Abstract
Conceptualisations of voluntary return have been typically contrasted with deportation, or forced removal, which provides a limited understanding of migrants’ motivations, agency, and actions and the processes involved. Migrants are classified as either having no choice but to migrate (involuntary migrants) or migrating voluntarily (voluntary migrants). This chapter critically evaluates the role that the notion of voluntariness plays in return migration decisions. Drawing from semi-structured interviews with Somali returnees and deportees, the study analysed returnees’ return decision-making and the labelling by the authorities. Findings show that voluntariness, agency, force and coercion operate at different levels and in different places of their return process. The study found that migrants’ return decision suggests a blurring of boundaries between voluntary and forced with a combination of choice and constraints that vary among the individuals. These findings further highlight the importance of individual circumstances in understanding return and reintegration dynamics beyond administrative labels.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Al-Sharmani, M. (2010). Transnational family networks in the Somali diaspora in Egypt: Women’s roles and differentiated experiences. Gender, Place & Culture, 17(4), 499–518.
Arowolo, O. O. (2000). Return migration and the problem of reintegration. International Migration, 38(5), 59–82.
Bakewell, O. (2008). Keeping them in their place: The ambivalent relationship between development and migration in Africa. Third World Quarterly, 29(7), 1341–1358. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802386492
Bartram, D. (2015). Forced migration and “Rejected alternatives”: A conceptual refinement. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 13(4), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2015.1030489
Black, R., & Gent, S. (2006). Sustainable return in post-conflict contexts. International Migration, 44(3), 15–38.
Carling, J., Bolognani, M., Bivand, M., Rojan, E., Ceri, T., Erlend, O., Silje, P., Pettersen, V., & Sagmo, T. (2015). Possibilities and realities of return migration [online]. https://files.prio.org/Publication_files/Prio/Carling%20et%20al%20(2015)%20-%20Possibilities%20and%20Realities%20of%20Return%20Migration.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2022.
Chimni, B. S. (1993). International law and world order a critique of contemporary approaches. Cambridge University Press.
Chimni, B. S. (2009). The birth of a “discipline”: From refugee to forced migration studies. Journal of Refugee Studies, 22(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen051
Collyer, M. (2012). Migrants as strategic actors in the European Union’s global approach to migration and mobility. Global Networks, 12(4), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00370.x
Crawley, H., & Skleparis, D. (2018). Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s ‘migration crisis.’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1348224
Erdal, M. B., & Oeppen, C. (2017). Forced to leave? The discursive and analytical significance of describing migration as forced and voluntary. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(6), 981–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2017.1384149
Erdal, M. B., & Oeppen, C. (2018). Forced to leave? The discursive and analytical significance of describing migration as forced and voluntary. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(6), 981–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2017.1384149
Erdal, M. B., & Oeppen, C. (2022). Chapter 5: Theorising voluntariness in return. In Handbook of return migration. Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved May 27, 2022.
Garre, M. Y. (2017). Durable solutions for Somali refugees a case study of the involuntary repatriation of Daadab refugees. Heritage Institute for Policy Studies.
Gibney, M. (2004). The ethics and politics of asylum: Liberal democracy and the response to refugees. Cambridge University Press.
Hammond, L. (1999). Examining the discourse of repatriation: Towards a more proactive theory of return migration. In R. Black & K. Koser (Eds.), The end of the refugee cycle? Berghahn Books.
Hathaway, J. (2007). Forced migration studies: Could we agree just to ‘date’? Journal of Refugees Studies, 20(3), 349–369.
Jones, R. (2020). Jobless migrants flee oil-rich countries to the chagrin of their home countries. https://www.wsj.com/articles/jobless-migrants-flee-oil-rich-countries-to-the-chagrin-of-their-home-countries-11590235200
Kalir, B. (2017). Between ‘voluntary’ return programs and soft deportation: Sending vulnerable migrants in Spain back ‘home.’ In Z. Vathi & R. Kings (Eds.), Return migration and psychosocial wellbeing (pp. 56–71). Routledge.
Koser, K., & Kuschminder, K. (2015). Comparative research on the assisted voluntary return and reintegration of migrants. In International organisation for migration. Geneva.
Long, K. (2011). Permanent crises? Unlocking the protracted displacement of refugees and internally displaced persons. Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford.
Lietaert, I., & Gorp, L. V. (2019). Talking across borders: Successful re-entry in different strands of re-entry literature. International Migration, 57(4), 105–120.
Maimuna, M. (2016). Somalia-Yemen links: Refugees and returnees. Forced Migration Review, 52, 55–56.
Majidi, N., & Schuster, L. (2019). Deportation and forced return. In A. Bloch & G. Donà (Eds.), Forced migration: Current issues and debates (pp. 88–105). Routledge.
Mohammadi, A., Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., & Sadeghi, R. (2018). Return to home: Reintegration and sustainability of return to post-conflict contexts. In G. Hugo, M. Abbasi-Shavazi, & E. Kraly (Eds.), Demography of refugee and forced migration. International studies in population (Vol. 13). Springer, Cham
Ottonelli, V., & Torresi, T. (2013). When is migration voluntary? International Migration Review, 47(4), 783–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12048
Owigo, J. (2021). Return migration during the Covid-19 crisis: The experiences of Somali female returnees from Saudi Arabia. Refugee Review.
Resch, K., & Enzenhofer, E. (2018). Collecting data in other languages—Strategies for cross-language research in multilingual societies. In U. Flick (Ed.), The sage handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 131–146). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.n9
Schuster, L., & Majidi, N. (2013). What happens post-deportation? The experience of deported Afghans. Migration Studies, 1(2), 240–241.
Schuster, L., & Majidi, N. (2015). Deportation stigma and re-migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(4), 635–652.
Sekhar, C. S. C. (2010). Fragile states. Developing Societies, 26(3), 263–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X1002600301
Shaffer, M., Ferrato, G., & Jinnah, Z. (2017). Routes, locations, and social imaginary: A comparative study of the ongoing production of geographies in Somali forced migration. African Geographical Review, 37(2), 159–171.
UNHCR. (2004). Handbook for repatriation and reintegration activities UNHCR UNHCR handbook for repatriation and reintegration activities [online]. https://www.unhcr.org/411786694.pdf. Accessed 21 Sep 2021.
UNHCR. (2021a). Situation horn of Africa Somalia situation [online]. data2.unhcr.org. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/horn/location/192. Accessed 23 Sep 2021.
UNHCR. (2021b). UNHCR Somalia monthly refugee returnee report—August 2021 [online]. UNHCR Operational Data Portal (ODP). https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/88562. Accessed 23 Sep 2021.
UNHCR. (2021c). UNHCR Yemen 2021 country operational plan. Retrieved December 26, 2021, from ReliefWeb website: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/UNHCR%20Yemen%202021%20Country%20Operational%20Plan.pdf
Van Lehman, D., & Mckee, E. (2019). Removals to Somalia in light of the convention against torture: Recent evidence from Somali Bantu Deportees [online]. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/immigration-law-journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2019/08/GT-GILJ190032.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2022.
Zetter, R. (2007). More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 172–92.
Zetter, R. (2011). Protecting environmentally displaced people: Developing the capacity legal and normative frameworks. Report commissioned by UNHCR and Governments of Switzerland and Norway Oxford Refugee Studies Centre. www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/files/publications/other/rr-protecting-environmentally-displaced-people-2011.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Owigo, J. (2023). The Motivations for Return Migration to Somalia: Beyond the Voluntary and Forced Binary. In: Adeniran, A.I. (eds) African Development and Global Engagements. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21283-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21283-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21282-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21283-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)