Abstract
In the article there is an investigation of the process of developing new principles for ensuring the security of the British Empire, aimed at the division of responsibility in the field of defense between the metropolis and the colonies. The chronological framework of the work is limited to the first half of the 19th century, when the first steps were taken to develop the theoretical foundations for integrating the colonies into the imperial defense and giving it a collective character. Based on the definition of the term “imperial defense”, its three-stage structure is distinguished. Objective (deterioration of the international situation) and subjective (unwillingness of British taxpayers to finance the defense of the colonies) reasons for integration are investigated. The main directions of the inclusion of colonies in the collective defense of the empire are formulated (“Gray’s plan”, “Godley’s plan”). The reaction of the British political elite (imperialists and anti-imperialists) and the colonies themselves to integration plans is traced. By the middle of the XIX century new principles of imperial defense policy were developed, according to which the metropolis shifted the burden of responsibility for ensuring the internal security of the colonies to the local authorities, and retained the obligation to protect them in the event of an external threat. However, due to the resistance of the imperialists and the unwillingness of the colonies, the new principles could not be fully implemented.
Keywords
- British Empire
- Colonies
- Imperial defense
- Collective defense
- Henry Grey
- (John Godley
- Arthur Mills)
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
References
Keith, A.B.: Responsible Government in the Dominions, vol. 3, pp. 1101–1661. At the Clarendon Press, Oxford (1912)
Morrell, W.P.: British Colonial Policy in the Age of Peel and Russell, p 554. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1930)
Richmond, H.: Imperial Defense. The Army Quarterly XXVII, pp. 11–30 (1933)
Trotter, R.G.: The British Empire-Commonwealth. A Study in Political Evolution, p. 131. The MacMillan Co. of Canada Ltd., Toronto (1932)
Louis, R.: The Oxford History of British Empire, vol. 3, p. 800. The Nineteenth Century, Oxford (1999)
Stacey, C.P.: Canada and the British army, 1846–1871. A Study in the Practice of Responsible Government, p. 316. Longmans, Green and Co., London (1963)
Grey H (1853) The Colonial Policy of Lord John Russell’s Administration, vol 1, p. 447. R. Bentley, London
Schuyler, R.L.: The rise of anti-imperialism in England. Polit. Sci. Q. 37, 440–471 (1922)
Doughty, A.G.: The Elgin-Grey papers, 1846–1852, vol, p 448. 1. J. O. Patenaude, I. S. O., Printer to the King, Ottawa (1937)
Monypenny, W.F., Buckle, G.E.: The life of B. Disraeli: Earl of Beaconsfield, vol 4, pp. 1855–1868. The Macmillan Company, London (1916)
Lucas, C.H.: The Empire at War, vol 1, p. 508. Oxford University Press, Toronto (1921)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Simonenko, E., Ivus, O. (2023). The Transformation of the Defense Policy of the British Empire in the First Half of the 19th Century. In: Beskopylny, A., Shamtsyan, M., Artiukh, V. (eds) XV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2022”. INTERAGROMASH 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 574. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_285
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_285
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21431-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21432-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)