Skip to main content

Where Does This Feature Belong to? Locating Business-to-Business Features in a Platform Ecosystem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Business (ICSOB 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 463))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1163 Accesses

Abstract

The question of how software development needs are channeled into different parts of a platform ecosystem has been addressed by separating owners and complementors and by separating the core and the periphery. This is not necessarily sufficient in business-to-business ecosystems due to their characteristics. Our grounded theory study observes a B2B platform that brings together multiple stakeholders and their software development. This paper describes the location aspect in decision making, what feature gets implemented in which part of the ecosystem and on what grounds. We refer to this decision of implementation location as feature demarcation. We describe the related structures and discuss why the location matters. Our work complements the existing research with an addition to the core-periphery view. In the process of situating a new feature we observe the architectural elements together instead of focusing on distinct entities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Bush, A.A.: Research commentary—Platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inf. Syst. Res. 21, 675–687 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hein, A., et al.: Digital platform ecosystems. Electron. Mark. 30(1), 87–98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O.: Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model. Inf. Syst. J. 23, 173–192 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olleros, X.: The lean core in digital platforms. Technovation 28, 266–276 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rodon Modol, J., Eaton, B.: Digital infrastructure evolution as generative entrenchment: the formation of a core–periphery structure. J. Inf. Technol. 36, 342–364 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211013362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jansen, S.: A focus area maturity model for software ecosystem governance. Inf. Softw. Technol. 118, 106219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2019.106219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Sahaym, A., Bjørn-Andersen, N.: Exploring value cocreation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: a revelatory case study. MIS Q. 36, 317–338 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2307/41410419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jovanovic, M., Sjödin, D., Parida, V.: Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms. Technovation 102218 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102218

  9. Hein, A., Weking, J., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., Krcmar, H.: Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems. Electron. Mark. 29(3), 503–518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00337-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Schuetz, S.W., Heinzl, A.: Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: antecedents and consequences for platform governance. Inf. Syst. J. 29, 119–144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Petrik, D., Herzwurm, G.: Towards the iIoT Ecosystem Development - Understanding the Stakeholder Perspective. ECIS 2020 Research Papers (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huber, T.L., Kude, T., Dibbern, J.: Governance practices in platform ecosystems: navigating tensions between cocreated value and governance costs. Inf. Syst. Res. 28, 563–584 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., Yoo, Y.: Distributed tuning of boundary resources: the case of Apple’s iOS service system. MIS Q. 39, 217–244 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Halckenhaeusser, A., Foerderer, J., Heinzl, A.: Wolf in a sheep’s clothing: when do complementors face competition with platform owners? In: ICIS 2020 Proceedings (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Teece, D.J.: Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. In: Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Platforms, pp. 211–225. Emerald Publishing Limited (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220170000037008

  16. Parker, G.G., Alstyne, M.W.V., Choudary, S.P.: Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. W. W. Norton & Company (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moore, J.F.: Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alter, S., Recker, J.: Using a work system perspective to expand BPM use cases for research. Bus. Anal. Inf. Syst. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baldwin, C., Woodard, C.J.: The architecture of platforms: a unified view. In: Platforms, Markets and Innovation (2008). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1265155

  20. Tiwana, A.: Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Newnes (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hyrynsalmi, S.: Letters from the War of Ecosystems: An Analysis of Independent Software Vendors in Mobile Application Marketplaces (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karhu, K., Gustafsson, R., Eaton, B., Henfridsson, O., Sørensen, C.: Four tactics for implementing a balanced digital platform strategy. MIS Q. Exec. 19, 105–120 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/2msqe.00027

  23. Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Mithas, S., Heinzl, A.: Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google photos. Inf. Syst. Res. 29, 444–460 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cenamor, J., Frishammar, J.: Openness in platform ecosystems: innovation strategies for complementary products. Res. Policy 50, 104148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Selander, L., Henfridsson, O., Svahn, F.: Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems. J. Inf. Technol. 28, 183–197 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2013.14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Murmann, J.P., Frenken, K.: Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Res. Policy 35, 925–952 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meriläinen, A., Sikanen, L., Harstela, P.: Puunhankinnan suunnittelujärjestelmät suomalaisissa puunhankintaorganisaatioissa. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 1995, 35–49 (1995). https://doi.org/10.14214/ma.6378

  28. Jylhä, P., Rikkonen, P., Hamunen, K.: Size matters – an analysis of business models and the financial performance of Finnish wood-harvesting companies. Silva Fenn 54 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10392

  29. Camposano, J.C., Haghshenas, M., Smolander, K.: Evaluating the value of emerging digital platform ecosystems: lessons from the construction industry. Presented at the Twenty-Ninth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2021) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Finnish Forest Centre: Finnish Forest Data Standards. https://www.metsakeskus.fi/fi/avoin-metsa-ja-luontotieto/suorakayttoaineistot/metsatietostandardit. Accessed 11 Mar 2022

  33. Skogforsk: Standard for Forest machine Data and Communication. https://www.skogforsk.se:443/english/projects/stanford/. Accessed 11 Mar 2022

  34. Metsäteho: Metsäkonetiedon omistusta, käyttöä ja käsittelyä koskevat periaatteet. http://www.metsateho.fi/metsakonetieto-suositus/. Accessed 11 Mar 2022

  35. Robson, C.: Real World Research. Wiley (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hodapp, D., Hawlitschek, F., Kramer, D.: Value co-creation in Nascent platform ecosystems: a Delphi study in the context of the internet of things. In: ICIS 2019 Proceedings (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaakko Vuolasto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vuolasto, J., Smolander, K. (2022). Where Does This Feature Belong to? Locating Business-to-Business Features in a Platform Ecosystem. In: Carroll, N., Nguyen-Duc, A., Wang, X., Stray, V. (eds) Software Business. ICSOB 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20706-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20706-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20705-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20706-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics