Skip to main content

The Efficiency of Herbicide Use Patterns in Soybean Crops in the Amur Region of Russia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2022” (INTERAGROMASH 2022)

Abstract

In the Amur Region, soybeans are cultivated in specialized crop rotations; its share in the structure of sown areas is more than 70%. This leads to repeated crops and deterioration of the phytosanitary state. Soil cultivation is minimized, weed control is carried out mainly by a chemical method. A wide range of herbicides is offered to agricultural enterprises, making it difficult to choose. Therefore, the scientific substantiation of the most effective agricultural chemicals is relevant. The experiment revealed a strong correlation dependence of the yield on the biological efficiency of the application of pre-emergence herbicides (r = 0.877) and the share of the weed component of agrophytocenosis represented by dicotyledonous weeds 25 days after herbicide application (by the number r = −0.936; by mass r = −0.825). The most effective herbicide use pattern has been established: pre-emergence application of tank mixture of 0.5 l/g of the herbicide containing Clomazone 480 g/l; 0.1 l/g of the herbicide containing Flumioxazin 480 g/l with post-emergence application of tank mixture of 0.6 l/ha of the herbicide containing Imazamox 40 g/l; 0.006 kg/ha of the herbicide containing Thifensulfuron-methyl 750 g/kg; 1.0 l/ha of the preparation containing Haloxyfop-R-methyl 104 g/l. Biological efficiency reaches 90% with pre-emergence herbicide application against dicotyledonous weeds and with post-emergence herbicide application against Equisetum arvense L. Applying of this herbicide use pattern contributes to the high productivity of soybean, allows increasing the yield by 1.4 times and reaching the level of 3.3 t/ha.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shchegorets, O., Tikhonchuk, P., Bumbar, I., Yakimenko, A.: Innovation as a factor in increasing the efficiency of soybean production in the Amur region. E3S Web Conf. 05010 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020305010

  2. de la Fuente, E.B., Suárez, S.A., Ghersa, C.M.: Soybean weed community composition and richness between 1995 and 2003 in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 115(1–4), 229–236 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pan, J., Zhang, L.G., Wang, L., Fu, S.: Effects of long-term fertilization treatments on the weed seed bank in a wheat-soybean rotation system. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 21, e00870 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaweda, D., Haliniarz, M., Bronowicka-Mielniczuk, U., Łukasz, J.: Weed infestation and health of the soybean crop depending on cropping system and tillage system. Agriculture 10(6), 208 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060208

  5. Datta, A., Ullah, H., Tursun, N., et al.: Managing weeds using crop competition in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Crop Prot. 95, 60–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nosratti, I., Sabeti, P., Chaghamirzaee, G., Heidari, H.: Weed problems, challenges, and opportunities in Iran. Crop Prot. 134, 104371 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chetan, C., Rusu, T., Chetan, F., Simon, A.: Influence of soil tillage systems and weed control treatments on root nodules, production and qualitative indicators of soybean. Procedia Technol. 22, 457–464 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sepat, S., Thierfelder, C., Ram Sharma, A., et al.: Effects of weed control strategy on weed dynamics, soybean productivity and profitability under conservation agriculture in India. Field Crops Res. 210, 61–70 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Greer, K., Martins, C., White, M., Pittelkow, C.M.: Assessment of high-input soybean management in the US Midwest: balancing crop production with environmental performance. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 292, 106811 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106811

  10. Scursoni, J.A., Satorre, E.H.: Glyphosate management strategies, weed diversity and soybean yield in Argentina. Crop Prot. 29(9), 957–962 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guan, X., Chen, X., Qiu, C., et al.: Effects of long-term herbicide application on the crops in soybean-peanut rotations in the red soil upland of Southern China. Field Crops Res. 248, 107723 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kandel, Y.R., Mueller, D.S., Legleiter, T., et al.: Impact of fluopyram fungicide and preemergence herbicides on soybean injury, population, sudden death syndrome, and yield. Crop Prot. 106, 103–109 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Epifantsev, V.V., Panasyuk, A.N., Osipov, Y.A., Vaitekhovich, Y.A.: Efficiency of tank mixture of herbicides reducing weediness and increasing the productivity of soybean crops. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 9, 1451–1455 (2019). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.A1250.109119

  14. Brown, L.R., Robinson, D.E., Nurse, R.E., et al.: Soybean response to simulated dicamba/diflufenzopyr drift followed by postemergence herbicides. Crop Prot. 28(6), 539–542 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pornprom, T., Sukcharoenvipharat, W., Sansiriphun, D.: Weed control with pre-emergence herbicides in vegetable soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). Crop Prot. 29(7), 684–690 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2010.02.003

  16. Sarangi, D., Sandell, L.D., Kruger, G.R., et al.: Comparison of herbicide programs for season-long control of glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in soybean. Weed Technol. 31(1), 53–66 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2016.1

  17. Ribeiro, V.H.V., Maia, L.G.S., et al.: Influence of PRE-emergence herbicides on soybean development, root nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Crop Prot. 144, 105576 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105576

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the company “Target Agro” for technical and financial support in the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Zakharova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zakharova, E., Nemykin, A. (2023). The Efficiency of Herbicide Use Patterns in Soybean Crops in the Amur Region of Russia. In: Beskopylny, A., Shamtsyan, M., Artiukh, V. (eds) XV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2022”. INTERAGROMASH 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 574. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21431-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21432-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics