Skip to main content

Teacher Professional Development on Social Inclusion: The PLEIADE Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Justice, Media and Technology in Teacher Education (ATEE 2021)

Abstract

This paper presents some preliminary results of an intervention case-study intended to improve the ability of an international community of 75 teachers to design collaborative and inclusive activities for their students. The study is carried out in the framework of an Erasmus+ project adopting a long-term, participatory, and gamified approach to teachers’ professional development. This comprises a preparatory phase, followed by one-year training phase and a one-year enactment phase. During the training, the teachers design collaborative learning activities for inclusion, while during enactment they carry them out with their students. This paper focuses on the training phase, presenting the approach adopted and preliminary results in terms of its feasibility, discussing enabling factors and barriers to its application. Among enablers, the previous experience of the teachers, the careful and systematic design of the training, and the availability of motivated team leaders who coordinate the activities in their schools deserve being mentioned. Among the barriers, it should be noted that the pandemic situation preventing teachers’ mobility and the linguistic issues were an obstacle to straightforward peer interactions. Additionally, low familiarity with practice sharing behaviors and scarce digital competence hindered effective practice sharing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    More details can be found on the project website at https://pleiade-project.eu/.

  2. 2.

    The Erasmus + programme provides funds for teachers’ (or students’) mobility.

  3. 3.

    https://www.etwinning.net/it/pub/index.htm.

References

  1. Dronkers, J., van der Velden, R., Dunne, A.: Why are migrant students better off in certain types of educational systems or schools than in others? Eur. Educ. Res. J. 11(1), 11–44 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.11

  2. Guðjónsdóttir, H., Cacciattolo, M., Dakich, E., Davies, A., Kelly, C., Dalmau, M.C.: Transformative pathways: inclusive pedagogies in teacher education. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 40(2), 165–182 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. OECD: Immigrant students at school: Easing the journey towards integration. OECD reviews of migrant education. OECD Publishing, Paris (2015). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264249509-en

  4. UNESCO: Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education. UNESCO, Paris (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. OECD: Teachers matter: Attracting, developing, and retaining effective teachers. OECD Publishing, Paris (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. OECD: TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. OECD Publishing, Paris (2019). https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en

  7. European Commission: Joint Report of the Council and the Commission on the implementation of the Strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (ET2020) (2015). http://ec.europa.eu/education/documents/et-2020-draft-joint-report-408-2015_en.pdf

  8. Dukuzumuremyi, S., Siklander, P.: Interactions between pupils and their teacher in collaborative and technology-enhanced learning settings in the inclusive classroom. Teach. Teach. Educ. 76, 165–174 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trust, T., Carpenter, J.P., Krutka, D.G.: Moving beyond silos: professional learning networks in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 35, 1–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trust, T.: Professional learning networks designed for teacher learning. J. Digit. Learn. Teach. Educ. 28(4), 133–138 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Persico, D., Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A.: The interplay between self-regulated professional learning and teachers’ work-practice. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 191, 2481–2486 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In: Supporting Lifelong Learning, pp. 121–136. Routledge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vescio, V., Ross, D., Adams, A.: A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teach. Teach. Educ. 24(1) (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004

  14. Delfino, M., Dettori, G., Persico, D.: An online course fostering self-regulation of trainee teachers. Psicothema 22(2), 299–305 (2010). https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/8905

  15. Passarelli, Dagnino, Persico, Pozzi, Manganello: Gamification and support to self-regulation as a means to promote practice sharing for teacher professional development. Cult. Edu. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2022.2102291

  16. Persico, D., Pozzi, F.: The role of representations for the development of a participatory culture of Learning Design among educators. In: Proceedings of the ATEE-SIREM Winter Conference - Learning & Teaching with Media & Technology, pp. 365–372. Association for Teacher Education in Europe, Brussels (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Persico, D., Passarelli, M., Manganello, F., Gewerc Barujel, A., Rodriguez Groba, A.: The participatory dimension of teachers’ self-regulated professional learning about learning design: beliefs versus behaviours. Prof. Dev. Educ. 1–13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1787193

  18. Osterman, K.F., Kottkamp, R.B.: Reflective Practice for Educators: Professional Development to Improve Student Learning. Corwin Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Littlejohn, A., Milligan, C., Margaryan, A.: Charting collective knowledge: supporting self‐regulated learning in the workplace. J. Workplace Learn. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. CAST: Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2 (2018). http://udlguidelines.cast.org

  21. Laurillard, D.: Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. Routledge (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Asensio-Pérez, J.I., et al.: Towards teaching as design: exploring the interplay between full-lifecycle learning design tooling and teacher professional development. Comput. Educ. 114, 92–116 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification”. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, pp. 9–15 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lane, N., Prestopnik, N.R.: Diegetic connectivity: blending work and play with storytelling in serious games. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 229–240 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Saban, A.: Functions of metaphor in teaching and teacher education: a review essay. Teach. Educ. 17(4), 299–315 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pozzi, F., Ceregini, A., Persico, D.: Designing networked learning with 4Ts. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Networked Learning, pp. 210–217 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ceregini, A., Persico, D., Pozzi, F., Sarti, L.: The 4Ts game to develop teachers’ competences for the design of collaborative learning. In: Burgos, D., et al. (eds.) HELMeTO 2019. CCIS, vol. 1091, pp. 192–205. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31284-8_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Merriam, S.B.: The case study in educational research: a review of selected literature. J. Educ. Thought (JET)/Revue de la Pensée Educative 204–217 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guskey, T.R.: Evaluating Professional Development. Corwin, Thousand Oaks (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Passarelli, M., Dagnino, F.M., Persico, D., Pozzi, F., Nikolova, N.: Blended Teachers’ Professional Development (TPD) Pathway (PLEIADE Intellectual Output No. 1) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pozzi, F., Persico, D.: Sustaining learning design and pedagogical planning in CSCL. Res. Learn. Technol. 21 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bicocchi, M., Ceregini, A., Persico, D., Polsinelli, P., Pozzi, F., Sarti, L.: The Hybrid I4T Game (PLEIADE Intellectual Output No. 2) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Manganello, F., Persico, D., Georgiev, A., Mihnev, P., Peltekov, M.: Gamified Platform for the Blended Training Activities (PLEIADE Intellectual Output No. 2) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The PLEIADE project is co-funded by the Erasmus+ programme of the European Union (Agreement number 2020-1-IT02-KA201-080089). The European Commission’s support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donatella Persico .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Persico, D. et al. (2022). Teacher Professional Development on Social Inclusion: The PLEIADE Approach. In: Ranieri, M., Pellegrini, M., Menichetti, L., Roffi, A., Luzzi, D. (eds) Social Justice, Media and Technology in Teacher Education. ATEE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1649. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20777-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20777-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20776-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20777-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics