Skip to main content

Data and Data Management in the Context of Digital Twins

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Digital Twin
  • 3385 Accesses

Abstract

With the emergence of Industry 4.0, smart applications and systems are becoming the norm, transforming traditional industries and sectors towards an increasingly data-driven approach. Digital Twin technologies are one of the driving paradigms for the production, integration, sharing and reuse of data. In this context, understanding and mastering the description and formalisation of data as well as its proper, secure, compliant management are crucial for a large-scale adoption of the Digital Twin technology.

We introduce the essential concepts for data, data structures and data management, and examine the importance of specific technologies, like ontologies, for the meaningful description of data and their relationships. We cover the essential modelling layers connected with data in this context, and present selected collaboration platforms for Digital Twin ecosystems in a context of interoperability as envisaged in the Digital Thread.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bao, Q., Zhao, G., & Yu, Y. (2020). Ontology-based modelling of part digital twin oriented to assembly. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 236(1–2), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420941160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barth, L. Ehrat, M. Fuchs, R. & Haarmann, J. (2020). ICISS 2020: Systematisation of Digital Twins: Ontology and conceptual framework. In Proceedings of the 2020 The 3rd international conference on information science and system. March 2020 pp. 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3388176.3388209

  3. Bazaz Moghadaszadeh, S., Lohtander, M., & Varis, J. (2020). Availability of Manufacturing data resources in Digital Twin. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berners-Lee, T., & Hendler, J. (2001). Publishing on the semantic web. Nature, 410, 1023–1024. https://doi.org/10.1038/35074206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Britan, G., & Mehdi, S. (2009). USAID, Office of Management Policy, Budget and Performance (MPBP). Performance monitoring & evaluation tips data quality standards (No. 12, 2nd ed.) http://transition.usaid.gov/policy/evalweb/documents/TIPS-DataQualityStandards.pdf. Accessed on 10 Jan 2022.

  6. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie. (2011). Theseus Forschungsprogram (in German). Available: https://www.digitale-technologien.de/DT/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/Publikation/theseus-forschungsprogramm-broschuere.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=7. Accessed on 10 Jan 2021.

  7. CDBB, Centre for Digital Built Britain. The Gemini Principles. (2018). Cambridge, UK. https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/TheGeminiPrinciples.pdf. Accessed on 3 Nov 2021.

  8. Chazelle, B., & Guibas, L. J. (1986). Fractional cascading: I. A data structuring technique. Algorithmica, 1, 133–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01840440

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, X., Jia, S & Xiang, Y. (2020). A Review: Knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph. Expert systems with applications (Vol. 141, p. 112948). College of electronic and information engineering, Tongji University. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112948

  10. Confirm: Confirm smart manufacturing – Science Foundation Ireland Research Centre. Homepage: https://confirm.ie/

  11. Conde, J., Munoz-Arcentales, A., Alonso, A., Lopez-Pernas, S., & Salvachua, J. (2021). Modeling Digital Twin data and architecture: A building guide with FIWARE as enabling technology. IEEE Internet Computing, 26(3), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DAMA. (2021). Mission, vision, purpose and goals, Available: https://www.dama.org/cpages/mission-vision-purpose-and-goals. Accessed on 1 Dec 2021.

  13. Deutsche Welle (DW). (2007). Germany to fund rival to Google search engine, DW. Available https://www.dw.com/en/germany-to-fund-rival-to-google-search-engine/a-2698176. Accessed on 10 Jan 2022.

  14. European Commission. (2007). EU clears state aid for German multimedia search engine project, 20 July 2007. Available https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/28084-eu-clears-state-aid-for-german-multimedia-search-engine-project. Accessed on 10 Jan 2021.

  15. Go Fair. (2016). How to go FAIR. Available: https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/. Accessed on 24 Nov 2021.

  16. Goujard, C. & Cerulus, L. (2021). Inside Gaia-X: How chaos and infighting are killing Europe’s grand cloud project, Politico, 26 Oct 2021. https://www.politico.eu/article/chaos-and-infighting-are-killing-europes-grand-cloud-project/. Accessed on 10 Jan 2022.

  17. Griffith, E. (2018). Available: https://uk.pcmag.com/old-news/118459/90-percent-of-the-big-data-we-generate-is-an-unstructured-mess. Accessed on 03 Nov 2021.

  18. Groger. C. (2021). There Is No AI Without Data, Communications of the ACM. Available: There Is No AI Without Data | November 2021 | Communications of the ACM. Accessed on 3 Nov 2021.

  19. Guarino, N. (1998). Formal ontologies and information systems, In Proceeding 1st International Conference. (FOIS) (pp. 3–15). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989126

  20. Hawkins, O., (n.d.) WPP Open Data 2030. Available: https://www.wpp.com/-/media/project/wpp/images/wpp-iq/pdfs/wpp-data-2030-report.pdf?la=en. Accessed on 30 Oct 2021.

  21. Husáková, M., & Bureš, V. (2020). Formal ontologies in information systems development: A systematic review. Information, 11(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Javed, I., Alharbi, F., Margaria, T., Crespi, N., & Qureshi, K. (2021). PETchain: A blockchain-based privacy enhancing technology. IEEE Access, 9, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3064896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kadner, K., Oberle, D., Schaeffler, M., Horch, A., Kintz, M., Barton, L., Leidig, T., Pedrinaci, C., Domingue, J., Romanelli, M., Trapero, R., & Kutsikos, K. (2011). Unified service description language XG final report. Available: https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/usdl/XGR-usdl-20111027/. Accessed on 10 Jan 2022.

  24. Krima, S., Barbau, R., Fiorentini, X., Rachuri, S., & Sriram, R. (2009). OntoSTEP: OWL-DL Ontology for STEP, NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD [online]. https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=901544. Accessed on 27 Nov 2021.

  25. Kupriyanovsky, V., Pokusaev, O., Klimov, A., Dobrynin, A., Lazutkina, V., & Potapov, I. (2016). BIM on the world’s railways – development, examples, and standards. International Journal of open Information technologies, 8(5), 57–80. Available: http://injoit.org/index.php/j1/article/view/934

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, M., Fang, S., Dong. H and Xu. C (2021) Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications: Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58Part B, 346–361, ISSN 0278-6125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017.

  27. Margaria, T., & Schieweck, A. (2019). The Digital Thread in Industry 4.0. In Proceeding IFM 2019, 15th International Conference on Integrated Formal Methods December 2019, Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34968-4_1

  28. Margaria, T., Chaudhary, H. A. A., Guevara, I., Ryan, S., & Schieweck, A. (2021). The interoperability challenge: Building a model-driven digital thread platform for CPS. In Proceeding ISoLA 2021, international symposium on leveraging applications of formal methods, verification and validation. LNCS (Vol. 13036, pp. 393–441). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Market Research (2020) Digital twin market research report. Available: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/digital-twin-market-225269522.html. Accessed 29 Oct 2021.

  30. Meierhofer, J. & West, S. (2019). Service value creation using a digital twin. In Naples forum of service, service dominant logic, Network and systems theory and service science. Integrating three perspectives for a new service agenda, Ischia (pp. 4–7) June 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/SDS49233.2020.00019

  31. Minerva, R., Lee, G. M., & Crespi, N.. (2020). Digital Twin in the IoT context: A survey on technical features, scenarios, and architectural models. In Proceedings of the IEEE (pp. 1–40). 10.1109/JPROC.2020.2998530

    Google Scholar 

  32. Minerva, R., Awan, F. & Crespi, N. (2021). Exploiting Digital Twins as enablers for synthetic sensing. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348409194_Exploiting_Digital_Twins_as_enablers_for_Synthetic_Sensing

  33. Minerva, R., Crespi, N., Farahnakhsh, R., & Aqan, F. M. (this volume). Artificial intelligence and the Digital Twin. Progression from data to knowledge. In N. Crespi, A. T. Drobot, & R. Minerva (Eds.), The Digital Twin. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Noy, N. F. & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology (KSL-01-05), Technical report, Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nyffenegger, F., Hänggi, R., & Reisch, A. (2018). A reference model for PLM in the area of digitization. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01614-2_33

  36. Ploennigs, J., Hensel, B., Dibowski, H., & Kabitzsch, K. (2012). BASont – A modular, adaptive building automation system ontology, In IECON 2012 – 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (pp. 4827–4833). 10.1109/IECON.2012.6389583

    Google Scholar 

  37. Reynolds, P. (2021) HSE breach latest in spider’s web of cyber-attacks. Available: https://www.rte.ie/news/2021/0516/1222004-cyber-attack-health/. Accessed on 2 Nov 2021.

  38. Ryan, S., Margaria, T. (2021). Definition, description and formalisation of Digital Twin Data structures. In 37th international manufacturing conference, Irish Manufacturing Council, September 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schleich, B., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L., & Wartzack, S. (2017). Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Schmitt, L., & Copps, D. (this volume). Chapter Two. The business of Digital Twins. In N. Crespi, A. T. Drobot, & R. Minerva (Eds.), The Digital Twin. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schroeder, G. N., Steinmetz, C., Pereira, C. E., & Espindola, D. B. (2016). Digital twin data modeling with automationML and a communication methodology for data exchange. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016;49(30):12-17

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schweiger, L., Barth, L., & Meierhofer, J. (2020). Data resources to create Digital Twins. In 2020 7th Swiss Conference on Data Science (SDS) (pp. 55–56). 10.1109/SDS49233.2020.00020

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sile. (2021). Silicon Economy. Retrieved January 2, 2022. Available from https://www.silicon-economy.com/en/homepage/

  44. Singh, S., Shehab, E., Higgins, N., Fowler, K., Reynolds, D., Erkoyuncu, J. A., & Gadd, P. (2021). Data management for developing digital twin ontology model. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 235(14), 2323–2337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420978117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tao, F., Sui, F., Liu, A., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Song, B., Guo, Z., Lu, S. C.-Y., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin-driven product design framework. International Journal of Production Research, 57(12), 3935–3953. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1443229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. WPP Report. (2020). Annual report 2020. Available: https://www.wpp.com/investors/annual-report-2020. Accessed 27 Oct 2021.

  47. Hartig, O., & Pérez, J. (2018). Semantics and Complexity of GraphQL. Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Science Foundation Ireland grants 13/RC/2094 (Lero, the Irish Software Research Centre) and 16/RC/3918 (Confirm, the Smart Manufacturing Research Centre).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiziana Margaria .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Margaria, T., Ryan, S. (2023). Data and Data Management in the Context of Digital Twins. In: Crespi, N., Drobot, A.T., Minerva, R. (eds) The Digital Twin. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21343-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21343-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21342-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21343-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics