Skip to main content

Multi-stage Bias Mitigation for Individual Fairness in Algorithmic Decisions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Networks in Pattern Recognition (ANNPR 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13739))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 687 Accesses


The widespread use of machine learning algorithms in data-driven decision-making systems has become increasingly popular. Recent studies have raised concerns that this increasing popularity has exacerbated issues of unfairness and discrimination toward individuals. Researchers in this field have proposed a wide variety of fairness-enhanced classifiers and fairness matrices to address these issues, but very few fairness techniques have been translated into the real-world practice of data-driven decisions. This work focuses on individual fairness, where similar individuals need to be treated similarly based on the similarity of tasks. In this paper, we propose a novel model of individual fairness that transforms features into high-level representations that conform to the individual fairness and accuracy of the learning algorithms. The proposed model produces equally deserving pairs of individuals who are distinguished from other pairs in the records by data-driven similarity measures between each individual in the transformed data. Such a design identifies the bias and mitigates it at the data preprocessing stage of the machine learning pipeline to ensure individual fairness. Our method is evaluated on three real-world datasets to demonstrate its effectiveness: the credit card approval dataset, the adult census dataset, and the recidivism dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Ahn, Y., Lin, Y.R.: Fairsight: visual analytics for fairness in decision making. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 26(1), 1086–1095 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., Kirchner, L.: Machine bias risk assessments in criminal sentencing. ProPublica, May 23 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, M., Bellamy, R.K., Hind, M., Houde, S., Mehta, S., Mojsilović, A., Nair, R., Ramamurthy, K.N., Olteanu, A., Piorkowski, D., et al.: Factsheets: Increasing trust in ai services through supplier’s declarations of conformity. IBM J. Res. Dev. 63(4/5), 6–1 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellamy, R.K., et al.: Ai fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting, understanding, and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.01943 (2018)

  5. Bellù, L.G., Liberati, P.: Inequality analysis: The gini index. FAO, EASYPol Module 40 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Kearns, M., Roth, A.: Fairness in criminal justice risk assessments: The state of the art. Sociological Methods & Research p. 0049124118782533 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blake, C.: Cj merz uci repository of machine learning databases. University of California at Irvine (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calders, T., Verwer, S.: Three naive bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification. Data Min. Knowl. Disc. 21(2), 277–292 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Chouldechova, A.: Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Big data 5(2), 153–163 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chouldechova, A., Roth, A.: The frontiers of fairness in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.08810 (2018)

  11. Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., Huq, A.: Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 797–806. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dua, D., Graff, C.: UCI machine learning repository (2017),

  13. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.: Fairness through awareness. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, pp. 214–226. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dwork, C., Ilvento, C.: Fairness under composition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.06122 (2018)

  15. Dwork, C., Ilvento, C.: Group fairness under composition (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Friedler, S.A., Scheidegger, C., Venkatasubramanian, S.: On the (im) possibility of fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07236 (2016)

  17. Gajane, P., Pechenizkiy, M.: On formalizing fairness in prediction with machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.03184 (2017)

  18. Hardt, M., Price, E., Srebro, N.: Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 29, 3315–3323 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kamishima, T., Akaho, S., Sakuma, J.: Fairness-aware learning through regularization approach. In: 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, pp. 643–650. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kearns, M., Roth, A., Sharifi-Malvajerdi, S.: Average individual fairness: algorithms, generalization and experiments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10607 (2019)

  21. Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., Raghavan, M.: Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05807 (2016)

  22. Lahoti, P., Gummadi, K.P., Weikum, G.: ifair: learning individually fair data representations for algorithmic decision making. In: 2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pp. 1334–1345. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mitchell, S., Potash, E., Barocas, S.: Prediction-based decisions and fairness: a catalogue of choices, assumptions, and definitions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.07867 (2018)

  24. Narayanan, A.: Translation tutorial: 21 fairness definitions and their politics. In: Proceedings of Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, New York, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ritov, Y., Sun, Y., Zhao, R.: On conditional parity as a notion of non-discrimination in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.08519 (2017)

  26. Roscher, R., Bohn, B., Duarte, M.F., Garcke, J.: Explainable machine learning for scientific insights and discoveries. Ieee Access 8, 42200–42216 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rothblum, G.N., Yona, G.: Probably approximately metric-fair learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.03242 (2018)

  28. Shorrocks, A.F.: Inequality decomposition by population subgroups. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 1369–1385 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Speicher, T., et al.: A unified approach to quantifying algorithmic unfairness: Measuring individual & group unfairness via inequality indices. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 2239–2248. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Verma, S., Ernst, M., Just, R.: Removing biased data to improve fairness and accuracy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.03054 (2021)

  31. Verma, S., Rubin, J.: Fairness definitions explained. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Fairness (FairWare), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wing, J.M.: Trustworthy ai. Commun. ACM 64(10), 64–71 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zafar, M.B., Valera, I., Gomez Rodriguez, M., Gummadi, K.P.: Fairness beyond disparate treatment & disparate impact: learning classification without disparate mistreatment. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1171–1180. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zemel, R., Wu, Y., Swersky, K., Pitassi, T., Dwork, C.: Learning fair representations. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 325–333. PMLR (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Pang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ghadage, A., Yi, D., Coghill, G., Pang, W. (2023). Multi-stage Bias Mitigation for Individual Fairness in Algorithmic Decisions. In: El Gayar, N., Trentin, E., Ravanelli, M., Abbas, H. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks in Pattern Recognition. ANNPR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13739. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20649-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20650-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics