Abstract
The question of how software development needs are channeled into different parts of a platform ecosystem has been addressed by separating owners and complementors and by separating the core and the periphery. This is not necessarily sufficient in business-to-business ecosystems due to their characteristics. Our grounded theory study observes a B2B platform that brings together multiple stakeholders and their software development. This paper describes the location aspect in decision making, what feature gets implemented in which part of the ecosystem and on what grounds. We refer to this decision of implementation location as feature demarcation. We describe the related structures and discuss why the location matters. Our work complements the existing research with an addition to the core-periphery view. In the process of situating a new feature we observe the architectural elements together instead of focusing on distinct entities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Bush, A.A.: Research commentary—Platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inf. Syst. Res. 21, 675–687 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323
Hein, A., et al.: Digital platform ecosystems. Electron. Mark. 30(1), 87–98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4
Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model. Inf. Syst. J. 23, 173–192 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x
Olleros, X.: The lean core in digital platforms. Technovation 28, 266–276 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.004
Rodon Modol, J., Eaton, B.: Digital infrastructure evolution as generative entrenchment: the formation of a core–periphery structure. J. Inf. Technol. 36, 342–364 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211013362
Jansen, S.: A focus area maturity model for software ecosystem governance. Inf. Softw. Technol. 118, 106219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2019.106219
Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Sahaym, A., Bjørn-Andersen, N.: Exploring value cocreation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: a revelatory case study. MIS Q. 36, 317–338 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2307/41410419
Jovanovic, M., Sjödin, D., Parida, V.: Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms. Technovation 102218 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218
Hein, A., Weking, J., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., Krcmar, H.: Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems. Electron. Mark. 29(3), 503–518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00337-y
Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Schuetz, S.W., Heinzl, A.: Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: antecedents and consequences for platform governance. Inf. Syst. J. 29, 119–144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12186
Petrik, D., Herzwurm, G.: Towards the iIoT Ecosystem Development - Understanding the Stakeholder Perspective. ECIS 2020 Research Papers (2020)
Huber, T.L., Kude, T., Dibbern, J.: Governance practices in platform ecosystems: navigating tensions between cocreated value and governance costs. Inf. Syst. Res. 28, 563–584 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0701
Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., Yoo, Y.: Distributed tuning of boundary resources: the case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Q. 39, 217–244 (2015)
Halckenhaeusser, A., Foerderer, J., Heinzl, A.: Wolf in a sheep’s clothing: when do complementors face competition with platform owners? In: ICIS 2020 Proceedings (2020)
Teece, D.J.: Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. In: Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Platforms, pp. 211–225. Emerald Publishing Limited (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220170000037008
Parker, G.G., Alstyne, M.W.V., Choudary, S.P.: Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. W. W. Norton & Company (2016)
Moore, J.F.: Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition (1993)
Alter, S., Recker, J.: Using a work system perspective to expand BPM use cases for research. Bus. Anal. Inf. Syst. (2017)
Baldwin, C., Woodard, C.J.: The architecture of platforms: a unified view. In: Platforms, Markets and Innovation (2008). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265155
Tiwana, A.: Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Newnes (2013)
Hyrynsalmi, S.: Letters from the War of Ecosystems: An Analysis of Independent Software Vendors in Mobile Application Marketplaces (2014)
Karhu, K., Gustafsson, R., Eaton, B., Henfridsson, O., Sørensen, C.: Four tactics for implementing a balanced digital platform strategy. MIS Q. Exec. 19, 105–120 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00027
Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Mithas, S., Heinzl, A.: Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google photos. Inf. Syst. Res. 29, 444–460 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0787
Cenamor, J., Frishammar, J.: Openness in platform ecosystems: innovation strategies for complementary products. Res. Policy 50, 104148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104148
Selander, L., Henfridsson, O., Svahn, F.: Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems. J. Inf. Technol. 28, 183–197 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2013.14
Murmann, J.P., Frenken, K.: Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Res. Policy 35, 925–952 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.011
Meriläinen, A., Sikanen, L., Harstela, P.: Puunhankinnan suunnittelujärjestelmät suomalaisissa puunhankintaorganisaatioissa. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 1995, 35–49 (1995). https://doi.org/10.14214/ma.6378
Jylhä, P., Rikkonen, P., Hamunen, K.: Size matters – an analysis of business models and the financial performance of Finnish wood-harvesting companies. Silva Fenn 54 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10392
Camposano, J.C., Haghshenas, M., Smolander, K.: Evaluating the value of emerging digital platform ecosystems: lessons from the construction industry. Presented at the Twenty-Ninth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2021) (2021)
Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014)
Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015)
Finnish Forest Centre: Finnish Forest Data Standards. https://www.metsakeskus.fi/fi/avoin-metsa-ja-luontotieto/suorakayttoaineistot/metsatietostandardit. Accessed 11 Mar 2022
Skogforsk: Standard for Forest machine Data and Communication. https://www.skogforsk.se:443/english/projects/stanford/. Accessed 11 Mar 2022
Metsäteho: Metsäkonetiedon omistusta, käyttöä ja käsittelyä koskevat periaatteet. http://www.metsateho.fi/metsakonetieto-suositus/. Accessed 11 Mar 2022
Robson, C.: Real World Research. Wiley (2016)
Hodapp, D., Hawlitschek, F., Kramer, D.: Value co-creation in Nascent platform ecosystems: a Delphi study in the context of the internet of things. In: ICIS 2019 Proceedings (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vuolasto, J., Smolander, K. (2022). Where Does This Feature Belong to? Locating Business-to-Business Features in a Platform Ecosystem. In: Carroll, N., Nguyen-Duc, A., Wang, X., Stray, V. (eds) Software Business. ICSOB 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20706-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20706-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20705-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20706-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)