Abstract
The last decades have seen frequent calls for a more extended evolutionary synthesis (EES) that will supposedly overcome the limitations in the current evolutionary framework with its intellectual roots in the Modern Synthesis (MS). Some radical critics even want to entirely abandon the current evolutionary framework, claiming that the MS (often erroneously labelled “Neo-Darwinism”) is outdated, and will soon be replaced by an entirely new framework, such as the Third Way of Evolution (TWE). Such criticisms are not new but have repeatedly re-surfaced every decade since the formation of the MS, and they were particularly articulated by developmental biologist Conrad Waddington and paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould. Waddington, Gould, and later critics argued that the MS was too narrowly focused on genes and natural selection, and that it ignored developmental processes, epigenetics, paleontology and macroevolutionary phenomena. More recent critics partly recycle these old arguments and argue that non-genetic inheritance, niche construction, phenotypic plasticity and developmental bias necessitate major revision of evolutionary theory. Here I discuss these supposed challenges, taking a historical perspective and tracing the arguments by critics back to Waddington and Gould. I dissect the old claims by Waddington, Gould and more recent critics that the MS was excessively gene centric and became increasingly “hardened” over time and narrowly focused on natural selection. Recent critics have consciously or unconsciously exaggerated the long-lasting influence of the MS on contemporary evolutionary biology and have underestimated many post-Synthesis developments, particularly Neutral Theory, evolutionary quantitative genetics and the power and generality of the Price Equation. Critics have also painted a biased picture of the MS as a more monolithic research tradition than it ever was and have downplayed the pluralistic nature of contemporary evolutionary biology, particularly the long-lasting influence of Sewall Wright with his emphasis on gene interactions and stochasticity. I argue that some of the criticisms of the MS and contemporary evolutionary biology are primarily meta-scientific, revealing the underlying identity politics of critics when pushing their alternative research agendas. It is still unclear what their proposed alternative research frameworks would entail and why the existing theoretical framework is insufficient. Finally, I outline and visualize the conceptually split landscape of contemporary evolutionary biology, with four different stably coexisting analytical frameworks: adaptationism, mutationism, neutralism and selectionism. I suggest that the field can accommodate the challenges raised by critics, although structuralism (“Evo Devo”) and macroevolution remain to be conceptually integrated within mainstream evolutionary theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ågren JA (2016) Selfish genetic elements and the gene’s-eye view of evolution. Curr Zool 62:659–665. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zow102
Antonovics J (1987) The evolutionary dys-synthesis: which bottles for which wine? Am Nat 129:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1086/284639
Arnold SJ (2014) Phenotypic evolution: the ongoing synthesis. Am Nat 183:729–746
Arnold SJ (2005) The ultimate causes of phenotypic integration: lost in translation. Evolution 59:2059–2061
Arnold SJ, Pfrender ME, Jones AG (2001) The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution. Genetica 112–113:9–32
Bailey NW, Marie-Orleach L, Moore AJ (2018) Indirect genetic effects in behavioral ecology: does behavior play a special role in evolution? Behav Ecol 29:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arx127
Barrett RD, Schluter D (2008) Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends Ecol Evol 23:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.008
Barton NH, Charlesworth B (1984) Genetic revolutions, founder effects and speciation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:133–164
Beatty J (2016) The creativity of natural selection? Part I: Darwin, Darwinism, and the mutationists. J Hist Biol 49:659–684
Beatty J (2019) The creativity of natural selection? Part II: the synthesis and since. J Hist Biol 52:705–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-019-09583-4
Bell MA (2012) Adaptive landscapes, evolution and the fossil record. In: Svensson EI, Calsbeek R (eds) The adaptive landscape in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Blount ZD, Lenski RE, Losos JB (2018) Contingency and determinism in evolution: replaying life’s tape. Science 362:eaam5979. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5979
Bolstad GH, Cassara JA, Márquez E et al (2015) Complex constraints on allometry revealed by artificial selection on the wing of drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:13284–13289. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505357112
Bonduriansky R, Crean AJ, Day T (2012) The implications of nongenetic inheritance for evolution in changing environments. Evol Appl 5:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00213.x
Bonduriansky R, Day T (2018) Extended heredity: a new understanding of inheritance and evolution, Illustrated edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Brakefield PM (2006) Evo-devo and constraints on selection. Trends Ecol Evol 21:362–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.001
Brandon RN (1990) Adaptation and environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Brodie ED III (2005) Caution: niche construction ahead. Evolution 59:249–251
Brunet TDP, Doolittle WF, Bielawski JP (2021) The role of purifying selection in the origin and maintenance of complex function. Stud Hist Philos Sci A 87:125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.03.005
Buskell A (2019) Reciprocal causation and the extended evolutionary synthesis. Biol Theor 14:267–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-019-00325-7
Buskell A (2020) Synthesising arguments and the extended evolutionary synthesis. Stud Hist Philos Sci 80:101244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101244
Buskell A, Currie A (2017) Forces, friction and fractionation: Denis Walsh’s organisms, agency, and evolution. Biol Philos 32:1341–1353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9585-z
Cagan A, Baez-Ortega A, Brzozowska N et al (2021) Somatic mutation rates scale with lifespan across mammals. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.19.456982v1
Cain J (2009) Rethinking the synthesis period in evolutionary studies. J Hist Biol 42:621–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009-9206-z
Carroll SB (2006) Endless forms most beautiful: the new science of evo devo, Reprint edn. W. W. Norton & Company, New York
Charlesworth B, Lande R, Slatkin M (1982) A neo-Darwinian commentary on macroevolution. Evolution 36:474–498
Charlesworth D, Barton NH, Charlesworth B (2017) The sources of adaptive variation. Proc Biol Sci 284:20162864. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2864
Chen B, Van Poucke J, Van de Vijver G (2021) Criticizing the modern synthesis: between phenomenal characteristics and synthetic principles. Biosemiotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09424-0
Cheverud JM (1984) Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J Theor Biol 110:155–171
Chevin LM (2016) Species selection and random drift in macroevolution. Evolution 70:513–525
Chevin LM, Lande R (2011) Adaptation to marginal habitats by evolution of increased phenotypic plasticity. J Evol Biol 24:1462–1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02279.x
Chevin LM, Lande R, Mace GM (2010) Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol 8:e1000357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000357
Conley BA (2019) Mayr and Tinbergen: disentangling and integrating. Biol Philos 35:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9731-x
Coyne JA, Barton NH, Turelli M (1997) Perspective: a critique of Sewall Wright’s shifting balance theory of evolution. Evolution 51:643–671
Crow JF (2008) Commentary: Haldane and beanbag genetics. Int J Epidemiol 37:442–445. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn048
Danchin É (2013) Avatars of information: towards an inclusive evolutionary synthesis. Trends Ecol Evol 28:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.02.010
Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dawkins R (2004) Extended phenotype—but not too extended. A reply to Laland, Turner and Jablonka. Biol Philos 19:377–396
Dawkins R (1986) The blind watchmaker. W. W. Norton & Company, New York
Day T, Bonduriansky R (2011) A unified approach to the evolutionary consequences of genetic and nongenetic inheritance. Am Nat 178:E18–E36. https://doi.org/10.1086/660911
Deichmann U (2016) Epigenetics: the origins and evolution of a fashionable topic. Dev Biol 416:249–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.06.005
Dickins TE (2020) Conflation and refutation: book review of Uller, T. and K. N. Laland. eds. 2019. Evolutionary causation: biological and philosophical reflections. Evolution 74:508–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13916
Dickins TE, Barton RA (2013) Reciprocal causation and the proximate-ultimate dichotomy. Biol Philos 28:747–756
Dickins TE, Rahman Q (2012) The extended evolutionary synthesis and the role of soft inheritance in evolution. Proc Biol Sci 279:2913–2921. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0273
Dobzhansky T (1937) Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York
Dobzhansky T (1970) Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New York
Dobzhansky T (1933) Geographical variation in lady-beetles. Am Nat 67:97–126
dos Reis CRM, Araújo LAL (2020) Extended evolutionary synthesis: neither synthesis nor extension. Biol Theor 15:57–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-020-00347-6
Dronamraju K (2011) Haldane, Mayr, and beanbag genetics, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Dupre J (2012) Evolutionary theory’s welcome crisis. In: Project syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/evolutionary-theory-s-welcome-crisis-by-john-dupre. Accessed 1 Mar 2021
Dupré J (2021) The metaphysics of biology. Elem Philos Biol. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024297
Edelaar P, Bolnick DI (2012) Non-random gene flow: an underappreciated force in evolution and ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 27:659–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.009
Edelaar P, Bolnick DI (2019) Appreciating the multiple processes increasing individual or population fitness. Trends Ecol Evol 34:435–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.02.001
Edelaar P, Siepielski AM, Clobert J (2008) Matching habitat choice causes directed gene flow: a neglected dimension in evolution and ecology. Evolution 62:2462–2472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00459.x
Eldredge N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf TJM (ed) Models in paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper and Co., San Francisco, pp 82–115
Endler JA (1986) Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Endler JA, McLellan T (1988) The processes of evolution: toward a newer synthesis. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:395–421
Faria R, Johannesson K, Butlin RK, Westram AM (2019) Evolving inversions. Trends Ecol Evol 34:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.12.005
Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives under the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Trans R Soc Edinburgh:399–433
Frank SA (1995) George Price’s contributions to evolutionary genetics. J Theor Biol 175:373–388. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1995.0148
Frank SA (1997) The Price equation, Fisher’s fundamental theorem, kin selection, and causal analysis. Evolution 51:1712–1729. https://doi.org/10.2307/2410995
Futuyma DJ (2017) Evolutionary biology today and the call for an extended synthesis. Interface Focus 7:20160145. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0145
Gardner A (2013) Darwinism, not mutationism, explains the design of organisms. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 111:97–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2012.08.012
Gardner A (2017) The purpose of adaptation. Interface. Focus 7:20170005. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0005
Gavrilets S (2004) Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Gavrilets S (2010) High-dimensional fitness landscapes and speciation. In: Pigliucci M, Muller GB (eds) Evolution—the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 45–79
Godfrey-Smith P (2007) Is it a revolution? Biol Philos 22:429–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9062-1
Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gomez K, Bertram J, Masel J (2020) Mutation bias can shape adaptation in large asexual populations experiencing clonal interference. Proc R Soc B 287:20201503. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1503
Goodnight CJ, Wade MJ (2000) The ongoing synthesis: a reply to Coyne, Barton and Turelli. Evolution 54:317–324
Goodwin B (2001) How the leopard changed its spots: the evolution of complexity, first thus edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Gould SJ (1983) The hardening of the modern synthesis. In: Greene M (ed) Dimensions of Darwinism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gould SJ (1980) Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging? Paleobiology 6:119–130
Gould SJ (1981) But not wright enough: reply to Orzack. Paleobiology 7:131–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300003857
Gould SJ (1982) Darwinism and the expansion of evolutionary theory. Science 216:380–387
Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:581–598
Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15
Grafen A (1988) On the use of data on lifetime reproductive success. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 454–471
Grafen A (2014) The formal darwinism project in outline. Biol Philos 29:155–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-013-9414-y
Grant PR, Grant BR (2014) 40 years of evolution: Darwin’s Finches on Daphne Major Island, Illustrated edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Greenspoon PB, Spencer HG (2018) The evolution of epigenetically mediated adaptive transgenerational plasticity in a subdivided population. Evolution 72:2773–2780. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13619
Gupta M, Prasad NG, Dey S et al (2017) Niche construction in evolutionary theory: the construction of an academic niche? J Genet 96:491–504
Haffer J (2007) Ornithology, evolution, and philosophy: the life and science of Ernst Mayr 1904–2005. Springer, Berlin
Haig D (2007) Weismann rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian temptation. Biol Philos 22:415–428
Haldane J (1964) A defense of beanbag genetics. Perspect Biol Med 7:343–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn056
Haldane JBS (1933) The part played by recurrent mutation in evolution. Am Nat 67:5–19
Haldane JBS (1932) The causes of evolution. Longmans, Green & Co., London
Hancock ZB, Lehmberg ES, Bradburd GS (2021) Neo-darwinism still haunts evolutionary theory: a modern perspective on Charlesworth, Lande, and Slatkin (1982). Evolution 75:1244–1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14268
Hansen TF (1997) Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341–1351
Hansen TF (2012) Adaptive landscapes and macroevolutionary dynamics. In: Svensson EI, Calsbeek R (eds) The adaptive landscape in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hendry AP (2016) Eco-evolutionary dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hochberg GKA, Liu Y, Marklund EG et al (2020) A hydrophobic ratchet entrenches molecular complexes. Nature 588:503–508. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3021-2
Hooper DM, Price TD (2017) Chromosomal inversion differences correlate with range overlap in passerine birds. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1526. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0284-6
Houle D, Bolstad GH, van der Linde K, Hansen TF (2017) Mutation predicts 40 million years of fly wing evolution. Nature 548:447–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23473
Huey RB, Hertz PE, Sinervo B (2003) Behavioral drive versus behavioral inertia in evolution: a null model approach. Am Nat 161:357–366
Huneman P (2019) Special issue editor’s introduction: “Revisiting the Modern Synthesis”. J Hist Biol 52:509–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-019-09585-2
Huxley JS, Teissier G (1936) Terminology of relative growth. Nature 137:780–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/137780b0
Jablonka E (2017) The evolutionary implications of epigenetic inheritance. Interface Focus 7:20160135. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0135
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press, Cambridge
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2007) The expanded evolutionary synthesis—a response to Godfrey-Smith, Haig, and West-Eberhard. Biol Philos 22:453–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9064-z
Jensen JD, Payseur BA, Stephan W et al (2019) The importance of the neutral theory in 1968 and 50 years on: a response to Kern and Hahn 2018. Evolution 73:111–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13650
Jones AG, Bürger R, Arnold SJ (2014) Epistasis and natural selection shape the mutational architecture of complex traits. Nat Commun 5:3709. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4709
Kaplan J (2008) The end of the adaptive landscape metaphor? Biol Philos 23:625–638
Kern AD, Hahn MW (2018) The neutral theory in light of natural selection. Mol Biol Evol 35:1366–1371. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy092
Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kingsolver JG, Gomulkiewicz R, Carter PA (2001) Variation, selection and evolution of function-valued traits. Genetica 112:87–104
Kingsolver JG, Schemske DW (1991) Path analyses of selection. Trends Ecol Evol 6:276–280
Kirkpatrick M, Barton N (2006) Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics 173:419–434. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.047985
Koestler A (1971) The case of the midwife toad. Hutchinson, London
Koonin EV (2009) The origin at 150: is a new evolutionary synthesis in sight? Trends Genet 25:473–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2009.09.007
Kull K (2014) Adaptive evolution without natural selection. Biol J Linn Soc 112:287–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12124
Kupper C, Stocks M, Risse JE et al (2016) A supergene determines highly divergent male reproductive morphs in the ruff. Nat Genet 48:79–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3443
Lack D (1945) The Galapagos finches (Geospizinae) a study in variation the Galapagos finches (Geospizinae) a study in variation. Occasional papers of the California Academy of Sciences
Lack D (1947) Darwin’s Finches, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Laland K, Uller T, Feldman M et al (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature 514:161–164. https://doi.org/10.1038/514161a
Laland KN, Sterelny K, Odling-Smee J et al (2011) Cause and effect in biology revisited: is Mayr’s proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science 334:1512–1516. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210879
Laland KN, Uller T, Feldman MW et al (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proc Biol Sci 282:20151019. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019
Lamm E (2018) Review of “Challenging the Modern Synthesis: Adaptation, Development, and Inheritance”. Notre Dame Philosophical Rev. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/challenging-the-modern-synthesis-adaptation-development-and-inheritanc/
Lande R (1979) Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33:402–416
Lande R (1980) The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94:203–215
Lande R (2009) Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation. J Evol Biol 22:1435–1446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01754.x
Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226
Lenski R, Mittler J (1993) The directed mutation controversy and Neodarwinism. Science 259:188–194. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7678468
Levins R, Lewontin R (1985) The dialectical biologist. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Lewens T (2019a) Neo-Paleyan biology. Stud Hist Philos Sci C 76:101185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101185
Lewens T (2019b) The extended evolutionary synthesis: what is the debate about, and what might success for the extenders look like? Biol J Linn Soc 127:707–721. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz064
Lima-De-Faria A (ed) (1990) Evolution without selection: form and function by autoevolution, 1st edn. Elsevier Science Ltd, Amsterdam
Loison L (2018) Lamarckism and epigenetic inheritance: a clarification. Biol Philos 33:29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9642-2
Loison L (2021) Epigenetic inheritance and evolution: a historian’s perspective. Philos Trans R Soc B 376:20200120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0120
Losos JB, Arnold SJ, Bejerano G et al (2013) Evolutionary biology for the 21st century. PLoS Biol 11:e1001466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001466
Losos JB, Jackman TR, Larson A et al (1998) Contingency and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of island lizards. Science 279:2115–2118
Love AC (2003) Evolvability, dispositions, and intrinsicality. Philos Sci 70:1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.1086/377385
Lu Q, Bourrat P (2018) The evolutionary gene and the extended evolutionary synthesis. Br J Philos Sci 69:775–800. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw035
Luque VJ (2017) One equation to rule them all: a philosophical analysis of the Price equation. Biol Philos 32:97–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9538-y
Luque VJ, Baravalle L (2021) The mirror of physics: on how the Price equation can unify evolutionary biology. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03339-6
Lynch M (2007) The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(Suppl 1):8597–8604. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702207104
Lynch M (2010) Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet 26:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2010.05.003
Lynch M, Conery J, Burger R (1995) Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am Nat 146:489–518. https://doi.org/10.1086/285812
Maynard Smith J, Burian R, Kauffman S et al (1985) Developmental constraints and evolution. Q Rev Biol 60:265–287
Mayr E (1993) What was the evolutionary synthesis. Trends Ecol Evol 8:31–34
Mayr E (1959) Where are we? Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 24:1–14
Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York
Mayr E (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology: kinds of causes, predictability, and teleology are viewed by a practicing biologist. Science 134:1501–1506. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.134.3489.1501
Mayr E, Provine WB (1998) The evolutionary synthesis. Perspectives on the unification of biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
McShea DW, Brandon RN (2010) Biology’s first law: the tendency for diversity and complexity to increase in evolutionary systems, Illustrated edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Moore L, Cagan A, Coorens THH et al (2021) The mutational landscape of human somatic and germline cells. Nature 597:381–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03822-7
Morrissey MB (2014) Selection and evolution of causally covarying traits. Evolution 68:1748–1761. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12385
Müller GB (2017) Why an extended evolutionary synthesis is necessary. Interface Focus 7:20170015. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0015
Muñoz-Gómez SA, Bilolikar G, Wideman JG, Geiler-Samerotte K (2021) Constructive neutral evolution 20 years later. J Mol Evol 89:172–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-021-09996-y
Nei M (2013) Mutation-driven evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Noble D (2015) Evolution beyond neo-Darwinism: a new conceptual framework. J Exp Biol 218:1273–1273. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.123125
Noble D (2017) Evolution viewed from physics, physiology and medicine. Interface Focus 7:20160159. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0159
Noble D (2021) The illusions of the modern synthesis. Biosemiotics 14:5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09405-3
Noble D (2013) Physiology is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology. Exp Physiol 98:1235–1243. https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.2012.071134
Noor MAF, Grams KL, Bertucci LA, Reiland J (2001) Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:12084–12088
Novick A, Doolittle WF (2019) How microbes “jeopardize” the modern synthesis. PLOS Gen 15:e1008166. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008166
Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Okasha S (2005) On niche construction and extended evolutionary theory. Biol Philos 20:1–10
Okasha S (2018) Agents and goals in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Orzack SH (1981) The modern synthesis is partly Wright. Paleobiology 7:128–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300003845
Otsuka J (2016) A critical review of the statisticalist debate. Biol Philos 31:459–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9528-0
Otsuka Y (2019) Ontology, causality, and methodology of evolutionary research programs. In: Uller T, Laland KN (eds) Evolutionary causation: biological and philosophical reflections. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 247–264
Peterson EL (2017) The life organic: the theoretical biology club and the roots of epigenetics, 1st edn. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
Phillips PC, Arnold SJ (1989) Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43:1209–1266
Pigliucci M (2007) Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution 61:2743–2749
Pigliucci M (2019) Causality and the role of philosophy in science. In: Uller T, Laland KN (eds) Evolutionary causation: biological and philosophical reflections. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 13–28
Pigliucci M (2006) Genetic variance-covariance matrices: a critique of the evolutionary quantitative genetics research program. Biol Philos 21:1–23
Pigliucci M (2008) Sewall Wright’s adaptive landscape: 1932 vs. 1988. Biol Philos 23:591–603
Pigliucci M (2009) An extended synthesis for evolutionary biology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1168:218–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04578.x
Pigliucci M, Finkelman L (2014) The extended (evolutionary) synthesis debate: where science meets philosophy. Bioscience 64:511–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu062
Pigliucci M, Kaplan J (2000) The fall and rise of Dr Pangloss: adaptationism and the spandrels paper 20 years later. Trends Ecol Evol 15:66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01762-0
Pigliucci M, Müller GB (2010a) Elements of an extended evolutionary synthesis. In: Pigliucci M, Muller GB (eds) Evolution—the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 3–17
Pigliucci M, Müller GB (2010b) Evolution—the extended synthesis. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Price TD, Qvarnstrom A, Irwin DE (2003) The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1433–1440
Provine WB (1986) Sewall Wright and evolutionary biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Queller DC (2017) Fundamental theorems of evolution. Am Nat 189:345–353. https://doi.org/10.1086/690937
Rabosky DL, Mccune AR (2010) Reinventing species selection with molecular phylogenies. Trends Ecol Evol 25:68–74
Rajon E, Charlat S (2019) (in)exhaustible suppliers for evolution? Epistatic selection tunes the adaptive potential of nongenetic inheritance. Am Nat 194:470–481. https://doi.org/10.1086/704772
Reeve HK, Sherman PW (1993) Adaptations and the goals of evolutionary research. Q Rev Biol 68:1–32
Reif W-E, Junker T, Hoßfeld U (2000) The synthetic theory of evolution: general problems and the German contribution to the synthesis. Theory Biosci 119:41–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-000-0004-6
Rice SH (2004) Evolutionary theory: mathematical and conceptual foundations. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Salazar-Ciudad I (2021) Why call it developmental bias when it is just development? Biol Direct 16:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-020-00289-w
Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P (2001) Perspective: evolution of flower color in the desert annual Linanthus parryae: Wright revisited. Evolution 55:1269–1282
Schluter D (1996) Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50:1766–1774
Schluter D (2009) Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323:737–741
Scott-Phillips TC, Laland KN, Shuker DM et al (2014) The niche construction perspective: a critical appraisal. Evolution 68:1231–1243. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12332
Sepkoski D (2012) Rereading the fossil record: the growth of paleobiology as an evolutionary discipline. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Shapiro JA (2011) Evolution: a view from the 21st century, 1st edn. Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Sheldrake R (1995) A new science of life: the hypothesis of morphic resonance, 0th edn. Park Street Press, Rochester
Siepielski AM, Morrissey MB, Buoro M et al (2017) Precipitation drives global variation in natural selection. Science 355:959–962. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2773
Simpson GG (1949) The meaning of evolution: a study of the history of life and of its significance for man. Yale University Press
Sinervo B, Svensson E (2002) Correlational selection and the evolution of genomic architecture. Heredity 16:948–955
Sober E (1984) The nature of selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Stebbins GL, Ayala FJ (1981) Is a new evolutionary synthesis necessary? Science 213:967–971. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.213.4511.967
Steffes DM (2007) Panpsychic organicism: Sewall Wright’s philosophy for understanding complex genetic systems. J Hist Biol 40:327–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-006-9105-5
Steppan SJ, Phillips PC, Houle D (2002) Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol Evol 17:320–327
Stinchcombe JR, Kirkpatrick M (2012) Genetics and evolution of function-valued traits: understanding environmentally responsive phenotypes. Trends Ecol Evol 27:637–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.002
Stoltzfus A (2019) Understanding bias in the introduction of variation as an evolutionary cause. In: Uller T, Laland KN (eds) Evolutionary causation: biological and philosophical reflections. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 29–61
Stoltzfus A (2006) Mutationism and the dual causation of evolutionary change. Evol Dev 8:304–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.00101.x
Stoltzfus A (2017) Why we don’t want another “Synthesis”. Biol Direct 12:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-017-0194-1
Stoltzfus A (1999) On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution. J Mol Evol 49:169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006540
Stoltzfus A, Cable K (2014) Mendelian-mutationism: the forgotten evolutionary synthesis. J Hist Biol 47:501–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-014-9383-2
Stoltzfus A, Yampolsky LY (2009) Climbing mount probable: mutation as a cause of nonrandomness in evolution. J Hered 100:637–647. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esp048
Sueoka N (1988) Directional mutation pressure and neutral molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85:2653–2657
Svensson E, Sinervo B (2000) Experimental excursions on adaptive landscapes: density-dependent selection on egg size. Evolution 54:1396–1403
Svensson E, Sinervo B, Comendant T (2002) Mechanistic and experimental analysis of condition and reproduction in a polymorphic lizard. J Evol Biol 15:1034–1047
Svensson EI (2018) On reciprocal causation in the evolutionary process. Evol Biol 45:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-017-9431-x
Svensson EI (2020) O causation, where art thou? Bioscience 70:264–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa009
Svensson EI (2017) Back to basics: using colour polymorphisms to study evolutionary processes. Mol Ecol 26:2204–2211. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14025
Svensson EI, Arnold SJ, Bürger R et al (2021) Correlational selection in the age of genomics. Nat Ecol Evol 5:562–573
Svensson EI, Berger D (2019) The role of mutation bias in adaptive evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 34:422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.015
Svensson EI, Calsbeek R (2012a) The adaptive landscape in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Svensson EI, Calsbeek R (2012b) The past, the present and the future of the adaptive landscape. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 299–308
Svensson EI, Gomez-Llano MA, Waller JT (2020) Selection on phenotypic plasticity favors thermal canalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:29767–29774. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012454117
Tanaka MM, Godfrey-Smith P, Kerr B (2020) The dual landscape model of adaptation and niche construction. Philos Sci 87:478–498. https://doi.org/10.1086/708692
Thompson DW (2014) On growth and form, 1st en edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tsuboi M, van der Bijl W, Kopperud BT et al (2018) Breakdown of brain–body allometry and the encephalization of birds and mammals. Nat Ecol Evol 2:1492–1500. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0632-1
Turelli M, Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P (2001) Stable two-allele polymorphisms maintained by fluctuating fitnesses and seed banks: protecting the blues in Linanthus parryae. Evolution 55:1283–1298
Uyeda JC, Hansen TF, Arnold SJ, Pienaar J (2011) The million-year wait for macroevolutionary bursts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:15908–15913
Vellend M (2016) The theory of ecological communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Via S, Lande R (1985) Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39:505–522
Waddington CH (1957) The strategy of the genes, 1st edn. Routledge
Wade MJ, Goodnight CJ (1998) Perspective: the theories of Fisher and Wright in the context of metapopulations: when nature does many small experiments. Evolution 52:1537–1553
Wade MJ, Kalisz SM (1990) The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44:1947–1955
Wagner A (2015) Arrival of the fittest: how nature innovates, Reprint edn Current
Walsh D, Lewins T, Ariew A (2002) The trials of life: natural selection and random drift. Philos Sci 69:429–446. https://doi.org/10.1086/342454
Walsh DM (2015) Organisms, agency, and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Welch JJ (2016) What’s wrong with evolutionary biology? Biol Philos 32:263–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9557-8
Wellenreuther M, Svensson EI, Hansson B (2014) Sexual selection and genetic colour polymorphisms in animals. Mol Ecol 23:5398–5414. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12935
West-Eberhard MJ (2007) Dancing with DNA and flirting with the ghost of Lamarck. Biol Philos 22:439–451
West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wilkins AS (2008) Waddington’s unfinished critique of neo-Darwinian genetics:then and now. Biol Theory 3:224–232. https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2008.3.3.224
Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159
Wright S (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc Sixth Internat Congr Gen 1:356–366
Xie KT, Wang G, Thompson AC et al (2019) DNA fragility in the parallel evolution of pelvic reduction in stickleback fish. Science 363:81–84. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1425
Yampolsky LY, Stoltzfus A (2001) Bias in the introduction of variation as an orienting factor in evolution. Evol Dev 3:73–83
York R, Clark B (2011) The science and humanism of Stephen jay Gould. Monthly Review Press, New York
Zeng Z-B (1988) Long-term correlated response, interpopulation covariation, and interspecific allometry. Evolution 42:363–374
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Pierrick Bourrat, Stephen De Lisle, Benjamin Jarrett, Aaron Novick, Masahito Tsuboi and Arvid Ågren who all commented on a first draft of this manuscript, and whose critical inputs were crucial when preparing the final version. Funding for my research has been provided by a grant from the Swedish Research Council (VR: 2016-03356).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Svensson, E.I. (2023). The Structure of Evolutionary Theory: Beyond Neo-Darwinism, Neo-Lamarckism and Biased Historical Narratives About the Modern Synthesis. In: Dickins, T.E., Dickins, B.J. (eds) Evolutionary Biology: Contemporary and Historical Reflections Upon Core Theory. Evolutionary Biology – New Perspectives on Its Development, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22028-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22028-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22027-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22028-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)