Skip to main content

Treatment of Women in Healthcare Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultural Issues in Healthcare

Abstract

Women consumers of healthcare in the United States comprise a distinctly vulnerable population within every sector of healthcare, including pharmaceutical medicine, insurance coverage, and disparity outcomes. Poor women of color are at a demonstrated disadvantage in maintaining good health and longevity [1]. Medical professionals and staff are challenged to meet the diverse health needs of patients in environments that are sustained by the efficiency of standardized, technology-based means of assessment and then treatment [2]. But how? Medical professionals extend treatment amid pressures of efficiency and the myriad circumstances presented by patients across intersections of race, class, and gender (among other social identity categories); leading health research recommendations on competent approaches to treatment also reflect these challenges (see [3]; Togami et al. 2018). Toward the goal of deepening our understanding of women’s treatment as patients, this chapter uses a pilot survey of providers’ perceptions about women’s healthcare experiences to explore themes in the literature about women’s differential health outcomes and their encounters in healthcare systems in order to imagine providers’ roles as pivotal in managing improvement toward better health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The present study underwent Expedited Review by the Protection of Human Subjects Committee (PHSC) at the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, VA and was approved in April 2018. Questions about the conceptual design and methodology of this work may be directed to either of the authors, while questions about ethics may be directed to Dr. Jennifer Stevens, Chair of PHSC, William & Mary, at jastev@wm.edu

  2. 2.

    Many thanks to Olivia Spencer, GIS Fellow in the Center for Geospatial Analysis at William and Mary, for her authorship in creating the maps and insight for considering comparative cases.

  3. 3.

    See Bowen (1978) or Keller and Noone (2020) for an in-depth overview of the theory, used in fields ranging from psychology to medicine to organizational consultation world-wide.

References

  1. Shalowitz, M. U., Schetter, C. D., Hillemeier, M. M., Chinchilli, V. M., Adam, E. K., Hobel, C. J., Ramey, S. L., Vance, M. R., O'Campo, P., Thorp, J. M., Jr., Seeman, T. E., Raju, T., & Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Human Development Community Child Health Network. (2019). Cardiovascular and metabolic risk in women in the first year postpartum: Allostatic load as a function of race, ethnicity, and poverty status. American Journal of Perinatology, 36(10), 1079–1089. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke, A. E. (2014). Biomedicalization. In W. C. Cockerham, R. Dingwall, & S. Quah (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs083

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Committee on the Health Professions Education Summit, Institute of Medicine, & Board on Health Care Services. The Core competencies needed for health care professionals. In: Health professions education. National Academies Press. 2003. p. 45–74.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Starr, P., & American Council of Learned Societies. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine (ACLS humanities E-book (series)). Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, A. E., et al. (2010). Biomedicalization technoscience, health, and illness in the U.S. In A. E. Clarke et al. (Eds.), E-Duke books scholarly collection. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2011) Health care quality and disparities in women: Selected findings from the 2010 national healthcare quality and disparities reports.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Merzel, C. (2000). Gender differences in health care access indicators in an urban, low-income community. American Journal of Public Health, 90(6), 909–916.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaiser Family Foundation. ( 2013). Health reform: Implications for women's access to coverage and care.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bertakis, K. D., Azari, R., Calhanan, E. J., & Bobbins, J. A. (2000). Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. The Journal of Family Practice, 49(2), 147–152.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bronstein, J. M., Felix, H. C., Bursac, Z., Steward, M. K., Foushee, H. R., & Klapow, J. (2012). Providing general and preconception health care to low-income women in family planning settings: Perception of providers and clients. Maternal Child Health, 16, 346–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salmon, M. M., Joseph, B. M., Saylor, C., & Mann, R. J. (1999). Women’s perception of provider, social, and program support in an outpatient drug treatment program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 19(2000), 239–246.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guiahi, M., Sheeder, J., & Teal, S. (2014). Are women aware of religious restrictions on reproductive health at Catholic hospitals? A survey of women’s expectations and preferences for family planning care. Contraception, 90, 429–434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trentalange, M., Bielawski, M., Murphy, T. E., Lessard, K., Brandt, C., Bean-Mayberry, B., et al. (2016). Patient perception of enough time spent with provider is a mechanism for improving women veterans’ experiences with VA outpatient health care. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 39(4), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss, B. D. (2003). Health literacy: A manual for clinicians. American Medical Association Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrari, R. M., Siega-Riz, A. M., Evenson, K. R., Moos, M., & Carrier, K. S. (2012). A qualitative study of women’s perceptions of provider advice about diet and physical activity during pregnancy. Patient Education and Counseling, 91(2013), 372–377.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heath, C.. American fitness professionals & associates. 2013. Retrieved 06 Jun 2016, from www.afpalfitness.com

  17. Haseltine, F. P. (1998). Press 1 for more options. Journal of Women's Health, 7(9), 1069–1070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pitts, C. G. (1999). Women, mental health, and managed care: A disparate system. Women & Therapy, 22(3), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bridgeman, J. (2007). Exceptional women, healthcare consumers and the inevitability of caring. Feminist Legal Studies, 15(2007), 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Close-Up Media (2012). Trueven Health Analytics— NPR health poll suggests women are more proactive about health screening.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hucko, D. (2001). Women are key market for healthcare as direct consumers and family influencers. Marketing to Women, 14(11).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Terplan, M., Longinaker, N., & Appel, L. (2015). Women-centered drug treatment services and need in the United States, 2002–2009. American Journal of Public Health, 105(11), e50–e54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Stolp, H., & Fox, J. (2015). Increasing receipt of women’s preventive services. Journal of Women's Health, 24(11), 875–881.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Thabane, L., Ma, J., Chu, R., Cheng, J., Ismaila, A., Rios, L. P., Robson, R., Thabane, M., Giangregorio, L., & Goldsmith, C. H. (2010). A tutorial on pilot studies: The what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Teijlingen, E. R., Rennie, A. M., Hundley, V., & Graham, W. (2001). The importance of conducting and reporting pilot studies: The example of the Scottish births survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34, 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01757.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Teijlingen ER, Hundley V. (2001) The Importance of Pilot Studies. Social Research Update. p. 35:1–4. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU35.html.

  27. Gray, D. (2013). In D. E. Gray (Ed.), Doing research in the real world (3rd ed.). SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 789–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wasserman, M. ( 2019). Hours constraints, occupational choice, and gender: Evidence from medical residents. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3371100 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3371100.

  30. Cohen, S. A., Sabik, N. J., Cook, S. K., Azzoli, A. B., & Mendez-Luck, C. A. (2019). Differences within differences: gender inequalities in caregiving intensity vary by race and ethnicity in Informa caregivers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 34(3), 245–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, M. (2016). The growing costs and burden of family caregiving of older adults: A review of paid sick leave and family leave policies. The Gerontologist, 56(3), 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tervalon, M., & Murray-García, J. (1998). Cultural humility versus cultural competence: A critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 9(2), 117–125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Women's Health USA 2012, US Department of Health and Human Services. (2013). Available from: https://mchb.hrsa.gov/whusa12/more/introduction.html.

  34. Sung, J., Qiu, Q., Marton, J.. New evidence on the relationship between inequality and health. 2019. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3174453 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3174453

  35. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry/Geospatial Research, Analysis, and Services Program. CDC Social Vulnerability Index 2018 Database US. Accessed 13 Jan 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  36. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. U.S. Cancer Statistics Data Visualizations Tool, based on 2019 submission data (1999–2017): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. www.cdc.gov/cancer/dataviz. Released in June 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica D. Griffin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Providers’ Perspective on Women’s Experiences in Healthcare

Appendix: Providers’ Perspective on Women’s Experiences in Healthcare

Questionnaire

Our research focuses on the experiences of women as patients in healthcare, and how social determinants of health impact their lives and treatment within clinical and healthcare settings. We would like to ask you several questions about your perspective on women’s experiences in healthcare, based on your experience as a professional and practitioner in medical settings.

Your answers to these questions will assist us in situating a somewhat abstract literature review in a “living context” of healthcare delivery, to the extent that there may be overlap or excluded categories.

Please answer as freely and honestly as you can. And, if our scholarship suggests realities that you have not encountered in your experience, or contrasts with your experiences, please do let us know in the answer. It is important that this chapter reflect any gaps between analyses of care and your lived experiences of care toward women as patients, to the extent that we can determine if they exist.

  1. 1.

    What is your current role in which given medical setting(s)?

    1. (a)

      How many years of experience have you had in this role?

    2. (b)

      In other medical departments or capacities, generally?

  2. 2.

    What has your training been for these roles, cumulatively?

  3. 3.

    Do you believe that women’s experiences vary from that of men’s, as patients in hospital, clinical, and other medical settings?

    1. (a)

      If so, can you provide examples of how?

    2. (b)

      If so, do you think the examples of difference occur?

    3. (c)

      If so, do you think there are ways that these differences can be addressed? (By your role, in particular?)

    4. (d)

      If you do not believe there is much variance, please move on to the next question.

  4. 4.

    In our research, we found that women who live in poverty (or low-income household or neighborhoods) are disproportionately more likely to develop heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, and other major illnesses—across racial groupings. Is it possible for you to observe this occurrence in your experiences with women as patients?

    1. (a)

      In what ways are you able to identify the income or educational level of women patients, for example?

    2. (b)

      In what ways do you observe the impact of limited economic resources in their experience of healthcare? Or in managing an illness?

    3. (c)

      If not, please move on to the next question.

  5. 5.

    Minority women (with few exceptions) were more likely to experience poverty and bias on a regular basis in society. Our research suggests that the experience of racism and discrimination carries over into the clinical experiences of women as patients, too. Have you ever witnessed what you would consider racial bias in treatment?

    1. (a)

      If so, in what ways?

    2. (b)

      If so, what measures were taken to rectify the situation?

    3. (c)

      If not, please move on to the next question.

  6. 6.

    Regarding issues that are specific to women’s healthcare (e.g., breast cancer and screening or prevention measures, sexual and reproduction health, maternity care, etc.), do you feel women’s healthcare also reveals disparities in the specialized clinical setting?

    1. (a)

      If so, what kinds of disparities do you observe in the specialized clinical setting?

    2. (b)

      If so, to what do you attribute the disparities that you observe? (For example, are there less resources and staffing? Or, is it the opposite—stark contrasts to the general care units, for example?)

    3. (c)

      If so, are your observations of disparities also outside of the clinical setting itself? And if so, in what ways? (For example, funding for research? Staffing professionals for care? Health policies? (when it comes to these specialized areas of treatment).

    4. (d)

      If not, please move on to the next question.

  7. 7.

    Life situations for women in modern society are rather complicated, often as the “Dr. Mom” role can take a toll on women or other role conflicts (as providers and caretakers in multiple family situations) create strain on women’s health and ability to manage their own health. In what ways do you observe role strain or role conflict in the way that women experience healthcare as patients?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Griffin, M.D., Glenn, I.G. (2023). Treatment of Women in Healthcare Environments. In: Scales, R., McCleary-Gaddy, A.T. (eds) Cultural Issues in Healthcare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20826-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20826-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20825-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20826-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics