Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Signals and Communication Technology ((SCT))

  • 372 Accesses

Abstract

Sensing is life; WSNs are acquiring snowballing interests in research and industry; they are infiltrated in day-to-day use. Owing to their requirement of low device complexity as well as slight energy consumption, proper standards are devised to ensure impeccable communication and meaningful sensing. This chapter takes care of enlightening the special features of WSNs and differentiates WSNs from MANETs and mesh networks. Care is also accorded to the different WSN standards that adapt to home and industry applications.

The critical requirement of any WSN deployment strategy is to gather and export the collected into an enterprise application or a spreadsheet. Embedded WSN-to-Internet integration is implemented via some kind of gateway device seated between the IEEE 802.15.4 network and the IP network. The gateway server’s role is to translate the sensor network traffic and provide it in a consumable form for another network, either IP or an industrial network. Also, the 6LoWPAN working group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) submitted the implementation of IP for low-power, low-bandwidth networks. 6LoWPAN defines IP communication over low-power wireless IEEE 802.15.4 personal area networks. The proposed standard, approved by the IETF in March 2007, incorporates IPv6 version of the IP protocol. Because of IP pervasiveness as a global communication standard across industries, vendors can create sensor nodes that can communicate directly with other IP devices, whether those devices are wired or wireless, local or across the Internet, on Ethernet, WiFi, 6LoWPAN, or other networks. Network managers are thus able to gain direct real-time access to sensor nodes and are able to apply a broad range of Internet management and security tools. More important, the WSN can be viewed and managed as just another IP device, making it accessible and familiar to many more people and applications.

WSN standards are tailored to suit typical applications; they vary accordingly from manufacturer to another depending on their main line of activity, whether it is pointed toward industry, military, environment, health, daily life, etc. As such there is no default standard, but there is a standard that fits in a given type of application and that characterizes a given producer.

This chapter offers an in-depth exhibition of the types of WSNs, the performance metrics of WSNs, and the different WSN standards.

Good beginnings lead to happy endings, most of the time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahna, Joon, Affan Syedb, Bhaskar Krishnamacharia, and John Heidemannb. 2011. Design and Analysis of a Propagation Delay Tolerant ALOHA Protocol for Underwater Networks. Ad Hoc Networks Journal 9 (5): 752–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akyildiz, I.F., W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci. 2002a. A Survey on Sensor Networks. Communications Magazine 40 (8): 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002b. Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. Computer Networks 38 (4): 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akyildiz, I.F., T. Melodia, and K.R. Chowdury. 2007. Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks: A Survey. IEEE Wireless Communication 14 (6): 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, G., M. Conti, Di Francesco, and M. 2009. Reliable and Energy-Efficient Data Collection in Sparse Sensor Networks with Mobile Elements. Performance Evaluation 66 (12): 791–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANT. 2013. ANT Message Protocol and Usage. ANT. www.thisisant.com/resources/ant-message-protocol-and-usage. Accessed 5 Sept 2013.

  • Birds & Blooms. 2013. Can Birds Smell or Taste? http://www.birdsandblooms.com/Birds/Summer/Can-Birds-Smell-or-Taste/. Accessed 22 Aug 2013.

  • Bouckaert, Stefan, Eli De Poorter, Benôit Latré, Jeroen Hoebeke, Ingrid Moerman, and Piet Demeester. 2010. Strategies and Challenges for Interconnecting Wireless Mesh and Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Personal Communications 53 (3): 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway, E., et al. 2002. Home Networking with IEEE 802.15.4: A Developing Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks. Communications Magazine 40 (8): 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo-Effen, M., D.H. Quintela, R. Jordan, W. Westhoff, and W. Moreno. 2004. Wireless Sensor Networks for Flash-Food Alerting. In The 5th International Caracas Conference on Devices, Circuits, and Systems, Dominican Republic, 142–146. Caracas: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar, V., W.K. Seah, Y.S. Choo, and H.V. Ee. 2006. Localization in Underwater Sensor Networks: Survey and Challenges. In First ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks (WuWNet), 33–40. Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro, C.M., and D.P. Agrawal. 2002. Mobile Ad Hoc Networking. 20th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Networks. 125–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, Márcio S., and Jorge L. M. Amaral. 2012. Analysis of Wireless Industrial Automation Standards: ISA-100.11a and WirelessHART. http://www.isa.org/InTechTemplate.cfm?template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=93257. Accessed 28 Aug 2013.

  • Di Francesco, M., S.K. Das, and G. Anastasi. 2011. Data Collection in Wireless Sensor Networks with Mobile Elements: A Survey. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) 8 (1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EnOcean. 2013. Radio Technology. http://www.enocean.com/en/radio-technology/. Accessed 5 Sept 2013.

  • Erol-Kantarci, Melike, Hussein T. Mouftah, and Sema Oktug. 2011. A Survey of Architectures and Localization Techniques for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. Communications Surveys & Tutorials 13 (3): 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, Lou. 2012, November 29. What’s The Difference Between Bluetooth Low Energy and ANT?. http://electronicdesign.com/mobile/what-s-difference-between-bluetooth-low-energy-and-ant. Accessed 31 Aug 2013.

  • Gao, T., D. Greenspan, M. Welsh, R.R. Juang, and A. Alm. 2005. Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Tracking over a Wireless Network. In 27th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, 102–105. Shanghai: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, Carles, and Josep Paradells. 2010. Wireless Home Automation Networks: A Survey of Architectures and Technologies. Communications Magazine 48: 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOV.UK. 2012, September 18. Radio and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment. www.gov.uk. Accessed 27 Sept 2013.

  • Gutierrez, J.A., M. Naeve, E. Callaway, M. Bourgeois, V. Mitter, and B. Heile. 2001. IEEE 802.15.4: A Developing Standard for Low-Power, Low-Cost Wireless Personal Area Networks. Network 15 (5): 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidemann, J., W. Ye, J. Wills, A. Syed, and Y. Li. 2006. Research Challenges and Applications for Underwater Sensor Networking. In Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 228–235. Las Vegas: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, Ivan, and Jose A. Gutierrez. 2003. IEEE 802.15.4 Low Rate – Wireless Personal Area Network Coexistence Issues. In Wireless Communications and Networking (WCNC), 1481–1486. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE. 2013a. IEEE 802.15 Working Group for WPAN. http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/. Accessed 15 Sept 2013.

  • —. 2013b. IEEE 802.15 WPAN Task Group 3 (TG3). www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG3.html. Accessed 15 Sept 2013.

  • IEEE. 2019. IEEE 802.15 Working Group for WPAN. 2019, January 1. http://www.ieee802.org/15/. Accessed 10 June 2019.

  • INSTEON. 2013. The Details – Version 2.0. White Paper, INSTEON.

    Google Scholar 

  • ITU. 1947. ITU. http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/oth/02/01/S020100002B4813PDFE.pdf. Accessed 7 Sept 2013.

  • Jornet, M., M. Stojanovic, and M. Zorzi. 2008. Focused Beam Routing Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks. In Third ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNET), 75–82. San Francisco: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, J.M., R.H. Katz, and K.S.J. Pister. 1999. Next Century Challenges: Mobile Networking for Smart Dust. In 5th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), 271–278. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A.N., F. Hekland, S. Petersen, and P. Doyle. 2008. When HART Goes Wireless: Understanding and Implementing the WirelessHART Standard. In IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), 899–907. Hamburg: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Jin-Shyan, Yu-Wei Su, and Chung-Chou Shen. 2007. A Comparative Study of Wireless Protocols: Bluetooth, UWB, ZigBee, and Wi-Fi. In The 33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), 46–51. Taipei: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, U., P. Wang, Y. Noh, L. Vieira, M. Gerla, and J.-H. Cui. 2010. Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks. In 29th Conference on Information Communications (INFOCOM), 1676–1684. San Diego: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., and Y. Liu. 2007. Underground Structure Monitoring with Wireless Sensor Networks. In The 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), 69–78. Cambridge: ACM/IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Mo, and Yunhao Liu. 2009. Underground Coal Mine Monitoring with Wireless Sensor Networks. Transactions on Sensor Networks V (2): 1–29.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., M.C. Vuran, and I.F. Akyildiz. 2007. Characteristics of Underground Channel for Wireless Underground Sensor Networks. In The 6th Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking WorkShop, 32–39. Corfu: Ionian University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montenegro, G., N. Kushalnagar, J. Hui, and D. Culler. 2007, September. Transmission of IPv6 Packets Over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks-RFC4944. http://www.hjp.at/doc/rfc/rfc4944.html. Accessed 29 Aug 2013.

  • Mulligan, G. 2007. The 6LoWPAN Architecture. In 4th Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors (EmNets), 78–82. ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Museum Scotland. 2013. Animal Senses. 2013, January 1. http://www.nms.ac.uk/our_museums/national_museum/explore_the_galleries/natural_world/animal_senses.aspx. Accessed 22 Aug 2013.

  • Negron, V. 2020, July 4. How Fish Sense and ‘Feel’. PETMED. https://www.petmd.com/fish/care/evr_fi_fish_senses. Accessed 15 Nov 2010.

  • O. Orkin Insect Zoo. 2013. Basic Facts: Insect Senses. Mississippi State University. 2013, January 1. http://insectzoo.msstate.edu/Students/basic.senses.html. Accessed 22 Aug 2013.

  • Pakzad, S.N., G.L. Fenves, S. Kim, and D.E. Culler. 2008. Design and Implementation of Scalable Wireless Sensor Network for Structural Monitoring. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 14: 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei, Zhongmin, Zhidong Deng, Bo Yang, and Xiaoliang Cheng. 2008. Application-Oriented Wireless Sensor Network Communication Protocols and Hardware Platforms: A survey. In IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), 1–6. Chengdu: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, S., and S. Carlsen. 2011. WirelessHART Versus ISA100.11a: The Format War Hits the Factory Floor. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine 5 (4): 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffaele, Bruno, Marco Conti, and Enrico Gregori. 2005. Mesh Networks: Commodity Multihop Ad Hoc Networks. Communications Magazine 43: 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinisch, C., W. Kastner, G. Neugschwandtner, and W. Granzer. 2007. Wireless Technologies in Home and Building Automation. In The 5th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Infromatics, 93–98. Vienna: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safaric, Stanislav, and Kresimir Malaric. 2006. ZigBee Wireless Standard. In 48th International Symposium ELMAR, 259–262. Zadar: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelby, Zach, and Carsten Bormann. 2011. 6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, J., et al. 2008. WirelessHART: Applying Wireless Technology in Real-Time Industrial Process Control. In Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (RTAS), 377–386. St. Louis: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilak, S., N. Abu-Ghazaleh, and W. Heinzelman. 2002. A Taxonomy of Wireless Micro-Sensor Network Models. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review VI (2): 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, Yi-Hsien, E.H.-K. Wu, and Gen-Huey Chen. 2003. Maximum Traffic Scheduling and Capacity Analysis for IEEE 802.15.3 High Data Rate MAC Protocol. In IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conference, 1678–1682. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government Printing Office. 2013, September. TITLE 47 – Telecommunication. www.ecfr.gov. Accessed 27 Sept 2013.

  • UCSB ScienceLine. 2020. How Do Plants Sense a Change in the Environment? UCSB ScienceLine. 2020, July 4. http://scienceline.ucsb.edu/getkey.php?key=1014. Accessed 25 Oct 2005.

  • Vuran, M.C., and I.F. Akyildiz. 2008. Cross-Layer Packet Size Optimization for Wireless Terrestrial, Underwater, and Underground Sensor Networks. In The 27th Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM). Phoenix: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneke, B., and K.S.J. Pister. 2002. MEMS for Distributed Wireless Sensor Networks. In 9th International Conference oon Electronics, Circuits and Systems, 291–294. Dubrovnik: IEEE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Der Wateren, and Frits Van. 2008. The Art of Developing WSN Applications with Myrianed. Technical Report, Chess Company, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wener-Allen, G., et al. 2006. Deploying a Wireless Sensor Network on an Active Volcano. Internet Computing 10: 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, D., M. Wei, and Y. Zhou. 2006. Secure-SPIN: Secure Sensor Protocol for Information via Negotiation for Wireless Sensor Networks. In First IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, 1–4. Singapore: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yick, J., B. Mukherjee, and D. Ghosal. 2005. Analysis of a Prediction-based Mobility Adaptive Tracking Algorithm. In The 2nd International Conference on Broadband Networks (BROADNETS), 753–760. Boston: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yick, Jennifer, Biswanath Mukherjee, and Dipak Ghosal. 2008. Wireless Sensor Network Survey. Computer Networks (52):2292–2330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., P.V. Orlik, A.F. Molisch, and P. Kinney. 2009. UWB Systems for Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE 97 (2): 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Zhong, Zheng Peng, Jun-Hong Cui, and Zhijie Shi. 2011. Scalable Localization with Mobility Prediction for Underwater Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 10 (3): 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZigBee Alliance. 2013. Specifications. ZigBee Alliance. 2013, January 1. http://zigbee.org/Specifications.aspx. Accessed 28 Aug 2013.

  • Z-Wave Alliance. 2012. Products. http://www.Z-Wavealliance.org/. Accessed 30 Aug 2013.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fahmy, H.M.A. (2023). Introduction. In: Concepts, Applications, Experimentation and Analysis of Wireless Sensor Networks. Signals and Communication Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20709-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20709-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20708-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20709-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics