Skip to main content

Are Dating Apps and Sex Robots Feminist Technologies? A Critical Posthumanist Alternative

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender in AI and Robotics

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 235))

Abstract

In the following, I first define what a feminist technology is, referring to the approach of Linda L. Layne, Sharra L. Vostral, and Kate Boyer. In a second step, the two examples of dating apps and sex robots—with a specific focus on embodiment and the datafied self—will be examined from different classical feminist perspectives. Finally, a critical posthumanist analysis and critique will provide an answer to the initial question of whether dating apps and sex robots are feminist technologies or if the question itself might cover exclusionary (and thus antifeminist) traits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    David [17] discusses whether Roxxxy actually exists or if TrueCompanion actually is a dummy company. In December 2022, the Homepage is no longer available.

References

  1. Aengst, J., Layne, L.L.: The need to bleed? A feminist technology assessment of menstrual-suppressing birth control pills. In: Layne, L. L., Vostral, S.L., Boyer, K. (eds.) Feminist Technology, pp. 55–88. University of Illinois (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alaimo, S., Hekman, S. (ed.): Material Feminisms. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indianapolis (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barad, K.: Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bendel, O.: Sexroboter im Gesundheitsbereich. IT Health 8, 36–37 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butler, J.: Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Callus, I., Herbrechter, S.: Posthumanism. In: Wake, P., Malpas, S. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Critical and Cultural Theory, pp. 144–153. Routledge, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coeckelbergh, M.: Money Machines. Electronic Financial Technologies, Distancing, and Responsibility in Global Finance. Ashgate (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Danaher, J.: Should we be thinking about robot sex? In: Danaher, J., McArthur, N. (ed.) Robot Sex. Social and Ethical Implications, pp. 3–14. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. de Largie, V.: Sex robots offer real benefits to society—and to women. In: iNews. The Essential Daily Briefing. Retrieved from https://inews.co.uk/opinion/sex-robots-offer-real-benefits-society-women/

  10. Di Nucci, E.: Sex robots and the rights of the disabled. In: Danaher, J., McArthur, N. (ed.) Robot Sex. Social and Ethical Implications, pp. 73–88. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Emcke, C.: Wie wir begehren. Frankfurt am Main (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Franklin, A.: Posthumanism. In: Ritzer, G. (ed.) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, pp. 3548–3550. Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haraway, D.: The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Herbrechter, S.: Critical Posthumanism. In: Braidotti, R., Hlavajova, M. (Eg.) Posthuman Glossary, pp. 94–96. Bloomsbury, London, Oxford, New York, New Delhi (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cuboniks, L.: A Politics for Alienation (2014). Retrieved from http://www.laboriacuboniks.net/de/

  16. Layne, L.L.: Introduction. In: Layne, L.L., Vostral, S.L., Boyer, K. (ed.) Feminist Technology, pp. 1–35. University of Illinois (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levy, D.: Roxxxy the ‘Sex Robot’—real or fake? Lovotics 1, 1–4 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Loh, J.: What is feminist philosophy of technology? A critical overview and a plea for a feminist technoscientific Utopia. In: Loh, J., Coeckelbergh, M. (ed.) Feminist Philosophy of Technology, pp. 1–24. J.B. Metzler (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Loh, J.: Trans- und Posthumanismus zur Einführung. Hamburg (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. McArthur, N., Danaher, J.: How sex robots could help with the nuts and bolts of relationships (2017). Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/03/sexbots-nuts-bolts-relationships-sex-robots

  21. Misselhorn, C.: Robots as moral agents? In: Rövekamp, F., Bosse, F (ed.) Ethics in Science and Society. German and Japanese Views, pp. 42–56. München (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mlot, S.: Sex robot Samantha upgrade with moral code (2018). Retrieved from https://www.geek.com/tech/sex-robot-samantha-upgraded-with-moral-code-1743756/

  23. Morgan, R.: Looking for robot love? Here are 5 sexbots you can buy right now (2017). Retrieved from https://metro.co.uk/2017/09/13/looking-for-robot-love-here-are-5-sexbots-you-can-buy-right-now-6891378/

  24. Murphy, M.: Interview. Kathleen Richardson makes the case against sex robots. In: Feminist Current (2017). Retrieved from https://www.feministcurrent.com/2017/06/02/interview-kathleen-richardson-makes-case-sex-robots/

  25. Murray, T.: Professor Kathleen Richardson on ethical problems with sex robots (2017). Retrieved from https://ispr.info/2017/10/27/professor-kathleen-richardson-on-ethical-problems-with-sex-robots/comment-page-1/

  26. Nayar, P.K.: Posthumanism. Polity, Cambridge (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pitts-Taylor, V. (ed.): Mattering. Feminism, Science, and Materialism. NYU Press, New York, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Realbotix: The Software (2019). Retrieved from https://realbotix.com/Harmony

  29. Rostalski, F.: Entscheiden im digitalen Zeitalter – Zur Bedeutung der technischen Beeinflussung des Menschen bei der Entscheidungsfindung. In: Hermann, I., Rostalski, F., Stock, G. (Ed.) Kompetent eigene Entscheidungen treffen?, pp. 9–23. Auch mit Künstlicher Intelligenz! Berlin (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Satz, D.: Feminist perspectives on reproduction and the family. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-family/

  31. Strikwerda, L.: Legal and moral implications of child sex robots. In: Danaher, J., McArthur, N. (ed.) Robot Sex. Social and Ethical Implications, pp. 133–151. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Trallori, L.N.: Der Körper als Ware. Mandelbaum Verlag, Wien, Berlin (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. TrueCompanion: FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) (2019). Retrieved from http://www.truecompanion.com/shop/faq

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janina Loh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Loh, J. (2023). Are Dating Apps and Sex Robots Feminist Technologies? A Critical Posthumanist Alternative. In: Vallverdú, J. (eds) Gender in AI and Robotics. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 235. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21606-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics