one that focuses on program evaluation. After draconian budget cuts in the wake of the Republican takeover in Congress in 1995, GAO took greater care to ensure that it was serving both the majority and minority in Congress equally. As a result of these transitions, the ethos of neutral competence is strong at the agency. Key to protecting this ethos is the 15-year term of the comptroller general which shields the agency from the vicissitudes of political change. That said, there were some incidents during the Trump Administration that raised concerns, and the lack of cooperation from some agencies during the Trump Administration made GAO’s program evaluation task more difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pub.L. 67–13, 42 Stat. 20, enacted June 10, 1921

  2. 2.

    Id.

  3. 3.

    Justification for this level of independence goes all the way back to James Madison who in the first Congress sponsored a bill that noted that the comptroller had quasi-judicial functions and hence should be treated differently than other appointees (Mosher 1979).

  4. 4.

    64 stat 832

  5. 5.

    Pub.L. 91–510

  6. 6.

    As Mosher (1979, p. 345) notes, “It steadily pursued its path through the Watergate crisis,” unlike OMB which was caught up on the apportionment scandals at the same time (see Chap. 3).

  7. 7.

    P.L. 99-177

  8. 8.

    106 S. Ct. 3181; 92 L. Ed. 2d 583; 1986 U.S. LEXIS 141

  9. 9.

    Letter from the Department of Homeland Security to GAO. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/20_0817_ogc_gao-as1-succession-response.pdf (last viewed April 6, 2022)

  10. 10.

    The GAO general counsel supervises the adjudication of bid protests, challenges to the terms of federal awards, or contracts. https://www.gao.gov/legal/bid-protests (last viewed February 3, 2022). There were more than 2000 of these in 2021 (GAO 2021a). The volume of bid protests has grown dramatically over the history of GAO from a few in the agency’s early days to more than 800 under Elmer Staats, to the numbers today (Mosher 1979).

  11. 11.

    https://www.gao.gov/assets/2021-07/gao-org-chart.pdf (last viewed February 3, 2022)

  12. 12.

    See midsize agency rankings here where GAO was #1 https://bestplacestowork.org/rankings/?view=overall&size=small&category=leadership& (last viewed June 29, 2022).

Bibliography

  • Basu, Onker N. “The institutional effects of leadership: The United States General Accounting Office and its audit report review process.” Accounting Historians Journal 21, no. 1 (1994): 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, Kathe. “Elmer Boyd Staats and the pursuit of good government.” Public Administration Review 66, no. 2 (2006): 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, Emily, Eric Lipton, and Chris Cameron. “G.A.O. Report Says Trump Administration Broke Law in Withholding Ukraine Aid” New York Times January 16, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (then Government Accounting Office). GAO’s Congressional Protocols (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office (then Government Accounting Office). “GAO Working for Good Government Since 1921”. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office “Serving the Congress and the Nation: Strategic Plan 2018–2023”. (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office Decision, “Matter of Office of Management and Budget Withholding of Ukraine Security Assistance” File B-331564, January 16, 2020a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Accountability Office “Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2021” (2021a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Havens, Harry S. The evolution of the general accounting office: From voucher audits to program evaluations. United States General Accounting Office, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havens, Harry S. “The evolution of the general accounting office: From voucher audits to program evaluations,” in Carol Weiss (ed) Organizations for Policy Analysis 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph O’Connell, Anne. “Auditing Politics or Political Auditing?.” UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper 964656 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, Frederick C. A tale of two agencies: A comparative analysis of the General Accounting Office and the Office of Management and Budget. Louisiana State University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, Frederick C. The GAO: The quest for accountability in American government. Westview Press Boulder CO, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, John T. “The GAO: An evolving role.” Public Administration Review (1978): 453–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Irene S. Balancing the Federal Budget: Trimming the Herds Or Eating the Seed Corn?. CQ Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Stuart. Analysis and public policy: successes, failures and directions for reform. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The President’s Committee on Administrative Management, “Report of the Committee with Studies of Administrative Management in the Federal Government” (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1937),

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Wallace Earl. Changing organizational culture: Strategy, structure, and professionalism in the US General Accounting Office. University of Tennessee Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shapiro, S. (2023). The Government Accountability Office: Redefining But Maintaining Neutral Competence. In: Trump and the Bureaucrats. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22079-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics