Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supply Network 5.0 Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supply Network 5.0

  • 638 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter deals with the second fundamental component of supply network 5.0: sustainability. It considers the green supply network management and the relationships of green supply with the SCOR framework. It details the challenges of a circular economy and responsible automation. This chapter defines a Sustainable Supply Network Management (SSNM) model for supply network 5.0. It includes a description of the ideas around SSNM’s concept, and its aspects related to the economic, social, and environmental pillars. This chapter aims to provide and enlighten the relationship between sustainability and supply network management. Specifically, after carefully considering green supply network management, the application of sustainability, and the different operative models used to enhance performances, this chapter aims to provide an example through a real case. To do that and to prove this relationship and how the potential results could broadly impact organizations, this chapter includes the Rana Plaza case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.sofidel.com/. Accessed 12 February 2022.

  2. 2.

    https://www.fondazioneecosistemi.org/evento-di-presentazione-del-sustainability-monitor-report/. Accessed 12 February 2022.

  3. 3.

    United States Environmental Protection Agency: Greenhouse Emissions (2020). www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions. Accessed 5 January 2022.

  4. 4.

    Walmart CSR Report: corporate.walmart.com/our-commitment-to-the-workers-of-bangladesh.

  5. 5.

    Primark Initiative: corporate.primark.com/fr/newsroom/actualites-de-lentreprise/aide-apportee-par-primark-depuis-leffondrement-du-rana-plaza-au-bangladesh/n/ea1b6941-25d7-40fd-839d-b301649af34e.

  6. 6.

    Circular Economy Action Plan 2020, European Commission, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FI.

  7. 7.

    DHL_Delivering_on_Circularity_White_Paper_2022.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2022.

  8. 8.

    https://pacecircular.org/eu-circular-electronics-initiative.

  9. 9.

    https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12822-Strategia-dellUE-in-materia-di-prodotti-tessili-sostenibili_it.

References

  • Akkucuk, U. (2020). SCOR model and the green supply chain. In Waste Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications. 366–382. IGI Global, Hershey, PA

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Odeh, M., & Smallwood, J. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management: Literature review, trends, and framework. International Journal of Computational Engineering & Management, 15(1), 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allenby, B. R. (2000). Environmental security: Concept and implementation. International Political Science Review, 21(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, M. (2007). An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy. Sustainability Science, 2 (1), 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appolloni, A., Coppola, M. A., & Piga, G. (2019). Implementation of green considerations in public procurement: a means to promote sustainable development. In Green Public Procurement Strategies for Environmental Sustainability, 23–44. IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi, A., & Kannan, G. (2016). Green Supplier Development Program Selection Using NGT and VIKOR Under Fuzzy Environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering 91: 100–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badr, Y., & Stephan, J. (2007). Security and risk management in supply chains. Journal of Information Assurance and Security, 2(4), 288–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bag, S., Telukdarie, A., Pretorius, J.H.C., & Gupta, S. (2021). Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: framework and future research directions. Benchmark. International Journal, 28(5), 1410–1450

    Google Scholar 

  • Barari, S., Agarwal, G., Zhang, W. C., Mahanty, B., & Tiwari, M. K. (2012). A decision framework for the analysis of green supply chain contracts: An evolutionary game approach. Expert systems with applications, 39(3), 2965–2976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, L., Amaral, A., & Pereira, T. (2017). Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: an overview. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1245–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benzaghta, M. A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M. M., Erkan, I., & Rahman, M. (2021). SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review. Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(1), 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibri, S. E. (2018). The IoT for smart sustainable cities of the future: An analytical framework for sensor-based big data applications for environmental sustainability. Sustainable cities and society, 38, 230–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braungart, M., McDonough, W. & Bollinger, A. (2007). Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions—a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (13–14), 1337–1348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinali, P. G., & De Giovanni, P. (2022). Responsible digitalization through digital technologies and green practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlini, V. (2022, August). Zignago Vetro, col ricilo prodotti più sostenibili e calo dei costi operativi, Il Sole 24 Ore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challenge, W. N. Z. (2021). The Supply Chain Opportunity. In World Economic Forum: Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giovanni, P. (2021). Smart supply chains with vendor managed inventory, coordination and environmental performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(2), 515–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Neve, G., & Prentice, R. (2017). Introduction: Rethinking garment workers’ health and safety. In Unmaking the Global Sweatshop, 1–26. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelfia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vass, T., Shee, H., Miah, S.J. (2021). Iot in supply chain management: a narrative on retail sector sustainability. International Journal of Logistic Research and Applications, 24(6), 605–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delreux, T., & Happaerts, S. (2016). Environmental policy and politics in the European Union. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L., Wei, F., Tan, C., Tang, D., Zhou, M., & Xu, K. (2014, June). Adaptive recursive neural network for target-dependent twitter sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 2: Short papers, 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou, Y., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2018). Green multi-tier supply chain management: An enabler investigation. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 24(2), 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, M. E. (1994). Socially responsible organizational buying: environmental concern as a noneconomic buying criterion. Journal of marketing, 58(3), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckelman, M. J., Huang, K., Lagasse, R., Senay, E., Dubrow, R., & Sherman, J. D. (2020). Health Care Pollution And Public Health Damage in the United States: An Update: Study examines health care pollution and public health damage in the United States. Health Affairs, 39(12), 2071–2079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L. M. & Tate, W. (2006, May). Annual International Supply Management Conference, May (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 350–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faisal, M. N. (2012). Sustainability metrics for a supply chain: the case of small and medium enterprises. International journal of services and operations management, 13(3), 392–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farahani, R. Z., Asgari, N., & Davarzani, H. (Eds.). (2009). Supply chain and logistics in national, international and governmental environment: concepts and models. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiksel, J. (2009). Design for environment: a guide to sustainable product development. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francas, D., & Minner, S. (2009). Manufacturing network configuration in supply chains with product recovery. Omega, 37(4), 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A. et al. (2017) Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66. 344–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, R., & Jackson, T. (2004). Supply loops and their constraints: the industrial ecology of recycling and reuse. Dong, C., Shen, B., Chow, P.-S., Yang, L. & To Ng, C. (2014). Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation. Annals of Operations Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-013-1514-1. Management Review, 46(2), 55–73.

  • Glover, J.L., Champion, D., Daniels, K. J. & Dainty, A. J. D. (2014), An Institutional Theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics, (152, 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnoni, M. G., & Lanzilotto, A. (2013). The GreenSCOR: A critical assessment for supporting effective green supply chain management. XVIII Summer School “Francesco Turco”—Industrial Mechanical Plants; AIDI. 256–261, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golicic, S. L. & Smith, C. D. (2013), A Meta-Analysis of Environmentally Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Firm Performance, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 78–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottge, S., Menzel, T., & Forslund, H. (2020). Industry 4.0 technologies in the purchasing process. Indust. Manag. Data Syst. 120(4), 730–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R. & Jafarian, A. (2013), A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a vendor based on triple bottom line approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, (47, 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R. & Vafadarnikjoo, A. (2015b). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Based DEMATEL Method for Developing Green Practices and Performances in a Green Supply Chain. Expert Systems with Applications 42 (20): 7207–7220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Shaw, M., & Majumdar, A. (2021). Social sustainability tensions in multi-tier supply chain: A systematic literature review towards conceptual framework development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, K., Morton, B., & New, S. (1996). Purchasing and environmental management: interactions, policies and opportunities. Business strategy and the environment, 5(3), 188–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groschopf, W., Dobrovnik, M., & Herneth, C. (2021). Smart contracts for sustainable supply chain management: conceptual frameworks for supply chain maturity evaluation and smart contract sustainability assessment. Front. Blockchain 4, 506436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms, D., Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2013), Strategies in Sustainable Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Investigation of Large German Organizations, Corporate social-responsibility and environmental management; Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Mgmt, 20(4), 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkamp, D., Bremmers, H. & Omta, O. (2010). Stimulating environmental management performance, British Food Journal (1966), (112)11, 1237–1251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, B. T., & Byrd, T. A. (2012). Toward creating competitive advantage with logistics information technology. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(1), 8–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillary, R. (2004). Environmental management systems and the smaller organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6), 561–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoejmose, S., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2013). An empirical examination of the relationship between business strategy and socially responsible supply chain management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(5), 589–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J., Zhang, Y., & Ding, M. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. Journal of cleaner production, 172, 3508–3519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Organisation for Standardization, I. S. O. (2020, November). ISO 26000—social responsibility. Iso.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junge, A. L. (2019). Digital transformation technologies as an enabler for sustainable logistics and supply chain processes–an exploratory framework. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(3), 462–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junge, A.L. (2020). Prospects of digital transformation technologies (DTT) for sustainable logistics and supply chain processes in manufacturing. In: Leiras, A., González-Calderón, C.A., de Brito Junior, I., Villa, S., Yoshizaki, H.T.Y. (eds.) POMS 2018. SPBE, 713–720. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kähkönen, A. K., Lintukangas, K., & Hallikas, J. (2018). Sustainable supply management practices: making a difference in a firm’s sustainability performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, D., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. European Journal of operational research, 233(2), 432–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayikci, Y. (2018). Sustainability impact of digitization in logistics. Proc. Manuf. 21, 782–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanfar, A.A.A., Iranmanesh, M., Ghobakhloo, M., Senali, M.G., Fathi, M.: (2021). Applications of blockchain technology in sustainable manufacturing and supply chain management: a systematic review. Sustainability 13(14), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, G. Y., Flores-García, E., Wiktorsson, M., & Noh, S. D. (2021). Exploring economic, environmental and social sustainability impact of digital twin-based services for smart production logistics. In: C-PALs IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraljic P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemghari, R., Okar, C., & Sarsri, D. (2018). Benefits and limitations of the SCOR® model in Automotive Industries. In MATEC Web of Conferences, 200, 00019). EDP Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C. T., H. Chiu, & P. Y. Chu. (2006). Agility Index in the Supply Chain. International Journal of Production Economics 100 (2): 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, R. J. (2013). Using Fuzzy DEMATEL to Evaluate the Green Supply Chain Management Practices. Journal of Cleaner Production 40: 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LMI. (2003). GreenSCOR: Developing a Green Supply Chain Analytical Tool. Report LG101T4. Logistics Management Institute, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthra, S., & Haleem, A. (2015). Hurdles in implementing sustainable supply chain management: An analysis of Indian automobile sector. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthra, S., Kumar, V., Kumar, S., & Haleem, A. (2011). Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2), 231–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, E. (2013). Towards the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 23–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiyazhagan, K., Diabat, A., Al-Refaie, A. & Xu, L. (2015), Application of analytical hierarchy process to evaluate pressures to implement green supply chain management, Journal of Cleaner Production, (107, 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiyazhagan, K., Vimal, K. E. K., Kumar, H., Ramesh, A., & Agarwal, V. (2022). Lean and Green Manufacturing. Springer, Singapore.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W. & Braungart, M. (2000). A world of abundance. Interfaces, 30 (3), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W. & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: remaking the way we make things, New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, H., & Kim, I. (2012). Green Supply Chain Research: Past, Present, and Future. Logistics Research 4 (1–2): 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraiti, P. L. (2022). Hydrogen as a marine fuel (Master’s thesis, Πανεπιστήμιο Πειραιώς).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik, S. (2022, Sep.–Oct.). Blockchain Technology In Bridging Supply Chain Trust, Traceability, and Transparency. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development, 5(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamba, C.C., Chan, P.W. & Sharmina, M. (2017). How does social sustainability feature in studies of supply chain management? A review and research agenda, Supply chain management, (22)6, 522–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nantee, N., Sureeyatanapas, P. (2021). The impact of Logistics 4.0 on corporate sustainability: a performance assessment of automated warehouse operations. Benchmark. Int. J. 28(10), 2865–2895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narimissa, O., Kangarani-Farahani, A. & Molla-Alizadeh-Zavardehi, S. (2020). Drivers and barriers for implementation and improvement of Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), (28)1, 247–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento, D. L. M., Alencastro, V., Quelhas, O. L. G., Caiado, R. G. G., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Rocha-Lona, L., & Tortorella, G. (2018). Exploring Industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context: A business model proposal. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(3), 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New, S. J. (2015), Modern slavery and the supply chain: the limits of corporate social responsibility?, Supply chain management, 20(6), 697–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti, B. (2012a), Lean and Digitize: An Integrated Approach to Process Improvement. Gower Publishing, Farnham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti, B. (2020). Procurement 4.0 and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Springer International Publishing, London, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti, B., (2013), Lean Six Sigma & Digitize Procurement, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 4(2), 184–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olan, F., Liu, S. Suklan, A. J. Jayawickrama, U. & Arakpogun, E. O.. (2021). The Role of Artificial Intelligence Networks in Sustainable Supply Chain Finance for Food and Drink Industry. International Journal of Production Research, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orellano, M., & Tiss, S. (2022). Impacts of Digital Transformation on Supply Chain Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review and Expert Assessment. In Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, 390–405. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padash, A., & Ghatari, A. R. (2020). Toward an Innovative Green Strategic Formulation Methodology: Empowerment of corporate social, health, safety and environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261, 121075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulraj, A., Chen, I. J. & Blome, C. (2017), Motives and Performance Outcomes of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices: A Multi-theoretical Perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, (145)2, 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, X., Wei, X., Xu, L., Cao, Y., & Prybutok, V. (2022). An organizational framework for sustainable supply chain management: An integrated theoretical perspective. Quality Management Journal, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulansari, F., & Putri, A. (2020, July). Green Supply Chain Operation Reference (Green SCOR) performance evaluation (case study: steel company). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1569(3), 032006). IOP Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, J., Liu, X, & W. Pedrycz. (2017). An Extended TODIM Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Method for Green Supplier Selection in Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Environment. European Journal of Operational Research 258 (2): 626–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A., Waddock, S., & McIntosh, M. (2013). The United Nations global compact: Retrospect and prospect. Business & Society, 52(1), 6–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauer, J. & Kaufmann, L. (2015), Mitigating External Barriers to Implementing Green Supply Chain Management: A Grounded Theory Investigation of Green-Tech Organizations’ Rare Earth Metals Supply Chains, The journal of supply chain management; Journal of Supply Chain Management, (51)2, 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarela, A. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management: drivers, practices, and strategies on ensuring sustainable supply chain. Thesis at Lut University, Lahti, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2117–2135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sajjad, A., Eweje, G. & Tappin, D. (2015). Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Motivators and Barriers, Business Strategy and the Environment. (24)7, 643–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sajjad, M., Irfan, M., Muhammad, K., Del Ser, J., Sanchez-Medina, J., Andreev, S., ... Lee, J. W. (2020). An efficient and scalable simulation model for autonomous vehicles with economical hardware. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 22(3), 1718–1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapiro, U. (2021, April). The Coca-Cola Company. 2020 Global Business & ESG Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari, K. (2017). A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Evaluating Green Supply Chain Management Practices. Computers & Industrial Engineering 105: 338–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., & Dou, Y. (2017). Green supply chain management: A concise introduction. Routledge, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q. & Lai, K-H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 130 (1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroha, R. (2014). Green logistics & its significance in modern day systems. International Review of Applied Engineering Research, 4(1), 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrettle, S., Hinz, A., Scherrer-Rathje, M., & Friedli, T. (2014). Turning sustainability into action: Explaining organizations’ sustainability efforts, and their impact on firm performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrödl, H., & Simkin, P. (2013, May). A SCOR perspective on Green SCM. In CONF-IRM, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searcy, C. (2009). Setting a course in corporate sustainability performance measurement. Measuring Business Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S. & Müller, M. (2008), From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management, Journal of Cleaner Production, (16)15, 1699–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R., Shishodia, A., Gunasekaran, A., Min, H., & Munim, Z. H. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in supply chain management: mapping the territory. International Journal of Production Research, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D. (2015). Process improvements in supply chain operations: multi-firm case studies. In Handbook of Research on Organizational Transformations through Big Data Analytics, 263–286. IGI Global, Hershey, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9 (1), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. K. (2008). Network design for reverse logistics. Omega, 36(4), 535–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, X., Yu, H., Solvang, W. D., Wang, Y., & Wang, K. (2022), The application of Industry 4.0 technologies in sustainable logistics: a systematic literature review (2012–2020) to explore future research opportunities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(7), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tachizawa, E. M., & Wong, C. Y. (2015). The performance of green supply chain management governance mechanisms: A supply network and complexity perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(3), 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira, C. R. B., Assumpção, A. L., Correa, A. L., Savi, A. F., & Prates, G. A. (2018). The contribution of green logistics and sustainable purchasing for green supply chain management. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 9(3), 1002–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thilakarathna, R. H., Dharmawardana, M. N., & Rupasinghe, T. (2015, December). The supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model: a systematic review of literature from the apparel industry. In 12th International Conference on Business Management (ICBM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran-Dang, H., Krommenacker, N., Charpentier, P., Kim, D.-S. (2020). The Internet of Things for logistics: perspectives, application review and challenges. IETE Technical Review 39(1), 93–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M. L. (2011). Green Supply Chain Management with Linguistic Preferences and Incomplete Information. Applied Soft Computing 11 (8): 4894–4903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, M. L., & Chiu, A. S. (2013). Evaluating Firm’s Green Supply Chain Management in Linguistic Preferences. Journal of Cleaner Production 40: 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2021). The 17 Goals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S., & Mao, Z. (2008). Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: A country-level analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (15):1552–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakulich, N. A. (2021). Sources and directions for developing 3PL logistics provider functions in the modern supply chain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Graaf, T. (2012). Obsolete or resurgent? The International Energy Agency in a changing global landscape. Energy Policy, 48, 233–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayan, G., & Kamarulzaman, N. H. (2020). An introduction to sustainable supply chain management and business implications. In Sustainable Business: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, 158–176. IGI Global, Hershey, PA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Ersoy, O. K., He, M. & Wang, F. (2016). Multi-offspring Genetic Algorithm and its Application to the Traveling Salesman Problem. Applied Soft Computing 43: 415–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiengarten, F., Fynes, B. & Onofrei, G. (2013), Exploring synergetic effects between investments in environmental and quality lean practices in supply chains, Supply chain management, (18)2, 148–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J. (2014), The Relationship Between Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Stakeholder Pressure, and Corporate Sustainability Performance, Journal of Business Ethics, (119)3, 317–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, H., Wei, X., Peng, X., & Prybutok, V. (2022). The evolution of supply chain management as measured with the Baldrige excellence framework. Quality Management Journal, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., Mathiyazhagan, K., Govindan, K., Noorul Haq, A., Ramachandran, N. V. & Ashokkumar, A. (2013) Multiple comparative studies of Green Supply Chain Management: Pressures analysis, Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 78, 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakovleva, N., Sarkis, J., & Sloan, T. (2012). Sustainable benchmarking of supply chains: the case of the food industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1297–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yongan, Z., & Menghan, L. (2011, November). Research on Green Supply Chain design for automotive industry based on Green SCOR Model. In 2011 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2, 549–552. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, R.Y., Xu, X., Klotz, E., & Newman, S. T: (2017). Intelligent manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0: a review. Engineering 3(5), 616–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business Department, Temple University, ROMA, Roma, Italy

    Bernardo Nicoletti

Authors
  1. Bernardo Nicoletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernardo Nicoletti .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nicoletti, B. (2023). Supply Network 5.0 Sustainability. In: Supply Network 5.0. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22032-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation