Abstract
Modern, open societies are characterized by growth and dynamism. To many environmentalists, however, it is this very commitment to growth and change that put modern societies at odds with the values of environmental protection. Many argue that the uncertainty that comes from growth endangers the environment, with the implication being that we should adopt general prohibitions rules like the “Precautionary Principle,” which prohibits economic activity unless it can be proven to have no substantial environmental impact. I argue that this conclusion is largely mistaken. Dynamism is so important and in opposition to general prohibition rules that we should avoid them when possible. Instead, I argue that we should favor a general default permission rule. This rule, I argue, is not only more suited to most environmental domains but also compatible with a dynamic capitalist economy, which is crucial for raising standards of living and finding solutions to existing environmental problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thrasher, J. (2023). Permission, Prohibition, and Dynamism. In: Adler, J.H. (eds) Climate Liberalism. Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21108-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21108-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21107-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21108-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)
