Abstract
Higher education institutions had to adapt to a new normal quickly brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic. This research set out to explore the factors impacting the adoption of online learning by students and the implications of these factors on future learning. An online survey was conducted and analysed using quantitative and qualitative methods, guided by an extended technology acceptance model. The research was necessary as online learning is anticipated to continue to be used for education by higher education institutions. The findings showed the benefits of learning flexibility of online learning. However, social isolation resulted in low motivation and perception of lowering the quality of education. The research concludes that students need reassurance that they are getting an adequate education through structured learning materials and processes with timely lecturer support. Students need access to peers and must be encouraged to engage. Furthermore, students need to find their optimal learning spaces because, as life-long learners, they need to teach themselves effectively.
Keywords
- Online learning
- Flexibility
- Isolation
- Education quality
- Learning spaces
- Extended technology acceptance model
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options

(adapted from [4])

References
Eltahir, M.E.: E-learning in developing countries: is it a panacea? A case study of Sudan. IEEE Access 7, 97784–97792 (2019)
Hrastinski, S.: What Do We Mean by Blended Learning? TechTrends 63(5), 564–569 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5
Rasheed, R.A., Kamsin, A., Abdullah, N.A.: Challenges in the online component of blended learning: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 144, 103701 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Vladova, G., Ullrich, A., Bender, B., Gronau, N.: Students’ acceptance of technology-mediated teaching – how it was influenced during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: a study from Germany. Front. Psychol. 12, 636086 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.636086
Iyer, D.G., Chapman, T.A.: Overcoming technological inequity in synchronous online learning. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 48, 26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04826
Singh, J.B., Sharma, S.K., Gupta, P.: Physical learning environment challenges in the digital divide: how to design effective instruction during COVID-19? Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 48, 18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04818
Adnan, M., Anwar, K.: Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: students’ perspectives. Online Submission 2(1), 45–51 (2020)
AbuJarour, S., Ajjan, H., Fedorowicz, J., Owens, D.: How working from home during COVID-19 affects academic productivity. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 48(1), 8 (2021)
Bhattacherjee, A.: Scholar Commons Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. Textbooks Collection (2012)
Dietrich, N., et al.: Attempts, successes, and failures of distance learning in the time of COVID-19. Am. Chem. Soc. (ACS) 97, 2448–2457 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00717
Sander, T.: What is the Definition of E-Learning? E-Student (2020). https://e-student.org/what-is-e-learning/
Wu, E.H., Lin, C., Ou, Y., Liu, C., Wang, W., Chao, C.: Advantages and constraints of a hybrid model K-12 E-learning assistant chatbot. IEEE Access 8, 77788–77801 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988252
Almaiah, M.A., Al-Khasawneh, A., Althunibat, A.: Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25(6), 5261–5280 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
Mpungose, C.B.: Emergent transition from face-to-face to online learning in a South African University in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic. Human. Soc. Sci. Commun. 7(1), 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00603-x
Amiti, F.: Synchronous and asynchronous E-learning. Eur. J. Open Educ. E-Learn. Stud. 5(2) (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3313
Dwivedi, Y.K., et al.: Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: transforming education, work and life. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 55, 102211 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211
Raza, S.A., Qazi, W., Khan, K.A., Salam, J.: Social isolation and acceptance of the learning management system (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: an expansion of the UTAUT model. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 59(2), 183–208 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120960421
Aucejo, E.M., French, J., Ugalde Araya, M.P., Zafar, B.: The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: evidence from a survey. J. Public Econ. 191, 104271 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104271
Irawan, A.W., Dwisona, D., Lestari, M.: Psychological impacts of students on online learning during the pandemic COVID-19. KONSELI: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling (E-J.) 7(1), 53–60 (2020). https://doi.org/10.24042/kons.v7i1.6389
Aboagye, E., Yawson, J.A., Appiah, K.N.: COVID-19 and e-learning: the challenges of students in tertiary institutions. Soc. Educ. Res. 2(1), 1–8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.212021422
Marek, M., Wu, W., Chew, C.: Teacher experiences in converting classes to distance learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol. 19(1), 89–109 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.20210101.oa3
Lee, M.K.O., Cheung, C.M.K., Chen, Z.: Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Inf. Manag. 42(8), 1095–1104 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007
Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985)
King, W.R., He, J.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 43(6), 740–755 (2006)
Streefkerk, R.: Inductive vs. Deductive Research Approach (with Examples) (2019)
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., Pal, D.K.: Likert scale: explored and explained. Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 7(4), 396 (2015)
Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M.: When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31(1), 2–24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Rönkkö, M., Cho, E.: An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Org. Res. Methods 25, 6–14 (2020)
Brown, J.D.: The Cronbach alpha reliability estimate. Shiken: JALT Test. Eval. SIG Newsl. 6(1), 17–18 (2002)
Samani, S.A.: Steps in research process (partial least square of structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)). Int. J. Soc. Sci. Bus. 1(2), 55–66 (2016)
Charmaz, K.: Constructionism and the grounded theory method. Handb. Constructionist Res. 1(1), 397–412 (2008)
Yong, A.G., Pearce, S.: A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 9(2), 79–94 (2013)
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.M.: SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. 10(3), 32–49 (2015)
Lowry, P.B., Gaskin, J.: Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: when to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 57(2), 123–146 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 19(2), 139–152 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Raykov, T., Grayson, D.: A test for change of composite reliability in scale development. Multivariate Behav. Res. 38(2), 143–159 (2003)
dos Santos, P.M., Cirillo, M.Â.: Construction of the average variance extracted index for construct validation in structural equation models with adaptive regressions. In: Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, pp. 1–13 (2021)
Zaiţ, A., Bertea, P.: Methods for testing discriminant validity. Manag. Mark. J. 9(2), 217–224 (2011)
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006)
Kiger, M.E., Varpio, L.: Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med. Teach. 42(8), 846–854 (2020)
Nonaka, I., Konno, N.: The concept of “Ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 40(3), 40–54 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Garbutt, M., Tsibolane, P., Pillay, T. (2022). “I Feel Like I Am Teaching Myself” - An Exploratory Study of the Factors and Implications of Online Learning. In: Barnett, R.J., le Roux, D.B., Parry, D.A., Watson, B.W. (eds) ICT Education. SACLA 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1664. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21076-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21076-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21075-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21076-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)