Abstract
The iconic status of the French Revolution does not exempt it from also being one of the most contested events within history; in fact, the latter is probably a pre-requisite for the former. One point of seeming agreement between theorists and historians, however, is the role of the French Revolution in what Furet terms, ‘the invention of the political form of modern society’ (1988 [1986): 18), or, more poetically, ‘the empirical modality through which the world of free and equal individuals has made its appearance in our history’ (1990: 798–799); that is, the invention of the modern nation-state. French revolutionary historiography has been central to the establishment of 1789, or then the period from 1789 to 1815, as the birth-date of a new historical epoch, the modern. As Furet (1981 [1978]) argues, the Revolution was not understood simply as an event within a complex of events, but rather, was seen as constitutive of the advent of a new age; one founded upon the idea of equality and expressed through the establishment of modern political institutions. This heightened the sense of the present as unique and unprecedented and, as a consequence, problematized the way in which the relationship between the past and present was theorized (Furet, 1981 [1978]; Crossley, 1993; see also Foucault, 2002 [1969]; Baehr, 2002). This chapter contests the dominant understandings of the nation-state that ascribe a particular significance to its emergence in the French Revolution and argues against the conception of cultural progress that locates ‘others’ within a history whose theoretical framework is predicated on the European experience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, B. (1996). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso.
Arnold, D. (1993). Colonizing the Body: State, Medicine and Epidemic Disease in Nineteenth-Century India. Oxford University Press.
Arnold, D. (2000). The New Cambridge History of India: III.5 Science, Technology and Medicine in Colonial India. Cambridge University Press.
Baehr, P. (2002). Identifying the Unprecedented: Hannah Arendt, Totalitarianism, and the Critique of Sociology. American Sociological Review, 67(December), 804–831.
Bartelson, J. (1995). A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.
Bayly, C. A. (1993). Knowing the Country: Empire and Information in India. Modern Asian Studies Special Issue: How Social, Political and Cultural Information is Collected, Defined, Used and Analyzed, 27(1), 2–43.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge.
Broers, M. (1989). Italy and the Modern State: The Experience of Napoleonic Rule. In F. Furet & M. Ozouf’s (Eds.), The French Revolution and the Creation of Modern Political Culture, Volume 3: The Transformation of Political Culture 1789–1848. Pergamon Press.
Broers, M. (1996). Europe Under Napoleon 1799–1815. Arnold.
Carr, E. H. (1945). Nationalist and After. Macmillan.
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.
Chakrabarty, D. (2002). Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies. University of Chicago Press.
Chatterjee, P. (1986). Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse. Zed Books.
Chatterjee, P. (1996). Whose Imagined Community? In G. Balakrishnan (Ed.), Mapping the Nation (pp. 214–225). Verso.
Cohn, B. S., & Dirks, N. B. (1988). Beyond the Fringe: The Nation-State, Colonialism, and The Technologies of Power. Journal of Historical Sociology, l/2, 224–228.
Cranston, M. (1988). The Sovereignty of the Nation. In C. Lucas (Ed.), The French Revolution and the Creation of Modern Political Culture, Volume 2: The Political Culture of the French Revolution. Pergamon Press.
Crossley, C. (1993). French Historians and Romanticism: Thierry, Guizot, the Saint- Simonians, Quient, Michelet. London.
Doyle, W. (1980). Origins of the French Revolution. Oxford University Press.
Droz, J. (1967). Eumpe Between the Revolutions 1815–1848. Fontana.
Dubois, L. (2004). A Colony of Citizens: Revolution and Slave Emancipation in the French Caribbean, 1787–1804. The University of North Carolina Press.
Elton, G. R. (1963). Reformation Europe 1517–1559. Collins.
Fischer, S. (2004). Modernity Disavowed: Haiti and the Cultures of Slavery in the Age of Revolution. Duke University Press.
Fisher, M. H. (1993). The Office of Akhbar Nawis: The Transition from Mughal to British Forms. Modern Asian Studies Special Issue: How Social, Political and Cultural Information is Collected, Defined, Used and Analyzed, 27(1), 45–82.
Fontana, B. (1985). The Shaping of Modern Liberty: Commerce and Civilization in the Writings of Benjamin Constant. Annales Benjamin Constant, 5, 2–15.
Ford, F. L. (1963). The Revolutionary-Napoleonic Era: How Much of a Watershed? The American Historical Review, 69/l, 18–29.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 87–104). University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, Michel. (2002 [1969]). The Archaeology of Knowledge translated by A. M. Sheridan-Smith (: Routledge).
Furet, François. (1981 [1978]). Interpreting the French Revolution translated by Elborg Forster (: Cambridge University Press).
Furet, François. (1988 [1986]). Marx and the French Revolution translated by D. K. Furet (: University of Chicago Press).
Furet, F. (1990). ‘A Commentary’ translated by Elborg Forster. French Historical Studies, 16(4), 792–802.
Guizot, Fransçois. (1997 [1846]). The History of Civilization in Europe translated by W. Hazlitt (London: Penguin Books).
Herder, Johann Gottfried von. (1969). J. G. Herder on Social and Political Culture translated and edited by F. M. Barnard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Hirschman, A. O. (1977). The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Princeton University Press.
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1977). The Age of Revolution: Europe 1789–1848. Abacus.
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1994). Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth and Reality. Cambridge University Press.
Joyce, P. (2002). Maps, Blood and the City: The Governance of the Social in Nineteenth-Century Britain. In P. Joyce (Ed.), The Social in Question: New Bearings in History and the Social Sciences (pp. 97–114). Routledge.
Kaplan, M. (1995). Panoptican in Poona: An Essay on Foucault and Colonialism. Cultural Anthropology, 10(1), 85–98.
Kedourie, Elie. (1994 [1960]). Nationalism fourth edition (: Blackwell).
Kumar, D. (1995). Science and the Raj 1857–1905. Oxford University Press.
Kumar, Deepak. (2003). ‘Developing a History of Science and Technology in South Asia’ Economic and Political Weekly June 7.
Michelet, Jules. (1967 [1847]). History of the French Revolution edited by G. Wright (: University of Chicago Press).
Mitchell, T. (1991). Colonizing Egypt. University of California Press.
Nandy, A. (1994). The I/legitimacy of Nationalism: Rabi11dra11ath Tagore and the Politics of Self. Oxford University Press.
Prakash, G. (1999). Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton University Press.
Prakash, G. (2002). The Colonial Genealogy of Society: Community and Political Modernity in India. In P. Joyce (Ed.), The Social in Question: New Bearings in History and the Social Sciences (pp. 81–96). Routledge.
Rodríguez-Salgado, M. J. (1998). ‘Christians, Civilized and Spanish: Multiple Identities in Sixteenth Century Spain’ reprinted from The Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 6th Series, 8, pp. 233–51.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. (2004 1762]). The Social Contract, Or Principles of Political Right translated by G. D. H. Cole (: Kessinger Publishing).
Said, E. W. (1975). Beginnings: Intention and Method. Basic Books Inc. Publishers.
Smith, Anthony D. (1983 [1971]). Theories of Nationalism second edition (: Duckworth).
Smith, A. D. (1986). The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Blackwell.
Smith, A. D. (1996). Nationalism and the Historians. In G. Balakrishnan (Ed.), Mapping the Nation (pp. 175–197). Verso.
Stoler, A. L. (1989). Rethinking Colonial Categories: European Communities and the Boundaries of Rule. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31(1), 134–161.
Talmon, J. L. (1967). Romanticism and Revolt Europe 1815–1848. W. W. Norton and Company.
Taylor, C. (1999). Nationalism and Modernity. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing Nationalism (pp. 219–245). State University of New York Press.
Teschke, B. (2003). The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations. Verso.
Visvanathan, S. (1988). On the Annals of the Laboratory State. In A. Nandy (Ed.), Science, Hegemony and Violence A Requiem for Modernity (pp. 257–288). Oxford University Press.
Viswanathan, G. (1989). Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India. Columbia University Press.
Wallerstein, I. (1997). Eurocentrism and Its Avatars: The Dilemmas of Social Science. New Left Review, 226(Nov-Dec), 93–107.
Weber, E. (1976). Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France 1870–1914. Stanford University Press.
Woolf, S. (1979). A History of Italy 1700–1860: The Social Constraints of Political Cliange. Methuen and Co. Ltd.
Woolf, S. (1991). Napoleon’. Integration of Europe. Routledge.
Woolf, S. (1992). The Construction of a European World-View in the Revolutionary-Napoleonic Years. Past and Present: The Cultural and Political Co11struction of Europe, 137, 72–101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhambra, G.K. (2023). Myths of the Modern Nation-State: The French Revolution. In: Rethinking Modernity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21537-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21537-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21539-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21537-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)